Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.159

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Salt tolerance mechanisms in Salt Tolerant Grasses (STGs) and their prospects in cereal crop improvement

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201455:31

DOI: 10.1186/1999-3110-55-31

Received: 17 January 2014

Accepted: 10 March 2014

Published: 14 March 2014

Abstract

Increasing soil salinity in the agricultural fields all over the world is a matter of concern. Salinity poses a serious threat to the normal growth and development of crop plants. What adds to the concern is that all the cereal crops are sensitive to increasing soil salinity. So it is implacable to either search for salinity resistant varieties of crop plants or transform them genetically to sustain growth and reproducibility at increasing salinity stress. For the second perspective, mining the salt tolerant genes in the close relatives of cereal crops apparently becomes important, and most specifically in the salt tolerant grasses (STGs). STGs include the halophytes, facultative halophytes and salt-tolerant glycophytes of the family Poaceae. In this review the potentiality of STGs has been evaluated for increasing the salinity tolerance of cereal crops. STGs are capable of surviving at increasing salt stress by utilizing different mechanisms that include vacuolization of toxic Na+ and Cl- in mature or senescing leaves, secretion of excess salts by salt glands, accumulation of osmolytes like proline and glycine betaine, and scavenging of ROS by antioxidative enzymes. The STGs are a therefore a potent source of salt tolerant genes.

Keywords

Salt tolerant grasses (STGs) Osmoprotectants Reactive oxygen species (ROS) Model STGs Transgenic plants

Review

Introduction

Salinity is one of the major abiotic stresses that hinder the performance of the crop plants all over the world. In most crop plants, the main toxic component of salinity is Na+ and Cl-, which interferes with the normal physiological processes, such as enzyme activities and protein synthesis, as well as causing osmotic imbalances (Munns and Tester 2008). Due to these toxic effects, crops grown on saline soils have significantly reduced yield (Lauchli and Grattan 2007). According to UNEP Report, globally some 20% of agricultural land under irrigation has become salt affected (Nellemann et al. 2009). It is known that 40% of the increase in food production over the last 50 years came from irrigated land (Prakash and Stigler 2012). Also the world population is estimated to double in the next 50 years, so greater yield is required to feed the growing population (Chaves and Davies 2010). The agricultural scenario is thus getting worse as the agricultural land is limited and salt-resistant varieties of crop plants are not available, so there is an emergent need to make the crop plants suitable to this changing scenario.

In this situation, one of the ways is to make the crop plants genetically engineered to sustain their growth and productivity in such challenging environment. For this purpose, it is important to look among the wild relatives of crop plants that carry a good gene pool (Sengupta and Majumder 2009). According to Tester and Bacic (2005), tracing the abiotic stress related genes in the grasses, which are close relatives of cereal crops could lead to the better understanding of the mechanism of salinity tolerance and even introgressing their genes in the cereal genome for inducting better tolerance to salinity. The salt sensitivity of all the grasses is not similar to the cereals and some of these grasses have inherent ability to withstand varying degrees of salt concentrations. According to Flowers et al.(2010), the order Poales accounts for approximately 8.1% of the total halophytic species. (Flowers and Colmer 2008) has defined a halophytic species as one that can survive to complete their life cycle in at least 200 mM salt solution. In the last decade the attempt for mining more and more salt tolerant genes from the grasses has increased gradually, also the genes have been characterized and transformed in different model plants to test their efficacy in enhancing salinity tolerance.

In this review, term ‘Salt Tolerant Grasses (STGs)’ has been used for all the grass species including the halophytes, facultative halophytes and salt-tolerant glycophytes. These STGs are a potent source of salt tolerant genes, supported by the occurrence of several traits that works constitutively for imparting salinity tolerance. Thus the STGs offer an ideal system for comparative studies with other cereal crops for mining out more and more novel genes for salt tolerance. Also the non STGs including the cereal crops are also the source of salt tolerant genes, but the prime focus of this review will be on the STGs to understand their salt tolerance mechanism and assess their potentiality as a source of genes for improving the salt tolerance of cereal crops.

STGs: an overview

The grass family (Poaceae) comprises approximately 10000 species classified in to 600–700 genera (Watson and Dallwitz 1992). According to Gorham et al. (1985) two different mechanisms of salt tolerance are present in plant species growing at high salinities. In succulent Chenopodiaceae, osmotic balance is maintained by the accumulation of Na+ and Cl- in shoots followed by synthesis of osmolytes like glycine betaine. In halophytic grasses on the other hand, salt tolerance is mainly achieved either by limiting the influx of salts into the shoots, which results in reduced growth rates under saline conditions or by excluding the excess salt by salt glands. Liphschitz and Waisel (1974) reported 25 species of grasses where salt glands were observed of which mostly were glycophytic, and their distribution was confined to non-saline habitats. Most of the grasses like Distichlis, Aeluropus of the tribe Aeluropodeae are typically halophytes (Liphschitz and Waisel 1974; Barhoumi et al. 2008; Oross and Thomson 1982). Halophytic grasses are highly salt tolerant due to their ability to exclude salt from the internal tissues. Tolerance to salinity in the halophytic grasses like Puccinellia and Thinopyrum is facilitated by the development of adventitious roots and a superior ability to maintain negative membrane potential in root cells, resulting in greater retention of K+ in shoots (Teakle et al. 2013). Also in most of the glycophytic grasses like Cynodon, Sporobolus, Zoysia and Buchloe salinity tolerance was positively correlated with Na+ and Cl- secretion through salt glands (Marcum 1999). This indicates that the presence of salt glands and Na+ exclusion is an important criterion for the primary selection of STGs from the grass species, however the exact mechanism of salinity tolerance in STGs may differ from species to species. Some of the STG species that are discussed in this review for their salt tolerant genes are recorded in Table 1 with their most probable salt tolerance mechanisms that have been focused in different transgenic experiments.
Table 1

