Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.159

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Endocarps of menispermaceous plants in Taiwan

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201657:14

DOI: 10.1186/s40529-016-0129-7

Received: 29 February 2016

Accepted: 23 May 2016

Published: 15 July 2016

Abstract

Background

The fruits of the family Menispermaceae are drupes, and because the drupe endocarps are morphologically diverse, they are generally used to classify members of this family. There is a lack of detailed knowledge of Menispermaceae endocarps in Taiwan. Therefore, in this study, the endocarps of seven genera and 14 species were dissected, and their morphological characters were photographed and described. Furthermore, a key for the 14 species based on the endocarps features, as well as a key of the studied genera, is proposed.

Results

The endocarp types comprise a straight shape in Tinospora dentata Diels and a horseshoe shape in the other 13 species. In general, the genus Cyclea bears two dorsal crests with 16 small spines, although there are about 25 spines in Cyclea insularis (Makino) Hatusima. The genus Cocculus has a dorsal convex endocarp with a subannular. In Taiwan, the endocarp of Sinomenium acutum (Thunb.) Rehder & E. H. Wilson has up to 26 transverse ridges, without spines on the crest and might be categorized under the genus Menispermum. Transverse endocarp ridges are found in Stephania cephalantha Hayata and Stephania tetrandra S. Moore, whereas transverse endocarp strips are found in Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers, Stephania longa Lour. and Stephania merrillii Diels.

Conclusion

We believe that the descriptions and photographs of the endocarp traits of T. dentata, which is endemic to Taiwan, will provide more evidence for further studies on extant and fossil species.

Keywords

Condyle Classification Dioecious climbing plants Mesocarp Moonseed family

Background

The Menispermaceae is a diverse family of mostly dioecious climbing plants, consisting of a few tree species, but mostly shrubs, and herbs. There are 72 genera and 520 species in this family (Jacques et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012), and the most speciose genera include Cissampelos L. (20–30 spp.), Cyclea Arn. ex Wight (30 spp.), Stephania Lour. (30–60 spp.), and Tinospora Miers (25–35 spp.) (Wefferling et al. 2013). Most members of this family are distributed throughout the tropics, although some are found in temperate regions. Their endocarps appear often in fossil records, and they indicate the presence of a wet forest ecosystem (Herrera et al. 2011). About 116 species in this family were surveyed for their endocarp traits by Jacques (2009).

Menispermaceae leaves are typically simple, with a palmatinerved venation, although a few genera have a pinnate venation. Their leaves are subpeltate, with a few taxa’s leaves being strongly peltate, with pulvinate petioles at both ends. Menispermaceae inflorescences and infructescences are mostly determinate; axillary, or borne on defoliate branches or old wood, rarely terminal; solitary or fasciculate; occur most often in racemes, cymes, or thyrses, sometimes in panicles or cymose heads, rarely reduced to solitary flowers (Wefferling et al. 2013). Flowers are unisexual, inconspicuous, trimerous, and actinomorphic; a few genera have pistillate, zygomorphic flowers; carpels are free, usually range between three and six in number, whereas the zygomorphic genera only have a single carpel; stamens are mainly free, but some genera form a synandrium (Ortiz et al. 2007). Fruits are produced aggregates of 3 or 6, single-seeded, and sometimes stipitate drupes. They usually consist of a fleshy or fibrous mesocarp, and a bony, woody, coriaceous, chartaceous or papyraceous endocarp.

The dorsal portion of the fruit in this family is mostly convex. Otherwise, it grows in a gibbous manner that curves the fruit into a horseshoe or crescent-shape, with the style scar becoming basal or sub-basal, appearing in mature fruit close to the pedicel. Otherwise, if the fruit is not curved, the style scar may be apical. Many endocarp characters vary within the family, such as endocarp type, limb length, condyle shape, convex or concave dorsal face, chambers, vascular trace, aperture, and perforation. Because this family is mainly defined by the curved seed found in many of the genera, it is also known as the moonseed family.

Menispermaceae endocarps vary widely in their ornamentation, which provides important taxonomic characters for distinguishing between and within the genera. Six genera and 13 taxa (including one variety) of this family have been identified in the Flora of Taiwan (Huang and Huang 1996), but exhaustive information on Menispermaceae endocarps is still lacking. This lack of data is addressed in this study, using their diverse endocarp ornamentation, by (1) carefully revising the various endocarp descriptors and providing detailed photographs of the discussed features, (2) developing a key based on endocarp morphological characters to identify the Menispermaceae genera and species in Taiwan.

