Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.159

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Overproduction of valuable methoxylated flavones in induced tetraploid plants of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss

  • Ali Akbar Zahedi1,
  • Bahman Hosseini2Email author,
  • Mohammad Fattahi2,
  • Esmail Dehghan3,
  • Hadi Parastar4 and
  • Hadi Madani1
Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201455:22

DOI: 10.1186/1999-3110-55-22

Received: 27 October 2013

Accepted: 8 January 2014

Published: 4 February 2014

Abstract

Background

Ploidy manipulation is considered an efficient method to increase production potential of medicinally important compounds. Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. is an endangered medicinal plant of Iran. Various concentrations of colchicine (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, and 0.50% w/v) were applied to shoot apical meristems of D. kotschyi seedlings in two and four-leaf stages to induce tetraploidy.

Results

According to the results, 0.5% (w/v) of colchicine can be effective for polyploidy induction in D. kotschyi. Putative tetraploids were selected by morphological and microscopic characteristics and their ploidy level was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis and chromosome counting. The chromosome number of original diploid plant was confirmed to be 2n = 2× = 20 whereas that of the tetraploid plant was 2n = 4× = 40. Tetraploid and mixoploid plants showed different morphological, physiological and microscopic characteristics from those of diploid counterparts. The total content of flavonoids was increased from 1583.28 in diploids to 1890.07 (μg/g DW) in stable tetraploids.

Conclusion

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode-Array Detection (HPLC–DAD) confirmed over accumulation of methoxylated hydroxyflavones in solid tetraploid plants of D. kotschyi.

Keywords

Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss Chromosome counting Flow cytometry Tetraploidy HPLC-DAD Xanthomicrol

Background

Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss, belonging to Labiateae family, is an endemic herbaceous plant and is known as Badrandjboie-Dennaie and Zarrin-Giah (Fattahi et al. 2011; Ghahreman 1987). Recent pharmacological studies have confirmed presence of several methoxylated flavonoids with anti-cancer properties (Jahaniani et al. 2005; Moghaddam et al. 2012) and inhibitory effects on the lectin-induced cellular immune response in this plant (Faham et al. 2008). Its leaf extract has been reported to have antihyperlipidemic (Ebrahim Sajjadi et al. 1998), immunomodulatory (Amirghofran et al. 2000), antinociceptive (Golshani et al. 2004) and cytotoxic (Jahaniani et al. 2005) effects. Aerial parts of D. kotschyi plants are sources of valuable flavonoids and essential oils (Ebrahim Sajjadi et al. 1998; Gohari et al. 2003; Monsef-Esfahani et al. 2007; Saeidnia et al. 2007) and its seeds are rich in linolenic, oleic and linoleic acids (Goli et al. 2013).

Flavonoides include over 4000 structurally related compounds existing in nature either as free aglycones or glycosidic conjugates and are generally classified according to their chemical structures into flavones, flavanones, flavanols, flavonols and anthocyanidins (Middleton et al. 2000). This diversity of structural patterns has made flavonoids a rich source of compounds with potential anticancer properties. Recent pharmacological studies suggested some methoxylated flavonoids (Xanthomicrol and Calycopterin) of D. kotschyi with anti-cancer properties (Jahaniani et al. 2005; Moghaddam et al. 2012).

Polyploidy has played an important role in genetic and phenotype diversity as well as plant evolution and breeding (Xing et al. 2011). Induction of artificial polyploidy has been considered as a method for increasing production potential of plants secondary metabolites (Dhawan and Lavania 1996; Omidbaigi et al. 2010a). Many polyploid lines of plants were created by application of artificial selective breeding, tissue culture, distant hybridization, physicochemical factors, protoplast culture, and somatic hybridization (Song et al. 2012). However, despite considerable research on artificial polyploidy in plants, very few cases of polyploid medicinal plants have been reported (De Jesus 2003; Dehghan et al. 2012; Lavania and Lavania 2005).

Colchicine (C22H25NO6), originally extracted from Colchicum autumnale (autumn crocus, meadow saffron) is a poisonous alkaloid that is extensively used for induction of polyploidy (Ade and Kumar Rai 2010). Colchicine-induced autotetraploid plants has been reported in several medicinal plants including Tanacetum parthenium L. (Saharkhiz 2007), Artemisia annua L. (Banyai et al. 2010), Dioscorea zingiberensis (Zhang et al. 2010), Dracocephalum moldavica L. (Omidbaigi et al. 2010b) and Hyoscyamus muticus (Dehghan et al. 2012).

Low rate of genetic diversity as well as homogenous population with limited ecological niche in the natural habitat are the main problems in plant breeding (Fattahi 2012). Excessive harvesting of wild plants, limited distribution areas, and a lack of cultivation and domestication are the main reasons that D. kotschyi is now listed as an endangered plant (Jalali and Jamzad 1999). Therefore, induction of genetic variation is vital for protection and domestication of this plant.

In this study, we have established a protocol for the induction of tetraploidy in D. kotschyi L. for the first time. We also aimed to increase its genetic variation and producing new genetic material for selection of plants with higher production potential of important flavonoid compounds.