STGs and their probable mechanism of action for salt tolerance

Grass genera

Mechanism of action

Agropyron

Compartmentation of ions, Na+ ion exclusion

Aeluropus

Compartmentation of ions in to vacuoles

Chloris

Enhanced ROS scavenging enzymes

Leymus

Osmolyte accumulation

Paspalum

Osmolyte accumulation

Pennisetum

Compartmentation of ions in to vacuoles

Porteresia

Osmolyte accumulation

Puccinellia

Enhanced ROS scavenging enzymes, Na+ ion exclusion

Spartina

Compartmentation of ions in to vacuoles

Mechanisms of salt tolerance in STGs

The survivability of STGs in saline environment depends greatly up on the art of handling the toxic Na+ and replacing it with K+. This is known as the selectivity of K+ over Na+. Net selectivity (SK: Na) is defined as the ratio of K+ concentration in the plant tissue to that in the medium divided by the ratio of Na+ concentration in the plant to that in the medium, which varies between families of flowering plants (Flowers et al. 1986). According to Flowers and Colmer (2008) SK: Na value in flowering plants ranges between average values of 9 and 60 with an overall mean of 19. In the order Poales the SK: Na values of as high as 60 are found. This makes the grasses a strong subject for studying the ion interactions. Marcum (1999) in his studies on the chloridoid grasses and their salinity tolerance mechanisms pointed out that the tolerance was associated with Na+ exclusion through the salt glands present on the epidermis of leaves and with accumulation of the compatible solutes like glycine betaine. The overall mechanisms of tolerance in the salt tolerant grasses are summarised in Figure 1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-55-31/MediaObjects/40529_2014_Article_87_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Generalized scheme showing the different aspects of salinity tolerance in salt tolerant grasses (STGs). UE- upper epidermis, LE- lower epidermis, BS- bundle sheath, MC- mesophyll cell, VB- vascular bundle, AS- air space beneath stoma, SG- salt gland, A- apical cell, B- Basal cell, M- mitochondria, C– channel proteins, V- vacuole.

Tissue-specific compartmentalisation appears to play an important role in most of the grasses (Lessani and Marschner 1978; Taleisnik 1989; Bhatti et al. 1993), where the toxic ions like Na+ and Cl- are redistributed to the mature or senescing leaves and other organs. It is widely accepted that cell turgor is maintained by storage of Na+ and Cl- in vacuoles, with the solute potential of the cytosol adjusted by accumulation of K+ and organic solutes (Storey 1995). Evidence exists for the presence of K+/Na+ transporter channels across the tonoplast mediated by Na+/H+ antiport activity, resulting in compartmentation of toxic ions in the vacuoles (Jeschke 1984). Ideally in grasses, Na+ and Cl- are largely sequestered in the vacuole of the cell, this sequestering is indicated by the high concentrations of these ions in leaves that are still functioning normally mainly by osmotic adjustments (Marcum 1999).

Salt glands and bladders are the most remarkable organs found in some halophytes which arise from epidermal cells and are modified trichomes (Adams et al. 1998). These specialized organs are meant for secretion of toxic ions from the internal part of plant tissues. The salt glands also appear in the STGs that confers increased salinity tolerance in these plants. Salt glands are usually not found in non halophytes (Ramadan and Flowers 2004). Salt glands appear mostly in the mesophyll tissue of C4 grasses. The efficiency of Na+ exclusion determines the salt tolerance of a particular species (Marcum 2006). Salt glands are generally bicelled in grasses. In Poaceae, bicellular salt glands are found commonly in the tribes: Chlorideae, Sporoboleae and Aeluropodeae (Liphschitz and Waisel 1974). Salt gland excretion in grasses is highly selective for toxic ions like Na+ and Cl- (Worku and Chapman 1998), although other ions like K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ may also be excreted in small amounts (Marcum and Murdoch 1994). The loading of toxic ions from the adjacent cells in to the salt gland is energy dependent (Naidoo and Naidoo 1999). Flowers et al. (1990) attributed the ability of maintaining a high K:Na ratio in the leaves to the secretion of toxic ions from the leaves. Most of the grass species, which are glycophyte in their habit, can tolerate high levels of salinity due to the presence of salt glands, and also the possession of salt glands suggests that they had a common halophytic ancestor (Liphschitz and Waisel 1974).

