Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.159

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Elevation gradient of soil bacterial communities in bamboo plantations

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201657:8

DOI: 10.1186/s40529-016-0123-0

Received: 5 January 2016

Accepted: 23 February 2016

Published: 29 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Elevation trends of macro organisms have long been well studied. However, whether microbes also exhibit such patterns of elevation change is unknown. Here, we investigated the changes in bamboo forest soil bacterial communities along six elevation gradients, from 600 to 1800 m a.s.l. in Mt. Da-an, a subtropical montane area in Nantou county at central Taiwan.

Results

Data from 16S rRNA gene clone libraries revealed that more than 70 % of the six communities contained Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria, although the relative abundance differed. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis of the distribution of operational taxonomic units showed differences in bamboo soil bacterial communities across gradients. The bacterial communities at 1000 and 1200 m showed greater diversity than the communities at both lower (600 and 800 m) and higher (1400 and 1800 m) elevations. In contrast to the bacterial community trend, soil C and N and microbial biomass properties increased linearly with elevation.

Conclusion

The bamboo soil bacterial community could interact with multiple factors such as soil organic matter content and temperature, for differences in composition and diversity with change in elevation.

Keywords

Bamboo Soil 16S rRNA genes Elevation Bacterial diversity

Background

Understanding the responses of soil communities across elevation gradients has long been a fascinating topic for ecologists. The composition of macro organisms along elevation gradients have been well studied (Herzog et al. 2005; Rahbek 2005; Kreft and Jetz 2007; McCain 2009). However, the distribution of microorganisms might not follow the same ecological rules as for macro organisms. For instance, the number of total bacteria, methanotrophic bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea was negatively correlated with increasing elevation (Ma et al. 2004; Giri et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2009), but the content of Gram-negative bacteria increases with increasing elevation in the Austrian central Alps (Margesin et al. 2009). Also, bacterial diversity decreased with elevation in the mountains of the southwestern United States (Bryant et al. 2008). However, in eastern Peru, the community diversity did not show a significant elevation gradient (Fierer et al. 2011). In South Korea, higher diversity occurs at high and low elevations, with minimum richness at middle elevations (Singh et al. 2014). Our understanding of major determinants of the distribution of bacteria is still largely limited. Considering the essential roles of microorganisms in many biogeochemical cycles in ecosystems, more studies on the bacterial trends among different mountain ecosystems are needed.

In East Asia, bamboo is one of the most important forest resources and can be used as construction or furniture material. Young bamboo shoots are also in high demand as a healthy food. Regular management, such as removal of understory vegetation as well as tillage and fertilizer application, is often used to maintain and increase bamboo production.

In the present study, we collected soil samples from moso bamboo plantations along six elevations, from 600 to 1800 m a.s.l., in central Taiwan. This transect provides an opportunity to study elevation distribution without the effects of different vegetation. Previously, we found the high-elevation bamboo plantations (1200 and 1400 m) significantly differed from low elevation plantations (600, 800, and 1000 m), with higher soil C and N contents, higher concentrations of soil soluble organic C and N, and a greater amount of soil microbial biomass C and N (Huang et al. 2014). However, the bacterial community trend along elevation gradients is still unknown. Using 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis, we attempted to elucidate the responses of the structure and diversity of the bamboo soil bacterial community to elevation gradients.

Methods

Site description and soil sampling

The study site was located at Mt. Da-an, a subtropical montane area in Nantou County, central Taiwan (23°42′N, 120°41′E). Soil samples were collected from moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) plantations along a county road with an increasing altitudinal gradient, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400 and 1800 m a.s.l. The six sampling gradients are all dominated by moso bamboo with few understory plants. The bamboo plantations in this area were established simultaneously around the 1960s. Both the culm density and culm age of the selected moso bamboo plantations were similar between elevations. However, aboveground bamboo biomass increased with elevation (Chen et al. 2014). The soils are well drained and characterized as Entisols. The parent material is sandstone and shale. The soils are loam with pH 3.9–4.4. Other properties of soils are reported in Table 1.
Table 1

Soil chemical and physical properties of study sites

Elevation (m)

pH

Organic C (g kg−1)

Total N (g kg−1)

C/N

600

4.0

25.3

2.4

10.5

800

3.9

35.8

3.6

9.9

1000

3.8

39.3

3.8

10.3

1200

3.7

64.9

6.1

10.6

1400

3.4

63.8

5.2

12.3

1800

4.4

151.3

10.2

14.8

At each elevation, three 25 × 25 m plots were established along transect lines in January 2012. The soil samples were collected in winter to avoid differences caused by seasonal changes. Within each plot, three subsamples were collected by use of a soil auger 8 cm in diameter and 10 cm deep and were combined. Visible detritus materials, such as roots and litter, were manually removed prior to passing soil through a 2-mm sieve. Soils were then stored at −20 °C, and extraction of soil community DNA was performed within 2 weeks.

