Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.159

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

In vitro growth and carbon utilization of the green-leaved orchid Dendrobium officinale are promoted by mycorrhizal associations

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201354:23

DOI: 10.1186/1999-3110-54-23

Received: 1 July 2013

Accepted: 26 August 2013

Published: 28 August 2013

Abstract

Background

Mycorrhizal associations play a key role in the life cycle and evolutionary history of orchids. All orchids grow from extremely small seeds that are lacking in reserves, and germination and growth into an underground heterotrophic, achlorophyllous stage depend upon symbiotic fungi to provide nutrient. However, the nutritional physiology between this symbiosis and green-leaved orchids is still unclear. To understand further how these associations affect growth and carbon utilization of green orchids, the green orchids were inoculated with two symbiotic fungi isolated from the roots of a wild orchid (Dendrobium officinale) in vitro and 13C stable isotope signature experiments were designed to analyze carbon nutrition acquisition.

Results

After two months, both fungi had formed mycorrhizal associations with the host roots. Moreover, the growth rate was more rapid for the mycorrhizal seedlings than for the non-mycorrhizal seedlings. The mycorrhizal seedlings not only absorbed more 13C from the substrate, but also the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings assimilated more atmospheric 13CO2 due to significantly higher effective quantum yield of photosystem II, compared with the non-mycorrhizal seedlings. These results suggested that the green orchids could receive more C nutrition from the substrate due to symbiotic fungi, and photosynthesis capacity of the green D. officinale could be enhanced by the S3 fungus, therefore carbon nutrition acquisition also increased. As a result, the S1- and S3- mycorrhizal seedlings showed markedly higher biomass and polysaccharides contents than the non-mycorrhizal seedlings.

Conclusions

These results improve our understanding of the mycorrhizal functioning in the green Dendrobium and show some potential application in the cultivation of D. officinale.

Keywords

13C Dendrobium officinale Growth Mycorrhizal associations Polysaccharides

Background

Mycorrhizal associations have an essential role in the life cycle and evolutionary history of orchids (Rasmussen and Rasmussen 2009). A division of orchids into three physiological types (fully autotrophic, fully mycoheterotrophic (MH), partial MH or mixotrophs) is based on carbon nutrition (Dearnaley et al. 2012). Regardless of their carbon at adult stage, all orchids grow from extremely small seeds that are lacking in reserves, and germination and growth into an underground heterotrophic, achlorophyllous stage (protocorm stage) depend upon symbiotic fungi to provide carbon nutrient (Smith and Read 1997; Arditti and Ghani 2000; Johnson et al. 2007). For adult photosynthetic stage, carbohydrates are also essential for orchid growth (Wang et al., 2008). Moreover, adult orchid roots are consistently heavily colonized by mycorrhizal fungi (McCormick et al. 2006). However, for adult orchids, it is still a matter of discussion whether and to what extent such carbohydrates are actually influenced by their symbiotic fungi. Therefore, accurate measurements of C-source uptake by mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal orchids are a critical component to better understanding of mycorrhizal functioning (Cameron et al. 2008).

Stable isotope signatures have proven that some fully autotrophic terrestrial orchids can acquire carbon, nitrogen, phosphate via the “up-flow” pathway through their symbiotic fungi (Cameron et al. 200620072008; Hynson et al. 2012). Standard experiments with those signatures have been conducted with media containing labeled substrates. C, N and P sources can be supplied through the media, but also carbon can also be obtained through atmospheric CO2. The conventional view is that plants can receive C from photosynthate by fixing CO2 and the photosynthate can also affect the growth and development in a plant. However, whether the ability of CO2 assimilation for green orchids is influenced by its fungal partner still needs experimental confirmation.

