Ontogeny of the extrafloral nectaries of Vigna adenantha (Leguminosae, Phaseolae) and its relation with floral development
© Ojeda et al.; licensee Springer. 2014
Received: 23 May 2014
Accepted: 23 October 2014
Published: 29 December 2014
The inflorescences of the genus Vigna Savi have extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) among the flowers whose origin is still unknown. The disposition, anatomy and morphology, as well as the ontogeny of the extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) associated with the inflorescences of Vigna adenantha (G.F.W. Meyer) Maréchal, Mascherpa & Stainier (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Phaseolae) were studied. Besides, the ultrastructure of the secretory stage was described.
The inflorescence, a raceme, bears a brief globose secondary axis in each node with 2 flowers and 5–7 EFNs, which develop in acropetal direction. Each EFN originates from the abscission of a flower bud that interrupts its development, resulting in an elevated EFN. This secretory structure is formed by a ring of epidermal and parenchymatic cells surrounding a group of elongated central cells. The nectary is irrigated by phloem and xylem. Four developmental stages proceed; each one relates to a different embryological stage of the flowers in each secondary axis.
The first functional EFN of each secondary axis of the inflorescence reaches its maturity when both the pollen grains and the embryo sacs are completely developed and the flowers begin to open. The secretion is granulocrine. The following EFNs develop in the same way.
KeywordsExtrafloral nectaries Inflorescences Ontogeny Morphology Anatomy Ultrastructure Vigna Leguminosae
In the genus Vigna Savi, the inflorescences are double racemes whose nodes bear a brief secondary globose axis in which commonly two flowers and one or more extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) develop. These glands have taxonomic relevance as they allow to distinguish Vigna from Phaseolus L. (McKey ).
Studies about the EFNs of different families of Angiosperms involve morphology (González and Ocantos ; Machado et al. ; Melo et al. ), anatomy (Francino et al. ; Lattar et al. ; Melo et al. ), ultrastructure (Fahn ; Durkee et al. ) and ontogeny (Maheshwari ; Ojehomon ; Leitâo et al. ; Sousa Paiva and Rodrigues Machado ), but some aspects, such as the vascular supply, have not received much attention (Ojehomon ; Nepi ).
The EFNs associated to inflorescences are supposed to originate from aborted floral primordia in Leguminosae (Tucker ) and specially in Papilionoideae (Ojehomon ). In some of them, not only when flower buds abort but also when flowers are shed (Díaz-Castelazo et al. ).
Ojehomon () studied the ontogeny of the EFNs of Vigna unguiculata (L.) G. W. Walpers; later, Kuo and Pate () analysed the anatomy during the secretory period. There are no other reports on the development of the EFNs in Vigna.
Ontogenetic studies concerning V. adenantha (G.F. W. Meyer) Maréchal, Mascherpa & Stainier only examined the ovule and pollen grain development, in the context of a comparative analysis of the Vigna-Phaseolus-Macroptilium (Benth.) Urb. complex (Faigón Soverna ; Faigón Soverna et al. ).
The aim of this work was to find out the origin and development of the EFNs, the cytology of the secretory stage, as well as the period of secretion and its relation with fruit and seed production in V. adenantha. Besides, the ontogeny of the first EFN on each secondary axis of the inflorescence was correlated with the pollen and embryo-sac development.
The studied material was collected from cultivated specimens at the Campo Experimental of the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (Universidad de Buenos Aires) situated in the Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
The cultivated specimens proceeded from: ARGENTINA. Prov. Corrientes: Dpto. Capital, E.B.C.O., 20/02/10, P. S. Hoc 396 (BAFC). Prov. Entre Ríos: Dpto. Concordia, Parque San Carlos, 23/03/02, P. S. Hoc 377 (BAFC); 27/02/10 P. S. Hoc 397 (BAFC). Prov. Buenos Aires: Pdo. Zárate, Puente Zárate Brazo Largo, 23/03/02, Hoc 378 (BAFC).
For observations with optical microscopy (OM) the inflorescences were fixed in FAA (formaldehide, ethanol, acetic acid, water) and preserved in ethanol 70%. Each node, from the apex to the base of the inflorescence, was sectioned, identified with a code, embedded in paraffin and cutted in sections 10 μm thick employing a microtome (Arcano). Histological slides were prepared: some of them were stained with safranin-fast green and others with cresyl violet. Observations and photographs were performed with an optic Nikon Labophot microscope.
Preparations for scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) were performed in the following way: each secondary axis was dehydrated in an ascendant series of alcohols (70, 80, 90, and 100%), submitted to critical point, covered with a gold-palladium alloy and observed and photographed with a Zeiss Supra 40 Scanning Electron Microscope.