Methods

Plant material

Seeds of D. kotschyi were collected from Chalus, Gachsar, Iran. Seeds were carefully soaked in 98% sulfuric acid for 10 min to remove the external germination inhibitors, according to Fattahi et al. (2011) and then were cultured in plastic pots (15-cm diameter), in a mixture media containing soil, leaf mold and sand (1: 1: 2) and placed in a greenhouse at 25 ± 2°C (days) and 17°C (nights), under a 16/8 h photoperiod at 65% relative humidity.

Induction of tetraploidy in D. kotschyi

In the present study, different concentrations of colchicine (0.0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.50% w/v) were applied to shoot apical meristems of two and four-leaf stages plantlets for 48 h using cotton ball method (Shahriari et al. 2009). At the 6th or 8th plant-leaf stages, the plantlets were assessed for the presence of different morphological characteristics from those of diploid control plants including the lengths and widths of stomatal guard cells, plant height and number of leave and side branches.

Determination of ploidy level

Flow cytometry analysis

In order to determine DNA ploidy of the putative tetraploids, flow cytometry analysis (FCM) was conducted by using a Partec, PA, flow cytometer equipped with a mercury lamp (Partec, Germany). Nuclei suspension was prepared by chopping a small piece of fresh leaves (about 0.5 cm2) in 400 μl of nuclei extraction buffer (Partec PA, Germany). After filtration through a Partec 30 μm Cell trice disposable filter (Partec) 1600 μl of staining solution containing the dye 4-6-diamino-2-4- phenylindole (DAPI, Partec PA, Germany) was added and a minimum of at least 5000 nuclei per sample were measured and histograms of relative DNA fluorescence were obtained by Mode Fit LT 3.1 software (Dehghan et al. 2012).

Chromosome counting

After removing external germination inhibitors of seed coats, as described by Fattahi et al. (2011), seeds were sterilized with 70% ethanol and sodium hypochlorite for 30 s and 20 min respectively, then washed three times by sterile distilled water for 30 min and were placed on wet filter paper in petri dishes and incubated at 25°C until they germinate. Germinated seeds with minimum root length of 2 cm, were pretreated in a saturated solution of 8-hydroxyquinoline 0.02 M at 4°C for 4 h and then at room temperature in dark for 1 h. The samples were then fixed in cold freshly prepared Carnoy’s fixative (ethanol and glacial acetic acid (3: 1)) at room temperature for 3 h and stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C for 12 h. After hydrolyzing by 1 N HCl at 60°C for 10 min, seeds were incubated in Aceto-Iron-Hematoxylin solution at 60°C for 45 min, and squashed on slides in 45% acetic acid-glycerol (9: 1). The chromosomes were observed with the light Olympus microscope (BH2) at 100X under oil immersion objective lens, and the best metaphase views were photographed with digital camera (Canon, Malaysia).

Evaluation of anatomical and physiological characteristics

Stomata characteristics

Five 8 month-old diploid, mixo- and tetraploid plants were randomly selected and stomatal measurements were conducted on them by. The nail varnish technique (Hamill et al. 1992). Microscopic studies were done under the light microscope (Olympus BH2) at 40X magnification. To determine their length and width, stomata on 25 randomly chosen microscopic fields were counted for each leaf. Counts were taken twice per leaf at random locations across the surface in the unit of 0.15 mm2.

Chlorophyll determinations

The chlorophyll content (a, b, total) of the leaves was evaluated by previously established extraction method (Arnon 1949). In this method extraction was done by acetone and optical density was read at 645 and 663 μm using a spectrophotometer and finally pigments quantity were calculated by using the formula reported by Arnon (1949).

Flowering time and fruit set

Flowering time was the time between seed sowing and the beginning of full flowering (80% flowering) and fruit set was the time between seed sowing and the beginning of fruit setting time among plants with different ploidy levels.

Comparison of selected morphological treats

Ten plants of each ploidy levels including diploids, tetraploids and chimers (mixoploids) were selected for studying leaf number (L. N.), plant height (P. H.), lateral branches number (L. B. N.), stem diameter (mm) (S. D.), inflorescence length (In. L), No. of flower in inflorescence (N. F. In.), flower height (F. H.) (cm), leaf length (L. L.) (cm), leaf width (L. W.) (cm), leaf diameter (L. D.) (mm).

Extraction of leaf surface flavonoids

Dried leaf material (200 mg) from three individuals of each population was extracted in separate vials containing 10 ml diethyl ether for 24 h as described in the literature (Fattahi et al. 2013; Vieira et al. 2001). In order to prevent the evaporation of diethyl ether, the vials were kept closed and the extraction was performed in a cold room. After 24 h, the extracts were poured into clean vials and leaves were rinsed with another 5 ml diethyl ether, which were added to the initial extracts. The diethyl ether was incubated in an extraction cabinet until complete evaporation of solvent. After adding 10 ml of 80% methanol to remain solid material, the extracts were filtered (0.45 μm pore size) into clean vials. 1.5 ml of prepared solution was transferred into a clean injector auto HPLC vials for automatic injection.