A ‘multifunctional’ perspective of mycorrhizal symbiosis accounts for the ways in which such fungi influence carbon-partitioning within plants (Finlay 2004). The concept of carbon nutrition has relied, to a large degree, on studies of carbonhydrates, which, in many cases, are used as a synonym for C accumulation (Mengel and Kirkby 2001). Carbon that is fixed from the atmosphere takes the form of sugars that are, on average, slightly enriched in 13C compared with secondary metabolites and structural C (Hynson et al. 2012). Polysaccharides play a vital role in plant metabolism and growth. (Chang and Chou 2007) have reported that mycorrhizae markedly enhance the amount of polysaccharides produced in Anoectochilus formosanus. However, the mechanism by which this is accomplished remains unclear. Based on this knowledge, it can be hypothesized that 1) the photosynthetic capacity in green-leaved orchid would improve by their mycorrhizal fungi, and 2) carbon acquisition, soluble polysaccharides accumulation and biomass production would increase in mycorrhizal seedlings.

Here, we provided 13CO2 and 13C-glucose in a quantitative investigation of C-source uptake by both mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal orchid plants and determined chlorophyll fluorescence of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal orchid leaves. Dendrobium is one of the largest genera in Orchidaceae (Mohanty et al. 2012). Being rich in polysaccharides, D. officinale is a valuable Chinese traditional medicine that has immunological activity and can inhibit the growth of tumor cells (Luo et al. 2000; Lin et al. 2011). Therefore, positive results from our experiments would be beneficial for its commercial production.

Methods

Plant material

Adult plants

Wild plants of Dendrobium officinale were collected from a subtropical forest at Xishuangbanna (21.7°N, 100.8°E), Yunnan Province, China.

Seedlings

Ripe capsules of D. officinale, collected from a nursery in Puer (22.78°N, 100.97°E), Yunnan Province, China, were washed under tap water and surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol. They were soaked in a 0.1% HgCl2 solution for 10 min and then rinsed with sterile distilled water three times. Afterward, they were blotted with sterile filter paper and split. The seeds were sown into culture bottles (8-cm diam) containing 100 mL of a Harvais medium (Harvais 1982) (autoclaved beforehand at 121°C for 30 min) and incubated in the tissue culture room (12 h of daylight, 50 μmol m-2 s-1, 26 ± 1°C). Germinated seedlings with roots were aseptically transplanted into fresh culture bottles with Harvais medium.

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Healthy roots from wild plants of D. officinale were selected, rinsed under tap water, and washed again in sterile distilled water. Once segmented, they were surface-sterilized by consecutive immersions for 8 to 10 min in 0.1% HgCl2, and then rinsed five times with sterile distilled water. After surface-drying, the root segments were aseptically cut into approximately 0.5- to 1-cm sections, and transferred to 9-cm Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA: 20% potato, 2% glucose, and 1.5% agar). The dishes were incubated in the dark at 25°C until fungal hyphae emerged from inside the roots. Pure cultures were obtained by transferring the hyphae onto fresh PDA and storing them in PDA slant tubes at 4°C. In all of these isolates, two fungi (named S1 and S3) were found to stimulate the growth of tissue-cultured seedlings of D. officinale through artificial inoculation, so they were selected for further study.

Molecular identification of fungi

Isolates S1 and S3 were cultured on PDA media. Because other reproductive structures failed to sporulate on that media, we subjected S1 and S3 to molecular analysis of the internal transcribed region (ITS) of the 5.8SrDNA and the large subunit gene of mitochondrial rDNA (mtLSU) sequences, respectively, using universal fungal primer combinations ITS1/ITS4 (Ma et al. 2003) and ML5/ML6 (Bruns et al. 1998). DNA was extracted from 30-day-old PDA-cultured colonies according to the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). PCR reactions (25 μL) were performed using 2.5 μL of 10 × buffer (with Mg2+), 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTP, 0.5 μL of TaqE (2.5U), 2 μL of 5 μM of each primer, 2 μL of undiluted DNA template and 14 μL of ddH2O. The cycle parameters included denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 53°C for 50s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min; followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced in an ABI Prism 3730 Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co. Ltd. The sequences were aligned by Contig Express and adjusted manually.

Inocula of fungi

Samples of the S1 and S3 fungi were transferred to 9-cm Petri dishes containing PDA media for incubation in the dark at 25°C for three weeks, respectively.