Under salinity stress, the osmotic potential of the cytoplasm and organelles is maintained by the accumulation of organic solutes termed as compatible solutes (Flowers et al. 1977; Wyn Jones and Gorham 1983). At lower concentrations, these solutes works by stabilizing the tertiary structure of proteins and enzymes, and function as osmoprotectants (Rhodes et al. 2002). The most likely candidate in the STGs that plays an important role in maintaining the osmotic balance of the plant cells are glycine betaine and proline (Gorham et al. 1986; Rhodes and Hanson 1993). Marcum (1999) in his experiments with Chloridoid grasses found that glycine betaine concentrations under salinity were positively correlated with salinity tolerance in Chloridoid grasses. Lee et al. (2008) reported synthesis of organic compounds in response to salinity stress and their contribution in osmotic adjustments in seashore paspalum grass (Paspalum vaginatum). Organic osmolytes that accumulated most importantly in seashore paspalum under salinity stress were proline, glycine betaine, and trigonelline. Marcum and Murdoch (1994) reported that high accumulation of proline in Cynodon dactylon kept was associated with the maintenance of osmotic balance, thus providing increased salt tolerance. The accumulation of glycine betaine in salt tolerant grasses like Cynodon and Spartina were found to be higher than those reported in wheat, sorghum, and other glycophytic grasses (Grieve and Maas 1984; Wyn Jones and Storey 1981). According to Sengupta et al. (2008), inositols like myo-inositol and pinitol also play an important role in stress tolerance mechanism of salt tolerant grasses like Porteresia coarctata.

Accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plant tissues is highly deteriorating as it can cause oxidative damage to proteins, DNA and lipids (Miller et al. 2010). According to Jitesh et al. (2006) most of the halophytes have shown increased efficiency of antioxidative enzymes that helps to negate the harmful effect of ROS. Similarly the STGs also seem to control the Na+ induced production of ROS by the increased activity of antioxidative enzymes. Muscolo et al. (2003) studied the activities of different antioxidative enzymes in Pennisetum clandestinum in relation to salinity and found that the grass was tolerant to salt stress up to 100 mM NaCl due to the up-regulation of ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase enzymes. Seckin et al. (2010) pointed the role of isozymes of antioxidative enzymes such as peroxidase (POX), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APOX) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in conferring salt tolerance to Hordeum marinum (sea barley grass) plants even at high concentration of NaCl (300 mM), in comparison to Hordeum vulgare (cultivated barley).

Prospect of STGs in cereal crop improvement

Model STGs for cereal crop improvement

Rice (Oryza sativa) is considered a model plant in monocots because of the relatively small size of its genome, which consists of about 430 Mbp and about 30,000 genes (Komatsu et al. 2003). Apart from rice, Brachypodium distachyon has recently emerged as a model system for grass crop genomic research (Hong et al. 2008). But these model plants are glycophytes and naturally lack the ability to adapt and survive in a saline environment, so they are not ideally suited for the dissection of salt stress related genes. Salt tolerance is a complex trait, and therefore requires intensive studies on the tolerance mechanisms of the salt tolerant species of Poaceae (STGs).

Sengupta and Majumder (2010) proposed Porteresia coarctata, a wild rice, as a potential model for studying salt stress biology in rice. The unique characteristic of this halophytic STG to survive at higher salt concentrations by secretion of excess salts through the leaves has drawn the attention towards it. Due to the availability of complete proteomic information of rice, comparative proteomic study of Porteresia in detail would serve the purpose of identification of newer genes and unique salt tolerance mechanisms in the later (Sengupta and Majumder 2009). Also recently Subudhi and Baisakh (2011) proposed Spartina alterniflora, as a potent halophytic grass model, as it possesses all known mechanisms of salt tolerance. A comparative analysis of DNA sequences of a full-length myoinositol-1-phosphate synthase gene of S. alterniflora (SaMIPS) revealed that it is closer to grass species like maize and rice (Baisakh et al. 2008). Other grasses such as Aeluropus littoralis and Puccinellia tenuiflora also has the potential to become an important source of salt tolerant genes to improve cereal crops (Zouari et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2007). Recent interest on exploring the economically unimportant wild grasses for salt tolerant genes for crop improvement is increasing rapidly and as a result new grasses are being proposed as models for dissection of salt tolerance mechanism and the associated genes. With recent advances, it has become very difficult to concentrate up on a particular species as a model plant. Therefore, it is better to club these potent model plants together, so that the elements of salinity tolerance can be studied together and comparatively. In Figure 2 we have summarized briefly the tools and techniques by which the STG model plants could be employed for cereal crop improvement.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1999-3110-55-31/MediaObjects/40529_2014_Article_87_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

An outline of tools and techniques through which STG model plants can be employed for cereal crop improvement.

