Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.159

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Rapid regeneration and ploidy stability of ‘cv IR36’ indica rice (Oryza Sativa. L) confers efficient protocol for in vitro callus organogenesis and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation

  • Subramanian Radhesh Krishnan1,
  • Arumugam Mohana Priya1 and
  • Manikandan Ramesh1Email author
Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201354:47

DOI: 10.1186/1999-3110-54-47

Received: 12 September 2013

Accepted: 7 October 2013

Published: 21 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Cereal crops are the major targets for transformation mediated crop improvement and IR36 is an early maturing, high yielding, insect and disease resistant rice variety however, it is abiotic stress sensitive. Hence, development of an efficient and reproducible micropropagation system via somatic embryogenesis and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation is prerequisite to develop abiotic stress tolerant IR36. Further, Genetic stability of analysis of plantlets through RAPD and ISSR and Ploidy level through Flow cytometry (FCM) measurement of 2C DNA content is necessary for future application of transformed IR36.

Results

In this study, Mature seeds inoculated on (Murashige and Skoog) MS medium with 11.31 μM 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) and 0.3 μM Kinetin (Kn) had highest callus induction frequency (98%). The highest regeneration frequency (80%) was observed in MS + 13.28 μM Benzyladenine (BA) with 8.06 μM α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA). Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) and Flow Cytometry (FCM) analysis showed no significant variation in the 2C DNA (0.81 pg/2C) content and Ploidy level between wild type IR36 and in vitro maintained rice lines. Of the various OD bacterial culture, an optimum OD of 0.4 and inoculation duration of 10 min resulted in efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. β-glucuronidase activity was maximum in callus (99.05%).

Conclusions

These results described here confirm the reliability of this protocol for micropropagation and delivery of desirable gene using A. tumefaciens into indica rice.

Keywords

Transformation Micropropagation IR36 ISSR Ploidy RAPD

Background

Oryza sativa is one of the popular cereals having high source of dietary carbohydrate and is a staple diet for more than three billion people, supplying 50–80 percent of their daily calorie need (Khush 2005). Hence, there is an urgent need to improve global rice production to meet the demand of ever increasing population. Thus it necessitates manipulation and successful implementation of tissue culture and molecular biological approaches. An efficient plant regeneration system is a prerequisite for genetic transformation of plants and crop improvement (Raemakers et al. 1997 Sanyal et al. 2005 Dabul 2009). Various protocols have been developed to initiate callus from explants such as immature embryos (Seraj et al. 1997 Li et al. 2007 Koetje et al. 1989), mature embryos (Seraj et al. 1997 Ramesh and Gupta 2006 Abe and Futsuhara 1984 Abe and Futsuhara 1986 Wang et al. 1987Azria and Bhalla 2000), root segments (Abe and Futsuhara 1984 Mandal et al. 2003), coleoptile (Oinam and Kothari. 1995 Chand and Sahrawat 1997), and leaf bases (Ramesh et al. 2009). A major hitch in tissue culture is conservation of genetic constancy (Rout et al. 2006). The genetic stability of tissue culture derived plantlets could be analysed through RAPD and ISSR markers (Priya et al. 2011 Shilpha et al. 2013). RAPD is an inexpensive but very sensitive method which requires less amount of genomic DNA (Williams et al. 1990) and ISSR markers are capable to discriminate closely related individuals (Moreno et al. 1998 Fang and Roose 1997). Further the Ploidy level and the 2C DNA content (Swift 1950; Bennett et al. 2000) can be analysed by flow cytometry.

Plant transformation technology has become an adaptable platform for cultivar improvement (Rao et al. 2009). Numerous transformation strategies are available. However, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation appears more effective and is the preferred mode because of regenerating plants with low transgene copy number, relatively precise mode of DNA transfer, high efficiency of transformation, transfer of relatively large piece of DNA, less expensive nature (Hiei et al. 1994), more stable over generations and reduced gene silencing associated with integration of TDNAs into euchromatic regions (Barakat et al. 1997 Shou et al. 2004). Though Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of several dicotyledonous plants is common, monocots are generally considered recalcitrant to Agrobacterium (Mohanty et al. 1999). Furthermore, transformation protocol for generating a large number of transformants is limited to only a few cultivars, indicating that experimental parameters for rice transformation have not been fully optimized (Ozawa 2009).

In order to overcome the major constraint of recalcitrant response of monocot to in vitro regeneration and transgene delivery, evaluation of regenerable explants material is becoming vital. Transient GUS expression was carried out to screen the explant source. Though stable transformation is necessary for gene integration analysis, it is time consuming (Yasmin and Debener 2010) but transient GUS expression is more cost effective (Wroblewski et al. 2005). In the present investigation a fast and reproducible protocol for an effective embryogenic callus induction, regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of IR36, an extremely drought sensitive cultivar (Atlin et al. 2012) has been reported and this could be further exploited to raise transgenic indica rice.

Methods

Plant material

IR36 seeds were procured from Tamil Nadu Rice Research Station, Aduthurai, Tamil Nadu, India. It was ensured that the seeds were healthy and disease free and then manually dehusked and surface sterilized with 70% (v/w) ethanol for 45 seconds followed by 0.1% mercuric chloride for 3 minutes and then thoroughly washed thrice with autoclaved distilled water, aseptically in laminar air flow chamber.