Inoculation experiments

Before experimental analysis, the two-month-old seedlings of D. officinale were trimmed to provide uniformly sized materials, each consisting of a stem supporting three to five leaves and two to three roots of 20 mm in length. Eight uniform seedlings were implanted into one culture bottle containing 100 mL of 1/2 MS (half-strength concentrations of the major and minor salts of the MS medium) (Murashige and Skoog 1962) medium supplemented with 0.75% sucrose and 0.75% agar after weighed (Hou and Guo 2009). For the inoculation treatments, a single mycelia plug (6-mm diam), cut from the margin of a fungal colony (either S1 or S3), was placed into the middle of each bottle. The control involved eight similarly placed seedlings that were not inoculated with any fungi. Each treatment comprised 25 replicates. All treatments were kept in the tissue culture room for two months.

Visualization of fungal infection in roots

The fungal hyphae were stained with a chitin-specific dye, wheat germ agglutinin-alexa fluor (WGA-AF) 488 conjugate (Molecular Probes, Karlsruhe, Germany). Fungal infection was observed through a previously described technique (Doehlemann et al. 2008) with some modifications. After inoculation period, the root segments were incubated in the staining solution 10 μg/ml WGA–AF 488; 0.02% Tween 20 in 1× PBS (137 mM NaCl, 27 mM KCl, 100 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM K2HPO4, adjusted to pH 7.4) for 60 min; during this period, the solution was vacuum infiltrated three times (3 min each) at 25 mm of Hg. After the samples were rinsed in 1 × PBS (phosphate buffer saline) (pH 7.4) three times, they were transferred into a Propidium Iodide (PI, Sigma) solution (20 μg mL-1 PI in 1× PBS) for 3 min and then rinsed in 1 × PBS (pH 7.4) three times. Finally, the samples were mounted on glass slides.

Confocal images were recorded on a laser scanning confocal microscope (OLYMPUS FV1000). The WGA-AF 488 was excited with a 488 nm laser and detected at 500 to 540 nm. The PI was excited with a 559 nm laser and detected at 580 to 619 nm.

Light microscopy examination

Twenty root segments were fixed in anhydrous ethanol for above 24 h, and then freehand sections were observed and photographed on a light microscope equipped with a camera (Leica DM 2500, Germany).

Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements

We conducted measurement for the light response of chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves from in vitro grown seedlings at 25°C with IMAGING-PAM (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) connected to a computer with control software. Six mature leaves from eight seedlings of each treatment were light-adapted (55 μmol photons m-2 s-1) for 15 min at 25°C before the measurement of light response curves. The effective quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) is calculated as: ΦPSII = (F m ’ - F s )/F m ’ (Genty et al. 1989), where F m ’ is the maximum fluorescence values upon illumination of a pulse (800 ms) of saturating light (10,000 μmol photons m-2 s-1) in the light-adapted state, and F s is steady-state fluorescence in light.

Experimental design for 13C stable isotope signature in a microcosm

Each of our experimental microcosms consisted of a culture bottle with a round, sealed septum (8-mm diam) passed through the middle of the lid (Figure 1). To supply 13CO2, each microcosm contained a 1.5-mL microtube with 30 mg of sterile 13C-labelled barium carbonate, plus 100 mL of 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 100 mg of unlabelled glucose and 0.75% agar. To determine C absorbed from substrates by plants, each microcosm had a 1.5-mL microtube with 30 mg sterile unlabelled barium carbonate and 100 mL of 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 100 mg of 13C-labelled glucose and 0.75% agar. Before the experiments began, the seedlings were trimmed to provide uniformly sized materials, each having three to five leaves and two to three roots. Three treatments per labeling experiment were established, with each treatment prepared as described for our inoculation experiments. However, a mycelia plug was placed near the roots of each seedling, rather than in the middle of medium, so that fungal infection would occur as soon as possible. Replicate treatments (n = 6) were preformed in case of contamination. All treatments were placed into the tissue culture room (12 h of daylight, 50 μmol m-2 s-1, 26 ± 1°C). To liberate the 13CO2 and unlabelled CO2 from the 13C-labelled and unlabelled barium carbonate, respectively, we injected 0.2 mL of a 25% (v: v) sterile lactic acid solution injected through the sealed septum in the middle of each lid. Afterward, the microcosms were sealed until the end of the experimental period.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-23/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_93_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Culture-bottle microcosm used to supply isotopically labelled CO 2 and glucose to the orchid seedlings. Lactic acid was injected into the microtube with Ba13CO3 to liberate 13CO2 through septum in lid. Medium contained 13C-labelled glucose.

