Similarity and difference in vegetation structure of three desert shrub communities under the same temperate climate but with different microhabitats
© Tao et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
Received: 23 July 2012
Accepted: 4 November 2013
Published: 2 December 2013
Community structure and species composition are closely related to plant diversity and ecosystem stability. To explore the similarity in vegetation structure of shrub communities under the same temperate climate but with different microhabitats, 36, 28 and 13 sampling plots in Ephedra distachya, Seriphidium terrae-albae and Artemisia songarica communities were selected respectively, during the course of three seasons (early spring, summer, autumn) in Gurbantunggut Desert, north-western China. The species composition, abundance, biomass and soil nutrients were investigated. Floristic changes were characterized by similarity and ordination methods.
Two communities, E. distachya and S. terrae-albae, were similar in terms of soil nutrients but differed from the A. songarica community. Soil organic matter, nitrogen and biological soil crusts accounted for the differences of microhabitats. In spring and summer, more plant families, genera and species were recorded in E. distachya and S. terrae-albae communities than in the A. songarica community but in each community, the number of families, genera, species, herbs and life forms showed a consistent trend summer > spring > autumn. There were significant differences in absolute biomass among the three communities, but the ratio of dead biomass to total biomass was consistently 1:4, indicating the constant turnover rate of plant biomass for nutrient cycling. In each community shrubs accounted for the most biomass. Herbaceous biomass was negligible but the herbs contributed the most richness and abundance.
The similarity in response of all three communities to seasonal changes in vegetation structure and biomass allocation demonstrate convergence although divergence is demonstrated in soil characteristics or microhabitats.
KeywordsSpecies composition Floristic similarity Life-form Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) Herbaceous plant The Gurbantunggut Desert
Deserts are ecosystems which take up approximately one fifth of the earth's land surface (Whitford, 2002). Desert ecosystems characteristically lack the biodiversity, stability and levels of soil nutrients found in forest and grassland ecosystems and thus have lower carrying capacity and productivity (biomass) and are slow to recover from disturbance (Rundel and Gibson, 1996; Whitford, 2002; Ward, 2009). Shrubs are a major component of desert vegetation and a key biological resource in the recovery and reconstruction of degraded desert ecosystems where they are of great importance for animal husbandry, soil improvement and as windbreaks for sand stabilisation (Aich, 1991; Li et al., 2006).
Community structure and species composition are the product of evolutionary and environmental drivers that are closely related to plant diversity and ecosystem stability (Putman, 1994; Li, 2000; Eldridge et al., 2007). Plant biomass is an important carrier of material circulation (e.g. C and N cycling), an important step of energy flow (Steinman et al., 1995; Shanmughavel and Francis, 1996) and a key indicator that can be used to evaluate the structure and function of ecosystems (Li et al., 2006). Species composition, diversity and biomass/productivity vary with plant communities and seasons (Stinson and Brown, 1983; Garcia-Pausas et al., 2011; Bischoff et al., 2005; Neves and Oliveira, 2010), but whether there are similar parallel trends (i.e. convergence) in such vegetation variables described above among communities in different microhabitats remains unclear.
The Gurbantunggut Desert is a temperate desert located in the centre of the Junggar Basin, northwestern China. The desert has a relatively higher species richness (Zhang and Li, 1994) and diversity of plant communities (Zhang and Chen, 2002) than other temperate deserts of China. Shrubs such as Ephedra distachya L. (Ephedraceae), Seriphidium terrae-albae (Krasch.) Poljak. (Asteraceae) and Artemisia songarica Schrenk. (Asteraceae), are widely distributed but discontinuous among the sand dunes (Zhang and Chen, 2002). E. distachya community is mainly distributed on dunes from the base to mid-dune and S. terrae-albae exists at the flat slope; both habitats are commonly covered by biological soil crusts (BSCs). A. songarica generally grows either on bare sand or in disturbed situations where there is minimal growth of BSCs.
In recent years, much interest has focused on the species diversity and biomass in the shrub communities of the Gurbantunggut Desert within a single season (Wang et al., 2005; Yu et al., 2010; Song et al., 2011); however, the similarity in vegetation structure of different communities and the seasonal change remain obscure. The three shrub communities above-mentioned chosen in this study were under the same temperate climatic and phenological conditions but with different microhabitats. The objective of this study was to explore the similarity or difference in vegetation structure (including species composition, biomass and community structure) during the course of three seasons (early spring, early summer, early autumn), and to investigate the relationship between vegetation structure and microhabitats. Our hypothesis was that there would be similarity in seasonal changing pattern for vegetation structure but obvious small-scale fluctuation due to microhabitats.