Methods

To fully examine the endocarp morphology of the taxa, and in preparation for their photography, we collected fresh fruits of 14 species in seven genera belonging to Menispermaceae in Taiwan from 2012 to 2015 (species listed in Appendix 1). Fruits were studied using material obtained from the Herbarium of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute (TAIF), the Provincial Pingtung Institute (PPI), or personal collections.

We prepared the endocarp material after Forman (1986), Tiffney (1991), Jacques (2009b), and Herrera et al. (2011). First, the fruits were hydrated in boiling water for about 10 min, and subsequently left in water overnight to soften the pericarp. Second, the pericarp and mesocarp were separated using fine pliers, a small sharp scalpel, or a nylon toothbrush, and subsequently rinsed until free of soft tissues. The soft tissue adhering to the surface of the endocarp was brushed away as much as possible, and then cleaned with the toothbrush. When hydrated, spines of some endocarps are only slightly flexible and easily broken when dried, and must therefore be handled carefully. Mesocarp tissue was removed after hydration with boiling water, or by soaking the fruits in tap water, depending on their size and mesocarp thickness. The adhesion of the mesocarp to the endocarp is highly variable, even intraspecifically, such that this variability is linked to differences in species, maturity, and drying process. Finally, the endocarps were left in petri dishes to air-dry for at least 1 day.

Photographs of the endocarps were taken from lateral view, dorsal view, and sagittal view using a Nikon D80 SLR digital camera (Lens AF Micro Nikkor 60 mm 1: 2.8D, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), in the herbarium of PPI. The endocarp dimensions were measured using Image-J software (Ferreira and Rasband 2011), and if multiple specimens were examined, the average size was recorded. Furthermore, data were supplemented with available images and descriptions from other published studies (Thanikaimoni 1986; Ortiz et al. 2007; Jacques 2009a; Liu Jacques 2010; Herrera et al. 2011; Wefferling et al. 2013; Ortiz and Nee 2014). The terminology for the description of the endocarps partly follows Jacques (2009a), and a complete definition of endocarp characters can be found in Appendix 2.

Overall, we examined the endocarp variation among 14 species in the family Menispermaceae. The endocarp measurements and descriptions included four parts: (1) endocarp type, surface type, length (mm), width (mm), and thickness (mm); (2) lateral view, including the rows of ridges, number of transverse ridges or strips, number of spines, perforation, aperture, chambers, vascular trace, condyle shape, limb length; (3) dorsal view, including the rows of ridges, number of spines, number of transverse ridges, groove presence; (4) ventral view, including ventral trace, longitudinal aperture, keeled at apex.

Results

The morphological descriptions of some species’ endocarps have been reported in earlier studies. However, for all 14 investigated species the photographs and observations are new. The endocarp descriptions of these 14 investigated species were used to construct a comparison table. The identifying details, including the endocarp type; the surface type; and a lateral, dorsal, and ventral view, appear in Table 1, as well as in figures as follows: Cissampelos pareira L. var. hirsuta (DC.) Forman (Figs. 1–5), Cocculus laurifolius DC. (Figs. 6–9), Cocculus orbiculatus (L.) DC. (Figs. 10–13), Cyclea gracillima Diels (Figs. 14–18), Cyclea insularis (Makino) Hatusima (Figs. 19–23), Cyclea ochiaiana (Yamam.) S. F. Huang & T. C. Huang (Figs. 24–28), Pericampylus glaucus (Lam.) Merr. (Figs. 29–33), Sinomenium acutum (Thunb.) Rehder & E. H. Wilson (Figs. 34–37), Stephania cephalantha Hayata (Figs. 38–43), Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers. (Figs. 44–48), Stephania longa Lour. (Figs. 49–54), Stephania merrillii Diels (Figs. 55–59), Stephania tetrandra S. Moore (Figs. 60–64), Tinospora dentata Diels (Figs. 65–69). Three views are shown for all figures, and each figure is indicated using abbreviated labels to show the relevant parts of the endocarp.
Table 1

Morphological characteristics of endocarps and flower parts in Menispermaceae in Taiwan

Characters

Cissampelos pareira L. var. hirsuta (DC.) Forman

Cocculus laurifolius DC.