Genes conferring salinity tolerance in STGs

A significant progress has been made for the identification of genes and their products, which play an important role in the plant system for overcoming the unfavourable situations of abiotic stresses (Cushman and Bohnert 2000). There are several papers published, that documents intensive works on genetic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance and development of transgenics using different candidate genes (Wu et al. 2005; Roy et al. 2011; Reguera et al. 2012). A number of studies for the identification and characterization of genes have also been done in STGs in response to salinity. Subudhi and Baisakh (2011) reported a number of candidate genes encoding transcription factors, ion transporters, osmoprotectants and antioxidants from salt tolerant Spartina alterniflora, upregulated during salt stress. Earlier, analysis of the expression pattern of other genes like cation transport protein (SaCTP), vacuolar ATPase (SaV-ATPase), and plasma membrane protein 3 (SaPMP3) in both leaf and root tissues by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) revealed clear upregulation under salt stress compared to the unstressed control (Baisakh et al. 2008). A number of genes have also been isolated and characterized from Porteresia coarctata that are related to the salt tolerance property of the plant, specially the genes operational in inositol metabolic pathway such as myoinositol phosphate synthase (PcMIPS) has been analysed in details (Sengupta and Majumder 2009). A putative UDP galactose epimerase gene and a metallothioneine gene was reported to play an important role in conferring salt tolerance to salt tolerant plants of Paspalum vaginatum (Endo et al. 2005). Wang et al. (2007) identified 162 unique transcripts corresponding to possible salt-related genes in P tenuiflora. Expression of transcripts encoding an aquaporin, V-ATPase subunit B, and the Na+/H+ antiporter NHX was characterized from the salt tolerant Festuca rubra ssp. litoralis under salt stress (Diedhiou et al. 2009). Characterization of salt induced ESTs in salt tolerant Aeluropus littoralis revealed that about 20% of the ESTs bear no resemblance in the protein database and are thus novel (Zouari et al. 2007). The analysis of such ESTs could be important in the development of salt tolerant transgenic cereal crops. A significant number of similar studies on other STGs and also in the glycophytic grasses is required to generated a huge database of genes and ESTs that has salt tolerant attributes.

Transgenic approaches with genes from STGs

There is an increasing interest to test the novelty of salt tolerant genes through development of transgenic plants. Increased salinity tolerance have been achieved in a range of plant species over expressing NHX gene from the halophytes and non-halophytes, which indicates that these genes are involved in Na+ tolerance in plants (Guo et al. 2006). Transgenic approaches to salt tolerance are largely achieved through the overexpression of the genes involved in Na+ exclusion from the root or leaves and Na+ compartmentalization in the vacuoles (Wang et al. 2003; Bhatnagar-Mathur et al. 2008). In the past decade, vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporters have been the centre of attention in transgenic studies for the alleviation of Na+ induced toxicity in plants (Zhang and Blumwald 2001; Vera Estrella et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2008). Several Na+/H+ antiporter genes have been characterized from STGs and have been showed to impart salt tolerance in transgenic experiments (Qiao et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2008). Also other genes such as myo-inositol phosphate synthase, ascorbate peroxidase and other transcription factors different STGs and are shown to impart salinity tolerance in transgenic experiments (Majee et al. 2004; Guan et al. 2011; Cheng et al. 2013). Some of the salt tolerant genes derived from STGs that conferred salinity tolerance in different transgenic experiments are listed in Table 2. Some of the salt tolerant genes from non STGs (exclusively grasses) are also mentioned.
Table 2

Genes from STGs and non-STGs imparting enhanced salinity tolerance in transgenic studies

Source

Gene

Description

Target organism

Inference

Reference

Agropyron elongatum*

AeNHX1

Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter

Arabidopsis sp.

Root specific compartmentation of Na+ ions

Qiao et al. 2007

Festuca sp.

Aeluropus littoralis*

AlNHX1

Vacuolar Na+/K+ antiporters

Nicotiana tabacum

Compartmentalize more Na+ in roots and keep a relatively high K+/Na+ ratio in leaves

Zhang et al. 2008

AlSAP

Two conserved zinc-finger domains A20 and AN1

Nicotiana tabacum

Transgenic plants able to set seed at up to 350 mM NaCl

Saad et al. 2010

Chloris virgata*

ChlMT1

Metallothioneine

Saccharomyces

Increases tolerance to salinity and ROS

Nishiuchi et al. 2007

Hordeum vulgare

HVA1

Encodes a group of 3 late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins

Morus alba

Enhanced salinity tolerance by increased accumulation of proline

Lal et al. 2008

HvNHX2

Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter

Arabidopsis thaliana

Able to grow at 200 mM NaCl

Bayat et al. 2011

Leymus chinensis*

LcDREB3a

Dehydration-responsive element-binding transcription factor

Arabidopsis thaliana

Improved abiotic stress tolerance including salinity with no retardation in growth

Xianjun et al. 2011

LcMYB-1

MYB related transcription factor

Arabidopsis thaliana

Enhanced salinity tolerance due to increased accumulation of proline and soluble sugars

Cheng et al. 2013

Oryza rufipogon

OrbHLH001

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein gene

Arabidopsis thaliana

Improved salinity tolerance in transgenic plants

Li et al. 2010

Oryza sativa

OsNHX1

Na+/H+ antiporter

Populus sp.

transgenic plants grew normally in the presence of 200 mM/l NaCl

Wang et al. 2005

Paspalum vaginatum*

PvUGE1

Putative UDP-galactose epimerase

Oryza sativa

Enhanced salinity tolerance

Endo et al. 2005

PvMET1

Metallothioneine

Oryza sativa

Enhanced salinity tolerance

Endo et al. 2005

Pennisetum glaucum*

PgNHX1

Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter

Oryza sativa

Induced more extensive root system and completion of life cycle of rice at 150 mM NaCl