The area is covered by massive, dense, semi-fixed sand dunes, from 10 – 50 m in height, running nearly south to north (Qian et al., 2009). Much of the sand surface is covered by BSCs comprising cyanobacteria, lichens and mosses (Zhang et al., 2010b). Winds are predominantly from the WNW, NW and N and wind speeds reach their peak from April to June (Figure 1d), with an annual average of 11.17 m s–1 (Wang et al., 2003; Li et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2011b). Eighteen plant communities and 208 vascular plants have been recorded and the natural vegetation is dominated by two small trees, Haloxylon persicum Bunge ex Boiss. et Buhse and Haloxylon ammodendron (C. A. Mey.) Bunge (Amaranthaceae) (Zhang and Chen, 2002). Additionally, ephemeral and ephemeroid species are both numerous and abundant in desert shrub communities.
Each 20 m × 20 m plot was divided into sixteen 5 m × 5 m sub-plots. In each plot, the shrub species composition and abundance were assessed using the eight 5 m × 5 m sub-plots positioned across the diagonals of the 20 m × 20 m plot. The herbaceous species were surveyed using a 1 m × 1 m area nested within each diagonal 5 m × 5 m sub-plots described above. Following the life form classifications of Zhang and Chen (2002), all recorded species were classified as either: shrub; perennial herbs with long vegetative period (PLV); perennial herbs with short vegetative period (PSV); annuals with long vegetative period (ALV); or annuals with short vegetative period (ASV). However, as PSV and ASV shared the same vegetative period, they were treated as one functional group, that is, as herbs with short vegetative period (HSV). Similarly PLV and ALV were treated together as another functional group, as herbs with long vegetative period (HLV). Nomenclature follows Flora of China (ECCAS, 1974–1999) and Flora Xinjiangensis (CRFX, 1993–2011).
Biomass of HLV and shrub was determined in autumn. The aboveground (AGB) and belowground (BGB) biomass of HLV were measured at maturity in the eight 1 m2 herbaceous sub-plots described above. The AGB of HLV was harvested and the BGB excavated. AGB and BGB were kept and after BGB (roots) was carefully washed, each sample of AGB or BGB was placed into a labelled cloth bag. The biomass samples were oven-dried at 70°C for 48 hours and then weighed on an electronic balance accurate to 0.0001 g.
Mathematical coefficients for AGB ( Y = a CV b ) for four shrubs in this study area
7.98 × 10–3
5.23 × 10–4
4.27 × 10–7
8.48 × 10–2
The BGB of each shrubs was estimated using root/shoot ratio R/S (n = 5 – 20). The individuals used for R/S were collected near the sampling plots. E. distachya and E. songoricum are typical clonal species and it is not possible to identify independent root systems. Thus, five 1 m × 1 m quadrats for E. distachya and five 2 m × 2 m for E. songoricum (five replicates for each species) were set up and BGB was excavated about 2.0 – 2.5 m deep. R/S was then calculated by unit area (1 m2). All roots of shrubs were washed by running water. All material for biomass determination was oven-dried at 70°C for 72 hours and then weighed using an electronic balance accurate to 0.01 g.
In order to determine dead biomass in autumn, in each plot, eight 0.5 m × 0.5 m quadrats were established in eight diagonal 5 m × 5 m sub-plots to collect dead AGB and BGB. Dead BGB was collected to a soil depth of 50 cm using a corer with an inner diameter of 8 cm. This was gathered using a 0.2 cm sieve in the field and later washed in the laboratory. The live roots were then removed and the dead BGB oven-dried and weighed. Neither dead AGB nor BGB was separated into shrub or herbaceous origins.
Soil sampling and analyses
Soil properties were only determined in summer as there is minimal seasonal change in soil nutrients in deserts (Gao et al., 2007). In early summer, 2010, a soil sample, consisting of a combined sample from five random points 0–10 cm deep, was collected from each vegetation sampling site. Samples were air dried in the shade after surface organic material and fine roots had been carefully removed. Soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorous (TP), total potassium (TK), available nitrogen (AN), pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined in the laboratory. SOM was determined by the dichromate oxidation method; pH was measured using a PHS-3C digital pH meter in a 1: 5 soil–water ratio suspension; EC using a DDS-307A conductivity meter (Precision and Scientific Corp. Shanghai, China) in sequence alongside the pH in same suspension; TN by the CuSO4-Se powder diffusion method (GB7848-87); TP by the NaOH fusion-Mo Te Sc colorimetry method (GB7852-87); TK by NaOH fusion-atomic absorption spectrometry (GB7854-87); AN by the alkali hydrolyzation-diffusion method (Bao, 2000).