Analysis of 13C stable isotope abundance

After two months, the plants were harvested from each bottle and dried at 80°C for 48 h. They were then ground to a fine powder to obtain a representative sub-sample of plant tissue for further analysis. Relative C isotope abundances were measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage, USA) at Institute of Desertification Studies, China Academy of Forestry, as described by (Liebel and Gebauer 2011). Three test substances of varying sample weight were routinely analyzed within each treatment. The maximum variation in δ13C was always below 0.1%.

Determination of polysaccharides contents

Dry samples from the aboveground parts of each treatment were homogenized, and their percentages of polysaccharides were determined by the phenol-sulphuric acid method (Pharmacopoeia Committee of the P.R. China 2010). Each treatment was performed in triplicates to minimize errors.

Data collection and statistical analysis

Two months after inoculation, the plants were harvested to record their heights, stem lengths, stem diameters, internode lengths and numbers of nodes. For each culture bottle, the fresh and dry weights, and the numbers of new roots and tillers also were determined. The eight plants from each bottle were weighed and then dried for 48 h at 80°C before measuring dry weight. The increment in fresh weight per bottle was calculated as plants weight after inoculation minus plant weight before inoculation. The statistical package SPSS 17.0 for Windows was used for data analysis. Differences among the treatments and control groups were tested with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by tests for least significant difference test. Values were presented as means ± standard error (SE).

Results

Formation of mycorrhizal associations

After two months of inoculation, S1 and S3 hyphae had spread over the root surfaces, invaded the cortical cells, and colonized the intracellular spaces of the roots of the inoculated seedlings (Figure 2A, B, E). In the cortical region, the hyphae penetrated through the cell walls and entered next to the cortical cells (Figure 2C). No fungal hyphae or pelotons were observed within the root cells from the control (non-inoculated) seedlings (Figure 2D, F).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-23/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_93_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Mycorrhizal associations of Dendrobium officinale roots. A: Hyphae (green) from S1 fungus colonizing root cortical cells; B: Hyphae (green) of S3 fungus colonizing root cortical cells; C: Hyphae (green) penetrating cell wall and invading a neighbor cell in the root; D: Root cortical cells from non-inoculated control seedlings; E: Transverse section showing pelotons formed in the cortical cells of the inoculated roots; F: Transverse section of the control root. arrows, peloton; VE, velamen; EX, exodermis; CO, cortex; VB, vascular bundle Scale bar = 50 μm.

Growth responses of D. officinale

Two months after being inoculated with S1 or S3, the host plants showed enhanced growth (Table 1). Compared with the control seedlings, increments of fresh weight, dry weight, plant heights, stem lengths and diameters, internode lengths, and number of nodes, tillers and new roots were significantly higher in the mycorrhizal seedlings.
Table 1

Effects of S1 and S3 on the growth of Dendrobium officinale seedlings (n = 25 each)

Parameters

S1

S3

Control

Increment in fresh weight (g)

0.96 ± 0.06b

1.27 ± 0.05c

0.57 ± 0.02a

Dry weight (g)

0.06 ± 0.00b

0.09 ± 0.00c

0.03 ± 0.00a

Plant height (cm)

2.16 ± 0.04b

2.12 ± 0.06b

1.81 ± 0.07a

Stem length (cm)

1.01 ± 0.02b

1.14 ± 0.04c

0.89 ± 0.03a

Stem diameter (cm)

0.18 ± 0.01b

0.28 ± 0.01c

0.15 ± 0.01a

Number of nodes

3.09 ± 0.06b

3.22 ± 0.11b

2.72 ± 0.01a

Internode length (cm)

0.31 ± 0.01b

0.33 ± 0.01b

0.25 ± 0.01a

Number of tillers

26.24 ± 0.99c

19.40 ± 0.75b

7.24 ± 0.60a

Number of new roots

21.80 ± 1.45c

15.00 ± 1.00b

9.68 ± 0.68a

Different letters within the same row indicate that values (mean ± standard error) are significantly different among treatments at P < 0.05, based on LSD test. Control, non-inoculated seedlings.