Cocculus orbiculatus (L.) DC.

Cyclea gracillima Diels

Cyclea insularis (Makino) Hatusima

Cyclea ochiaiana (Yamam.) S. F. Huang & T. C. Huang

Pericampylus glaucus (Lam.) Merr.

Sinomenium acutum (Thunb.) Rehder & E. H. Wilson

Stephania cephalantha Hayata

Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers

Stephania longa Lour.

Stephania merrillii Diels

Stephania tetrandra S. Moore

Tinospora dentata Diels

Types

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Horseshoe

Straight

Surface

Rugose

Reticulated

Reticulated

Scabrid

Scabrid

Scabrid

Scabrid

Short ridges

Excavated

excavated

Excavated

Excavated

Excavated

Scabrid

Length (mm)

3.4–3.5

4.3–5.2

3.1–3.8

2.7–2.9

4.2–4.8

4.1–4.2

4.5–6.3

5.1–5.5

4.7–5.7

5.0–5.3

5.8–6.5

9.1–10.3

4.8–5.0

8.0–8.8

Width (mm)

3.4–3.5

4.6–5.3

3.4–4.0

2.7–2.8

3.9–4.4

3.9–4.1

4.5–5.7

6.7–7.2

4.4–5.7

4.8–5.2

4.9–5.4

8.5–9.2

4.3–4.5

6.9–7.2

Thick (mm)

1.8–1.9

3.6–4.2

2.2–2.5

2.1–2.2

2.2–2.7

1.8–2.2

2.1–2.3

2.1–2.3

2.4–2.9

2.2–2.5

2.3–2.7

3.3–4.5

1.7–1.9

5.7–5.9

Lateral view

Row of ridges

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2–3

Number of transverse ridges

Obscure

Obscure

9

30

12

17

Number of transverse strips

9

10

14

Number of spines

 

15, 17

15, 23

13, 13

15, 20

Obscure

Perforated

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/1

1

0/1

1

0

0

Chamber

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Vascular trace

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Aperture

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Condyle

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Limbs

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

Dorsal view

Row of ridges

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

Number of spines

17, 17

25, 25

17, 17

20, 20

27

Numerous

Number of transverse ridges

7, 7

12, 12

17, 17

Number of transverse strips

9, 10

10, 11

12, 12

Groove

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

Ventral view

Ventral trace

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

Longitudinal aperture

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Keeled at apex

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Flower parts

Androecium

0

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

Style position

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0 absent, 1 present, 0/1 absent/present; longitudinal aperture: 0 absent, 1 present; chamber 0 absent, 1 present; vascular trace: 0 absent, 1 present; condyle: 0 compressed, 1 chamber; limb: 0 equal in length, 1 unequal in length; groove: 0 absent, 1 present; dorsal convex: 0 absent, 1 present; keeled at apex: 0 absent, 1 present; androecium: 0 synandrium, 1 no synandrium; style position: 0 basal, 1 terminal

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0129-7/MediaObjects/40529_2016_129_Fig1_HTML.gif
Figs. 1–18

Menispermaceae endocarps. 1–5 Cissampelos pareira L. var. hirsuta (DC.) Forman (PPI, P. H. Chen 502). 1 Lateral view, obscure transverse ridges with a prominent perforation. 2 Dorsal view, a groove. 3 Ventral view, vascular trace. 4 Sagittal view, immature seed. 5 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp. 6–9. Cocculus laurifolius DC. (PPI, P. H. Chen 964). 6 Lateral view, unequal length of limbs. 7 Dorsal view, conspicuous dorsal convex, surface with reticulated ridges. 8 Sagittal view, seed. 9 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp. 1013 Cocculus orbiculatus (L.) DC. (PPI, P. H. Chen 769). 10 Lateral view, same length of limbs. 11 Dorsal view, surface with reticulated ridges. 12 Sagittal view, seed. 13 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp. 1418 Cyclea gracillima Diels (PPI, P. H. Chen 564). 14 Lateral view, two lateral ridges with conspicuous chambers and spines. 15 Dorsal view, two dorsal ridges, dorsal convex. 16 Ventral view, vascular trace. 17 Sagittal view, seed, and same length of limbs. 18 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp. ch chamber, co condyle, g groove, is immature seed, ms mature seed, l limb, p perforated, re reticulated, s spine, tr transverse ridges, vt vascular trace