HPLC–DAD-ESI-MS conditions

Chromatographic separation was performed using a Knauer HPLC system equipped with a Waters Symmetry Shield column (C8, 3.9 × 150 mm) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The column oven temperature was set at 30°C. The mobile phase consisted of an isocratic mixture of 60% of A (2% acetic acid in water) and 40% of B (acetonitrile) during 32 min (Fattahi et al. 2013). The DAD was set at 215 nm to provide real time chromatograms, and UV spectra from 190 to 400 nm were recorded for plant component identification. An LC/MSD-TOF (2006) (Agilent Technologies) instrument was used for compound mass detection. Electrospray ionization (ESI-MS) was performed in both positive and negative modes, at a fragmentation voltage of 215 V (positive) and −175 V (negative). Drying gas temperature was 300°C and drying gas (N2) flow was 7.01 L/min, with a nebulizer pressure of 15 psi. Capillary voltages were 3.5 kV (negative) and 4 kV (positive).

Statistical analysis

This study was done as factorial base experiment in completely randomized design with two factors (different concentrations of colchicine and growth stages of treated plantlets) and ten replicates. Data analyses were carried out with the SAS 9.1 for windows software package (Statistical). Means were compared using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) at the 1% and 5% probability levels.

Results and discussion

Determination of ploidy level

Flow cytometry analysis

Flow cytometry analysis of diploid control plants showed a peak at channel 30, related to the G1 of diploid plants (Figure 1a), while the corresponding peak of tetraploids was at about 60 (Figure 1c). Mixoploid plants possess both peaks of 30 and 60 indicating the presence of diploid and tetraploid nuclei (Figure 1b).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-55-22/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_75_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Flow cytometric histograms [A) 2×, B) 2×-4×, C) 4×], and root tip chromosome number of D. kotschyi in metaphase [D) diploid (2n = 2× = 20) and E) tetraploid (2n = 4× = 40)].

Chromosome counting

Chromosome counting is the most direct method of ploidy analysis. In line with the flow cytometric data, chromosome counts in tetraploids demonstrated that these plants doubled their diploid chromosome number to 2n = 4× = 40 (Figure 1). To our knowledge there is no report on chromosome counting of D. kotschyi and this is the first report on chromosome number of this important medicinal plant.

Survival rate and growth of colchicine-treated plantlets

The effect of different colchicine concentrations on the survival rate of plants was assessed 30 days after treatment. The survival rate of treated seedlings decreased with increase of colchicine concentration. The highest number of tetraploid plants (12%) and mortality (56%) were recorded when applying 0.5% colchicine to shoot apical meristems of seedlings (Table 1). Only 47% of colchicine-treated plants survived and continued their growth. Colchicine is an antimitotic agent that inhibits the formation of spindle fibers and effectively arrests mitosis at the metaphase stage leading to polyploidy and, as such, has been widely used to induce polyploidy in plant breeding (Abdoli et al. 2013). It has been reported that colchicine results in low growth rate of Astragalus memberanaceus, possibility due to physiological damage and a reduced rate of cell division (Chen and Gao 2007).
Table 1

The effect of different concentrations of colchicine treatment on survival rate and ploidy induction of D. kotschyi

Colchicine (%)

No. of observed plant

Survival rate (%)

Ploidy level (%)

Diploid

Mixoploid

Tatraploid

Control

50

100

50 (100)

0

0

0.05

50

76

29 (58)

5 (10)

4 (8)

0.1

50

68

26 (52)

4 (12)

2 (4)

0.2

50

64

25 (50)

6 (8)

3 (6)

0.5

25

44

1 (4)

7 (28)

3 (12)

Total

225

-

131

22

12

The result showed a lower growth rate of tetraploid plants than their diploid counterparts. Colchicine treatments at concentrations of 0.5% and 0.1% (w/v) resulted in induction of 28% and 12% mixoploids, respectively (Table 1).

The effects of ploidy level on selected anatomical and physiological characteristics

The structural characteristics of D. kotschyi were significantly affected by ploidy level. The increase in ploidy level of D. kotschyi plants resulted in a significant increase (P <0.01) in stomatal lengths and widths (Figure 2). As shown in Table 2, the number of stomata on abaxial leaf surfaces was also significantly different between diploid and tetraploid plants. Stomatal lengths and widths have been widely used as an indicator of polyploidy (Lin et al. 2011). Generally tetraploid plants tend to have larger stomata than their diploid parents (Gantait et al. 2011; Hodgson et al. 2010; Omidbaigi et al. 2010a; Rêgo et al. 2011; Tang et al. 2010).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-55-22/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_75_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Comparison of morphological characteristics among diploid, mixoploid and tetraploid plants of D. kotschyi . plant stomata [A) 2×, B) 2×-4×, C) 4×], leaf [D) 2×, E) 2×-4×, F) 4×], Plant morphology [G) 2×, H) 2×-4×, I) 4×], glandular trichome [J) 4×, K) 2×, L) 2×-4×], and plant flower [1) diploid, 2) mixoploid), 3) tetraploid].