The mycorrhizal fungi were re-isolated from the D. officinale roots after two months of inoculation. As expected, no fungus was isolated from the non-inoculated orchids. We then sequenced the ITS-5.8S rDNA sequences of the re-isolated fungus from the roots inoculated with S1 as well as the mtLSU sequences of the re-isolated fungus from the S3-inoculated roots and verified that these fungi were the same as those used for the first inoculations (data unpublished).

Chlorophyll fluorescence

Values for ФPSII in the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings were significantly higher than those in the S1-mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings. However, values for ФPSII did not differ between the S1- mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings (Figure 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-23/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_93_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Responses of ФPSII to incident PPFD for leaves of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Dendrobium officinale seedlings. Data are the means of six replicates; SES are denoted by error bars. Single asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference compared with the control at P < 0.05; double asterisk (**) indicates a significant difference compared with the control at P < 0.01.

Carbon utilization by different treatments

Both 13C derived from 13CO2 and 13C from 13C-labelled glucose were readily detectable in the mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings (Figure 4). For the seedlings fed with only 13CO2, the δ13C value in the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings was about 1.94-fold higher than that in the non-mycorrhizal seedlings, and was also significantly different from that calculated for the S1-mycorrhizal seedlings. However, value for δ13C derived from 13CO2 had no significant difference between the S1-mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings (Figure 4A). By contrast, δ13C derived from 13C-glucose in the S1- and S3-mycorrhizal seedlings was about 3.67- and 4.34- fold higher, respectively, than that in the control seedlings. Again, however, the δ13C value derived from 13C-glucose had no significant difference between the S1 and S3 treatments (Figure 4B).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-23/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_93_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Whole-plant δ 13 C measurements from mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings of Dendrobium officinale (n = 3 each). Values (mean ± standard error) not followed by the same letter are significantly different at P < 0.05, based on LSD test. (a) derived from 13CO2; and (b) from 13C-labelled glucose. Control, non-inoculated seedlings.

Polysaccharides contents

Compared with the non-mycorrhizal seedlings, the mycorrhizal seedlings had significantly higher polysaccharides percentages when harvested. Contents in the seedlings treated with S1 and S3 fungi were 1.42- and 1.46- fold, respectively, of those measured from the control. However, the two inoculation treatments did not differ significantly in their polysaccharide accumulations (Figure 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-23/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_93_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Effects of S1 and S3 on polysaccharides contents in Dendrobium officinale seedlings (n = 3 each). Values (mean ± standard error) not followed by the same letter are significantly different at P < 0.05, based on LSD test. Control, non-inoculated seedlings.

Discussion

The functioning of mycorrhizae depends upon the development of an association between a fungus and a host plant (Johnson et al. 1997). We demonstrated here that two isolates formed mycorrhizal associations with Dendrobium officinale. Both S1 and S3 markedly enhanced the growth of D. officinale seedlings. Although it has previously been documented that symbiotic fungi can promote the growth of their host plants (Stewart and Kane 2007; Zhang et al. 2012), the mechanism by which this occurs remains unclear.