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0129-7/MediaObjects/40529_2016_129_Fig2_HTML.gif
Figs. 19–37

Menispermaceae endocarps. 1923 Cyclea insularis (Makino) Hatusima (TAIF, Chiu & Chen 4116). 19 Lateral view, two lateral ridges with outer wall of chambers and spines. 20 Dorsal view, two dorsal ridges with spines. 21 Ventral view, vascular trace. 22 Sagittal view, seed, showing unequal length of limbs. 23 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp. 2428 Cyclea ochiaiana (Yamam.) S. F. Huang & T. C. Huang (PPI, P. H. Chen 513). 24 Lateral view, conspicuous chambers and spines. 25 Dorsal view, two dorsal ridges with spines. 26 Ventral view, vascular trace. 27 Sagittal view, seeds, showing unequal length of limbs. 28 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp. 2933 Pericampylus glaucus (Lam.) Merr. (PPI, P. H. Chen 430). 29 Lateral view, broad dorsal crests. 30 Dorsal view, conspicuous spines, 31 Ventral view, vascular trace. 32 Sagittal view, seeds exhibits conspicuous ribs, unequal length of limbs. 33 Sagittal view empty, inner endocarp with convex ribs. 3437 Sinomenium acutum (Thunb.) Rehder & E. H. Wilson (TAIF, Chung et al. 11713). 34 Lateral view, vascular trace near one limb and a vascular notch, number of short transverse ridges (protuberance) >26. 35 Dorsal view, number of dorsal ridges >26. 36 Sagittal view, seed crescent–shaped with ribs. 37 Sagittal view empty, entry of lateral vascular tube. a aperture, br broad ridge, ch chamber, co condyle, g groove, is immature seed, ms mature seed, p perforated, r ribs, s spine, tr transverse ridges, vt vascular trace

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0129-7/MediaObjects/40529_2016_129_Fig3_HTML.gif
Figs. 38–59

Menispermaceae endocarps. 3843 Stephania cephalantha Hayata (PPI, P. H. Chen 860). 38 Lateral view, incomplete perforation. 39 Lateral view, a prominent perforation. 40 Dorsal view, transverse ridges. 41 Ventral view, vascular trace. 42 Sagittal view, seed and unequal length of limbs. 43 Sagittal view empty, intrusive ribs in locule and course of straight vascular trace through the solid condyle. 4448 Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers (PPI, P. H. Chen 416). 44 Lateral view, shape ovate with a prominent perforation. 45 Dorsal view, transverse ridges (strips). 46 Ventral view, vascular trace. 47 Sagittal view, seed and unequal length of limbs. 48 Sagittal view empty, intrusive ribs in locule and course of straight vascular trace through the solid condyle. 4954 Stephania longa Lour. (PPI, P. H. Chen 792). 49 Lateral view, incomplete perforation. 50 Lateral view, a prominent perforation. 51. Dorsal view, transverse ridges (strips).52 Ventral view, vascular trace. 53. Sagittal view, seed and unequal length of limbs. 54 Sagittal view empty, intrusive ribs in locule and course of straight vascular trace through the solid condyle. 5559 Stephania merrillii Diels (PPI, P. H. Chen 150). 55 Lateral view, a prominent perforation. 56 Dorsal view, transverse ridges (strips). 57 Ventral view, vascular trace. 58 Sagittal view, seed and longer seed limb. 59 Sagittal view empty, intrusive ribs in locule and course of straight vascular trace through the solid condyle. co condyle, is immature seed, ip incomplete perforation, l limb, ms mature seed, r ribs, p perforated, tr transverse ridges, vt vascular trace

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0129-7/MediaObjects/40529_2016_129_Fig4_HTML.gif
Figs. 60–69