Verma et al. 2007

Porteresia coarctata*

PcINO1

Synthesis of L- myoinositol-1 phosphate synthase

Nicotiana tabacum

Tobacco plants showed growth in 200–300 mM NaCl

Majee et al.2004

PcSrp

Root-specific cDNA encoding serine-rich-protein

Eleusine coracana

Transgenic plants able to grow and set seed at 250 mM NaCl

Mahalakshmi et al.2006

Puccinellia tenuiflora*

PutAPx

Ascorbate peroxidase coding gene

Saccharomyces

Imparted higher resistance to salinity induced oxidative stress

Guan et al.2011

AKT-1-type-K + channel

Plasma membrane K+ channel protein

Arabidopsis thaliana

Increased accumulation of K+ ion as compared to Na+

Ardie et al. 2010

Spartina alterniflora*

SaVHAC1

Vacuolar H+ ATPase subunit C1

Oryza sativa

Enhanced salinity tolerance in rice

Baisakh et al. 2012

SaSce9

Small ubiquitin related modifier (SUMO) conjugating enzyme

Arabidopsis thaliana

Enhanced salinity and drought tolerance by inducing stress responsive genes

Karan and Subudhi 2012

Triticum aestivum

TaNIP

Nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein (novel aquaporin gene)

Arabidopsis thaliana

Enhanced salt tolerance by accumulation of higher K+ and proline

Gao et al. 2010

TaST

Unknown salt-induced gene

Arabidopsis thaliana

Enhanced salt tolerance by accumulating more Ca2+, soluble sugar, and proline and less Na+

Huang et al. 2012

TaNHX2

Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter

Medicago sativa

Enhanced salt tolerance

Zhang et al. 2012

Zea mays

ZmPMP3-1

Plasma membrane protein

Arabidopsis thaliana

Enhanced salinity tolerance by regulation of ion homeostasis and ROS scavenging

Fu et al. 2012

(*) indicates Grasses considered as STG model plants.

Conclusion

STGs offer a promising system for the analysis of the mechanisms associated with salinity stress tolerance. The inherent potentiality of these grasses to counteract the negative impacts of salinity is very encouraging for the dissection of more and more novel salt tolerant genes. Also due to their close affinity to the cereal crops, the success of transgenic experiments with the genes from STGs in cereal crops is expected to be very pronounced. Salt tolerance is a complex physiological trait and it has been very difficult to translate the outcome of laboratory experiments in the field, which urges the need for increasing the evaluation of transgenic plants under field conditions (Jewell et al. 2010). Moreover, the very fact that salt tolerance in grasses is an evolutionary labile trait and difficult to transfer in the cereal crops (Bennett et al. 2013), makes it a difficult proposition; still the STGs are emerging as an important plant system that will lead to improved understanding of the gene networks and molecular physiology of cereal crops under salinity stresses. Therefore, further exploration is needed to test the contribution of single or multiple salt stress related genes or regulatory factors from the STGs including Spartina alterniflora, Porteresia coarctata, Puccinellia tenuiflora, Aeluropus littoralis, Agropyron elongatum and other potent STGs for possible utilization in cereal crop improvement.

Abbreviations

STGs: 

Salt tolerant grasses

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

POX: 

Peroxidase

CAT: 

Catalase

APOX: 

Ascorbate peroxidase

SOD: 

Superoxide dismutase

MIPS: 

Myoinositol phosphate synthase

CTP: 

Cation transport protein

PMP: 

Plasma membrane protein

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

ESTs: 

Expressed sequence tags.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of North Bengal