Few previous studies have quantified the amount of CO2 that is assimilated in mycorrhizal versus non-mycorrhizal plants. Our study suggested that the amount of CO2 that is assimilated in the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings was significantly higher than that in the non-mycorrhizal seedlings. Some evidences have been reported that mycorrhizal seedlings have higher stomatal conductance and chlorophyll concentrations than non-mycorrhizal seedlings (Sheng et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2009). This implies that the mycorrhizal seedlings have greater photosynthetic capacity. Another explanation for this phenomenon might be that a fungus can serve as a nutrient sink, because some orchid plantlets can transfer a substantial amount of photosynthate to its symbiotic fungi (Cameron et al. 2006). Other explanations might be that mycorrhizae can decrease the resistance (stomatal and mesophyll) to CO2 diffusion, or increase the activities of carboxylating enzymes, or change hormones levels in mycorrhizal plant (Reid et al. 1983). In the present study, to study photosynthesis we used chlorophyll fluorescence analysis, which has become one of the most powerful and relatively straightforward techniques. The results pointed out that ФPSII in the leaves of the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings was significantly higher than that in the S1-mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings. This implied that the capacity of photosynthetic electron flow of the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings was higher than that of the S1-mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings. Because there is a positive correlation between photosynthetic electron flow and CO2 assimilation, the amount of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings was higher than that in the S1-mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings.

Our results indicated that, compared with the non-mycorrhizal seedlings, both of the S1- and S3- mycorrhizal seedlings absorbed more C sources from the substrate. It has been confirmed experimentally that fungal symbiont can transfer C to the adult Goodyera repens (Cameron et al. 2006). That is, adult mycorrhizal orchids continue to receive C nutrition from their fungal partners, which is possibly because that the photosynthetic products cannot meet the demand of plant growth and development. Some researchers have found that mycorrhizal fungi could induce significant changes in the morphology of the host plant roots by increasing branches lengths and diameters (Hooker and Black 1995; Zhang et al. 2012). In another study, we also found that the host plant produced a larger number of root hairs (data unpublished). Such responses enable the plant to absorb more nutrients from the substrate. But it needs further investigation that the C enhancement from 13C-glucose in our orchid is due to direct absorption of host roots or transferring from intraradical fungal structure.

In addition, we found that the S1- and S3- mycorrhizal seedlings had significantly higher polysaccharides contents. It has been widely recognized that, during photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2 can be fixed to produce carbohydrates, especially polysaccharides. Our results demonstrated that the S3-mycorrhizal seedlings assimilated a larger amount CO2, indicating that more carbohydrates (including polysaccharides) were being accumulated. Moreover, soluble sugars within the substrate, e.g., sucrose and glucose, are effectively taken up after being transferred to the roots via the associated fungi (Pfeffer et al. 1999; Hynson et al. 2012). And soluble sugars are the common precursors of polysaccharides synthesis (Zha et al. 2007). Our results indicated that the mycorrhizal seedlings absorbed significantly more C from glucose than the non-mycorrhizal seedlings. Hence, we suggested that the increase of polysaccharides content in mycorrhizal plants may be related to the increase of C sources.

Plant polysaccharides are classified as either structural or non-structural (Potkins et al. 1991). The structural components of plant cells largely comprise carbohydrates, and are critical to cell wall functioning (Caffall and Mohnen 2009). Non-structural polysaccharides serve as an energy reserve for initial cell growth and expansion (Percival 1979). Thus, in our present study, the enhancement of biomass in the mycorrhizal seedlings was probably due to an increase in their non-stuctural polysaccharides accumulation.

Conclusions

In this study, two endophytic fungi (S1 and S3) sampled from wild D. officinale formed in vitro mycorrhizal associations with host roots, thereby markedly enhancing seedling growth. Both the S1- and S3- mycorrhizal seedlings received a larger amount of C source from substrates, while those seedlings exposed to the S3 fungus assimilated more CO2, which led to a higher percentage of polysaccharides. S1 and S3 differed in their extent of influence on the capacity of photosynthetic electron flow of D. officinale, indicating that they may have separate roles within the same host. Although we investigated carbon utilization of the green orchid in experimental conditions, further investigations should focus on the effects of symbiotic fungi on carbon nutrient acquisition of the adult D. officinale under field conditions. Moreover, the mechanism for increased photosynthesis capacity and polysaccharides accumulation via mycorrhizal associations should be explored in a more comprehensive way.

