Land-use type
|
Depth (cm)
|
N (%)
|
C/N ratio
|
---|
Tea plantation
|
0–5
|
1.03 (0.29)a
|
11.3 (0.8)
|
5–10
|
0.52 (0.131)
|
10.7 (0.2)
|
10–30
|
0.19 (0.025)
|
10.1 (0.4)
|
30–50
|
0.11 (0.015)
|
8.20 (0.53)
|
Bamboo forest
|
0–5
|
0.77 (0.215)
|
10.6 (0.3)
|
5–10
|
0.69 (0.057)
|
10.5 (0.5)
|
10–30
|
0.26 (0.053)
|
9.93 (0.66)
|
30–50
|
0.14 (0.025)
|
7.11 (0.79)
|
Japanese cedar forest
|
0–5
|
2.08 (0.54)
|
15.4 (0.3)
|
5–10
|
0.80 (0.061)
|
13.1 (0.8)
|
10–30
|
0.29 (0.064)
|
11.4 (1.4)
|
30–50
|
0.16 (0.015)
|
8.65 (1.80)
|
Taiwania forest
|
0–5
|
2.82 (0.71)
|
12.2 (2.2)
|
5–10
|
1.10 (0.39)
|
14.5 (1.9)
|
10–30
|
0.26 (0.046)
|
10.9 (2.0)
|
30–50
|
0.13 (0.031)
|
7.00 (2.12)
|
ANOVA for significance of
|
Land-use type
|
JC = TW > TP = BM***
|
JC > TW > TP = BM***
|
Depth (cm)
|
0–5 > 5–10 > 10–30 = 30–50***
|
0–5 = 5–10 > 10–30 > 30–50***
|
-
TP tea plantation, BM bamboo forest, JC Japanese Cedar forest, TW Taiwania forest
- *** p < 0.001
-
aValues in parentheses are stand errors (n = 3)