16S rRNA gene clone library construction and sequencing

The 16S rRNA gene clone libraries were constructed as described (Lin et al. 2010). In brief, soil community DNA was extracted by using the PowerSoil® Soil DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Industries, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified by PCR with the primer set 27F and 1492R (Lane 1991). After 15 cycles, the PCR products were cloned by using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the pCR2.1 vector. White colonies on selective Luria–Bertani (LB) agar plates were picked into 96-well blocks containing 1 ml LB broth plus kanamycin (50 µg ml−1) and grown overnight. Sterile glycerol was added to a final concentration of 10 %, and an aliquot was transferred to a 96-well sequencing block. Both the sequencing and the original culture blocks were stored at −80 °C.

DNA sequencing and sequence analyses

Bacterial clones were partially sequenced with the primer 27F. Sequence analysis involved an ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences were analyzed with the Mallard and Pintail programs to test for chimeras (Ashelford et al. 2005, 2006). The entire clone sequences obtained in the study have been deposited to GenBank (accession numbers KJ407398-KJ408214 and KM108145-KM108301).

Taxonomic assignment of sequences from the clone library was made using the naïve Bayesian rRNA classifier (Wang et al. 2007) in the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp). Diversity estimates, including Shannon diversity index, Chao1 estimator and rarefaction analysis, were calculated for operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity by using the program DOTUR (Schloss and Handelsman 2005). PRIMER V6 (PRIMER-E, Lutton, Ivybridge, UK) was used for non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) generated with Bray-Curtis similarity of sequence data. Mantel tests as implemented in PRIMER v6 were also assessed to analyze the relationships between phylogenetic distances of bacterial communities and soil properties.

Results

Phylogenetic groups of bacterial community

About 50–60 clones of 16S rRNA genes were derived from each of the three replicate samples. The sequences from replicates of each elevation were then combined for further analysis. A total of 151–182 bacterial sequences were obtained from each of six elevations. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the communities were composed of 11 bacterial groups. The Acidobacteria (comprising 46–64 % of all clones from each elevation) and Proteobacteria-affiliated clones (24–37 %) were the two most abundant phyla (Fig. 1). The relative abundance of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes in the community at 1000 and 600 m, respectively, was higher than that in other communities. Other phyla including Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia, were all less abundant and accounted for less than 5 % of the clones (Fig. 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0123-0/MediaObjects/40529_2016_123_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Relative abundance of phylogenetic groups in 16S rRNA gene libraries along elevational gradients

Within the Acidobacteria, GP1, 2 and 3 were all abundant groups in the six communities, but the relative abundance of GP2 at 1400 m, and GP3 at 600, 800 and 1800 m was less than 10 % (Table 2). The relative abundance of Bacillales was higher at 600 m than that in other communities (Table 2). Within the α-Proteobacteria, Rhizobiales was more abundant in the communities at 1400 and 1800 m. The relative abundance of Rhodospirillales was higher at 1000 m than that in the other communities (Table 2).
Table 2

The 10 most abundant phylogenetic groups detected in bamboo soil communities along elevation gradients

Phylogenetic group

Percentage of clones

600 m

800 m

1000 m

1200 m

1400 m

1800 m

Acidobacteria

 GP1a

25.3

37.0

19.8

29.8

17.9

18.9

 GP2

10.2

8.7

17.6

17.2

9.0

23.3

 GP3

6.6

7.5

15.9

12.6

21.4

3.8

 GP5

3.6

2.9

1.1

2.0

2.1

1.9

Bacteroidetes

 Sphingobacteriales

0.6

2.3

1.1

0.7

3.4

1.9

Firmicutes

 Bacillales

10.8

3.5

0.5

1.3

0.7

0.0

Planctomycetes

 Planctomycetales

3.0

0.6

1.6

0.0

3.4

2.5

α-Proteobacteria

 Rhizobiales

5.4

12.1

9.3

10.6

20.0

20.1

 Rhodospirillales

2.4

4.6

8.2

3.3

4.8

3.1

γ-Proteobacteria

 Xanthomonadales

4.8

2.3

2.2

1.3

3.4

3.8

aGP, group

Bacterial diversity

The community diversity indices were calculated based on the OTUs with 97 % sequence similarity. Although we observed no clear trends in diversity indices (Table 3), analyses of rarefaction curves suggested that communities at 1000 and 1200 m were the most diverse, and the communities at the lowest elevation of 600 m and the highest elevation of 1800 m were the least diverse (Fig. 2).
Table 3