Menispermaceae endocarps. 6064 Stephania tetrandra S. Moore (PPI, P. H. Chen 415). 60 Lateral view, incomplete perforation with convex sculpturing near ventral notch. 61 Dorsal view, transverse ridges. 62 Ventral view, vascular trace. 63 Sagittal view, seed and unequal length of limbs. 64 Sagittal view empty, straight vascular tube. 6569 Tinospora dentata Diels (PPI, P. H. Chen 361). 65 Lateral view, two or three slightly lateral ridges with spines on the surface. 66 Dorsal view, one dorsal ridge. 67 Ventral view, a longitudinal aperture of linear condyle, keeled at apex. 68 Sagittal view, seed. 69 Sagittal view empty, empty endocarp, showing subglobose condyle. a aperture, co condyle, i.e. inner endocarp, k keeled, ms mature seed, r ribs, s spine, sc subglobose condyle, tr transverse ridges, vt vascular trace

The endocarps of 14 menispermaceous species in Taiwan displayed both horseshoe and straight types, and their length ranged from 2.1 to 10.3 mm (Table 1). At the generic level, their shape was generally similar, but their ornamentation varied among species. The dorsal ridges were more or less symmetric, and the lateral faces did not have a convex sculpturing in the genera Cissampelos, Cyclea, and Stephania. Based on these endocarp characteristics, we constructed a key to seven genera (Appendix 3), based on the Menispermaceae fruit by Wefferling, et al. (2013). We furthermore established a key to the 14 species, allowing identification to the level of genera and species, as follows: https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40529-016-0129-7/MediaObjects/40529_2016_129_Figa_HTML.gif .

Discussion

The family Menispermaceae is divided in two large clades, with the tribes Tinosporeae and Menispermeae included in clades 1 and 2, respectively. Molecular phylogeny was studied using five characteristics either from the flower, i.e., using the androecium and style scar, or from the seed, i.e., using the endosperm, cotyledons, and shape (Ortiz et al. 2007; Jacques and Bertolino 2008). According to the previous reports, among the seven genera in this study, the synandrium in the central column with horizontal anthers is a synapomorphy of three genera, i.e., Cissampelos, Cyclea, and Stephania, but in four genera, i.e., Cocculus, Pericampylus, Sinomenium, and Tinospora, there are no synandrium. The position of the style scar is terminal in the genus Tinospora and basal in the other six genera. Endosperm is present in all seven genera. The cotyledons are foliaceous in Tinospora and fleshy in the other six genera. The seed shape is straight in Tinospora and crescent in the other genera.

The ancestral conditions for Menispermaceae are synapomorphies of foliaceous cotyledons, no synandrium, and the terminal position of the style scar (Jacques and Bertolino 2008), as well as straight-shaped seeds (Ortiz et al. 2007). In this study, we suggest that the morphological phylogeny of the genus Tinospora is the most original condition among seven genera in Taiwan because of foliaceous cotyledons, terminal style scar, and straight-shaped seed; the genera Cissampelos, Cyclea, and Stephania are derived from Cocculus, Pericampylus, and Sinomenium because of a synapomorphy of no synandrium.

The three genera, Cissampelos, Cyclea, and Stephania, form a clade (SCC clade, or pantropical clade in Herrera et al. 2011) that is strongly supported as monophyletic, which has female flowers with a single carpel as a morphological synapomorphy (Wefferling et al. 2013). Furthermore, the endocarps of the three genera are variously ornamented with spines, tubercles, wings, or ridges; distal limb is longer (rarely equal), and sometimes has two (to four) lateral chambers. These chambers can have lateral apertures or not; the vascular trace is ventral; the condyle is compressed bilaterally or both bilaterally and dorsoventrally, and is sometimes perforated (Wefferling et al. 2013).

Cissampelos and Cyclea are closely related to Stephania (Hoot et al. 2009; Jacques et al. 2011), but their endocarps are easily distinguished. In Cissampelos and Cyclea, there are always two lateral crests (ridges) per side, usually two dorsal crests, and their endocarps are often imperforated. According to published results (Jacques 2009; Liu and Jacques 2010; Herrera et al. 2011), endocarps of Cissampelos pareira L. are covered by conspicuous spines with two dorsal and lateral ridges (crests). They also have a distinctly longer distal limb that slightly comes closer, and the outer lateral ridge partly overlaps the inner one (all ridges bear outgrowths). Ortiz and Nee (2014) described a new species of Cissampelos arenicola M. Nee & R. Ortiz. Its endocarp length and width are about 6 × 7 mm, and it is suborbicular-bilaterally compressed, with one small circular perforation on the lateral faces. Furthermore, its ornamentation is obscure, consisting of a very low medial ridge and faintly transverse ridges. In this study, the endocarp of C. pareira var. hirsuta was found to be horseshoe-shaped, with one circular perforation, and one dorsal and lateral ridge (Table 1; Figs. 1–3) that are more or less similar as in C. arenicola, but truly differ from those of C. pareira. This might be due to intraspecific differences, or because we included immature fruits that had not yet developed those characteristics. However, because of the low number of specimens known for some species (e.g., only two fruits were collected), this study did not consider any intraspecific variability for endocarp shape and size. Therefore, collecting and studying more mature fruits might resolve these inconsistencies in endocarp characteristics.