Table 2

Some selected anatomical and physiological characteristics of diploid, mixoploid and tetraploid plants of D. kotschyi

 

Stomata

Chlorophyll (mg/g FW)

Trichome density

Planting to flowering time (month)

Fruit set

 

Density (no./mm2)

Length (μm)

Width (μm)

a

b

Total

202.8 ± 28.8 a

20.01 ± 2.42 b

5.63 ± 1.06 b

0.55 ± 0.01 c

0.246 ± 0.03 c

0.80 ± 0.03 c

Low

6

High

2× + 4×

103.7 ± 13.3 b

33.02 ± 3.18 a

11.64 ± 1.77 a

1.01 ± 0.05 b

0.337 ± 0.03 b

1.35 ± 0.07 b

Medium to high

7

Low

68.8 ± 14.0 c

36.42 ± 5.21 a

12.27 ± 1.64 a

1.15 ± 0.05 a

0.658 ± 0.06 a

1.81 ± 0.11 a

High

8

Low

Different letters within the column indicate a highly significant difference of mean (±SD) tested by Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) at p ≤ 0.01. The data were analyzed from 10 replications of each treatment.

The chlorophyll (a, b and total) content of tetraploid plants were also significantly changed with ploidy levels (P < 0.01) (Table 2). The highest content of chlorophyll a (1.15 mg/g FW) and b (0.65 mg/g FW) were recorded for induced tetraploid plants. Similar results were also reported in colchicine-induced tetraploid plants of Aloe vera L. (Li et al. 2002) Tanacetum parthenium L. (Majdi et al. 2010) and Datura stramonium L. (Amiri et al. 2010).

In this study high and low trichome density were observed on abaxial surface of tetraploid and diploid plants, respectively (Figure 2; Table 2). Similar results were also reported in Lavandula angustifolia (Urwin et al. 2007) and Arachis paraguariensis (Aina et al. 2012).

The diploid plants generally grew more rapidly than tetraploid plants and began to flower before than tetraploid ones (Figure 2; Table 2). This is in accordance with the results on Passiflora edulis Sims. (Rêgo et al. 2011) and Gerbera jamesonii Bolus cv. Sciella (Gantait et al. 2011).

Fertility and seed set was lower in induced autotetraploids than their parental diploid plants (Table 2). Similar anatomical and structural changes were also reported in another plants such as Zinger officinalis Roscoe (Adaniya and Shirai 2001) and Dracocephalum moldavica L. (Omidbaigi et al. 2010b).

Comparison of selected morphological treats

Leaf length (L. L.) and thickness (L. D.) were significantly affected by induction of tetraploidy (P < 0.01), however no significant difference was observed between leaf width (L. W.) of different ploidy levels (Figure 2; Table 3). Tetraploid and mixoploid plants showed a lower L. L. than that of diploid plants (Table 3). Similar results have been reported in other studies (Roy et al. 2001; Viehmannová et al. 2012).
Table 3

Morphological characteristics of diploid, mixoploid and tetraploid plants of D. kotschyi

Ploidy

Vegetative stage

Flower stage

 

L. N.

P. H.

L. B. N.

S. D. (mm)

In. L. (cm)

N. F. In.

F. H. (cm)

L. L. (cm)

L.W. (cm)

L.D. (mm)

247.8 ± 48.89 a

63.90 ± 10.99 a

55.10 ± 10.24 a

1.376 ± 0.23 b

8.33 ± 3.05 b

13.33 ± 1.52 b

2.33 ± 0.057 b

2.10 ± 0.26 a

1.73 ± 0.24 a

0.302 ± 0.016 c

2× + 4×

91.3 ± 47.47 b

26.20 ± 11.04 b

12.90 ± 9.20 b

1.718 ± 0.18 a

17.50 ± 0.5 a

14.5 ± 0.5 b

3.30 ± 0.435 ab

1.52 ± 0.48 b

1.62 ± 0.38 a

0.412 ± 0.042 b

70.3 ± 36.90 b

20.55 ± 11.09 b

8.50 ± 5.44 b

1.879 ± 0.16 a

17.83 ± 0.76 a

19 ± 1 a

3.33 ± 0.208 a

1.50 ± 0.46 b

1.70 ± 0.33 a

0.481 ± 0.053 a

Different letters within the column indicate a highly significant difference of mean (±SD) tested by Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) at p ≤ 0.01. The data were analyzed from 10 replications of each treatment. L. N., Leaf number; P. H., Plant height; L. B. N., lateral branches number; S. D., Stem diameter (mm); In. L. Inflorescence length; N. F. In. No. of Flower in inflorescence; F. H., Flower height (cm); L. L., Leaf length (cm); L. W., Leaf width (cm); L. D., leaf diameter (mm).

Plant growth indices including plant height (P. H.), leaf number (L. N.), lateral branch numbers (L. B. N.) and stem diameter (S. D.) were significantly affected by ploidy level (P < 0.01). While P. H., L. N. and L. B. N. decreased, the S. D. increased in mixoploid and tetraploid plants (Table 3).

Analysis of variance showed a significant increase in corolla length caused by induction of tetraploidy (P < 0.01). The highest corolla length (3.33 cm) was recorded in tetraploids while it was 2.33 cm for diploid plants (Figure 2; Table 3). Similar results have been previously reported for Gerbera jamesonii Bolus cv. Sciella (Abd El-Naby et al. 2012; Gantait et al. 2011). It seems that higher DNA content and larger cell size in tetraploid plants is associated with the late flowering time (Gantait et al. 2011; Stebbins 1984). There was also a significant difference in Inflorescence length (In. L.) and number of flowers in inflorescence (N. F. In.) between diploid and tetraploid plants (Table 3).