References

  1. Adams P, Nelson DE, Yamada S, Chmara W, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ, Griffiths H: Growth and development of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Aizoaceae). New Phytol 1998, 138: 171–190. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00111.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardie SW, Liu S, Takano T: Expression of the AKT1-type K(+) channel gene from Puccinellia tenuiflora , PutAKT1, enhances salt tolerance in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Rep 2010, 29(8):865–874. 10.1007/s00299-010-0872-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baisakh N, Rao MVR, Rajasekaran K, Subudhi P, Janda J, Galbraith D, Vanier C, Pereira A: Enhanced salt stress tolerance of rice plants expressing a vacuolar H + -ATPase subunit C1 (SaVHAC1) gene from the halophyte grass Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Plant Biotech J 2012, 10(4):453–464. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00678.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Baisakh N, Subudhi PK, Bhardwaj P: Primary responses to salt stress in a halophyte, smooth cordgrass ( Spartina alterniflora Loisel.). Funct Integr Genomic 2008, 8: 287–300. 10.1007/s10142-008-0075-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Barhoumi Z, Djebali W, Abdelly C, Chaibi W, Smaoui A: Ultrastructure of Aeluropus littoralis leaf salt glands under NaCl stress. Protoplasma 2008, 233: 195–202. 10.1007/s00709-008-0003-xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayat F, Shiran B, Belyaev DV: Overexpression of HvNHX2, a vacuolar Na + /H + antiporter gene from barley, improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana . Aust J Crop Sci 2011, 5(4):428–432.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett TH, Flowers TJ, Bromham L: Repeated evolution of salt-tolerance in grasses. Biol Lett 2013, 9(2):20130029. 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0029View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Vadez V, Sharma KK: Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: retrospect and prospects. Plant Cell Rep 2008, 27: 411–424. 10.1007/s00299-007-0474-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatti AS, Steinert S, Sarwar G, Hilpert A, Jeschke WD: Ion distribution in relation to leaf age in Leptochloa fusca (L.). Kunth. (kallar grass). I. K., Na, Ca and Mg. New Phytol 1993, 123: 539–545. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03766.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves M, Davies B: Drought effects and water use efficiency: improving crop production in dry environments. Funct Plant Biol 2010, 37: 3–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ: Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2000, 3: 117–124. 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00052-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng L, Li X, Huang X, Ma T, Liang Y, Ma X, Peng X, Jia J, Chen S, Chen Y, Deng B, Liu G: Overexpression of sheep grass R1-MYB transcription factor LcMYB1 confers salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol Bioch 2013, 70: 252–260.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Diedhiou CJ, Popova OV, Golldack D: Transcript profiling of the salt-tolerant Festuca rubra ssp. Litoralis reveals a regulatory network controlling salt acclimatization. J Plant Physiol 2009, 166(7):697–711. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Endo N, Yoshida K, Akiyoshi M, Yoshida Y, Hayashi N: Putative UDP-galactose epimerase and metallothioneine of Paspalum vaginatum enhanced the salt tolerance of rice, Oryza sativa L. from transplanting to harvest stages. Breeding Sci 2005, 55: 163–173. 10.1270/jsbbs.55.163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD: Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 2008, 179: 945–963. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Flowers TJ, Flowers SA, Hajibagheri MA, Yeo AR: Salt tolerance in halophytic wild rice, Porteresia coarctata Tateoka. New Phytol 1990, 114: 675–684. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00439.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Flowers TJ, Galal HK, Bromham L: Evolution of halophytes: multiple origins of salt tolerance in land plants. Funct Plant Biol 2010, 37: 604–612. 10.1071/FP09269View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Clipson NJW: Halophytes. Quart Rev Biol 1986, 61: 313–337. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1986.tb00657.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR: The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 1977, 28: 89–121. 10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.000513View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu J, Zhang DF, Liu YH, Ying S, Shi YS: Isolation and characterization of maize PMP3 genes involved in salt stress tolerance. PLoS One 2012, 7(2):e31101. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031101View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao Z, He X, Zhao B, Zhou C, Liang Y, Ge R, Shen Y, Huang Z: Overexpressing a putative aquaporin gene from wheat, TaNIP, enhances salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Physiol 2010, 51(5):767–775. 10.1093/pcp/pcq036View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorham J, Budrewicz E, McDonnell E, Wyn Jones RG: Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: salinity-induced changes in leaf solute composition of some perennial Triticeae. J Exp Bot 1986, 37: 1114–1128. 10.1093/jxb/37.8.1114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorham J, Wyn Jones RG, McDonnell E: Some mechanisms of salt tolerance in crop plants. Plant Soil 1985, 89: 15–40. 10.1007/BF02182231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Grieve CM, Maas EV: Betaine accumulation in salt-stressed sorghum. Physiol Plantarum 1984, 61: 167–171. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb05892.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Guan Q, Li L, Tetsuo T, Liu S: Cloning of an ascorbate peroxidase gene from Puccinellia tenuiflora and its expression analysis. Genom App Biol 2011, 28(4):631–639.Google Scholar
  26. Guo SL, Yin HB, Zhang X, Zhao FY, Li PH, Chen SH, Zhao YX, Zhang H: Molecular cloning and characterization of a vacuolar H + -pyrophosphatase gene, SsVP, from the halophyte Suaeda salsa and its overexpression increases salt and drought tolerance of Arabidopsis . Plant Mol Biol 2006, 60: 41–50. 10.1007/s11103-005-2417-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong SY, Seo PJ, Yang MS, Xiang F, Park CM: Exploring valid reference genes for gene expression studies in Brachypodium distachyon by real-time PCR. BMC Plant Biol 2008, 8: 112. 10.1186/1471-2229-8-112View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang X, Wang G, Shen Y, Huang Z: The wheat gene TaST can increase the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 2012, 31(2):339–347. 10.1007/s00299-011-1169-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeschke WD: K + -Na + exchange at cellular membranes, intracellular compartmentation of cations, and salt tolerance. In Salinity Tolerance in Plants. Edited by: Staples RC, Toenniessen GH. Wiley, New York; 1984:37–66.Google Scholar