Diversity of soil bacterial communities detected in 16S rRNA gene clone librariesa

Measure of diversity

Elevation (m)

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1800

No. of sequences

169

173

182

151

163

159

No. of OTUs

89

73

94

80

79

59

Shannonb

4.29

3.93

4.27

4.07

4.08

3.82

Chao 1

132

112

151

134

124

80

95 % Chao 1

110–179

90–162

123–209

106–192

100–176

67–117

aCalculations were based on operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity

bShannon diversity index (H)

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0123-0/MediaObjects/40529_2016_123_Fig2_HTML.gif
Fig. 2

Rarefaction curve analysis for the bamboo soil libraries with operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97 % nucleotide sequence similarity

Bacterial community comparison

On NMDS analysis of the library, the composition of bamboo soil bacterial community differed across elevation gradients (Fig. 3). The communities in 600 and 1000-m soils were more separated from other communities. Examining the distribution of OTUs also revealed differences in composition. The distribution of the 10 most abundant OTUs, affiliated with Acidobacteria and α-Proteobacteria, differed by elevation (Table 4). OTU 8 could be found in all six communities, with OTU 29 not found in soils at 600 and 1800 m. Likewise, OTUs 23 and 50 were present only in soils lower than 1000 m. OTU distribution was not significantly correlated associated with environmental parameters, including elevation, organic C, total N, C/N ratio and soil pH (P > 0.05; data not shown).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0123-0/MediaObjects/40529_2016_123_Fig3_HTML.gif
Fig. 3

Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling plot of six plantation soil bacterial communities based on distribution of OTUs. The OTUs were at an evolutionary distance of 0.03

Table 4

Relative abundance and phylogenetic affiliation of the ten most abundant OTUsa

OTU

No. of sequences

Affiliation

Elevation (m)

 

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1800

8

50

Rhodoplanes

8

7

10

8

8

9

95

28

Acidobacteria

0

7

9

9

3

0

1

25

Acidobacteria

6

7

2

3

5

2

49

20

Bradyrhizobium

1

7

1

1

10

0

53

15

Acidobacteria

3

4

3

5

0

0

10

14

Acidobacteria

2

0

1

1

5

5

35

14

Acidobacteria

5

4

1

2

1

1

23

11

Rhodospirillaceae

1

7

3

0

0

0

50

11

Acidobacteria

4

6

1

0

0

0

142

11

Acidobacteria

0

1

2

2

2

4

aOTUs with 97 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity

Discussion

In the present study, along six elevation gradients from 600 to 1800 m a.s.l. in bamboo forests, the soil bacterial communities at 1000 and 1200 m a.s.l. showed higher levels of diversity than those at both lower and higher elevations. The diversity differed from the monotonic and unimodal patterns observed for macro organisms (Rahbek 2005; McCain 2009). This result is similar to the changes in bacterial diversity with elevation on Mount Fuji (Singh et al. 2012), suggesting that the pattern of bamboo soil bacterial diversity along elevation gradients is different from that of plants and animals. With phospholipid fatty acid and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis, the microbial community the low and high elevations (Chang et al. 2016). In a comprehensive analysis of soil bacterial communities across six elevations representing six vegetation types from forest to alpine tundra in Mt. Changbai, China, pH was the best predictor of community composition, and vegetation could have indirectly affected the communities by altering soil C and N status across elevation gradients (Shen et al. 2013). In the present study, the range of soil pH was narrow (3.4-4.4), and pH was not significantly correlated with bacterial community structure. Because small pH changes could cause differences in bacterial communities within short and long distances (Yergeau et al. 2010; Sagova-Mareckova et al. 2011), the effects of pH on the bamboo soil community in this region still need to be further investigated.