BSCs were considered to be an important soil factor as BSCs at different developmental levels were broadly distributed throughout the study area (Zhang et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2010b). The algal and moss crusts were at early and late developmental stages respectively, intermixed with many intermediate stages. Bare sand was recorded as L i = 0, pure moss crust as L i = 9, with eight other intermediate stages between bare sand and moss crust. The index of developmental levels of BSCs (IBL) was defined as IBL = Log10 (L i + 1) with a value range of IBL [0, 1].
Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods. Species richness values for the total number of species in each shrub community were analyzed for each of the three seasons. The species richness values for HSV were calculated in early summer and for HLV in early autumn. Eight soil parameters, species richness values, plant biomass in autumn were compared using one-way ANOVA. Levene’s test was used to test for homogeneity and post-hoc multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey's HSD test. In addition a robust T2 Tamhane’s test was used when variances were not homogeneous (Búrquez et al., 2010). The relationships between soil parameters and species richness/biomass were determined using Pearson Correlation Analysis. SPSS 19.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for all the above data analysis.
Similarity coefficients of total species and herb species were analyzed by Sørensen index: C = 2c / (a + b), where C is the similarity index value, a, b the numbers of species from communities A and B respectively and c the number of species shared by both communities. The correlations of soil parameters (77 plots × 8 factors) of total species (with the species compositional data) in spring, summer and autumn were done using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis through PC-ORD version 5 (MjM Software, Oregon). NMDS is a powerful tool for ecological community data, and it appears to provide a better fit to ecological data than may be obtained using other ordination techniques (McCune and Grace, 2002). The Sørenson (Bray–Curtis) distance with a random starting configuration was used for these analyses. Random starting configurations and 30 runs with real data were used to compute the ordination solution with the dimensionality of each data set assessed by requesting a step down from a six-dimensional ordination. A stable two-dimensional solution was finally identified for all ordinations in all three seasons. We also calculated Pearson correlation coefficients to further elucidate correlations between community patterns and soil parameters in NMDS ordinations. Significance of correlations was determined using the critical values for correlation coefficients (Zar, 1998). Graph of sample plots in ordination space with overlays of environmental variables were used to describe the ordination gradients.
Soil parameters (means ± standard error) and their Pearson correlation coefficients in three communities (EDC, STC and ASC)
SOM (g kg–1)
TN (g kg–1)
TP (g kg–1)
TK (g kg–1)
AN (mg kg–1)
EC (μs cm-1)
Community type (n = 36, 28 and 13 respectively)
2.01 ± 0.08a
0.14 ± 0.008a
0.29 ± 0.011b
19.23 ± 1.04a
28.4 ± 2.21a
8.21 ± 0.016a
65.4 ± 1.30a
0.68 ± 0.04a
1.77 ± 0.09a
0.14 ± 0.006a
0.35 ± 0.014a
11.09 ± 0.82b
28.5 ± 1.38a
8.18 ± 0.026a
60.3 ± 3.39a
0.54 ± 0.06b
1.42 ± 0.05b
0.10 ± 0.003b
0.31 ± 0.012ab
6.69 ± 0.53c
15.8 ± 1.19b
8.41 ± 0.044b
42.0 ± 2.65b
0.25 ± 0.08c
Soil parameters (n = 77)
Results of species similarity indicated that, in spring and summer, the species similarity index values (C = 0.857 in spring and C = 0.887 in summer) between EDC and STC were more than those between EDC and ASC (C = 0.591 and C = 0.583), and between STC and ASC (C = 0.602 and C = 0.554). In autumn, the three community pairs had close to the same similarity index values (C = 0.828 – 0.867). In general, the species composition of EDC was similar to STC, but both were obviously richer and more complex than ASC.