Identification and quantification of flavonoids by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS

In order to identification first of all, molecular ion in [M-H]- ions and UV spectra were provided for all compounds (Table 4). According to this table eleven compounds including luteolin-7–O–β-D- glucopyranoside, apigenin 7–O–glucoside (cosmosiin), rosmarinic acid, luteolin 3′–O–β-D-glucuronide, luteolin, apigenin, cirsimaritin, isokaempferide, penduletin, xanthomicrol and calycopterin (Additional file 1) identified by a comparison of the TR, UV λmax, and [M-H]- ions of the D. kotschyi peaks with those of known standards (compounds 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11) and quantified by its standard calibration curve and for the others (compounds 1, 2, 4 and 9) identification was done by comparing spectral data reported in previous work (Greenham et al. 2003; Fattahi et al. 2013) and quantified by xanthomicrol calibration curve.
Table 4

Retention time, maximum UV absorption, and molecular weight, flavonoid contents (μg/g DW) in the di-, mix- and tetraploid plants and identification methods of phenolic and flavonoid compounds of D. kotschyi

Peak

Compound name

RT (min)

UV (nm)

(m/z)[M-H]-/[M-H]+

Diploid

Mixploid

Tetraploid

Identification methods

1

Luteolin-7-O-β-D- glucopyranoside

1.66

205, 255–266, 348

447.09/ -

64.92

116.63

93.82

UV, MS, Ref.

2

Apigenin 7-O-glucoside (cosmosiin)

9.20

233, 269

431.10/ -

32.72

28.59

26.63

UV, MS, Ref.

3

Rosmarinic acid

16.65

234, 290, 329

359.07/ -

938.82

963.96

952.33

UV, MS, Ref., St.

4

Luteolin 3′-O-β-D-glucuronide

17.11

236, 267, 340

461.07/ -

246.48

246.27

252.05

UV, MS, Ref.

5

Luteolin

20.13

232, 267, 344

285.04/ -

20.96

15.78

24.97

UV, MS, Ref., St.

6

Apigenin

22.46

232,268,337

269.04/ -

43.15

42.26

35.86

UV, MS, Ref., St.

7

Cirsimaritin

23.2

276, 232,234

313.07/ -

45.87

42.38

36.48

UV, MS, Ref., St.

8

Isokaempferide

24.68

232, 266, 350

299.05/ -

54.86

31.57

54.35

UV, MS, Ref., St.

9

Penduletin

26.36

234, 272, 340

343.08/345.09

44.69

16.33

80.21

UV, MS, Ref.

10

Xanthomicrol

27.7

232, 282, 333

343.08/345.09

81.75

31.09

140.17

UV, MS, Ref., St.

11

Calycopterin

30.24

233, 278, 337

373.09/375.10

9.06

61.41

193.20

UV, MS, Ref., St.

RT, retention time; Ref or reference, means that compound previously reported by other researchers.

The analytical method applied in this study lending to chromatographic peaks separation shown in Figure 3. In this study quantity of phenolic and flavonoid compounds shown in Table 4. Although the content of hydroxyflavones (apigenin and cosmosiin) was not significantly changed by tetraploidy induction, the results showed that the content of methoxylated flavones (penduletin, xanthomicrol and calycopterin) were increased in tetraploid plants (Table 4). As the ploidy level increased, the percentage of calycopterin, xanthomicrol, penduletin, luteolin, luteolin 3′–O–β-D-glucuronide, rosmarinic acid and luteolin-7-O-β-D- glucopyranoside within the total flavonol pool increased, while the relative concentration of cosmosiin, apigenin, cirsimaritin and isokaempferide decreased. The tetraploid plants could produce about 2 and 21 times higher xanthomicrol and calycopterin compared with their diploid parents, respectively.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-55-22/MediaObjects/40529_2013_Article_75_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Chromatograms of HPLC-DAD peaks corresponding to 1) Luteolin-7- O - β -D- glucopyranoside; 2) Apigenin 7-O-glucoside (cosmosiin); 3) Rosmarinic acid; 4) Luteolin 3′- O -.β.-D-glucuronide; 5) Luteolin; 6) Apigenin; 7) Cirsimaritin; 8) Isokaempferide; 9) Penduletin; 10) Xanthomicrol; 11) Calycopterin in: A) Diploid control plant, B) mixoploid, C) tetraploid plant.

