Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of major eucalypt SSR loci applied in population genetic studies

From: Microsatellite resources of Eucalyptus: current status and future perspectives

S.No Species Na (Minimum–Maximum) Ho (Minimum–Maximum) He (Minimum–Maximum) Reference
1 E. nitens 9–16 0.40–0.80 0.72–0.91 Byrne et al. [1996]
2 E. grandis 5–18 0.33–0.87 0.74–0.91 Brondani et al. [1998]
3 E. urophylla 7–17 0.35–0.81 0.60–0.93 Brondani et al. [1998]
4 E. globulus 14–21 0.31–0.85 0.69–0.92 Steane et al. [2001]
5 E. globulus 16–24 0.42–0.78 0.81–0.92 Jones et al. [2002]
6 E. urophylla 5–16 0.1–0.93 0.23–0.93 Brondani et al. [2002]
7 E. grandis 4–17 0.18–0.93 0.64–0.93 Brondani et al. [2002]
8 E. curtisii 1–9 0.0–0.85 0–0.85 Smith et al. [2003]
9 E. brownii, E. populnea 10–21 0.61–1 0.58–0.95 Holman et al. [2003]*
10 E. grandis 14–21 0.51–0.85 0.62–0.86 Chaix et al. [2003]
11 E. dunnii 11–22 0.26–0.83 0.68–0.93 Zelener et al. [2005]
12 E. benthamii 4–26 0.61–0.71 0.62–0.78 Butcher et al. [2005]
13 E. leucoxylon 8–20 0.77–0.92 0.47–0.93 Ottewell et al. [2005]
14 E. grandis 6–33 - 0.65–0.94 Kirst et al. [2005b]
15 E. globulus 4.6–9.6 0.66–0.74 0.66–0.79 Jones et al. [2006]*
16 E. globulus 9.7 0.62 0.75 Freeman et al. [2007]*
17 E. perriniana 5.6–10.9 0.54–0.72 0.65–0.83 Rathbone et al. [2007]*
18 E. globulus 9–21 0.55–0.83 0.72–0.91 Foster et al. [2007]
19 E. grandis 14–28 0.59–0.93 0.77–0.95 Jones et al. [2008]
20 E. regnans 4–15 0.65–0.91 0.67–0.93 Nevill et al. [2008]
21 E. obliqua 5–20 0.57–0.94 0.63–0.94 Nevill et al. [2008]
22 E. delegatensis 6–19 0.68–0.94 0.59–0.93 Nevill et al. [2008]
23 E. radiata 6–17 0.65–0.95 0.7–0.91 Nevill et al. [2008]
24 E. pauciflora 5–15 0.6–0.88 0.67–0.9 Nevill et al. [2008]
25 E. cloeziana 5–10 0.62–0.82 0.57–0.85 Nevill et al. [2008]
26 E. globulus 11–17 0.75–0.83 0.85–0.90 Rao et al. [2008]
27 E. camaldulensis 5–13 0.28–0.84 0.25–0.9 da Silva et al. [2009]
28 E. camaldulensis 5.0–11.3 0.66–0.82 0.72–0.88 Butcher et al. [2009]*
29 E. tereticornis 3.2–7.7 0.67–0.76 0.76–0.82 Butcher et al. [2009]*
30 E. rudis 6.1–7.9 0.56–0.71 0.67–0.83 Butcher et al. [2009]*
31 E. grandis 7–15 0.55–0.94 0.75–0.91 Faria et al. [2010]
32 E. globulus 5–12 0.4–0.92 0.48–0.93 Faria et al. [2010]
33 E. urophylla 4–10 0.13–0.86 0.48–0.92 Faria et al. [2010]
34 E. camaldulensis 4–14 0–1.0 0.60–0.92 Faria et al. [2010]
35 E. dunnii 5–9 0.5–1.0 0.74–0.91 Faria et al. [2010]
36 E. saligna 4–15 0.31–1 0.58–0.95 Faria et al. [2010]
37 E. grandis 4–7 0.25–0.81 0.05–0.87 Faria et al. [2010]
38 E. globulus 4–8 0.4v0.92 0.60–0.83 Faria et al. [2010]
39 E. urophylla 4–8 0.15–0.92 0.59–0.83 Faria et al. [2010]
40 E. camaldulensis 2–8 0.19–0.8 0.18–0.82 Faria et al. [2010]
41 E. dunnii 3–7 0.13–0.94 0.30–0.85 Faria et al. [2010]
42 E. saligna 4–8 0.06–0.93 0.50–0.83 Faria et al. [2010]
43 E. aggregata 4.66–9.33 0.65–0.71 0.70–0.73 Field et al. [2010]
44 E. rubida 6.67–12.8 0.75–0.79 0.736–0.91 Field et al. [2010]
45 E. grandis 2–7 0.06–1.0 0.18–0.77 Faria et al. [2011]
46 E. urophylla 1–7 0.0–0.93 0.0–0.81 Faria et al. [2011]
47 E. globulus 2–8 0.14–0.94 0.23–0.82 Faria et al. [2011]
48 E. camaldulensis 2–10 0.07–0.93 0.07–0.90 Faria et al. [2011]
49 E. aggregata × E. rubida 5.67–14.2 0.77–0.86 0.83–0.89 Field et al. [2010]
50 E. pilularis 12.6 0.78 0.75 Shepherd et al. [2010]*
51 E. globulus 6–21 0.71–0.93 0.5–0.9 Ribeiro et al. [2011]
52 E. obliqua 11–32 0.71–0.91 0.75–0.94 Bloomfield et al. [2011]
53 E. incrassata - 0.61–0.92 0.76–0.80 Breed et al. [2012]
54 E. gomphocephala 27–60 0.58–0.73 0.6–0.69 Bradbury and Krauss [2013]
55 E. gomphocephala 8–27 0.52–0.87 0.51–0.84 Bradbury et al. [2013b]
56 E. gomphocephala 2–12 0.17–0.87 0.24–0.86 Bradbury et al. [2013a]
57 E. victrix 5–25 0.52–0.91 0.48–0.93 Nevill et al. [2013]
58 E. grandis 1–14 0–1 0.08–0.96 Zhou et al. [2014]
  1. * Indicates the mean values; Na- Number of alleles; Ho- Observed Heterozygosity; He- Expected Heterozygosity.