Callus induction from different explants

Surface sterilized seeds were transferred to sterile tissue papers to remove the moisture, using sterile forceps. These seeds were inoculated on autoclaved MS medium (Murashige and Skoog. 1962) supplemented with 2,4-D (2.26, 4.52, 6.78, 9.04, 11.31, 13.57, 15.83, 18.09 μM) and combination of 2,4-D (11.31 μM) with Kn (0.02, 0.20, 0.30, 0.40, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80, 0.90, 0.22 μM) and with BAP (0.44, 0.88, 1.32, 1.76, 2.20, 2.64, 3.08, 3.52, 3.96, 4.40 μM) separately. The pH of media was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving it for 15 min at 121°C. The cultures were incubated in the dark at 24 ± 2°C for four weeks for callus induction. The creamy white, friable and nodular embryogenic calli were excised and transferred to the same fresh medium for further growth and embryo maturation.

In addition to seeds, intact explants were used as plant material for micropropagation experiments and transformation, to obtain these explants (leaf base, coleoptile, leaf blade and root) seeds were initially germinated on half-strength MS media for a period of 1 week. Then each explant was transferred to MS with 11.31 μM 2, 4-D and 0.3 μM Kn for callus induction. A total of 16 explants were used and the experiment was done in triplicates.

Regeneration from callus

Approximately 5 mm (diameter) of the subcultured calli were exposed to two treatments, MS medium supplemented with various concentrations of BAP (0.44, 0.88, 1.32, 1.76, 2.20, 2.64, 3.08, 3.52, 3.96, 4.40, 6.65, 8.86, 11.07, 13.28, 15.49, 17.70 μM), then with combination of 13.28 μM BAP and NAA (0.53, 1.07, 1.61, 2.1, 2.6, 3.22, 3.76, 4.3, 4.83, 5.37, 8.06, 10.7, 13.34, 15.98, 18.62, 21.26). Hundred explants were used in each concentration and were done in triplicates to get the significant regeneration efficiency. The cultures were maintained in vitro at 24°C under long-day light conditions with a 16/8 h day/night photoperiod, with an average irradiance of 50 mmol m-2 s-1.

Rooting and acclimatization

Regenerated shoots (around 8 cm after 21 days in regeneration medium) were aseptically excised and transferred to half strength MS medium with 30 g L-1 sucrose. The cultures were kept for a photoperiod of two weeks. After the complete initiation of roots, the agar attached on roots were removed and were washed with running tap water and then transferred to a tray with vermi compost and peat soil (1:1 ratio) for a period of two weeks. Then finally transferred to green house condition and watered daily.

Genetic stability analysis

RAPD and ISSR markers

Analysis of the genetic stability was carried using RAPD and ISSR (SIGMA, USA) markers. The plant genomic DNA of germinated, in vitro regenerated, in vitro germinated and hardened plantlets was extracted using HiPurA kit (HiMEDIA, India) and its quality was checked by resolving in 0.8% agarose gel. DNA concentration and purity was measured using spectrophotometer (Hitachi U2800) at 260 nm. 50 ng of total genomic DNA was used as template for a 25 μl reaction mixture consisting of 2.5 μl of 10× buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of dNTPs, 5 μM primer, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific). The PCR conditions were as follows, initial denaturation at 94°C for 7 min, followed by 40 cycles denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 37°C for 1 min and extension for 2 min at 72°C, followed by a final extension for 7 min at 72°C, using a programmable thermal cycler (Eppendorf).

Flow cytometry analysis

Nuclear suspension was prepared using Two Step protocol (Dolez. 2007, Otto. 1990). 20 mg of young leaves of rice plantlet were placed at the centre of petri plate and to this, added 2 ml of ice-cold Otto I solution [0.1 M Citric acid, 0.5% (vol/vol) Tween 20]. Using a sterile scalpel the leaves were chopped into small pieces and the homogenate was mixed by pipetting slowly (without air bubbles), and is filtered through a 42-nm nylon mesh. Then pelleted the nuclei at 150 g/5 min. Slowly the supernatant was removed and to the pellet added 100 μl fresh ice-cold Otto I solution. Then to this 1 ml of Otto II solution [0.4 M Na2HPO4.12H2O] was added. Finally Propidium Iodide (PI-50 mg/ml) was added and shaken gently and simultaneously treated with RNAse.

PI stained nuclei were analysed through flow cytometer (FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences). Batch analysis report of each sample was calculated using FACSDiva Version 6.1.3 software. IR36 wild type (Tamil Nadu Rice Research Station, Aduthurai) with 2C DNA value 0.90 pg (Martinez et al. 1994) was used as external standard. The 2C DNA content of randomly chosen three samples from each of germinated, in vitro germinated, in vitro regenerated and hardened leaves tissues were calculated as according to (Dolezel et al. 2007). The 2C genome sizes were obtained by the conversion (1 pg DNA to 978 Mbp) given by (Dolezel et al. 2003). DNA fluorescence index (Alan et al. 2007) shows how close are the control and the samples tested in its 2C DNA content.

Bacterial strain and vector

EHA105 containing the disarmed Ti plasmid and the binary vector pCAMBIA1301 containing the GUS gene with castor bean catalase intron, the kanamycin phosphotransferase II (ntpII) gene and hygromycin phosphotransferase (hpt) gene, conferring resistance to kanamycin and hygromycin respectively.