  30. Jewell MC, Campbell BC, Godwin ID: Transgenic plants for abiotic stress resistance. In Transgenic Crop Plants. Edited by: Kole C, Michler CH, Abbott AG, Hall TC. Springer, Heidelberg; 2010:67–132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Jitesh MN, Prasanth SR, Sivaprakash KR, Parida AK: Antioxidant response mechanism in halophytes: their role in stress defence. J Gen 2006, 85(3):237–254. 10.1007/BF02935340View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Karan R, Subudhi PK: A stress inducible SUMO conjugating enzyme gene (SaSce9) from a grass halophyte Spartina alterniflora enhances salinity and drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis . BMC Plant Biol 2012, 12: 187. 10.1186/1471-2229-12-187View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Komatsu S, Konishi H, Shen S, Yang G: Rice proteomics: a step toward functional analysis of the rice genome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003, 2: 2–10. 10.1074/mcp.R200008-MCP200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lal S, Gulyani V, Khurana P: Overexpression of HVA1 gene from barley generates tolerance to salinity and water stress in transgenic mulberry ( Morus indica ). Transgenic Res 2008, 17(4):651–663. 10.1007/s11248-007-9145-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lauchli A, Grattan SR: Plant growth and development under salinity stress. In Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Edited by: Jenks MA, Hasegawa PM, Jain SM. Springer, Heidelberg; 2007:1–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee GJ, Carrow RN, Duncan RR, Eiteman MA, Rieger MW: Synthesis of organic osmolytes and salt tolerance mechanisms in Paspalum vaginatum . Environ Exp Bot 2008, 63: 19–27. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lessani H, Marschner H: Relation between salt tolerance and long-distance transport of sodium and chloride in various crop species. Aust J Plant Physiol 1978, 5: 27–37. 10.1071/PP9780027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Li F, Guo S, Zhao Y, Chen D, Chong K, Xu Y: Overexpression of a homopeptide repeat-containing bHLH protein gene (OrbHLH001) from Dongxiang Wild Rice confers freezing and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Rep 2010, 29: 977–986. 10.1007/s00299-010-0883-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Liphschitz N, Waisel Y: Existence of salt glands in various genera of Gramineae. New Phytol 1974, 73: 507–513. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1974.tb02129.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu H, Wang Q, Yu M, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Zhang H: Transgenic salt-tolerant sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) constitutively overexpressing an Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar Na + /H + antiporter gene, AtNHX3, accumulates more soluble sugar but less salt in storage root. Plant Cell Environ 2008, 31: 1325–1334. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01838.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahalakshmi S, Christopher GSB, Reddy TP, Rao KV, Reddy VD: Isolation of a cDNA clone (PcSrp) encoding serine-rich-protein from Porteresia coarctata T. and its expression in yeast and finger millet ( Eleusine coracana L.) affording salt tolerance. Planta 2006, 224(2):347–359. 10.1007/s00425-005-0218-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Majee M, Maitra S, Dastidar KG, Pattanaik S, Chatterjee A, Hait NC, Das KP, Majumder AL: A novel salt tolerant L- myo -Inositol-1-phosphate synthase from Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka, a halophytic wild rice: molecular cloning, bacterial overexpression, characterization, and functional introgression into tobacco-conferring salt tolerance phenotype. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 28539–28552. 10.1074/jbc.M310138200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcum KB: Salinity tolerance mechanism of grasses in the sub-family Chloridoideae. Crop Sci 1999, 39(4):1153–1160. 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040034xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Marcum KB: Saline tolerance physiology in grasses. In Ecophysiology of High Salinity Tolerant Plants. Edited by: Khan MA, Weber DJ. Springer, Heidelberg; 2006:157–172.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcum KB, Murdoch CL: Salinity tolerance mechanisms of six C4 turfgrasses. J Am Soc Hort Sci 1994, 119: 779–784.Google Scholar
  46. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R: Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signaling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 2010, 33(4):453–467. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Munns R, Tester M: Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008, 59: 651–681. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Muscolo A, Sidari M, Panuccio MR: Tolerance of kikuyu grass to long term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defences. Plant Growth Regul 2003, 41(1):57–62. 10.1023/A:1027378417559View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Naidoo Y, Naidoo G: Cytochemical localization of adenosine triphosphatase activity in salt glands of Sporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth. S Afr J Bot 1999, 65: 370–373.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Nellemann C, Devette MM, Manders T: The Environmental Food Crisis: The Environment’s role in averting future food crisis: A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme of the United Nations, Nairobi; 2009.Google Scholar
  51. Nishiuchi S, Liu S, Takano T: Isolation and characterization of a metallothionein-1 protein in Chloris virgata Swartz that enhances stress tolerance to oxidative, salinity and carbonate stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Biotechnol Lett 2007, 29(8):1301–1305. 10.1007/s10529-007-9396-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Oross JW, Thomson WW: The ultrastructure of salt glands of Cynodon and Distichlis (Poaceae). Am J Bot 1982, 69(6):939–949. 10.2307/2442890View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Prakash A, Stigler M: FAO Statistical Yearbook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; 2012.Google Scholar
  54. Qiao WH, Zhao XY, Li W, Luo Y, Zhang XS: Overexpression of AeNHX1, a root-specific vacuolar Na + /H + antiporter from Agropyron elongatum , confers salt tolerance to Arabidopsis and Festuca plants. Plant Cell Rep 2007, 26: 1663–1672. 10.1007/s00299-007-0354-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramadan T, Flowers JJ: Effects of salinity and benzyl adenine on development and function of microhairs of Zea mays L. Planta 2004, 219: 639–648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Reguera M, Peleg Z, Blumwald E: Targeting metabolic pathways for genetic engineering abiotic stress-tolerance in crops. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012, 1819(2):186–194. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.08.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rhodes D, Hanson AD: Quarternary ammonium and tertiary sulfonium compounds in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1993, 44: 357–384. 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.002041View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Rhodes D, Nadolska-Orczyk A, Rich PJ: Salinity, osmolytes and compatible solutes. In Salinity: Environment - Plants - Molecules. Edited by: Lauchli U, Luttge U. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands; 2002:181–204.Google Scholar