Forman (1986) and Thanikaimoni (1986) describe in detail that Cocculus showed a formation of dome–shaped extensions of the lateral ridges over the median septum that create a two–chambered condyle. The diagnostic characters of Cocculus included lateral faces of endocarp without aperture, or with aperture or perforation centered in the lateral concave face. Lateral chambers are present, as well as a surface with longitudinal and transverse ridging. Finally, a lateral compression that is restricted to center of each lateral face results in a subannular endocarp (Wefferling et al. 2013). Furthermore, Jacques (2009b) reported an endocarp morphological description of C. laurifolius, C. orbiculatus, and those of the genus Cocculus. When comparing the figures and terms used in the previous reports for these two species in Taiwan, we observed differences in the characteristics of the subannular shape, the formation of lateral chambers without aperture, a reticulated surface, and their obscure ventral trace (Figs. 6–13), whereas the other characteristics were consistent with the previous results described as above.

Jacques (2009b) included the concave exterior of laterally compressed endocarps as part of the condyle, and referred to a double external condyle in descriptions of several taxa, including Cissampelos, Cocculus, Cyclea, Pericampylus, and Stephania. In this study, the endocarps of three species, C. gracillima, C. insularis, and C. ochiaiana (Figs. 1–18, 19–28) are consistent with the characteristics described as above, because they have two dorsal and two lateral ridges, and two lateral chambers combined with a condyle aperture on the ventral view. Liu and Jacques (2010) indicated that the genus Cyclea bears two dorsal crests with 16 small spines, but there are about 25 spines in C. insularis. The latter might be an intraspecific difference or influenced by the measuring method. Wefferling et al. (2013) indicated that the endocarps of the genus Cyclea show a variety of ornamentation, with two to four lateral chambers with or without lateral apertures. In the present study, we found that three species in Taiwan display a lateral aperture with different chamber sizes, especially the endemic species C. insularis (Figs. 24, 27).

The endocarp of P. glaucus shows a lateral concavity (i.e., condyle) a broader dorsal ridge at one limb, a ventral vascular trace, concave lateral faces with convex sculpturing near ventral notch, and long spines or very thick spines (Jacques 2009b; Herrera et al. 2011; Wefferling et al. 2013). The characteristics described above are consistent with the species in Taiwan (Figs. 29–33). The species Pericampylus formosanus Diels was placed as the synonym of P. glaucus (Lo et al. 2008), but the former can be differentiated from the latter by the covering hairs on both surfaces of the leaf and the filaments united into a tube (Huang and Huang 1996). Future comparative studies on hairs, filaments, and endocarps between these two species might provide strong evidence for the synonym treatment.

The endocarp lateral faces of the genus Sinomenium show a conspicuous off-center aperture near distal limb (Wefferling et al. 2013), and S. acutum (Herrera et al. 2011) and S. acutum var. cinereum (Wefferling et al. 2013) have spines on the dorsal ridge. Jacques (2009b) also indicated that the double external condyle of S. acutum is not perforated, makes a large central area with a conspicuous hollow near one limb, and has a comma-shaped ridge bordering it. The position of this hollow and the aperture is as same as the one near the limb, but these two researchers describe it by different terms. A personal communication with Dr. Jacques indicated that the aperture must be connected to a subglobose condyle, such as in the genus Tinospora. He furthermore suggested that, for the genus Sinomenium, it should be called a vascular trace (Table 1). The vascular trace was indeed observed in S. acutum, but the spines were not in this study (Figs. 34–37). The key to the genera of Menispermaceae indicated that the number of lateral ridges of Sinomenium is <25, and that of Menispermum is >26 (Jacques 2009b), and the number of lateral ridges of species in Taiwan is >26. Liu and Jacques (2010) compared fossil endocarps with extant species of S. acutum and Maianthemum canadense L. In their study, the number of protuberances (i.e., lateral ridges) for S. acutum ranged from 18 to 21, and showed ventral notch that was straight or slightly concave, whereas those of M. canadense L. ranged between 27 and 30, and the ventral notch was V-shaped. Furthermore, the ornamentation of endocarps of Menispermum has no spines on the dorsal crest, the number of lateral ridges is >26, and the ventral notch is almost V-shaped. We therefore question if the species S. acutum in Taiwan is misplaced and similar to the Menispermum genus. This inconsistency should be addressed with further sampling data.