Agrobacterium- mediated transformation

Overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens was adjusted to various OD (0.2 - 1.0) by suspending the pellet in 30% liquid MS medium. About 5 mm diameter of sub cultured embryogenic calli were used for infection and were co-cultivated for different time periods (5–25 min) with different OD cultures. The calli were blot dried with sterile tissue paper. These calli were transferred to co-cultivation medium incorporated without and with various concentrations of AS (100–500 μM) with Whatmann #1 filter paper on the surface. The infected calli were kept under incubation (24 ± 2°C) for 48 to 72 hours in dark.

GUS assay of the putative transformants

After 48 to 72 hrs of co-cultivation with Agrobacterium, the infected explants embryogenic calli, coleoptiles, leaf bases, leaf blades and root tips were subjected to GUS assay. For histochemical detection, GUS assay buffer having 50 mM phosphate buffer, TritonX-100, 20% methanol, and 1 mM substrate 5-bromo, 4-chloro, 3-indolyl β-D-glucuronide (Jefferson. 1987) was used. The samples were then incubated in dark at 37°C for 24 to 48 hrs. The transformation frequency was observed by calculating the ratio between numbers of calli expressing GUS with the total number of calli (25 explants per experiment, in triplicates) kept for assay. Additionally the transient GUS expression in explants were confirmed by taking cross sections of these GUS-positive explants and were observed under bright field microscope (Nikon H550L, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Data were recorded for per cent callus induction, shoot regeneration, GUS expression and ploidy analysis. All the experiments were repeated thrice and done in a completely randomized design. Data were subjected to one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Values at P<0.5 level of significance were used for mean comparison.

Results

Effect of 2,4-D, Kn and BAP on callus induction

In order to evaluate the effect of growth hormones on callus induction different concentrations of 2,4-D alone was incorporated in different media – MS, B5 (Gamborg et al. 1968) and N6 (Chu 1978). MS medium with 11.31 μM 2,4-D gave good callus induction with 140 mg fresh weight. Comparatively the callus was friable, embryogenic and creamy white in texture than those from B5 and N6 medium that produced brown and slimy callus. Combination of 2, 4-D (11.31 μM) with various concentrations of BAP and Kn incorporated in MS were used for callus induction. Embryogenic scutellum derived calli formation from seed explants was favoured in the presence of 2,4-D and 2,4-D with BAP whereas 2,4-D with Kn had resulted in maximum callus induction of 98% which is significantly higher than the maximum callus induction at 11.31 μM 2,4-D (93.75%) alone or in combination with 0.44 μM BAP (85%) (Table 1). Furthermore, increase in callus induction was also accompanied by marked increase in calli fresh weight of 161 mg. A comparison of the maximum fresh weight of callus obtained using 2,4-D (15.83 μM) and 2,4-D (11.31 μM) with BAP (0.44 μM) showed decline in callus fresh weight 145 mg and 154 mg respectively.
Table 1

Effect of plant growth regulators (PGRs) on callus induction from mature seed after 28 days of incubation

Concentration of 2,4-D (μM)

Concentration of Kn (μM)

Concentration of BAP (μM)

Average callus induction (%)

Average mean F.Wt (mg)

Control (MS alone)

-

-

6.25 ± 0

41.3 ± 2.1

11.31

-

-

93.75 ± 6.25*

140.24 ± 0.9*

11.31

0.02

-

63.17 ± 0.76

154.73 ± 2.44

11.31

0.20

-

87.00 ± 0.50

148.70 ± 5.28

11.31

0.30

-

98.00 ± 0.87*

161.28 ± 1.28*

11.31

0.40

-

62.00 ± 0.50

157.03 ± 4.87

11.31

0.50

-

55.42 ± 0.88

150.05 ± 5.93

11.31

0.60

-

44.58 ± 0.88*

151.29 ± 8.52

11.31

0.70

-

36.67 ± 0.76*

146.31 ± 3.61

11.31

0.80

-

98.17 ± 0.29

146.56 ± 3.78

11.31

0.90

-

43.08 ± 0.95*

150.46 ± 7.37

11.31

0.22

-

11.67 ± 0.76*

142.83 ± 1.06

11.31

-

0.44

85.00 ± 3.50

154.09 ± 4.67

11.31

-

0.88

73.16 ± 2.02

147.13 ± 6.37

11.31

-

1.32

76.08 ± 2.79

148.87 ± 0.89*

11.31

-

1.76

52.16 ± 2.02*

135.43 ± 10.79

11.31

-

2.20

50.66 ± 3.06*

146.52 ± 8.93

11.31

-

2.64

58.83 ± 3.33*

144.79 ± 4.21

11.31

-

3.08

79.66 ± 1.53

150.50 ± 8.08

11.31

-

3.52

75.83 ± 1.04

140.67 ± 0.50

11.31

-

3.96

68.75 ± 0.00

142.65 ± 12.23

11.31

-

4.40

61.5 ± 1.32

128.50 ± 0.47*

-Nil.

Values represent means ± standard deviation; * indicates significance at the level of P < 0.5.