Species richness (means ± standard error) of different life-forms (functional groups) in three communities (EDC, STC and ASC) in summer
EDC (n = 36)
2.47 ± 0.12a γ
12.06 ± 0.65a
3.36 ± 0.25a β
8.69 ± 0.57a α
3.86 ± 0.26b
0.64 ± 0.14b δ
3.22 ± 0.23b βγ
STC (n = 28)
2.54 ± 0.14a β
9.25 ± 0.70a
2.96 ± 0.21a β
6.29 ± 0.65a α
5.07 ± 0.30a
0.18 ± 0.09c γ
4.89 ± 0.26a α
ASC (n = 13)
2.57 ± 0.29a α
5.54 ± 0.88b
2.77 ± 0.36a α
2.77 ± 0.68b α
4.00 ± 0.38b
1.23 ± 0.17a β
2.77 ± 0.36b α
Above and belowground biomass (means ± standard error) in three communities (EDC, STC and ASC) in autumn
EDC (n = 36)
STC (n = 28)
ASC (n = 13)
Total AGB (g m–2)
114.01 ± 4.19a
125.02 ± 7.04a
84.99 ± 8.31b
75.65 ± 3.85ab
92.71 ± 7.00a
60.52 ± 7.77b
71.55 ± 3.95ab
84.63 ± 7.20a
57.06 ± 7.98b
67.26 ± 3.96a
74.54 ± 7.03a
51.93 ± 7.37a
4.09 ± 0.49a
5.06 ± 0.72a
3.47 ± 0.78a
3.90 ± 0.49a
4.96 ± 0.73a
0.82 ± 0.26b
0.19 ± 0.07b
0.10 ± 0.04b
2.65 ± 0.75a
38.36 ± 1.52a
32.30 ± 1.86b
24.47 ± 2.23c
Total BGB (g m–2)
69.28 ± 3.66a
29.25 ± 1.50b
23.29 ± 3.40b
64.40 ± 3.62a
24.34 ± 1.75b
22.45 ± 3.47b
63.75 ± 3.62a
23.08 ± 1.74b
21.82 ± 3.52b
61.51 ± 3.62a
13.84 ± 1.30b
16.94 ± 2.41b
0.66 ± 0.08a
1.26 ± 0.31a
0.63 ± 0.15a
0.45 ± 0.06a
0.55 ± 0.08a
0.10 ± 0.03b
0.21 ± 0.06a
0.71 ± 0.31a
0.53 ± 0.14a
4.87 ± 0.45a
4.91 ± 0.54a
0.84 ± 0.18b
Total biomass (TB) (g m–2)
183.28 ± 7.64a
154.26 ± 8.21b
108.28 ± 11.53c
140.05 ± 7.44a
117.05 ± 8.56b
82.97 ± 11.00c
135.30 ± 7.55a
107.70 ± 8.75b
78.88 ± 11.29b
128.77 ± 7.59a
88.38 ± 8.33b
68.86 ± 9.78b
4.75 ± 0.54b
9.35 ± 1.66a
4.09 ± 0.92b
4.34 ± 0.54a
5.54 ± 0.81a
0.91 ± 0.29b
0.41 ± 0.11b
3.81 ± 1.56a
3.18 ± 0.90ab
43.23 ± 1.59a
37.21 ± 1.91b
25.31 ± 2.16c
Relationships between vegetation and soil parameters
Pearson correlation coefficients between soil variables and species richness components and biomass components across three communities: *indicates significant correlation ( P < 0.05); **indicates greatly significant correlation ( P < 0.01); n = 77
Total species in spring
Total species in summer
Total species in autumn
Total live and dead (TB)
Total live of total species
Total live of HSV
Total live of ALV
AGB of total species
BGB of total species
Pearson correlation coefficients of soil parameters with first two NMDS ordination axes in three seasons
Similarity and difference in vegetation structure among three desert communities
In this study, species composition and structure differed among three communities, but all had the same trends in seasonal changes. Vegetation is usually closely related to environmental variables and understanding the relationship has been a central issue in plant ecology and synecology (Pausas and Austin, 2001; Jafari et al., 2004; Dias and Melo, 2010). Not only interspecific and intraspecific interactions but also the environmental influence together contribute to the formation and evolution of community structure and function; simultaneously, vegetation effects changes to the environment (Putman, 1994; Li, 2000). In arid areas, water and nutrients are the key factors limiting plant survival (Rundel and Gibson, 1996; Whitford, 2002; Li et al., 2008; Ward, 2009); and in rugged terrain (e.g. hills and sand-dunes), position and aspect have also been shown to be important (Parker, 1988). In the south-western area of the Gurbantunggut Desert which has a stable climate and minor human disturbance (Sun and Yang 2010), heterogeneous microhabitats developed among different communities depending on water content, soil nutrients, soil surface structure and the position on the sand-dune (Qian et al. 2009). Soil water content in layers from 10 cm to 60 cm layers at the bottom of sand-dunes is much higher than soil water content near the top (Wang et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010a). EDC and STC mostly grow from the bottom of sand dunes to mid-slope, whereas ASC generally grows in bare sand on the top of sand-dunes. Therefore, we can assume that in the dune system, there is more soil water available to EDC and STC than ASC. It is important also to note that BSCs which are involved in a series of processes which change physical and chemical soil properties, cover the base of dunes but are absent from the top (Zhang et al., 2006; Zhang, 2010b; Zhao et al., 2010). BSCs can improve soil nutrient content (N, P, also K) (Zhang et al., 2006), principally in the 0–5 cm layer. In this study, all eight soil factors are significantly different among the three communities (Table 2). With the exception of pH and TP, the soil parameters for EDC and STC are more than that for ASC. NMDS ordinations and Pearson correlation analysis also reveal that BSC, SOM, TN and EC are most important factors influencing community characteristics and thus the habitat of ASC is very different from those of the other two communities.