Abbreviations

TAB: 

Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide

ITS: 

Internal transcribed region

mtLSU: 

Large subunit gene of mitochondrial rDNA

PBS: 

Phosphate buffer saline

PDA: 

Potato dextrose agar

PI: 

Propidium Iodide

PPFD: 

Photosynthetic photon flux density

WGA-AF: 

Wheat germ agglutinin-alexa fluor

ФPSII: 

Quantum yield of PSII.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Jinsong Wu for his guidance in the visualization of mycorrhizal associations by laser scanning confocal microscopy; we also thank the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Southwest China, for providing that microscope. We also appreciate the relevant staff of Gaoligong Montain Nature Reserve, Yunnan Province. The research was supported by the Western Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Small Population of Regression Project of the Forestry Department of Yunnan Province, China.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Arditti J, Ghani AKA: Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytol 2000, 145: 367–421. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00587.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruns TD, Szaro TM, Gardes M, Cullings KW, Pan JJ, Taylor DL, Horton TR, Kretzer A, Garbelotto M, Li Y: A sequence database for the identification of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes by phylogenetic analysis. Mol Ecol 1998, 7: 257–272. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1998.00337.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Caffall KH, Mohnen D: The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr Res 2009, 344: 1879–1900. 10.1016/j.carres.2009.05.021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron DD, Johnson I, Leake JR, Read DJ: Mycorrhizal acquisition of inorganic phosphorus by the green-leaved terrestrial orchid Goodyera repens . Ann Bot 2007, 99: 831–834. 10.1093/aob/mcm018PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron DD, Johnson I, Read DJ, Leake JR: Giving and receiving: measuring the carbon cost of mycorrhizas in the green orchid, Goodyera repens . New Phytol 2008, 180: 176–184. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02533.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron DD, Leake JR, Read DJ: Mutualistic mycorrhiza in orchids: evidence from plant-fungus carbon and nitrogen transfers in the green-leaved terrestrial orchid Goodyera repens . New Phytol 2006, 171: 405–416. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01767.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang DCN, Chou LC: Growth responses, enzyme activities, and component changes as influenced by Rhizoctonia orchid mycorrhiza on Anoectochilus formosanus Hayata. Bot Stud 2007, 48: 445–451.Google Scholar
  8. Dearnaley JDW, Martos F, Selosse MA: Fungal associations. In Orchid mycorrhizas: molecular ecology, physiology, evolution and conservation aspects. 2nd edition. Edited by: Hock B. Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Doehlemann G, Wahl R, Vranes M, De Vries RP, Kämper J, Kahmann R: Establishment of compatibility in the Ustilago maydis /maize pathosystem. J Plant Physiol 2008, 165: 29–40. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 1987, 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
  11. Finlay RD: Mycorrhizal fungi and their multifunctional roles. Mycologist 2004, 18: 91–96. 10.1017/S0269915X04002058View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR: The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. BBA-Gen Subjects 1989, 99: 87–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvais G: An improved culture medium for growing the orchid Cypripedium reginae axenically. Can J Bot 1982, 60: 2547–2555. 10.1139/b82-309View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou XQ, Guo SX: Interaction between a dark septate endophytic isolate from Dendrobium sp. and roots of D . nobile seedlings. J Integr Plant Biol 2009, 51: 374–381. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00777.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooker JE, Black KE: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as components of sustainable soil-plants systems. Crit Rev Biotechnol 1995, 15: 201–212. 10.3109/07388559509147408View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hynson NA, Mambelli S, Amend AS, Dawson TE: Measuring carbon gains from fungal networks in understory plants from the tribe Pyroleae (Ericaceae): a field manipulation and stable isotope approach. Oecologia 2012, 169: 307–317. 10.1007/s00442-011-2198-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson NC, Graham JH, Smith FA: Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phytol 1997, 135: 575–585. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00729.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson TR, Stewart SL, Dutra D, Kane ME, Richardson L: Asymbiotic and symbiotic seed germination of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae)-preliminary evidence for the symbiotic culture advantage. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2007, 90: 313–323. 