Influence of different explants on callus induction

All tested explants showed callus induction as well as callus maturation on MS supplemented with 11.31 μM 2,4-D and 0.30 μM Kn (Figures 1A, B, C, D, and 2A). Among these the mean average of callus induction was 53.6%, 47.3%, 99%, for coleoptile, leaf base and mature seed (Table 2). The results indicate lowest callus induction of 39.6% from root and the absence of callus induction from leaf blade. Subculture allows callus to gain mass in addition to increase in somatic embryos (Figure 1E).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-47/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_97_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Stages of in vitro propagation and plantlet establishment. Calli derived from A) Coleoptile (bar = 13 mm), B) Root (bar = 10 mm), C) Leaf base (bar = 8 mm), D) Mature seed derived calli (1 month old) (bar = 11 mm), E) Embryogenic calli after subculture (arrows indicate somatic embryos) (bar = 7.5 mm), F) Shoot primordia from embryogenic clumps on regeneration medium (bar = 12.5 mm), G) Multiple shoot formation and proliferation after 21 day (bar = 22 mm), H) Shoots rooted on half-strength MS (bar = 12.5 mm), I) 4-months old greenhouse established plants, bar = 95 mm.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-47/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_97_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Effect of Different Growth Hormones and Bacterial density in Tissue Culture and Transformation. A) Effect of 2,4-D on callus induction, B) Effect of BAP on shoot regeneration, C) Effect of bacterial density and infection duration on transformation, D) Effect of acetosyringone on transformation.

Table 2

Callus induction and histochemical GUS expression of various explants of IR36

Explant

Average CI (%)

Average F.Wt (mg)

Transformation efficiency (TE %)

Callus

-

-

99.05 ± 1.65

Coleoptile

53.66 ± 6.65

95.60 ± 3.17

87.61 ± 9.18

Leaf base

47.33 ± 1.52

83.46 ± 2.20

85.71 ± 7.55

Mature seed

99.00 ± 0.87

160.76 ± 0.87

50.47 ± 0.00

Leaf blade

0

-

49.52 ± 10.03

Root

39.66 ± 1.15

31.66 ± 3.36

58.09 ± 9.18

-Not applicable.

TE is number of putative transformants/total number of explants per treatment.

Regeneration

For further regeneration experiments scutellar derived calli were used. After 7 days of culture on various combinations of hormones, green shoot primordia appeared, however more shoot buds were observed in calli on BAP with NAA (Figure 1F). According to the results of the present study, 13.28 μM BAP and 8.06 μM NAA showed 80% regeneration (Table 3) with average shoot height of 17.22 cm (Figures 1G, and 2B). On the other hand evaluation of shoot regeneration as well as shoot height in both treatments with BAP alone or BAP with different combinations of NAA, shown to have reduction in regeneration and mean shoot height after further increase in hormone concentration.
Table 3

Effect of plant growth regulators (PGRs) on regeneration from seed derived calli after 21 days of inoculation

Concentration of BAP (μM)

Concentration of NAA (μM)

Average regeneration (%)

Average mean of shoot height (cm)

13.28

-

66.0 ± 1.0

7.39 ± 0.43

13.28

0.53

38.2 ± 0.2*

8.73 ± 0.36

13.28

1.07

41.0 ± 2.0*

8.39 ± 0.25

13.28

1.61

49.33 ± 1.5*

9.22 ± 0.19

13.28

2.1

54.60 ± 0*

9.33 ± 0.03

13.28

2.6

57.2 ± 8.5*

8.84 ± 1.20

13.28

3.22

61.133 ± 1.02

14.59 ± 2.35

13.28

3.76

51.86 ± 5.7

13.39 ± 0.37*

13.28

4.3

62.0 ± 2.0

11.63 ± 0.37*

13.28

4.83

65.73 ± 1.2

13.07 ± 0.65*

13.28

5.37

65.0 ± 4.0

14.19 ± 1.64

13.28

8.06

80.00 ± 0.2*

17.22 ± 0.99*

13.28

10.7

75.06 ± 3.5*

17.09 ± 0.50*

13.28

13.34

76.80 ± 0*

15.28 ± 1.0*

13.28

15.98

64.46 ± 0.5

16.06 ± 0.87*

13.28

18.62

56.40 ± 0*

14.91 ± 0.70*

13.28

21.26

52.0 ± 10*

12.55 ± 0.67*

-Not applicable.

Values represent means ± standard deviation; * indicates significance at the level of P < 0.5.

Rooting and acclimatization

Finally elongated shoots were rooted on half-strength MS media. Rooting of green, healthy regenerated shoots on half-strength MS also promoted development of multiple (2–3) secondary shoots (Figure 1H). Properly developed roots appeared after 2 weeks. The plantlets subjected to green house condition also appeared healthy without any morphological changes. Rooting and acclimatization of plantlets resulted in multiple tillers with average height of 82 cm without any deleterious effects on their survival (Figure 1I).

Effect of bacterial density on transformation

The influence of bacterial density on transformation is significant as the early stage after Agrobacterium infection should not be hampered by bacterial overgrowth. Hence, in order to determine the effect of bacterial density on transient GUS expression, calli infected with various concentration of Agrobacterium OD600 (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0) were monitored. The significant difference was observed between 0.4 and 1.0 OD infected calli marked by high infection rate (Figure 2C). On the other hand significant difference was not observed among other OD whereas tissue necrosis was seen. The optimum OD was 0.4 manifested by significant GUS expression.

