Skip to main content

Advertisement

Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Botanical Studies Cover Image

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Original Article
  • Open Access

Anti-fungal activity, mechanism studies on α-Phellandrene and Nonanal against Penicillium cyclopium

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201758:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0168-8

©  The Author(s) 2017

  • Received: 25 September 2016
  • Accepted: 3 March 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Essential oils from plants have been reported to have wide spread antimicrobial activity against various bacterial and fungal pathogens, and these include α-Phellandrene, Nonanal and other volatile substances. However, biological activities of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal have been reported only in a few publications. Further investigations are necessary to determine the antimicrobial activity of these compounds, especially for individual application, to establish the possible mechanism of action of the most active compound.

Results

The results are shown that α-Phellandrene and Nonanal have a dose-dependent inhibition on the mycelial growth of Penicillium cyclopium. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) are 1.7 and 1.8 mL/L for α-Phellandrene, 0.3 and 0.4 mL/L for Nonanal, respectively. The volatile compounds altered the morphology of P. cyclopium hyphae by causing loss of cytoplasmic material and distortion of the mycelia. The membrane permeability of P. cyclopium increased with increasing concentrations of the two volatile compounds, as evidenced by cell constituent release, extracellular conductivity and induced efflux of K+. Moreover, the two volatile compounds induced a decrease in pH and in the total lipid content of P. cyclopium, which suggested that cell membrane integrity had been compromised.

Conclusions

The results demonstrated that α-Phellandrene and Nonanal could significantly inhibit the mycelia growth of P. cyclopium by severely disrupting the integrity of the fungal cell membrane, leading to the leakage of cell constituents and potassium ions, and triggering an increase of the total lipid content, extracellular pH and membrane permeability. Our present study suggests that α-Phellandrene and Nonanal might be a biological fungicide for the control of P. cyclopium in postharvest tomato fruits.

Keywords

  • P. cyclopium
  • Antifungal activity
  • SEM
  • Mechanism
  • Membrane permeability

Background

Many plant species, including tomato, synthesize and store numerous volatile terpenoid compounds during normal leaf development (Buttery et al. 1988; Paré and Tumlinson 1999). Tomato is a constitutive emitter of low amounts of mono- and sesquiterpenes under non-stressed conditions, but these emissions become greatly enhanced under stress (Jansen et al. 2009; Maes and Debergh 2003). The volatile blends from Solanum lycopersicum leaves detected with SPME GC–MS were mainly terpenoids (i.e., α-Phellandrene), fatty acid derivatives (i.e., Nonanal) and aromatic compounds (Zhang et al. 2008).

Nonanal has been reported to exhibit antimicrobial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in the concentration of 100 to more than 800 mg/kg (Muroi et al. 1993). Nonanal is reported to have a MIC of 0.2 μg/mg against Staphylococcus aureus (Kubo et al. 1995). α-Phellandrene showed weak inhibitory effects against all tested bacteria at the concentrations of 1 to >4 mg/mL (Demirci et al. 2001; Iscan et al. 2012). α-Phellandrene, β-Phellandrene, ocimene, limonene, myrcene, and α-caryophyllene have shown in vitro activity against Bacillus sp., Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and S. aureus (Perez et al. 1999; Costa et al. 2000). Essential oils are usually mixtures of monoterpene and sesquiterpene, and their oxygenated derivatives. Their composition and proportion depended on species as well as the extraction and separation methods (Fisher and Phillips 2008). Essential oils are aromatic oily liquids, their antimicrobial properties have been empirically recognized for centuries, but scientifically confirmed only recently (Dorman and Deans 2000). α-Phellandrene and Nonanal are present in large quantities in many species such as canola, soybean, Senecio laetus, Haplophyllum tuberculatum, Minuartia meyeri and Apium graveolens (Inouye et al. 2001; Fernando et al. 2005; Al-Burtamani et al. 2005; Nurettin et al. 2006; Rodriguez-Burbano et al. 2010; Hernández et al. 2013; Pandey et al. 2014). These essential oils had a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against various bacterials and pathogenic fungi including Candida albicans, Alternaria alternate, Bipolaris sp., Curvularia lunata, Fusarium oxysporium (Inouye et al. 2001; Al-Burtamani et al. 2005; Nurettin et al. 2006; Hernández et al. 2013; Sharma et al. 2014).

The lipophilicity of essential oils enable them to preferentially partition from an aqueous phase into membrane structures of the fungi, resulting in membrane expansion, increased membrane fluidity and permeability, disturbance of membrane-embedded proteins, inhibition of respiration, alteration of ion transport processes in fungi and induced leakage of ions and other cellular contents (Burt 2004; Fadli et al. 2012; Khan et al. 2010; Oonmetta-aree et al. 2006).

Biological activities of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal were reported only in a few publications. Further investigations are necessary to determine the anti-microbial activity of these compounds, especially for individual application, to establish the possible mechanism of action of the most active compound to combat resistant pathogenic fungi. This study aims to analyze α- Phellandrene and Nonanal on the mycelial growth of Penicillium cyclopium. The effects of different concentrations of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal on surface morphology, cell membrane permeability, and release of cellular material were investigated to elucidate their anti-fungal mechanisms.

Methods

Chemicals

α-Phellandrene (>99%) and Nonanal (>96%) were obtained from Dieckmann company (Shenzhen, China). Cholesterol (95%) and phosphovanillin (98%) were purchased from TCI Shanghai (Shanghai, China). All the chemicals were analytical grade.