Disturbance can be a major factor affecting the bamboo soil bacterial diversity. In recent years, the major production area for timber and bamboo shoots has changed from 600 and 800 m to 1000 and 1200 m in this region. However, the plantations we studied possessed comparable culm density and ages, which indicates similar bamboo productivity and levels of disturbance. Because of the different owners, the bamboo plantations might have been subjected to different fertilizer application and stem harvest, and determining the exact influence of human activity is difficult. One study showed that the effects of disturbance could affect microbial communities across time (Keiser et al. 2011), suggesting the need for further elucidation in these communities.

The Acidobacteria were the most abundant group. They also predominate in other ecosystems, including agricultural systems and subtropical and tropical forests (Jangid et al. 2011; Araujo et al. 2012; Meng et al. 2013). Acidobacteria are generally considered as oligotrophs (Nemergut et al. 2010) and versatile heterotrophs, exhibiting slow metabolic rates under low-nutrient conditions (Ward et al. 2009). Bamboo could release a large number of allelopathic compounds. The heterotrophic ability to survive with allelopathic compounds could be further explored.

Proteobacteria were also abundant in these communities, with α-Proteobacteria the most abundant across different elevations. Within α-Proteobacteria, many sequences were related to the Rhizobiales and Rhodospirillales, indicating the potential role for N2 fixation, organic matter decomposition and plant growth promotion in the soils (Zhang and Xu 2008; Yarwood et al. 2009). Higher soil C/N ratio in higher elevations may indicate lower amounts of available nitrogen and requirement for N2-fixing bacteria in the community. The relatively high abundance of Rhizobiales-affiliated OTUs at 1400 and 1800 m was associated with high soil C/N ratio, which is an important factor to predict community structure (Chu et al. 2010).

The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was higher at 1400 m than that at other elevations. Known as copiotrophic bacteria, Bacteroidetes species tend to be found in nutrient-rich environments (Fierer et al. 2007). High elevation with high amounts of organic C and lower decomposition rates could provide a favorable condition for the growth of Bacteroidetes. Our previous study also revealed a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes in a cedar forest than adjacent bamboo forest soils (Lin et al. 2013). These results suggest that the Bacteroidetes, as well as the phyla Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria, could play an important role in the soil bacterial community.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study revealed that bacterial diversity of bamboo soil communities were lower at both lower and higher elevations in this mountain area of central Taiwan, with greater diversity at 1000 and 1200 m. As well, the community structure differed by elevation. Considering the low sequence number in the clone library, further studies with more sequences and using next generation sequencing technique (e.g., pyrosequencing) are needed to address the responses of the bamboo soil community along elevation gradients.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica

References

  1. Araujo J, de Castro A, Costa MMC, Togawa RC, Pappas GJ Jr, Quirino BF, Bustamante MMC, Williamson L, Handelsman J, Krüger RH (2012) Characterization of soil bacterial assemblies in Brazilian savanna-like vegetation reveals Acidobacteria dominance. Microb Ecol 64:760–770View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashelford KE, Chuzhanova NA, Fry JC, Jones AJ, Weightman AJ (2005) At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7724–7736View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashelford KE, Chuzhanova NA, Fry JC, Jones AJ, Weightman AJ (2006) New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5734–5741View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant JA, Lamanna C, Morlon H, Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ, Green JL (2008) Microbes on mountainsides: contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11505–11511View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang EH, Chen TH, Tian G, Chiu CY (2016) The effect of altitudinal gradient on soil microbial community activity and structure in moso bamboo plantations. Appl Soil Ecol 98:213–220
  6. Chen TH, Chiu CY, Xie ZY, Wang S (2014) Growth characteristics of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) plantations at various altitudes in Da-an area, Nantou County. Quart J Chin For 47:181–192 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  7. Chu H, Fierer N, Lauber CL, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Grogan P (2010) Soil bacterial diversity in the Arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes. Environ Microbiol 12:2998–3006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fierer N, Bradford MA, Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88:1354–1364View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fierer N, McCain CM, Meir P, Zimmermann M, Rapp JM, Silman MR, Knight R (2011) Microbes do not follow the elevational diversity patterns of plants and animals. Ecology 92:797–804View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Giri DD, Shukla PN, Kashyap S, Singh P, Kashyap AK, Pandey KD (2007) Variation in methanotrophic bacterial population along an altitude gradient at two slopes in tropical dry deciduous forest. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2424–2426View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Herzog SK, Kessler M, Bach K (2005) The elevational gradient in Andean bird species richness at the local scale: a foothill peak and a high-elevation plateau. Ecography 28:209–222View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang CY, Jien SH, Chen TH, Tian G, Chiu CY (2014) Soluble organic C and N and its relationships with soil organic C and N and microbial characteristics in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) plantations along an elevation gradient in central Taiwan. J Soils Sediments 14:1061–1070View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Schmidt TM, Coleman DC, Whitman WB (2011) Land-use history has a stronger impact on soil microbial community composition than aboveground vegetation and soil properties. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2184–2193View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Keiser AD, Strickland MS, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2011) The effect of resource history on the functioning of soil microbial communities is maintained across time. Biogeosciences 8:1477–1486View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kreft H, Jetz W (2007) Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5925–5930View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, New York, pp 115–175Google Scholar
  17. Lin YT, Huang YJ, Tang SL, Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Chiu CY (2010) Bacterial community diversity in undisturbed perhumid montane forest soils in Taiwan. Microb Ecol 59:369–378View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin YT, Tang SL, Pai CW, Whitman WB, Coleman DC, Chiu CY (2013) Changes in the soil bacterial communities in a cedar plantation invaded by moso bamboo. Microb Ecol 67:421–429View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma X, Chen T, Zhang G, Wang R (2004) Microbial community structure along an altitude gradient in three different localities. Folia Microbiol 49:105–111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Margesin R, Jud M, Tscherko D, Schinner F (2009) Microbial communities and activities in alpine and subalpine soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67:208–218View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McCain CM (2009) Vertebrate range sizes indicate that mountains may be ‘higher’ in the tropics. Ecol Lett 12:550–560View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Meng H, Li K, Nie M, Wan JR, Quan ZX, Fang CM, Chen JK, Gu JD, Li B (2013) Responses of bacterial and fungal communities to an elevation gradient in a subtropical montane forest of China. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:2219–2230View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nemergut DR, Cleveland CC, Wieder WR, Washenberger CL, Townsend AR (2010) Plot-scale manipulations of organic matter inputs to soils correlate with shifts in microbial community composition in a lowland tropical rain forest. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2153–2160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sagova-Mareckova M, Omelka, M. Cermak L, Kamenik Z, Olsovska J, Hackl, E, Kopecky J, Hadacek, F (2011) Microbial communities show parallels at sites with distinct litter and soil characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7560–7567
  26. Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1501–1506View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Shen C, Xiong J, Zhang H, Feng Y, Lin X, Li X, Liang W, Chu H (2013) Soil pH drives the spatial distribution of bacterial communities along elevation on Changbai Mountain. Soil Biol Biochem 57:204–211View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh D, Lee-Cruz L, Kim WS, Kerfahi D, Chun JH, Adams JM (2014) Strong elevational trends in soil bacterial community composition on Mt. Halla, South Korea. Soil Biol Biochem 68:140–149
  29. Singh D, Takahashi K, Kim M, Chun J, Adams JM (2012) A hump-backed trend in bacterial diversity with elevation on Mount Fuji, Japan. Microb Ecol 63:429–437View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naïve Bayesian Classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward NL, Challacombe JF, Janssen PH, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Wu M, Xie G, Haft DH, Sait M, Badger J, Barabote RD, Bradley B, Brettin TS, Brinkac LM, Bruce D, Creasy T, Daugherty SC, Davidsen TM, DeBoy RT, Detter JC, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Ganapathy A, Gwinn-Giglio M, Han CS, Khouri H, Kiss H, Kothari SP, Madupu R, Nelson KE, Nelson WC, Paulsen I, Penn K, Ren Q, Rosovitz MJ, Selengut JD, Shrivastava S, Sullivan SA, Tapia R, Thompson LS, Watkins KL, Yang Q, Yu C, Zafar N, Zhou L, Kuske CR (2009) Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2046–2056View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Yarwood SA, Myrold DD, Högberg MN (2009) Termination of belowground C allocation by trees alters soil fungal and bacterial communities in a boreal forest. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:151–162View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yergeau E, Bezemer TM, Hedlund K, Mortimer SR, Kowalchuk GA, Van Der Putten WH (2010) Influences of space, soil, nematodes and plants on microbial community composition of chalk grassland soils. Environ Microbiol 12:2096–2106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang L, Xu Z (2008) Assessing bacterial diversity in soil. J Soils Sediments 8:379–388View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang LM, Wang M, Prosser JI, Zheng YM, He JZ (2009) Altitude ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in soils of Mount Everest. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:208–217View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lin and Chiu. 2016