Artificial polyploidy generally enhances the concentration of secondary metabolites (Lavania 2013). The mechanism to explain these changes relies on the assumption that chromosome doubling induces an increase in cell size the amount of genetic substance within the nuclei and the nuclear membrane decreases the chromatin is in contact with the nuclear membranes, thereby enhancing gene activity and photosynthetic rate on a per cell basis (Lavania and Lavania 2005; Levin 2002). It may be that with more chromatin coming into contact with the nuclear membrane due to the lower ratio of nuclear membrane to gene dosage after polyploidization, gene activity is elevated (Levin 2002). Changing the metabolic profile in autopolyploid plants by a simple duplication of the basic genome was interpreted as a cause of an alteration in the mechanism(s) which regulates the biosynthesis of individual compounds (Dehghan et al. 2012). Lipophilic flavonoid aglycones have a limited distribution in plants compared to their water-soluble glycosides. As they usually accumulate on the leaf surface, and are found in glandular trichomes or are extruded through the cuticle, they are known as surface or external flavonoids. Aglycone flavonoids, especially in the highly methylated form, accumulate in the Lamiaceae family (Tomás-Barberán and Wollenweber 1990). Therefore another possible reason for flavonoid methoxy enhancement can be because of high glandular trichomes stracture in tetraploid plants. To our knowledge there is only a few reports related to the effects of ploidy level on accumulation of medicinally important flavonoids. Griesbach and Kamo (1996) reported increasing of the major flavonols (quercetin-3-sophoroside) and decreasing of the minor flavonols (quercetin-3,7-diglucoside) in colchicine treated Petunia ‘Mitchell’. In another study Abdoli et al. (2013) reported a 71% and 45% increase in cholorgenic acid content and cichoric acid compounds of tetraploid leaves of Echinacea purpurea L., respectively. Similar results were also reported for different secondary compounds including apigenin (Švehlíková and Repčák 2000), artemisinin (Banyai et al. 2010), Phenylpropanoid content (Caruso et al. 2011) and scopolamine (Dehghan et al. 2012).

Conclusion

This study is the first report on induction and establishment of autotetraploid plants of D. kotschyi. The highest applied concentration (0.5% v/w) of colchicine, results in the induction of highest number of stable tetraploid plants. Induction of tetraploidy significantly affected different morphological, microscopic, physiological and biochemical characteristics of D. kotschyi. These changes suggested ploidy manipulation as a rapid and effective method for enhancing genetic diversity and metabolite production of D. kotschyi.

Abbreviations

HPLC–DAD: 

High-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection

FCM: 

Flow cytometry

LN: 

Leaf number

PH: 

Plant height

LBN: 

Lateral branches number

SD: 

Stem diameter

InL: 

Inflorescence length

NFIn: 

Number of flower in inflorescence

FH: 

Flower height

LL: 

Leaf length

LW: 

Leaf width

LD: 

Leaf diameter.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Urmia University, Iran.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Student of Medicinal Plants, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University
(2)
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University
(3)
Ph.D. Biotechnology and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
(4)
Department of Chemistry, University of Isfahan