We did not investigate the seed banks in this study, but it was obvious from literature that seed banks affected community structure; different habitats also had an effect on seed banks, seed germination and formation of BSCs (Su et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2011b). It is difficult for seeds to lodge on the smooth surface of bare sand on dune crests which are also more exposed to wind erosion than the fixed sandy areas at the bottom of dunes or at mid-slope. Seeds are more likely to be blown to the base or mid-slope of sand-dunes, enhancing the resources of the seed bank in those locations (Wang et al., 2003). Wind also reduces the stability of the sandy surface of dune crests making them unsuitable for BSC formation. BSCs can accelerate seed germination, seedling survival, growth and nutrient uptake for most desert species (Long and Li, 2003; Zhang and Nie, 2011), although several studies showed that BSCs inhibited the germination of some species (e.g. Malcolmia africana and Ceratocarpus arenaarius) (Nie et al., 2009). Larger seed banks can reduce the effect of inhibition by BSCs, augmenting species richness in EDC and STC.
Comparable microhabitats in EDC and STC have produced a complex community structure in EDC and STC with an abundance of species, very different from that found in ASC (Figures 3 and 5; Table 3). In all three communities, the number of life-forms change seasonally from spring (four), to summer (five) and to autumn (three) (Figure 4) and the number of species present in spring and summer exceeds the number present in autumn. Therefore, the similarity in response of all three communities to seasonal changes in vegetation structure (species richness and life-forms) implies convergence; evidence of divergence implicit in response to differences in soil nutrient content, moisture content and BSCs.
Biomass allocation pattern and nutrient return
The total live biomass of the three communities in the Gurbantunggut Desert in early autumn were relatively low (82.97 – 140.05 g m–2). Semi-fixed sand-dunes presented the most well developed landforms (dominated by Haloxylon forest) in our study area, with a biomass of 7.53 Mg hm–2 (Wang et al., 2005). Therefore, the TB in EDC, STC and ASC accounts for 17.6%, 15.2% and 11.3% of the TB in Haloxylon forest, respectively. Dead biomass accounted for a quarter of the total biomass in the three communities. Return of nutrients from plants to the soil was an important step in nutrient recycling, providing resources for further plant growth. In the Gurbantunggut Desert, atmospheric deposition accounts for a small quantity of N (Liu et al., 2011a), but most is derived from the decomposition of dead biomass. The Horqin Sandy Land has higher but varying proportions of dead biomass proportions (40.7% – 65.1%) (Li et al., 2005) than the Gurbantunggut Desert (approximately 25%). In contrast, the proportions in subtropical forest (3.31% – 8.6%) (Shen et al., 2011) and temperate deciduous forest (7.4% – 20.3%) (Fang et al., 2007), are significantly less than those of the desert, owing to the rapid nutrient cycling rate in the forests. The consistent proportions of dead biomass in the three desert communities of this study may suggest a convergent adaptation which enhances the stability of nutrient cycling in the different communities.
Studies have reported that although constituting a relatively small portion (less than 1%) of the total biomass in forest in North America, the herbaceous understory, especially for ephemeral plants, has a quantifiable significance at the ecosystem level, mediating carbon dynamics and energy flow and influencing the cycling rates of essential nutrients, including N, P, K, and Mg (Parsons and Moldenke, 1975; Gilliam, 2007). Despite that the dead biomass was not separated into shrub or herbaceous origins in this study, the herbs accounted for relatively larger proportion of the dead biomass. This indicated that herbs played an important role in soil nutrient cycling in deserts.
Consequently, although there were differences in absolute biomass, biomass allocation patterns on a community-scale among the three desert communities were either the same or very similar, presenting obvious evidence of convergence of desert shrub communities in arid environments.