Effect of infiltration and co-cultivation duration

To determine the influence of Agrobacterium infection duration on transient GUS expression, various time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 min) were chosen. Exposure of the explants to 0.4 OD Agrobacterium for 10 min was found to be optimum as significant GUS staining was observed whereas 15, 20 and 25 min of infiltration besides resulting in GUS signals lead to contamination (Figure 2C). Co-cultivation for 2 days showed better infection without browning or Agrobacterium overgrowth (Data not shown).

Effect of acetosyringone

Further investigation was carried out to determine the optimum concentration of acetosyringone during co-cultivation, for which various concentration (100, 200, 300, 400, 500 μM) of AS were incorporated separately. Our analysis revealed difference in GUS expression between infection in the presence and absence of AS. However, significant level of GUS expression was observed at 100 μM AS after which GUS expression combined with necrosis was observed (Figure 2D). Cross sections of callus were taken to study the development of somatic embryogenesis. Seed derived callus showed globular embryos after one month of inoculation (Figure 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-47/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_97_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Development of somatic embryos. Cross section of A) one month old callus with somatic embryo (Arrows indicate globular regions), B) Post globular embryo and C) Post globular germinating regions of IR36 rice.

Histochemical GUS expression analysis

Selection of suitable explants is vital for efficient transformation. Hence the Agrobacterium infected explants were screened using GUS assay. Transformation efficiency is expressed as ratio of number of GUS-positive calli to initial number of explants inoculated. Generally all tissue types responded positively to histochemical assay (Figure 4), blue stain was observed in all the explants but stronger in calli (99%) followed by coleoptiles (87.6%), leaf bases (85.7%), root (58%), mature seed (50.47%) and leaf blade (49.5%) (Table 3). Furthermore, cross section of GUS-positive leaf bases were observed under bright field microscope. The arrows designate the region where GUS expression was maximum in the cross section. In all the explants observed the GUS staining was limited to vascular cells and was high in the regions of metaxylem (Figure 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-47/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_97_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Histochemical GUS activity in different tissues of A.tumefaciens infected IR36. A), C) Dark blue staining in coleoptile and leaf base, D) E) Strongly stained embryogenic calli and mature seed B), F) slightly stained root and leaf blade.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-47/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_97_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Cross section examination and PCR analysis of transformants A) Radial root tissue sections of Root (e-epidermis, c-cortex, ca-cambium, en-endodermis, x-xylem, r-root hair), B) Leaf base (m – mesophyll, mx – metaxylem, e – epidermis), C) PCR of GUS positive samples (Lane C + pCAMBIA plasmid, Lane: 1–3 GUS positive samples, Lane M: 1Kb ladder and Lane C- untransformed sample).

Assessment of genetic stability by molecular markers

Ten RAPD and five ISSR primers were used to study the genetic stability of germinated, in vitro germinated, in vitro regenerated and hardened plantlets (Additional file 1). A total of 158 bands were obtained and no polymorphic band pattern was observed. RAPD and ISSR primers produced amplicons with a range of 250–4000 bps (Figure 6). This ensures that there is no genetic variation among the wild type and tissue culture derived plantlets.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-54-47/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_97_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

RAPD and ISSR profile analysis A) Primers OPA-02, OPA-03; B) OPA-04; C) ISSR A1, ISSR A3, and ISSR 33.

Ploidy level and 2C DNA content analysis

Flow cytometry analysis of tissue culture derived samples with wild type (IR36) nuclei as external standard provided average mean 2C DNA content of 0.81 pg/2C which was not that significantly different as reported by Martinez et al. 1994 (0.90 pg/2C in IR36). The Propidium Iodine-Absorbance (PI-A) peaks produced by the samples gave an average mean Ploidy level of 24522.58 (Additional file 2). Further the DNA Fluorescence index for wild type and in vitro derived samples was found to be similar (Table 4).
Table 4

Nuclear DNA content assessment between wild type and tissue culture derived IR36 samples

Material donor*

Number of days old

DNA fluorescence index1

Average mean ploidy2

Average nuclear DNA content3(pg/2c)

Average 2c genome size4 (Mbps)

Germinated

40

0.942

25798.33

0.85

829.38

In vitro Germinated

45

0.881

24114.00

0.79

775.23

In vitro Regenerated

45

0.873

23901.00

0.79

768.39

Hardened

40

0.887

24277.00

0.80

780.47

*Sample Size: Three samples each.

1DNA fluorescence index (DI = 2CIR36 sample/2CIR36 wild type) (Alan et al. 2007).

2Average PI-A mean value of P2 population.

3. SamplePloidy integer = ReferencePloidy × MeanpositionoftheG 1 samplepeak MeanpositionoftheG 1 referencepeak

4DNA content 1 pg DNA = 978 Mbp (Dolezel et al. 2003.