In addition, the secretory stage was examined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For this, the material was fixed in glutaraldehyde 2.5%, soon after it was submerged in buffer phosphate during 24 hours, then fixed in osmium tetroxide (OsO4) 1.5% at 2°C for 3 hours, dehydrated in an upward series of acetone and embedded in Spurr’s resin. For previous observations with light microscopy, sections of 1 μm thickness were stained with toluidine blue 0.1%. Fine sections were stained with uranil acetate and lead citrate, observed and photographed with a Jeol-Jem 1200 EXII transmission electron microscope.
Nectar concentration was measured in a natural population in Concordia (Entre Ríos province, Argentina) as follows: to exclude ants from the EFNs, a thin stripe of aluminium paper was wrapped around the peduncle and each stripe was impregnated with an ant deterrent resin (Tanglefoot, USA). Nectar accumulated in several nectaries was removed with a 1 μl capillary tube. The column of collected nectar was measured in the capillary and the volume calculated. Nectar concentration was registered with a hand refractometer for small volumes (Bellingham & Stanley, UK). In cases in which volume was to small to get a measurable reading, a known volume of distilled water was added to the refractometer and the corresponding calculation was made, taking into account the dilution factor.
Photograhic plates were compounded with Adobe Photoshop software.
Four stages of development were distinguished in the EFNs. In the following description the development of the first EFN is assessed and it is correlated with the microsporogenesis, microgametogenesis, megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis of the flowers of the same node. The following EFNs of the secondary axis have the same ontogeny.
Stage 1. The bud of the EFN is placed in the axil of a bract of the secondary axis and is constituted by a protodermis which protects the underlaying meristematic tissue (Figure 2C). The bract has simple and glandular pluricellular trichomes in its abaxial surface (Figure 3B). Around or beside the bud, a ring begins to develop; it is constituted by a protodermis which protects the underlaying parenchyma. Beneath the bud as well as beneath the developing ring, procambial bands can be observed which originate phloem and xylem (Figure 2C).
In the same node of the secondary axis, two floral buds are developing as floral primordia, the microspore mother cells in their first meiotic division are found in the anthers, but the megaspore mother cell has not differentiated yet in the ovules.
Stage 2. Beneath the bract, two bracteoles are formed (Figure 2D), which are pilose in their abaxial face, with simple and glandular pluricellular trichomes (Figure 3C). In the meristematic apex of the bud, sepals primordia can be observed (Figures 2D and 3D). At the base of the bud, a band of cells more vacuolated than the surrounding ones are distinguished, which would correspond to a future abscission zone (Figure 2D). Below this zone, there are longitudinally enlarged cells, with thin primary walls and large nuclei. The ring of the future EFN is already totally differentiated: it is constituted by an epidermis and a parenchyma without intercellular spaces, with highly vacuolated cells and with conspicuous nuclei (Figure 2D). At the base of the EFN in formation, vascular bands are observed (Figure 2E, F).
In the corresponding floral buds of the same node, microspore tetrads are present in the anthers and the megaspore mother cell begins the meiotic division in the ovule.
Stage 3. The bud of the EFN does not continue its development and detaches from the abscission zone, leaving exposed the longitudinally enlarged cells in the center of the nectary (Figures 2G and 3E, F). These central cells elongate longitudinally even more, remaining as papillae, whose walls partially degrade exhibiting perforations (Figure 3G). Bellow these central cells there is a parenchymatic tissue. The secretion, which stains strongly with safranin-fast green (Figure 2G) and toluidine blue (Figure 2H), accumulates among the central cells. The parenchyma cells of the ring have conspiscuous vacuoles with content that also stain intensely with toluidine blue (Figure 2H).
In the corresponding floral buds of the same node, the anthers have pollen grains already formed and some tapetum rests, while in the ovules the megaspore is in the mitotic process which ends in the megagametophyte formation.
Stage 4. Nectar secretion ceases and the central cells desintegrate (Figure 3H).
In the corresponding floral buds of the same node anthers are dehiscent and the tapetum is completely dissolved while in the ovules, the megagametophyte is totally formed. At this moment, anthesis begins.
Ultrastructure of the secretory stage (stage 3)
Nectary activity period
During the inflorescence development, once the first EFN of a secondary axis arrives to stage 3, the second EFN begins to differentiate in the next node and so on, in the acropetal sense of the secondary axis (Figures 2B and 3A).
When the fruits have seeds with embryos in the globular stage, at least one EFN in stage 4, one EFN in stage 3 and one EFN in stage 1 coexist in the same secondary axis of the inflorescence, so the EFNs activity is continuous during maturation of the fruits (Figure 2A).
Nectar removed from nectaries in stage 3 was highly viscose, the concentration ranged from 0.02 to 12.5 (3.01 ± 4.78, n = 5) percent of total sugars. During sunny days with low ambient humidity, crystallization of the nectar was observed on the EFN surface.