Ecological significance of seasonal changes in structure of herbaceous plants
There are numerous herbaceous species in all three communities, and the seasonal changes of herbs represent similarity. The seasonal variations in life-form and species richness are closely related to the appearance and disappearance of herbaceous species (HSV and HLV), especially HSV. Central Asia is considered to the centre of origin and distribution of HSV following the disappearance of the Tethyan Ocean in the Late Neogene and Early Quaternary Period (Mao and Zhang, 1994). Distribution of HSV extended as far as the Mediterranean, Western Asia and North Africa. In China, the Junggar Basin, which includes the Gurbantunggut Desert, is regarded as the easternmost point of HSV distribution (about 205 species) (Mao and Zhang, 1994). In the Gurbantunggut Desert, HSV benefit from limited snow/rainfall in winter and early spring (Mao and Zhang, 1994; Lan and Zhang, 2008) and being to germinate in March and April in spite of low temperatures. HSV flower and mature in May/June prior to the arrival of hot, dry summer conditions.
During the growing period (April to September), the Gurbantunggut experiences very strong winds, predominantly from April to June, in other words, the growth period of HSV (Wang et al., 2003; Li et al., 2010). HSV and BSCs play an important role in reducing sandstorm frequency (Zhang et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2010b) although sandstorms are less frequent and not as intense as those experienced in other deserts of China (Wang et al., 2003). In early spring, HSV can form dominant synusia or small communities so that some shrub communities can only thrive after HSV has died off in early summer (Zhang and Chen, 2002). Not only does HSV effectively maintain soil surface stability but also generates change in species composition of desert communities (Table 3), important factors in the preservation of biodiversity and stability of desert ecosystems.
Following the demise of HSV in late summer, HLV grew profusely to occupy the eco-niche left by HSV. However, between the disappearance of HSV and appearance of HLV there appears to be an interval during which there is less competition for resources, allowing the two “similar functional groups” to grow at different times during two seasons (summer and autumn). HLV plays an important role in the desert ecosystem until late autumn. The relationship of HSV to HLV was not germane to community type and was a feature shared by all three desert shrub communities.
The total biomass of herbaceous species was exceptionally low in all three communities (Table 4), and the proportions of total biomass of HLV to TB of total species in autumn never exceeded 8.0%. If the study is expanded to a larger scale to include the small tree Haloxylon, the proportions of total biomass of HLV to TB of total species in autumn drop to 0.6% (EDC), 1.2% (STC) and 0.55% (ASC). Thus the biomass of herbs is easily overlooked in large-scale estimation of biomass but in the Gurbantunggut Desert the ecological significance (e.g. retaining ecosystem stability and species diversity, preventing sand diffusion, animal husbandry, soil nutrient cycling) of herbs, especially HSV, cannot be disregarded.
This study represented the similarity and difference in vegetation structure of three desert shrub communities (EDC, STC and ASC) under the same temperate climate but with different microhabitats in the Gurbantunggut Desert, northwestern China. The microhabitats in EDC and STC have produced a complex community structure in EDC and STC with an abundance of species, very different from that found in ASC, but all communities had the same trends in seasonal changes due to the same temperate climate. There were also differences in absolute biomass, biomass allocation patterns on a community-scale among the three desert communities, but there were consistent proportions of dead biomass in the three communities. Thus, the similarity in response of all three communities to seasonal changes in vegetation structure and biomass allocation demonstrate convergence although divergence is demonstrated in soil characteristics or microhabitats.
Ephedra distachya community
Herbs with long vegetative period
Seriphidium terrae-albae community
Artemisia songarica community
Annuals with short vegetative period
Perennial herbs with short vegetative period
Total biomass (AGB + BGB)
Herbs with short vegetative period
Biological soil crust
Annuals with long vegetative period
Index of the developmental levels of BSCs
Perennial herbs with long vegetative period.
We thank Xiao-Bing ZHOU, Lin WU, Guo-Dong LI from Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Dong QIU, Yang DING, Wei ZHAO, Xing LIU from Xinjiang Agricultural University, for their kindly helps in field work. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. U1203301, 41201056).
- Aich AE: Role of shrubs in ecosystem functions. Options Méditerranéennes–Série Séminaires 1991, 16: 43–46.
- Bao SD: Agriculture Soil Chemical Analysis. 3rd edition. Beijing, China: Science Press; 2000. (in Chinese) (in Chinese)
- Bischoff A, Auge H, Mahn E: Seasonal changes in the relationship between plant species richness and community biomass in early succession. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6: 385–394. 10.1016/j.baae.2005.03.003View Article
- Búrquez A, Martínez-Yrízar A, Núñez S: Aboveground biomass in three Sonoran Desert communities: variability within and among sites using replicated plot harvesting. J Arid Environ 2010, 74: 1240–1247. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.04.004View Article
- CRFX (Commissione Redactorum Florae Xinjiangensis): Flora Xinjiangensis. Urumqi, China (in Chinese): Xinjiang Science, Technology and Health Press (K); 1993–2011.
