Skip to main content

Table 4 MBST of NILs under different nitrogen regimes

From: Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the resistance of rice near-isogenic lines with BPH resistance genes

Varieties/NILs

TN1

IR24

NIL-BPH 4

NIL-BPH 9

NIL-BPH 10

NIL-BPH 17

NIL-BPH 18

NIL-BPH 20

NIL-BPH 21

NIL-BPH 26

NIL-BPH 32

NIL-BPH 2 + 32

NIL-BPH 9 + 32

NIL-BPH 18 + 32

Nitrogen

regimes

 N0

8.3 ± 0.5

a

6.0 ± 0.0

cd

5.0 ± 0.0

def

4.0 ± 1.0

efg

6.7 ± 0.6

bc

0.0 ± 0.0

l

5.7 ± 0.6

cde

4.0 ± 2.6

efg

5.3 ± 1.2 cdef

5.0 ± 1.0

def

4.0 ± 1.0

efg

2.7 ± 1.2

ghi

0.3 ± 0.6

kl

1.7 ± 0.6

ijkl

 N50

8.5 ± 0.5

a

6.5 ± 1.2

c

4.7 ± 0.6

def

0.7 ± 1.2

jkl

6.0 ± 1.0

cd

0.3 ± 0.6

kl

5.3 ± 0.6 cdef

5.3 ± 0.6 cdef

6.0 ± 1.0

cd

6.0 ± 1.0

cd

2.0 ± 0.0 hijk

4.0 ± 1.7

efg

0.3 ± 0.6

kl

2.7 ± 1.5

ghi

 N200

8.0 ± 1.1

ab

5.2 ± 0.8

def

2.7 ± 2.1

ghi

5.0 ± 1.0

def

5.7 ± 0.6

cde

0.3 ± 0.6

kl

3.7 ± 1.5

fgh

2.3 ± 2.1 ghij

1.7 ± 0.6

ijkl

4.7 ± 2.3

def

2.0 ± 1.0 hijk

2.0 ± 1.7 hijk

0.3 ± 0.6

kl

0.0 ± 0.0

l

  1. The survival rate score of N. lugens nymphs feeding on TN1, IR24, and NILs was based pm that reported by Jena et al. (2006). Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05)