The EFN of V. adenantha originates from the abscission of a floral bud that interrupts its development. This cessation of meristematic activity and detachment of the developing flower was also observed in Macroptilium species (Díaz-Castelazo et al. ) and the origin of EFNs from aborted flower buds in inflorescences has been suggested for other Legumes (Ojehomon ; Tucker ).
This kind of nectaries would fit the “Hochnektarien” (elevated nectaries) type according to the classification proposed by Zimmerman () and accepted by Elias (), since they are elevated from the surrounding tissues.
Ojehomon () analysed the development of the glands in Vigna unguiculata and described them as “cushion units”, inferring that the secretion is the result of excretion of cellular products, and discarding their function as EFNs. The present results agree with the observations on the ontogeny described by Ojehomon () but not with the role that was suggested.
Kuo and Pate () described the EFNs in the secondary axis of the inflorescences of Vigna unguiculata as a compound structure formed by various conical secretory subunits but they did not clarify if all of them are active at the same time. They observed that each cone was formed by secretory parenchyma whose production (nectar plus cellular debris) was discharged through an orifice surrounded by a ring constituted of epidermis and parenchyma. In V. adenantha the EFNs are not compound structures because every EFN of each secondary axis originates independently and reaches the secretory stage at a different moment, following an acropetal sequence, because they are developing floral buds that abort subsequently. According to this, from the initiation of the floral buds that will produce flowers, there is always a nectary in active secretion in the same node until the fruit ripening of those flowers (stage 3). In other Legumes, the extrafloral nectaries are also active until pod maduration (Pate et al.; CAB ).
Kuo and Pate () pointed out that the vascular supply of the EFNs of V. unguiculata is only constituted by phloem; contrarily, in V. adenantha the vascular supply is constituted by phloem and xylem.
Kuo and Pate () did not mention that the cells of the ring secrete, in contrast to the observations in this work. Those authors postulated that the secretion would occur through the intercellular spaces underlying the central cells. In V. adenantha, all the cells (the central ones and the ones from the ring) secrete.
Nectar would be liberated by three ways: through the ectodesmata of the epidermal cells of the ring (with previous accumulation outside the plasma membrane), through the cavities of the middle lamellae present between these cells and through the partially degraded walls of the central cells. The ectodesmata and the cavities would aid the secretion crossing the thick outer tangential epidermal cell walls of the ring. A thin cuticle is usually present on the nectary epidermis, which becomes thinner as nectar secretion proceeds (Nepi ). Cavities have been observed inside thick tangential walls of secretory cells (Aliscioni et al.  and cites therein).
The presence and abundance of dictyosomes and endoplasmic reticulum in the ring and in the central cells, as well as the vesicles along the ectodesmata, suggest granulocrine secretion, unlike the conclusions by Kuo and Pate (), who interpreted that nectar would follow an apoplastic route and flow through the orifices of the conical subunits.
The scant measurements of extrafloral nectar concentration involving several plant families and different EFN types range from very dilute (0.73) to considerable concentrated (80) total sugar percent even within the same nectary type (see Díaz-Castelazo et al. ), although ants, the most frequent visitors of these glands, prefer concentrated nectar, i.e., 40-50 total sugars % (Nicolson ). The high variation of extrafloral nectar concentration has been attributed to the influence of microenvironment conditions surrounding the usually exposed EFNs (Koptur ), in contrast to the more concealed floral ones whose concentration does not vary as much.
The EFNs in V. adenantha are generated from aborted floral primordia. The secretion is granulocrine. In each secondary axis of the inflorescence, several EFNs originate and secrete successively and independently until fruit ripening; this succession provides constant reward to patrolling ants, which would protect the developing fruits until maturation.
This is the first report in which the development of the EFNs is correlated with the development of the flowers of the same node.
Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (Universidad de Buenos Aires)
Formaldehide, alcohol, acetic acid, water
Scanning electronic microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy
The authors wish to thank the help with histological preparations to S. Rosenfeldt. This work was financed with the grant UBACYT X100 from Universidad de Buenos Aires. F. S. Ojeda has a fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); P.S. Hoc and M.T. Amela García are Profesor and assistant Professor, respectively (Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires) and researchers of the CONICET; B. G. Galati is a researcher and Professor at the FAUBA (Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires).