References

  1. Abd El-Naby ZM, Mohamed NA, Radwan KH, El-Khishin DA: Colchicine induction of polyploidy in Egyptian clover genotypes. J Am Sci 2012, 8(10):221–227.Google Scholar
  2. Abdoli M, Moieni A, Badi HN: Morphological, physiological, cytological and phytochemical studies in diploid and colchicine-induced tetraploid plants of Echinacea purpurea L. Acta Physiol Plant 2013., 1–9: doi:10.1007/s11738–013–1242–9 doi:10.1007/s11738-013-1242-9Google Scholar
  3. Adaniya S, Shirai D: In vitro induction of tetraploid ginger ( Zingiber officinale Roscoe) and its pollen fertility and germinability. Sci Hortic 2001, 88(4):277–287. 10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00212-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ade R, Kumar Rai M: Review: colchicine, current advances and future prospects. Nusant Biosci 2010, 2(2):90–96.Google Scholar
  5. Aina O, Quesenberry K, Gallo M: In vitro induction of tetraploids in Arachis paraguariensis . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012., 1–8: doi:10.1007/s11240–012–0191–0 doi:10.1007/s11240-012-0191-0Google Scholar
  6. Amirghofran Z, Azadbakht M, Karimi MH: Evaluation of the immunomodulatory effects of five herbal plants. J ethnopharmacol 2000, 72(1):167–172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Amiri S, Kazemitabaar S, Ranjbar G, Azadbakht M: The effect of trifluralin and colchicine treatments on morphological characteristics of jimsonweed ( Datura Stramonium L.). Trakia J Sci 2010, 8(4):47–61.Google Scholar
  8. Arnon DI: Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant physiol 1949, 24(1):1–15. 10.1104/pp.24.1.1View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Banyai W, Sangthong R, Karaket N, Inthima P, Mii M, Supaibulwatana K: Overproduction of artemisinin in tetraploid Artemisia annua L. Plant biotechnol 2010, 27(5):427–433. 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.10.0726aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Caruso I, Lepore L, De Tommasi N, Dal Piaz F, Frusciante L, Aversano R, Garramone R, Carputo D: Secondary metabolite profile in induced tetraploids of wild Solanum commersonii Dun. Chem Biodivers 2011, 8(12):2226–2237. 10.1002/cbdv.201100038View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen L-L, Gao S-L: In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in Astragalus membranaceus . Sci Hortic 2007, 112(3):339–344. 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.045View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. De Jesus L: Effects of artificial polyploidy in transformed roots of Artemisia annua L. Worcester Polytechnic Institue: Dissertation; 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Dehghan E, Häkkinen ST, Oksman-Caldentey K-M, Ahmadi FS: Production of tropane alkaloids in diploid and tetraploid plants and in vitro hairy root cultures of Egyptian henbane ( Hyoscyamus muticus L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012, 110(1):35–44. 10.1007/s11240-012-0127-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhawan O, Lavania U: Enhancing the productivity of secondary metabolites via induced polyploidy: a review. Euphytica 1996, 87(2):81–89. 10.1007/BF00021879View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebrahim Sajjadi S, Movahedian Atar A, Yektaian A: Antihyperlipidemic effect of hydroalcoholic extract, and polyphenolic fraction from Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. Pharm Acta Helv 1998, 73(3):167–170. 10.1016/S0031-6865(98)00016-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Faham N, Javidnia K, Bahmani M, Amirghofran Z: Calycopterin, an immunoinhibitory compound from the extract of Dracocephalum kotschyi . Phytother Res 2008, 22(9):1154–1158. 10.1002/ptr.2382View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fattahi M: Evaluation of morphological, phytochemical diversity and hairy root production in Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss. Dissertation: University of Tehran, Iran; 2012.Google Scholar
  18. Fattahi M, Nazeri V, Sefidkon F, Zamani Z, Palazon J: The effect of pre-sowing treatments and light on seed germination of Dracocephalum kotschyi Boiss: An endangered medicinal plant in Iran. Hort Environ Biotechnol 2011, 52(6):559–566. 10.1007/s13580-011-0057-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fattahi M, Nazeri V, Torras-Claveria L, Sefidkon F, Cusido RM, Zamani Z, Palazon J: Identification and quantification of leaf surface flavonoids in wild-growing populations of Dracocephalum kotschyi by LC–DAD–ESI-MS. Food Chem 2013, 141(1):139–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.019 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.019View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gantait S, Mandal N, Bhattacharyya S, Das PK: Induction and identification of tetraploids using in vitro colchicine treatment of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus cv. Sciella. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2011, 106(3):485–493. 10.1007/s11240-011-9947-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghahreman A: Flore de iranica en couleur naturelle, faculty of science. University of Tehran; 1987:432.Google Scholar
  22. Gohari AR, Saeidnia S, Matsuo K, Uchiyama N, Yagura T, Ito M, Kiuchi F, Honda G: Flavonoid constituents of Dracocephalum kotschyi growing in Iran and their trypanocidal activity. Nat Med 2003, 57(6):250–252.Google Scholar
  23. Goli SAH, Sahafi SM, Rashidi B, Rahimmalek M: Novel oilseed of Dracocephalum kotschyi with high n-3 to n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio. Ind Crop Prod 2013, 43: 188–193.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Golshani S, Karamkhani F, Monsef-Esfehani HR, Abdollahi M: Antinociceptive effects of the essential oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi in the mouse writhing test. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2004, 7(1):76–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenham J, Harborne JB, Williams CA: Identification of lipophilic flavones and flavonols by comparative HPLC, TLC and UV spectral analysis. Phytochem Anal 2003, 14(2):100–118. 10.1002/pca.693View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Griesbach R, Kamo K: The effect of induced polyploidy on the flavonols of Petunia ‘Mitchell’. Phytochem 1996, 42(2):361–363. 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00893-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamill S, Smith M, Dodd W: In vitro induction of banana autotetraploids by colchicine treatment of micropropagated diploids. Aust J Bot 1992, 40(6):887–896. 10.1071/BT9920887View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodgson J, Sharafi M, Jalili A, Díaz S, Montserrat-Martí G, Palmer C, Cerabolini B, Pierce S, Hamzehee B, Asri Y: Stomatal vs. genome size in angiosperms: the somatic tail wagging the genomic dog? Ann Bot 2010, 105(4):573–584. 10.1093/aob/mcq011View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Jahaniani F, Ebrahimi SA, Rahbar-Roshandel N, Mahmoudian M: Xanthomicrol is the main cytotoxic component of Dracocephalum kotschyi and a potential anti-cancer agent. Phytochem 2005, 66(13):1581–1592. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.04.035View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jalali A, Jamzad Z: Red data book of Iran: research institute of forests and rangelands Iran Tehran. 1999, 748.Google Scholar