- Dias E, Melo C: Factors influencing the distribution of Azorean mountain vegetation: implications for nature conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19: 3311–3326. 10.1007/s10531-010-9894-xView Article
- Eldridge DJ, Koen TB, Harrison L: Plant composition of three woodland communities of variable condition in the western Riverina, New South Wales, Australia. Cunninghamia 2007,10(2):89–198.
- ECCAS (Editor Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for Flora of China): Flora of China. Beijing, China (in Chinese): Science Press; 1974–1999.
- Fang JY, Liu GH, Zhu B, Wang XK, Liu SH: Carbon budgets of three temperate forest ecosystems in Dongling Mt., Beijing, China. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences 2007, 51: 92–101.View Article
- Gao XF, Han GD, Zhang G, Zhao ML, Lu P: Study on dynamics of soil enzyme activity and nutrient of desert steppe under different grazing intensities. Pratacultural Sci. 2007, 24: 10–13.
- Garcia-Pausas J, Casals P, Romanyà J, Vallecillo S, Sebastià M: Seasonal patterns of belowground biomass and productivity in mountain grasslands in the Pyrenees. Plant Soil 2011, 340: 315–326. 10.1007/s11104-010-0601-1View Article
- Gilliam FS: The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience 2007, 57: 845–858. 10.1641/B571007View Article
- Jafari M, Zare Chahouki MA, Tavili A, Azarnivand H, Zahedi Amiri G: Effective environmental factors in the distribution of vegetation types in Poshtkouh rangelands of Yazd Province (Iran). J. Arid Environ. 2004, 56: 627–641. 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00077-6View Article
- Lan HY, Zhang FC: Reviews on special mechanisms of adaptability of early-spring ephemeral plants to desert habitats in Xinjiang. Acta Bot. Borea1 –Occident Sin. 2008, 28: 1478–1485.
- Li B: Ecology. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press; 2000. (in Chinese) (in Chinese)
- Li FL, Bao WK, Wu N, You C: Growth, biomass partitioning, and water-use efficiency of a leguminous shrub (Bauhinia faberi var. microphylla) in response to various water availabilities. New Forests 2008, 36: 53–65. 10.1007/s11056-008-9081-zView Article
- Li QH, Jiang ZP, Zhang JB, Zhao YM: The progress and perspective of research on the ecological characteristics and benefits of shrub. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 2006, 20: 159–164.
- Li Y, Ali M, Liu Y, Zhang P, Ji CR: Characteristics of snow cover and sand-dust events and their correlation in Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Desert Res. 2010, 30: 961–967.
- Li YQ, Zhao HL, Zhao XY, Zhang TH, Yi XY, Zuo XA: Study on the dynamics of biomass, calorific value and energy of the psammophyte communities during desertification. Arid Zone Res. 2005, 22: 289–294.
- Liu X, Duan L, Mao J, Du E, Shen J, Lu X, Zhang Y, Zhou X, He C, Zhang F: Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environ. Pollution 2011, 159: 2251–2264. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.002View Article
- Liu HL, Shi X, Wang JC, Yin LK, Huang ZY, Zhang DY: Effects of sand burial, soil water content and distribution pattern of seeds in sand on seed germination and seedling survival of Eremosparton songoricum (Fabaceae), a rare species inhabiting the moving sand dunes of the Gurbantunggut Desert of China. Plant Soil 2011, 345: 69–87. 10.1007/s11104-011-0761-7View Article
- Long LQ, Li XR: Effects of soil microbiotic crusts on seedling survival and seedling growth of two annual plants. J. Desert Res. 2003, 23: 656–661.
- McCunen B, Grace JB: Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software Design; 2002.
- Mao ZM, Zhang DM: The Conspectus of ephemeral flora in northern Xinjiang. Arid Zone Res. 1994, 11: 1–26.
- Neves F d S, Oliveira VHF: Successional and seasonal changes in a community of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in a Brazilian tropical dry forest. Braz. J. Nature Conserv. 2010, 8: 160–164. 10.4322/natcon.00802009View Article
- Nie H, Zhang YM, Wu N, Zhang J, Zhang BC: Effects of biological crusts on the germination of five desert vascular plants with different seed morphologies. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2009, 33: 161–170.
- Parker KC: Environmental relationships and vegetation associates of columnar cacti in the northern Sonoran Desert. Vegetatio 1988, 78: 125–140. 10.1007/BF00033422View Article
- Parsons DU, Moldenke AR: Convergence in vegetation structure along analogous climatic gradients in California and Chile. Ecology 1975, 56: 950–957. 10.2307/1936305View Article
- Pausas JG, Austin MP: Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: an appraisal. J. Veg. Sci. 2001, 12: 153–166. 10.2307/3236601View Article
- Putman RJ: Community Ecology. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1994.