- Aliscioni SS, Torreta JP, Bello ME, Galati BG: Elaiophores in Gomesa bifolia (Sims) M. W. Chase & N. H. Williams (Oncidiinae: Cymbidieae: Orchidaceae): structure and oil secretion. Ann Bot 2009, 104: 1141–1149. 10.1093/aob/mcp199View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- CAB (2004) Acacia colei. Forestry compendium. Datasheets. CAB, UK CAB (2004) Acacia colei. Forestry compendium. Datasheets. CAB, UK
- Díaz-Castelazo C, Gray-Rico V, Ortega F, Ángeles G: Morphological and secretory characterization of secretory characterization of extrafloral nectaries in plants of coastal Veracruz, Mexico. Ann Bot 2005, 96: 1175–1189. 10.1093/aob/mci270View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Durkee LT, Haber MH, Dorn L, Remington A: Morphology, ultastructure, and function of extrafloral nectaries in three species of Caesalpiniaceae. J Iowa Acad Sci 1999, 106(4):82–88.Google Scholar
- Elias TS: Extrafloral nectarines: their structure and distribution. In The biology of nectaries. Edited by: Bentley B, Elias TS. Columbia University Press, New York; 1983:175–203.Google Scholar
- Fahn A: The extrafloral nectaries of Sambucus nigra . Ann Bot 1987, 60: 299–308.Google Scholar
- Faigón Soverna, A (2002) Estudios embriológicos en la subtribu Phaseolinae (Leguminosae). Dissertation, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
- Faigón Soverna A, Galati B, Hoc PS: Study of ovule and megagametophyte development in four species of subtribe Phaseolinae (Leguminosae). Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Ser Botanica, Polish Acd Sci 2003, 45: 57–67.Google Scholar
- Francino DMT, Sant’Anna-Santos BF, Silva KLF, Thadeo M, Meira RMSA, Azevedo AA: Anatomia foliar e caulinar de Chamaecrista Trichopoda (Caesalpinioideae) e histoquímica do nectário extrafloral. Planta Daninha, Vinosa-MG 2006, 54: 695–705.Google Scholar
- González AM, Ocantos MN: Nectarios Extraflorales en Piriqueta y Turnera (Turneraceae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 2006, 41: 269–284.Google Scholar
- Koptur S: Interactions between insects and plants mediated by extrafloral nectaries. In Insect/plant interactions. Edited by: Bernays E. Florida. CRC Press, Boca Raton; 1992:85.Google Scholar
- Kuo J, Pate JS: The extrafloral nectaries of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp): I. Morphology, anatomy and fine structure. Planta 1985, 166: 15–27. 10.1007/BF00397381View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lattar E, Solís SM, Avanza MM, Ferrucci MS: Estudios morfo-anatómicos en nectarios florales y extraflorales de Triumfetta rhomboidea (Malvaceae, Grewioideae). Bol Soc Argent Bot 2009, 44(1–2):33–41.Google Scholar
- Leitâo CAE, Meira RMSA, Azevedo AA, Araújo JM: Ontogenia dos nectários extraflorales de Triunfetta semitriloba (Tiliaceae). Planta Daninha, Vinosa-MG 2002, 20(3):343–351. 10.1590/S0100-83582002000300003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Machado SR, Morellato LPC, Sajo MG, Oliveira PS: Morphological patterns of extrafloral nectaries in woody plant species of the Brazilian Cerrado. Plant Biol 2008, 10: 660–673. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00068.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maheshwari JK: The structure and development of extra-floral nectarines in Duranta plumieri Jacq. Phytomorphology 1954, 4: 208–211.Google Scholar
- McKey D: Interactions between ants and leguminous plants. In Advances in legume biology. Edited by: Stirton CH, Zarucchi JL. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, St. Louis; 1989:673.Google Scholar
- Melo Y, Machado SR, Marccus A: Anatomy of extrafloral nectaries in Fabaceae from dry-seasonal forest in Brazil. Bot J Linn Soc 2010, 163: 87–98. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01047.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nepi M: Nectary structure and ultrastructure. In Nectaries and nectar. Edited by: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E. Springer, Dordrecht; 2007:129. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nicolson SW: Nectar consumers. In Nectaries and nectar. Edited by: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2007:289–342. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ojehomon O: The development of the inflorescence and extra-floral nectarines of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. J West African Sci Assoc 1968, 13: 93–110.Google Scholar
- Pate JS, Peoples MB, Storer PJ, Atkins CA: The extrafloral nectaries of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) II. Nectar composition, origin of nectar solutes, and nectary functioning. Planta 1985, 166: 28–38. 10.1007/BF00397382View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sousa Paiva EA, Rodrigues Machado S: Ontogênese, anatomia e ultra-estructura dos nectários extraflorais de Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. Ex Hayne (Fabaceae–Caesalpinioideae). Acta Bot Bras 2006, 20(2):471–482.Google Scholar
- Tucker SC: Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiol 2003, 131: 911–926. 10.1104/pp.102.017459View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman JG: Über die extrafloralen nectarien der Angiospermen. Beihefte zum botanischen Zentralblatt 1932, 49: 99–196.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.