  31. Lavania UC: Polyploidy, body size, and opportunities for genetic enhancement and fixation of heterozygosity in plants. Nucleus 2013, 56(1):1–6. 10.1007/s13237-013-0075-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lavania U, Lavania U: Genomic and ploidy manipulation for enhanced production of phyto-pharmaceuticals. Plant Genet Resour 2005, 3(2):170–177. 10.1079/PGR200576View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Levin DA: The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. USA: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  34. Li W, Sixiang Z, Zhijian G: In vitro culture of tetraploids of Aloe vera L. Acta Hort Sin 2002, 29(2):176–178.Google Scholar
  35. Lin X, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Lu X, Zhang F, Shen Q, Wu S, Chen Y, Wang T, Tang K: Enhancement of artemisinin content in tetraploid Artemisia annua plants by modulating the expression of genes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. Biotechnol and Appl Biochem 2011, 58(1):50–57. 10.1002/bab.13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Majdi M, Karimzadeh G, Malboobi MA, Omidbaigi R, Mirzaghaderi G: Induction of tetraploidy to feverfew ( Tanacetum parthenium Schulz-Bip.): morphological, physiological, cytological, and phytochemical changes. HortSci 2010, 45(1):16–21.Google Scholar
  37. Middleton E, Kandaswami C, Theoharides TC: The effects of plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease, and cancer. Pharmacol rev 2000, 52(4):673–751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moghaddam G, Ebrahimi SA, Rahbar‒Roshandel N, Foroumadi A: Antiproliferative activity of flavonoids: influence of the sequential methoxylation state of the flavonoid structure. Phytother Res 2012, 26: 1023–1028. 10.1002/ptr.3678View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Monsef-Esfahani H, Karamkhani F, Nickavar B, Abdi K, Faramarzi M: The volatile constituents of Dracocephalum kotschyi oils. Chem Nat Compd 2007, 43(1):40–43. 10.1007/s10600-007-0027-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Omidbaigi R, Mirzaee M, Hassani M, Moghadam M: Induction and identification of polyploidy in basil ( Ocimum basilicum L.) medicinal plant by colchicine treatment. Int J Plant Prod 2010, 4(2):87–98.Google Scholar
  41. Omidbaigi R, Yavari S, Hassani ME, Yavari S: Induction of autotetraploidy in dragonhead ( Dracocephalum moldavica L.) by colchicine treatment. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 2010, 18(1):23–35.Google Scholar
  42. Rêgo M, Rêgo E, Bruckner C, Finger F, Otoni W: In vitro induction of autotetraploids from diploid yellow passion fruit mediated by colchicine and oryzalin. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2011, 107(3):451–459. 10.1007/s11240-011-9995-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Roy A, Leggett G, Koutoulis A: In vitro tetraploid induction and generation of tetraploids from mixoploids in hop ( Humulus lupulus L.). Plant Cell Rep 2001, 20(6):489–495. 10.1007/s002990100364View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Saeidnia S, Gohari A, Hadjiakhoondi A, Shafiee A: Bioactive compounds of the volatile oil of Dracocephalum kotschyi : Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, A. J biosci 2007, 62(11):793–796.Google Scholar
  45. Saharkhiz MJ: The effects of some environmental factors and ploidy level on morphological and physiological characteristics of feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium L.) medicinal ornamental plant. Iran: Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University; 2007.Google Scholar
  46. Shahriari F, Dehghan E, Farsi M: Tetraploid induction of Hyoscyamus muticus L. using colchicine treatment. In Proceedings of the 14th Austalasian plant breeding, 11th SABRAO conference. Australia; 2009.Google Scholar
  47. Song C, Liu S, Xiao J, He W, Zhou Y, Qin Q, Zhang C, Liu Y: Polyploid organisms. Sci China Life Sci 2012, 55(4):301–311. 10.1007/s11427-012-4310-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stebbins G: Polyploidy and the distribution of the arctic-alpine flora: new evidence and a new approach. Bot Helv 1984, 94(1):1–13.Google Scholar
  49. Švehlíková V, Repčák M: Variation of apigenin quantity in diploid and tetraploid Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert. Plant Biol 2000, 2(4):403–407. 10.1055/s-2000-5957View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tang Z-Q, Chen D-L, Song Z-J, He Y-C, Cai D-T: In vitro induction and identification of tetraploid plants of Paulownia tomentosa . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2010, 102(2):213–220. 10.1007/s11240-010-9724-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Tomás-Barberán FA, Wollenweber E: Flavonoid aglycones from the leaf surfaces of some Labiatae species. Plant Syst Evol 1990, 173(3):109–118. doi:10.1007/bf00940856 doi:10.1007/bf00940856View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Urwin NA, Horsnell J, Moon T: Generation and characterisation of colchicine-induced autotetraploid Lavandula angustifolia . Euphytica 2007, 156(1–2):257–266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Viehmannová I, Trávníčková M, Špatenková E, Černá M, Trávníček P: Induced polyploidization and its influence on yield, morphological, and qualitative characteristics of microtubers in Ullucus tuberosus . Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2012., 1–8: doi:10.1007/s11240–011–0076–7 doi:10.1007/s11240-011-0076-7Google Scholar
  54. Vieira RF, Grayer RJ, Paton A, Simon JE: Genetic diversity of Ocimum gratissimum L. based on volatile oil constituents, flavonoids and RAPD markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 2001, 29(3):287–304. doi:10.1016/s0305–1978(00)00062–4 doi:10.1016/s0305-1978(00)00062-4 10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00062-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Xing S-H, Guo X-B, Wang Q, Pan Q-F, Tian Y-S, Liu P, Zhao J-Y, Wang G-F, Sun X-F, Tang K-X: Induction and flow cytometry identification of tetraploids from seed-derived explants through colchicine treatments in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. J Biomed Biotechnol 1–10 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/793198 doi:10.1155/2011/793198Google Scholar
  56. Zhang X-Y, Hu C-G, Yao J-L: Tetraploidization of diploid Dioscorea results in activation of the antioxidant defense system and increased heat tolerance. J plant physiol 2010, 167(2):88–94. 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zahedi et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.