The endocarp dorsal ridges of the genus Stephania are discontinuous, with a strong ornamentation that has an intrageneric variation, namely in the transverse ridges, and in the condyle perforation (Jacques 2009b). In this study, the genus Stephania displays the crustaceous, transverse ridging that is different from Cissampelos and Cyclea. Transverse ridges of endocarps are found in S. cephalantha, and S. tetrandra (Figs. 38–43, 60–64), whereas transverse strips are found in S. japonica, S. longa and S. merrillii (Figs. 44–59). The other lateral face characters in this genus are consistent with the previous results (see Table 1). Concave lateral faces are present, and have a convex sculpturing near the ventral notch in S. tetrandra (Fig. 60). This character is only found in the genus Pericampylus (Wefferling et al. 2013).

The endocarp of the genus Tinospora is bony, round, ovoid/obovoid, or subellipsoidal in outline, tuberculate or verrucose, sometimes echinate, hispid (with stiff bristles), or ornamented with wings and ridges. The lateral chambers are absent, the vascular trace is positioned inside the ventral concavity of the condyle and forms a cylindrical, protruding vascular tube extends nearly to the level of the aperture mouth; the condyle is hollow, deeply intrusive, and subglobose or subreniform, and it is open ventrally (Wefferling et al. 2013). In the present study, the endocarp of T. dentata, which is an endemic species in Taiwan (Hengchun Peninsula), is round in shape with a developed keel at the apex on the dorsal ridge, and a linear condyle aperture; the condyle is subglobose in shape (Fig. 69), with a cupule and locule, and a protruding vascular tube. Lo et al. (2008) did not report this drupe information, and this is the first description and photographs for the endocarp of T. dentata (Table 1; Figs. 65–69) providing some evidence and references for further studies.

Birds and mammals are the most commonly observed fruit consumers in Menispermaceae. Birds species known disperse fruits and seeds include the eastern phoebe flycatchers (dispersing Cocculus DC.; Kessler 1993). Mammalian dispersal vectors include gorillas, lemurs, galagos (dispersing Cissampelos; Jacques 2009b), and white-faced monkeys (dispersing Cissampelos; Croat 1978). Forman (1986) points to humans as a recent and significant dispersal agent. Relatively little is known about menispermaceous fruit dispersal or seed predation within the family. Furthermore, the knowledge of endocarp adaptation is limited by the lack of information on the seed dispersal. Therefore, ecological studies and understanding of endocarp dispersal should provide new insights in the adaptive role of some endocarp features.

The molecular phylogeny of the three species C. orbiculatus, P. glaucus, and S. japonica, collected from Taiwan and preserved the herbarium (MO and HAST), has been reported (Ortiz et al. 2007). That study emphasized the importance of specimen exchanges among herbaria for different field studies. Some inconsistencies in our results could be addressed with an extensive sampling of fruits and genomic sequencing of the data. The endocarp characters we described can provide some phylogenetic information for a morphological phylogenetic analysis of this family.