  59. Roy B, Noren SK, Mondal AB, Basu AK: Genetic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in agricultural crops. Biotechnol 2011, 10: 1–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Saad RB, Zouari N, Ramdhan WB, Azaza J, Meynard D, Guiderdoni E, Hassairi A: Improved drought and salt stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco overexpressing a novel A20/AN1 zinc-finger “AlSAP” gene isolated from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis . Plant Mol Biol 2010, 72: 171–190. 10.1007/s11103-009-9560-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Seckin B, Turkan I, Sekmen AH, Ozfidan C: The role of antioxidant defense systems at differential salt tolerance of Hordeum marinum Huds. (sea barley grass) and Hordeum vulgare L. (cultivated barley). Environ Exp Bot 2010, 69(1):76–85. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.02.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Sengupta S, Majumder AL: Insight into the salt tolerance factors of a wild halophytic rice, Porteresia coarctata : a physiological and proteomic approach. Planta 2009, 229: 911–929. 10.1007/s00425-008-0878-yView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sengupta S, Majumder AL: Porteresia coarctata (Roxb.) Tateoka, a wild rice: A potential model for studying salt-stress biology in rice. Plant Cell Environ 2010, 33: 526–542. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02054.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sengupta S, Patra B, Ray S, Majumder AL: Inositol methyl transferase from a halophytic wild rice, Porteresia coarctata Roxb. (Tateoka): regulation of pinitol synthesis under abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ 2008, 31: 1442–1459. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01850.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Storey R: Salt tolerance, ion relations and the effect of root medium on the response of citrus to salinity. Aust J Plant Physiol 1995, 22: 101–114. 10.1071/PP9950101View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Subudhi PK, Baisakh N: Spartina alterniflora Loisel., a halophyte grass model to dissect salt stress tolerance. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 2011, 47: 441–457. 10.1007/s11627-011-9361-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Taleisnik EL: Sodium accumulation in Pappophorum I. uptake, transport and recirculation. Ann Botany 1989, 63: 221–228.Google Scholar
  68. Teakle NL, Bazihizina N, Shabala SN, Colmer TD, Barrett-Lennard EG, Rodrigo-Moreno A, Lauchli AE: Differential tolerance to combined salinity and O 2 deficiency in the halophytic grasses Puccinellia ciliata and Thinopyrum ponticum : The importance of K + retention in roots. Environ Exp Bot 2013, 87: 69–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Tester M, Bacic A: Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses - From model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiol 2005, 137: 791–793. 10.1104/pp.104.900138View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Verma D, Singla-Pareek SL, Rajagopal D, Reddy MK, Sopory SK: Functional validation of a novel isoform of Na + /H + antiporter from Pennisetum glaucum for enhancing salinity tolerance in rice. J Biosci 2007, 32: 621–628. 10.1007/s12038-007-0061-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang S, Chen Q, Wang W, Wang X, Lu M: Salt tolerance conferred by over-expression of OsNHX1 gene in Poplar 84 K. Chin Sci Bull 2005, 50(3):225–229. 10.1007/BF02897531View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A: Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218: 1–14. 10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang Y, Chu Y, Liu G, Wang MH, Jiang J, Hou Y, Qu G, Yang C: Identification of expressed sequence tags in an alkali grass ( Puccinellia tenuiflora) cDNA library. J Plant Physiol 2007, 164(1):78–89. 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.12.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Watson L, Dallwitz MJ: The grass genera of the world. CAB International publishers, UK; 1992:1038.Google Scholar
  75. Worku W, Chapman GP: The salt secretion physiology of a Chloridoid grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., and its implications. Sinet 1998, 21: 1–16.Google Scholar
  76. Wu L, Fan Z, Guo L, Li Y, Chen ZL, Qu LJ: Over-expression of the bacterial nhaA gene in rice enhances salt and drought tolerance. Plant Sci 2005, 168: 297–302. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.05.033View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Wyn Jones RG, Gorham J: Osmoregulation. In Physiological Plant Ecology III. Responses to the Chemical and Biological Environment. Edited by: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 1983:35–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Wyn Jones RG, Storey R: Betaines. In Physiology and Biochemistry of Drought Resistance in Plants. Edited by: Paleg LG, Aspinall D. Academic Press, Australia; 1981:171–204.Google Scholar
  79. Vera Estrella R, Barkla BJ, Garcia-Ramirez L, Pantoja O: Salt stress in Thellungiella halophila activates Na + transport mechanisms required for salinity tolerance. Plant Physiol 2005, 139: 1507–1517. 10.1104/pp.105.067850View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Xianjun P, Xingyong M, Weihong F, Man S, Liqin C, Alam I, Lee BH, Dongmei Q, Shihua S, Gongshe L: Improved drought and salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana by transgenic expression of a novel DREB gene from Leymus chinensis . Plant Cell Rep 2011, 30(8):1493–1502. 10.1007/s00299-011-1058-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang HX, Blumwald E: Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19: 765–768. 10.1038/90824View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhang GH, Su Q, An LJ, Wu S: Characterization and expression of a vacuolar Na + /H + antiporter gene from the monocot halophyte Aeluropus littoralis . Plant Physiol Biochem 2008, 46(2):117–126. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.10.022View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang YM, Liu ZH, Wen ZY, Zhang HM, Yang F, Guo XL: The vacuolar Na + –H + antiport gene TaNHX2 confers salt tolerance on transgenic alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ). Func Plant Biol 2012, 39(8):708–716. 10.1071/FP12095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Zouari N, Saad RB, Legavre T, Azaza J, Sabau X, Jaoua M, Masmoudi K, Hassairi A: Identification and sequencing of ESTs from the halophyte grass Aeluropus littoralis . Gene 2007, 404: 61–69. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.08.021View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Roy and Chakraborty; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.