Discussion

The aim of this research was to establish efficient micropropagation of IR36 using optimum hormones for somatic embryogenesis and regeneration as well as efficient transformation from various explants. Though various reports are available for micropropagation and transformation of Oryza sativa the analysis using different explants source together with the assessment of each explant for transformation is needed. And the present study reports this, in addition to this the genetic stability analysis through three different approaches assure the reliability and applicability of this protocol for other Oryza sativa rice varieties. Somatic embryos play a more significant role in micropropagation than any mode of organogenesis and are vital tool for plant transformation either by Agrobacterium or biolistic methods (Alaiwi et al. 2012). Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 harboring a binary vector pCABIA1301 carrying the UidA reporter gene and hygromycin phosphotransferase gene under a constitutive CaMV35S promoter was used. Mature seed giving high frequency callus induction (98%) and regeneration (80%) is considered to be the key explant material for in vitro propagation and further transformation. This high efficiency reflects the fact that this is widely used for in vitro propagation. Wani (Wani et al. 2011) reported the efficiency of scutellar derived calli over other explants derived calli for regeneration. Proliferation of calli was achieved on transfer of the one month old calli to the same fresh medium this in line with the previous report. Breaking of one month old calli resulted in browning consequent to phenolic production and leads to poor callus proliferation and somatic embryogenesis as well as two-month-old hard friable calli were able to withstand Agrobacterium infection efficiently (Kumar et al. 2005). On the contrary it has been reported that the regeneration potential of the callus was greatly influenced by the callus age and younger the callus the higher the regeneration potential (Jain AK and Datta RK 1992 Sahoo et al. 1997). The maximum percentage of regeneration using BAP alone was 66%. However, combination of the same concentration of BAP (11.07 μM) with NAA 8.06 μM resulted in 80% of regeneration. Similar finding has been reported already, stating that the interaction of auxin and cytokinin is important for in vitro organogenesis (Fan et al. 2011). The mean average of callus induction varied with the type of explants. The maximum callus induction of 98% was observed from mature seed. Variation in callus induction frequency was observed with different explants, coleoptile (53.6%), leaf base (47.3%), root (39.6%). whereas callus failed to induce from leaf explant this is in concordance with previous report from Poaceae family. Friable callus from leaf explants was unsuccessful because they may not be a good source for callus induction (Valentine et al. 2010). The RAPD and ISSR profiling of wild type and tissue culture derived plantlets showed no polymorphism in band patterns. This ensures that there is genetic veracity among the germinated, in vitro germinated, in vitro regenerated and hardened plantlets. The flow cytometry analysis of the in vitro regenerated IR36 and the wild type showed no variations in their Ploidy levels.

Among the several factors taken into consideration the concentration of Agrobacterium inoculum in the infection medium is an important factor to develop highly efficient transformation protocol (Li et al. 2007; Gao et al. 2009). Decrease in transformation frequency with increase in bacterial intensity was observed. Our result is in accord with the previous report of poor GUS signal at higher densities (Yasmin and debener 2010) and explant tissues were almost wholly colonized by the bacteria, elimination of which also becomes more difficult (Jha et al. 2011). In monocots, incorporation of phenolic compound acetosyringone during co-cultivation supports the gene transfer (Stachel et al. 1985). Presence of acetosyringone (AS) was found to be essential for transformation (Mohanty et al. 1999) whereas no transformation occurred in the absence of acetosyringone (Hoque et al. 2005). Among the various concentrations tested 100 μM AS resulted in significant GUS expression. Co-cultivation in the presence of 100 μM acetosyringone was found to be the most suitable for optimum transformation (Kumar et al. 2005; Svabova and Griga 2008; Karthikeyan et al. 2012). Transient GUS expression was observed almost in all explants due to the promoter used but with variation in percent response and staining. The CaMV 35S promoter is expressed in all plant organs (Odell et al. 1985). The importance of the starting material for transformation and performance of GUS assay in the tissues immediately after infection as an indication for preferable tissue has been reported (Hiei et al. 1994). The frequency of transformation was high in all the explants except root and leaf blade.

It is evident that the high frequency somatic embryogenesis mediated by callus of various explant source and efficient regeneration demonstrated here also augments frequency of transformation. These results insist that now it is possible to introduce desirable gene efficiently into indica rice cultivar IR36 through A. tumefaciens.

Conclusions

The current study besides describing optimization of hormones for invitro propagation and conditions for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, highlights the genetic stability which is mandatory for tissue culture derived and transformed plantlets. To date, for the first time a highly reproducible protocol has been standardized for efficient in vitro propagation of IR36. High frequency embryogenesis mediated by callus of various explants source and efficient regeneration also augments frequency of transformation. The results insist that now it is possible to introduce desirable gene efficiently into indica rice cultivar IR36 through Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The Ploidy level of regenerated and wild type and their genetic stability has been confirmed by FCM and RAPD, ISSR markers respectively.

Abbreviations

AS: 

Acetosyringone

BA: 

Benzyladenine

CaMV 35S: 

Cauliflower mosaic virus promoter

FCM: 

Flow cytometry

GUS: 

β–Glucuronidase

Hpt: 

Hygromycin phosphotransferase

Kn: 

Kinetin

MS: 

Murashige and Skoog medium

NAA: 

α-naphthalene acetic acid

2: 

4-D: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

SRK is grateful to DST for the award of Junior Research Fellowship (DST-PURSE).