Conclusion

The synapomorphies of the androecium, style scar, seed shape, and cotyledons for the family Menispermaceae are supported for morphological phylogeny. The genus Tinospora may be the most original condition among seven genera of Taiwan with its characteristics of terminal style position, straight-shaped seed, and foliaceous cotyledons. The three species C. ochiaiana, S. merrillii, and T. dentata, are endemic for Taiwan, and their endocarp information will provide guidelines for the identification or phylogenetic analysis of this family. The endocarp of C. pareira var. hirsuta is significantly different from that of C. pareira and should be further investigated. Surprisingly, the two dorsal ridges with 25 spines in C. insularis differ significantly from previous reports that the genus Cyclea has about 16 small spines. The endocarp of Cocculus is subannular in shape, with a dorsal convex face. The different characteristics between the genera Sinomenium and Menispermum will be useful for taxonomic determinations. Transverse ridges and strips on the dorsal and lateral face of endocarps are found in the genus Stephania. Finally, we provide the first description and photographs of endocarp characteristics for T. dentata. This information will provide a reference for further studies.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SZY conceived of and designed the experiments. PHC conducted the fieldwork and collected the plant specimens and performed the taxonomical study. SZY wrote the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank the curators of herbaria TAI and TAIF for examining the specimens, and the staff members of the PPI herbarium at the National Pingtung University of Science and Technology for performing the investigation of lianas and collecting the living materials.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Croat TB (1978) Flora of Barro Colorado Island. Stanford University Press, Stanford, p 185Google Scholar
  2. Ferreira T, Rasband W (2011) The ImageJ User Guide version 1.44. http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/docs/user-guide.pdf
  3. Forman LL (1986) Menispermaceae. In: van Steenis CGGJ, de Wilde WJJO (eds) Flora Malesiana, vol 10. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 157–253Google Scholar
  4. Herrera F, Manchester SR, Hoot SB, Wefferling KM, Carvalho MR, Jaramillo C (2011) Phytogeographic implications of fossil endocarps of Menispermaceae from the paleocene of colombia. Am J Bot 98:2004–2017View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoot SB, Zautke H, Harris DJ, Crane PR, Neves SS (2009) Phylogenetic patterns in Menispermaceae based on multiple chloroplast sequence data. Syst Bot 34:44–56View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang SF, Huang TC (1996) Menispermaceae. In: Huang TC et al (eds) Flora of Taiwan, vol 2, 2nd edn. Editorial Committee, Dept Bot, NTU, Taipei, pp 591–607Google Scholar
  7. Jacques FMB (2009a) Survey of the Menispermaceae endocarps. Adansonia 31:47–87View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacques FMB (2009b) Fossil history of the Menispermaceae (Ranunculales). Annales de Pal é ontologie 95:53–69View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacques FMB, Bertolino P (2008) Molecular and morphological phylogeny of Menispermaceae (Ranunculales). Plant Syst Evol 274:83–97View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacques FMB, Wang W, Ortiz RDC, Li HL, Zhou ZK, Chen ZD (2011) Integrating fossils in a molecular-based phylogeny and testing them as calibration points for divergence time estimates in Menispermaceae. J Syst Evol 49:25–49View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kessler PJA (1993) Menispermaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V (eds) The families and genera of vascular plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 402–418Google Scholar
  12. Liu YSC, Jacques FMB (2010) Sinomenium macrocarpum sp. nov. (Menispermaceae) from the Miocene-Pliocene transition of Gray, northeast Tennessee, USA. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 159:112–122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lo HS, Chen TM, Gilbert G (2008) Menisperaceae. In: Wu CY, Raven PH (eds) Flora of China, vol 7. Science Press, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing, Saint Louis, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  14. Ortiz RDC, Nee MH (2014) A new species of Cissampelos (Menispermaceae) from Bolivia and Paraguay. PhytoKeys 38:89–99View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ortiz R, Kellogg EA, Van Der Werff H (2007) Molecular phylogeny of the moonseed Family (Menispermaceae): implications for morphological diversification. Am J Bot 94:1425–1438View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Thanikaimoni G (1986) Evolution of the Menispermaceae. Can J Bot 64:3130–3133View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiffney BH (1991) The collection and study of dispersed angiosperm fruits and seeds. Palaios 5:499–519View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang W, Ortiz RDC, Jacques FMB, Xiang XG, Li HL, Lin L, Li RQ et al (2012) Menispermaceae and the diversification of tropical rainforests near the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. New Phytolog 195:470–478View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wefferling KM, Hoot SB, Neves SS (2013) Phylogeny and fruit evolution in menispermaceae. Am J Bot 100:1–23View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang SZ, Chen PH, Chen CF, Chen CW (2016) Identity of a problematic Menispermaceae in Taiwan, Cissampelos pareira L. var. hirsuta (Buch. ex DC.) Forman. Taiwania 61(1):27–33Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016