- Qian YB, Wu ZN, Yang HF, Jiang C: Spatial heterogeneity for grain size distribution of eolian sand soil on longitudinal dunes in the southern Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Arid Land 2009, 1: 26–33.
- Rundel PW, Gibson AC: Ecological Communities and Processes in a Mojave Desert Ecosystem: Rock Valley, Nevada. New York, US: Cambridge University Press; 1996.View Article
- Shanmughavel P, Francis K: Biomass and nutrient cycling in bamboo (Bambusa bambos) plantations of tropical areas. Biol. Fert. Soils 1996, 23: 431–434. 10.1007/BF00335918View Article
- Shen Y, Tian DL, Yan WD, Xiao Y: Biomass and its distribution of natural secondary Quercus fabric + Sassafras tsumu + Cunninghamia lanceolata community in Yuanling Country, Hunan Province. J. Central South Univ. Forest Tech. 2011, 31: 44–52.
- Song YY, Zhou CB, Zhang WH: Vegetation coverage, species richness, and dune stability in the southern part of Gurbantunggut Desert. Ecol. Res. 2011, 26: 79–86. 10.1007/s11284-010-0765-4View Article
- Steinman AD, Mulholland PJ, Beauchamp JJ: Effects of biomass, light, and grazing on phosphorus cycling in stream periphyton communities. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 1995, 14: 371–381. 10.2307/1467203View Article
- Stinson CSA, Brown VK: Seasonal changes in the architecture of natural plant communities and its relevance to insect herbivores. Oecologia 1983, 56: 67–69. 10.1007/BF00378218View Article
- Su YG, Li XR, Chen YW, Tan HJ, Jia RL: Effects of biological soil crusts on soil seed bank and seed germination of desert plants in North China. Act. Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27: 938–946.
- Sun DX, Yang JC: Precipitation characteristics at the hinterland of Gurbantunggut Desert and the surrounding areas. Arid Land Geogr. 2010, 33: 769–775.
- Wang CL, Guo QS, Tan DY, Shi ZM, Ma C: Haloxylon ammodendron community patterns in different habitats along southeastern edge of Zhunger Basin. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 16: 1224–1229.
- Wang JC, Shi X, Zhang DY, Yin LK: The morphological plasticity of Eremosparton songoricum along heterogeneous micro-habitats of continuous moisture gradient changes in sand dunes. Act. Ecol. Sin. 2009, 29: 3641–3648.
- Wang XQ, Jiang J, Lei JQ: Distribution of ephemeral plants and their significance in dune stabilization in Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Geogr. Sci. 2003, 58: 598–605.
- Ward D: The Biology of Deserts. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.
- Whitford WG: Ecology of Desert Systems. London, UK: Academic Press; 2002.
- Yu DD, Tang LS, Li Y, Xu GQ: Spatial variation of the diversity characteristics of understory plant species of Haloxylon persicum in the Gurbantunggut Desert. Arid Zone Res. 2010, 27: 559–566.
- Zar JH: Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
- Zhang JB, Xiong HG, Guo YX, Zhong XJ, Yu YZ: Study on spatial variability of surface soil moisture in different positions of sand dunes in south Gurbantonggut Desert. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2010a, 17: 125–131.
- Zhang LY, Chen CD: On the general characteristics of plant diversity of Gurbantunggut sandy desert. Act. Ecol. Sin. 2002, 22: 1923–1932.
- Zhang LY, Li ZW: A Preliminary Study on the vegetations between Taklimakan Desert and Gurbantunggut Desert. Environ. Prot. Xinjiang 1994, 16: 1–7.
- Zhang YM, Nie HL: Effects of biological soil crusts on seedling growth and element uptake in five desert plants in Junggar Basin, western China. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2011, 35: 380–388. 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00380View Article
- Zhang YM, Wang HL, Wang XQ, Yang WK, Zhang DY: The microstructure of microbiotic crust and its influence on wind erosion for a sandy soil surface in the Gurbantunggut Desert of Northwestern China. Geoderma 2006, 132: 441–449. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.06.008View Article
- Zhang YM, Wu N, Zhang BC, Zhang J: Species composition, distribution patterns and ecological functions of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Arid Land 2010b, 2: 180–189. 10.3724/SP.J.1227.2010.00180View Article
- Zhao HL, Guo YR, Zhou RL, Drake S: Biological soil crust and surface soil properties in different vegetation types of Horqin Sand Land, China. Catena 2010, 82: 70–76. 10.1016/j.catena.2010.05.002View Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.