The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of the Bioinformatics Infrastructure facility, Alagappa University funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and technology, Government of India (BT/BI/04/055/2001). We are greatly thankful to UGC- Networking Resource Centre in Biological Sciences (NRCBS) Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai for providing the FCM instrumentation facility and Dr. A. Mahesh, Project Faculty for his great help in doing the experiment.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University

References

  1. Abe T, Futsuhara Y: Varietal difference of plant regeneration from root callus tissues in rice. Jpn J Breed 1984, 34: 147–155. 10.1270/jsbbs1951.34.147View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Abe T, Futsuhara Y: Genotypic variability for callus formation and plant regeneration in rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 1986, 72: 3–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alaiwi WAA, Potlakayala SD, Goldman SL, Josekutty PC, Karelia DN, Sairam V, Rudrabhatla: Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of the medicinal plant Centaurea Montana. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012, 109: 1–8. 10.1007/s11240-011-0067-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Alan AR, Zeng H, Assani A, Shi WL, McRae HE, Murch SJ, Saxena PK: Assessment of genetic stability of the germplasm lines of medicinal plant Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (Huang-qin) in long-term, in vitro maintained cultures. Plant Cell Rep 2007, 26: 1345–1355. 10.1007/s00299-007-0332-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atlin GN, Venuprasad R, Bernier J, Kumar A, Verulkar S, Sahu RK, Lafitte HR, Serraj R, Cairns J, Sinha PK, Mandal NP, Shashidhar HE, Chandrababu R, Robin S, Dwivedi JL, Rathi S, et al.: Developing drought-tolerant rice cultivars by selection for yield under managed stress: progress in breeding and genetic analysis at IRRI. 2012.http://seeds.irri.org/droughtGoogle Scholar
  6. Azria D, Bhalla PL: Plant regeneration from mature embryo-derived callus of Australian rice ( Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Aus J Agric Res 2000, 51: 305–312. 10.1071/AR98189View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Barakat A, Carels N, Bernardi G: The distribution of genes in the genome of Gramineae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94: 6857–6861. 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6857PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett MD, Bhandol P, Leitch IJ: Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses −807 new estimates. Ann Bot 2000, 86: 859–909. 10.1006/anbo.2000.1253View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chand S, Sahrawat AK: Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from coleoptile tissue of indica rice. Rice Biotech Quarterly 1997, 32: 12–16.Google Scholar
  10. Chu CC: The N6 medium and its application to anther culture of cereal crops. Proc. Symp. Plant Tissue Culture Science Press, Beijing, In; 1978:45–50.Google Scholar
  11. Dabul ANG: Screening of a broad range of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) germplasm for in vitro rapid plant regeneration and development of an early prediction system. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2009, 45: 414–420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J: Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry, Wiley-Liss, Inc. Cytometry A 2003, 51A: 127–128. 10.1002/cyto.a.10013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J: Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flowcytometry. Nature protocols 2007, 9: 2233–2244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan M, Liu Z, Zhou L, Lin T, Liu Y, Luo L: Effects of Plant Growth Regulators and Saccharide on In vitro Plant and Tuberous Root Regeneration of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). J Plant Growth Regul 2011, 30: 11–19. 10.1007/s00344-010-9163-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang DQ, Roose ML: Identification of closely related citrus cultivars with inter simple sequence repeat markers. Theor Appl Genet 1997, 95: 408–417. 10.1007/s001220050577View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K: Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 1968, 50: 151–158. 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao N, Shen W, Cao Y, Su Y, Shi W: Influence of bacterial density during preculture on Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2009, 98: 321–330. 10.1007/s11240-009-9566-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T 9: Efficient transformation of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 1994,6(2):271–282. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.6020271.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoque MN, John W, Mansfield BMH: Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of Indica rice genotypes: an assessment of factors affecting the transformation efficiency. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2005, 82: 45–55. 10.1007/s11240-004-6154-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jain AK, Datta RK: Shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration in mulberry (Moms bombycis Koiz.): factors influencing morphogenetic potential in callus cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 1992, 29: 43–50. 10.1007/BF00036145View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jefferson RA: Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1987, 5: 387–405. 10.1007/BF02667740View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jha P, Shashi RA, Agnihotri PK, Kulkarni VM, Bhat V: Efficient Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. using shoot apices as explant source. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2011, 107: 501–512. 10.1007/s11240-011-0001-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Karthikeyan A, Shilpha J, Pandian SK, Ramesh M: Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of indica rice cv. ADT 43. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012, 109: 153–165. 10.1007/s11240-011-0083-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Khush GS: What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol 2005, 59: 1–6. 10.1007/s11103-005-2159-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Koetje DS, Grimes HD, Wang YC, Hodges TK: Regeneration of indica rice ( Oryza sativa L.) from primary callus derived from immature embryos. J Plant Physiol 1989, 135: 184–190. 10.1016/S0176-1617(89)80175-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar KK, Maruthasalam S, Loganathan M, Sudhakar D, Balasubramanian P: An Improved Agrobacterium -Mediated Transformation Protocol for Recalcitrant Elite Indica Rice Cultivars. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2005, 23: 67–73. 10.1007/BF02772648View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Li ZN, Fang F, Liu GF, Bao MZ: Stable Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation of London plane tree (Platanus acerifolia Willd.). Plant Cell Rep 2007, 26: 641–650. 10.1007/s00299-006-0271-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mandal AB, Maiti A, Biswas A: Somatic embryogenesis in root derived callus of indica rice. Plant Tissue Cult 2003,13(2):125–133.Google Scholar