10.1007/s11240-007-9270-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liebel HT, Gebauer G: Stable isotope signatures confirm carbon and nitrogen gain through ectomycorrhizas in the ghost orchid Epipogium aphyllum Swartz. Plant Biol 2011, 13: 270–275. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00369.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin Y, Li J, Li B, He T, Chun Z: Effects of light quality on growth and development of protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium officinale in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2011, 105: 329–335. 10.1007/s11240-010-9871-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo HL, Cai TY, Cheng QL: Enhancement of Dendrobium candidum polysaccharides on killing effect of LAK cells of umbilical cord and peripheral cancer patients in vitro. Chinese J Cancer Res 2000, 19: 1124–1126.Google Scholar
  22. Ma M, Tan TK, Wong SM: Identification and molecular phylogeny of Epulorhiza isolates from tropical orchids. Mycol Res 2003, 107: 1041–1049. 10.1017/S0953756203008281View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McCormick MK, Whigham DF, Sloan D, O’Malley K, Hodkinson B: Orchid-fungus fidelity: a marriage meant to last? Ecology 2006, 87: 903–911. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[903:OFAMMT]2.0.CO;2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mengel K, Kirkby EA: Principles of plant nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands; 2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohanty P, Das MC, Kumaria S, Tandon P: High-efficiency cryopreservation of the medicinal orchid Dendrobium nobile Lindl. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012, 109: 297–305. 10.1007/s11240-011-0095-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Murashige T, Skoog F: Arevised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962, 15: 473–497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Percival E: The polysaccharides of green, red and brown seaweeds: their basic structure, biosynthesis and function. Brit Phycol J 1979, 14: 103–117. 10.1080/00071617900650121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pfeffer PE, Douds JDD, Bécard G, Shachar-Hill Y: Carbon uptake and the metabolism and transport of lipids in an arbuscular mycorrhiza. Plant Physiol 1999, 120: 587–598. 10.1104/pp.120.2.587PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pharmacopoeia Committee of the P. R. China: Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing; 2010.Google Scholar
  30. Potkins ZV, Lawrence TLJ, Thomlinson JR: Effects of structural and non-structural polysaccharides in the diet of the growing pig on gastric emptying rate and rate of passage of digesta to the terminal ileum and through the total gastrointestinal tract. Brit J Nutr 1991, 65: 391–413. 10.1079/BJN19910100View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasmussen HN, Rasmussen FN: Orchid mycorrhiza: implications of a mycophagous life style. Oikos 2009, 118: 334–345. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17116.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Reid CPP, Kidd FA, Ekwebelam SA: Nitrogen nutrition, photosynthesis and carbon allocation in ectomycorrizal pine. Plant Soil 1983, 71: 415–432. 10.1007/BF02182683View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheng M, Tang M, Chen H, Yang BW, Zhang FF, Huang YH: Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18: 287–296. 10.1007/s00572-008-0180-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith SE, Read DJ: Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, UK; 1997.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart SL, Kane ME: Symbiotic seed germination and evidence for in vitro mycobiont specificity in Spiranthes brevilabris (Orchidaceae) and its implications for species-level conservation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 2007, 43: 178–186. 10.1007/s11627-006-9023-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang CY, Chiou CY, Wang HL, Krishnamurthy R, Venkatagiri S, Tan J, Yeh KW: Carbohydrate mobilization and gene regulatory profile in the pseudobulb of Oncidium orchid during the flowering process. Planta 2008, 227: 1063–1077. 10.1007/s00425-007-0681-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zha XQ, Luo JP, Jiang ST, Wang JH: Enhancement of polysaccharides production in suspension cultures of protocorm-like bodies from Dendrobium huoshanense by optimization of medium compositions and feeding of sucrose. Process Biochem 2007, 42: 344–351. 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.09.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang LC, Chen J, Lv YL, Gao C, Guo SX: Mycena sp., a mycorrhizal fungus of the orchid Dendrobium officinale . Mycol Progress 2012, 11: 395–401. 10.1007/s11557-011-0754-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou YJ, Yang FS, Song XQ, Zhu GP, Hu MJ: Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on seedling’s growth and photosynthetic capability of Dendrobium sinense , endemic to Hainan. North Hortic 2009, 12: 11–15.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.