Skip to main content

Table 4 Actual and predicted cross-pollination rate (%) of the ZINB models by distance

From: Using a zero-inflated model to assess gene flow risk and coexistence of Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L. on a field scale in Taiwan

Distance (m)

Average CP (%)a

Predicted CP (%)

ZINB-Exponential power model

ZINB-Weibull model

0.35

2.8025

3.0087

2.9728

1.05

0.9989

1.1185

1.1617

1.75

0.3321

0.4916

0.4771

2.45

0.4401

0.2614

0.2541

3.15

0.2085

0.1772

0.1765

3.85

0.1497

0.1461

0.1475

4.55

0.3062

0.1351

0.1365

5.25

0.0631

0.1315

0.1323

5.95

0.0518

0.1305

0.1309

6.65

0.078

0.1303

0.1304

7.35

0.0358

0.1302

0.1303

8.05

0.0503

0.1302

0.1302

8.75

0.0256

0.1302

0.1302

9.45

0.0294

0.1302

0.1302

10.15

0.0398

0.1302

0.1302

10.85

0.0256

0.1302

0.1302

11.55

0.0167

0.1302

0.1302

12.25

0

0.1302

0.1302

12.95

0.0308

0.1302

0.1302

  1. CP: cross-pollinated rate
  2. aAverage cross-pollinated rate of the validation dataset