  29. Martinez CP, Arumuganathan K, Kikuchi H, Earle ED: Nuclear DNA content of ten rice species as determined by flow cytometry. Jpn. J. Genet 1994, 69: 513–523. 10.1266/jjg.69.513View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohanty A, Sarma NP, Tyagi AK: Agrobacterium -mediated high frequency transformation of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 and transmission of the transgenes to R2 progeny. Plant Sci 1999, 147: 27–137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreno S, Martin J, Ortiz J: Inter simple sequence repeats PCR for characterization of closely related grapevine germplasm. Euphytica 1998, 101: 117–125. 10.1023/A:1018379805873View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 1962, 15: 473–497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH: Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985,84(14):4870–4874.Google Scholar
  34. Oinam GS, Kothari SL: Totipotency of coleoptile tissue in indica rice ( Oryza sativa L. cv. CH 1039). Plant Cell Rep 1995, 14: 245–248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Otto FJ: DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. Methods in Cell Biology 1990, 33: 105–110. Academic Press, San Diego Academic Press, San DiegoView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ozawa K: Establishment of a high efficiency Agrobacterium -mediated transformation system of rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci 2009, 176: 522–527. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Priya AM, Pandian SK, Ramesh M: Efficient in vitro plant regeneration through leaf base derived callus cultures of abiotic stress sensitive popular Asian indica rice cultivar ir 64 ( oryza sativa l.). Acta Biol Hung 2011,62(4):441–452. 10.1556/ABiol.62.2011.4.9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Raemakers CJJM, Sofiari E, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF: Regeneration and transformation of cassava . Euphytica 1997, 96: 153–161. 10.1023/A:1002970925897View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramesh M, Gupta AK: Genetic transformation of embryogenic callus cultures of indica rice using particle bombardment and selection of stably transformed hygromycin resistant plants. Asian J Microbiol Biotech Env Sci 2006,8(3):617–622.Google Scholar
  40. Ramesh M, Murugiah V, Gupta AK: Efficient in vitro plant regeneration via leaf base segments of indica rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Exp Biol 2009, 47: 68–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rao AQ, Baths A, Kiang S, Shah ad K, Shashi AA, Husain T, Riazuddin S: The myth of plant transformation. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27: 753–763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rout GR, Mohapatra A, Jain SM: Tissue culture of ornamental pot plant: a critical review on present scenario and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 2006,24(6):531–560. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.05.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sahoo Y, Pattnaik SK, Chand PK: Plant regeneration from callus cultures of Moms indica L. derived from seedlings and mature plants. Sci Hortic 1997, 69: 85–98. 10.1016/S0304-4238(96)00980-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanyal I, Singh AK, Kaushik M, Amla DV: Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) with Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac gene for resistance against pod borer insect Helicoverpa armigera . Plant Sci 2005, 168: 1135–1146. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.12.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Seraj ZI, Islam Z, Faruque MO, Devi T, Ahmed S: Identification of the regeneration potential of embryo derived calluses from various indica rice varieties. Plant Cell Tiss Organ cult 1997, 48: 9–13. 10.1023/A:1005766513009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Shilpha J, Silambarasan T, Pandian SK, Ramesh M: Assessment of genetic diversity in Solanum trilobatum L., an important medicinal plant from South India using RAPD and ISSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 2013, 60: 807–818. 10.1007/s10722-012-9951-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Shou FBR, Whitham SA, Wang K: Assessment of transgenic maize events produced by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium mediated transformation. Mol Breed 2004, 13: 201–208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Stachel SE, Messens E, Montagu MV, Zambryski P: Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells which activate the T-DNA transfer process in Agrobacterium tumefaciens . Nature 1985, 318: 624–629. 10.1038/318624a0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Svabova L, Griga M: The effect of co-cultivation treatments on transformation efficiency in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2008, 95: 293–304. 10.1007/s11240-008-9443-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Swift H: The constancy of deoxyribose nucleic acid in plant nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1950, 36: 643–654. 10.1073/pnas.36.11.643PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Valentine O, Ntui AP, Supaporn H, Mii M: Plant regeneration from stem segment-derived friable callus of “Fonio” (Digitaria exilis (L.) Stapf.). Sci Hortic 2010, 125: 494–499. 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.04.017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang MS, Zapaa FJ, Castro DCD: Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis from mature seed and young inflorescence of wild rice ( Oryza perennis ). Plant Cell Rep 1987, 6: 294–296. 10.1007/BF00272002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wani SH, Sanghera GS, Gosal SS: An efficient and reproducible method for regeneration of whole plants from mature seeds of a high yielding indica rice ( Oryza sativa L.) variety PAU 201. New Biotech 2011,28(4):418–422. 10.1016/j.nbt.2011.02.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafaleski JA, Tiongey SV: DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 1990, 18: 6531–6535. 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wroblewski T, Tomczak A, Michelmore R: Optimization of Agrobacterium mediated transient expression assays for lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Biotech J 2005, 3: 259–273. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00123.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Yasmin A, Debener T: Transient gene expression in rose petals via Agrobacterium infiltration. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2010, 102: 245–250. 10.1007/s11240-010-9728-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Krishnan et al.; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.