Pathogens

Penicillium cyclopium was provided by the Department of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Xiangtan, China, and the fungal was isolated from infected tomato (S. lycopersicum) fruit. The fungal spores concentrations were adjusted to 5 × 105 spores/mL using a haemocytometer before each test. 100 μL fungal suspensions (105 spores/mL) were added into the triangle bottle with 40 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB) and incubated in a rotatory shaker at 28 ± 2 °C and 120 rpm for 4 days.

Measurement of mycelial growth

Effects of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal on the mycelial growth of P. cyclopium were evaluated in vitro by agar dilution method (Yahyazadeh et al. 2008). PDA (20 mL) was poured to sterilized Petri dishes (90 mm diameter) and measured amounts of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal were added to PDA mediums (plus with 0.05% Tween-80) to give the following concentration of 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50, 1.75 and 2.00 mL/L for α-Phellandrene; of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350 and 400 μL/L for Nonanal. 6 mm diameter discs of P. cyclopium inocula were cut from the center of an actively growing P. cyclopium culture on fresh PDA plates without antibiotics at 28 ± 2 °C for 4 days with a paper punch, and then was placed at the center of each new Petri plate. The culture plates were then incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 48 h. As controls, PDA dishes were supplemented with the same amount of filtration sterilization alcohol (99.5%) instead of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal. Each treatment was performed in triplicate. The lowest concentration that completely inhibited the growth of the fungus after 24 h of incubation was considered as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) was regarded as the lowest concentration which no growth of the pathogen was observed after a 72 h incubation period at 28 ± 2 °C in a fresh PDA plate, indicating more than 99.5% killing of the original inoculum (Talibi et al. 2012).

Different amounts of volatile substances were added to 50 ml PDB liquid medium for the final concentration of α-Phellandrene 0.00, 225.00, 450.00, 900.00, 1350.00, 1575.00 and 1800.00 μL/L, and of Nonanal 0.00, 50.00, 100.00, 200.00, 300.00, 350.00 and 400.00 μL/L. One hundred microlitres P. cyclopium conidial spore suspensions (105 cfu/mL) were poured into each triangle bottle, which was incubated on 28 ± 2 °C and a rotatory shaker at 120 rpm for 4 days. Fungal growth was estimated gravimetrically by weighting the biomasses after drying at 80 °C to a constant weight. The percentage of mycelial growth inhibition (PGI) was calculated according to the following formula:
$$\text{PGI}(\%)=[(\text{d}_\text{c}-\text{d}_\text{t})/\text{d}_\text{c}] \times100$$
where dc (g) is net dry weight of control fungi and dt (g) is net dry weight of treated fungi (Helal et al. 2006).

Release of cytoplasmic material absorbing at 260 nm

The release of cytoplasmic material absorbing at 260 nm was measured following the method of Yahyazadeh et al. (2008) and Paul et al. (2011), with some modifications. Viable cells of P. cyclopium in their exponential logarithmic phase were collected by vacuum filtration, then washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.0), and re-suspended with 20 mL of the above buffer solution. The suspensions were then incubated at 28 ± 2 °C in the presence of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal at three different concentrations (0, MIC and MFC) for 0, 30, 60 and 120 min. After incubation, cells were centrifuged at 12,000g for 2 min, and the absorbance (260 nm) of the above supernatant (1 mL) was determined with the UV-2450 UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation).

Measurement of extracellular conductivity and extracellular pH

The measurement of extracellular conductivity of P. cyclopium cells was conducted using a DDS-W conductivity meter (Instructions for Shanghai Precision Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) according to the method described previously (Shao et al. 2013). The extracellular pH of P. cyclopium cells was determined using a Delta-320 pH-meter (Instructions for the Mettler-Toledo Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Initially, 100 μL fungal suspensions (105 spores/mL) were added to 50 mL PDB and incubated at 28 ± 2 °C in a thermostatic cultivation shaker for 4 days. The mixtures were collected by vacuum filtration, washed for 2–3 times with sterilized double distilled water, and re-suspended in 20 mL sterilized double distilled water. After the incubation of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal at MIC or MFC for 0, 30, 60 and 120 min, the extracellular conductivity and extracellular pH of P. cyclopium were determined. Control flasks without α-Phellandrene or Nonanal were also tested using an equal amount of alcohol instead.

Determination of total lipid content

Total lipid content of P. cyclopium cells with α-Phellandrene and Nonanal at three concentrations (0, MIC, MFC) was determined using the phosphovanillin method (Helal et al. 2007). The 3-day-old mycelia from 50 ml PDB was collected by vacuum filtration and dried with a vacuum freeze drier for 6 h. About 0.05 g of dry mycelia were homogenized with liquid nitrogen and extracted with 4.0 mL of methanol–chloroform–water mixture (2:1:0.8, v/v/v) in a clean dry test tube with vigorous shaking for 30 min. The tubes were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The lower phase containing lipids was thoroughly mixed with 0.2 mL saline solution and centrifuged at 4000×g for 10 min. Then, an aliquot of 0.2 mL chloroform and lipid mixture was transferred to a novel tube and 0.2 mL concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) was added, heated for 10 min in a boiling water bath. Three milliliter phosphovanillin was added, the tube was shaken vigorously, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance at 520 nm was utilized to calculate total lipid contents from the standard calibration curve. Cholesterol served as a standard.

Statistical analysis

All of the experiments were repeated three times. The results were expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation and were compared using an analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) for multiple comparisons. All dates were processed by SPSS statistical software package release 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Antimicrobial assay of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal

The mycelial growth of P. cyclopium was affected by α-Phellandrene or Nonanal in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05) (Table 1). High concentrations of α-Phellandrene (≥1.35 mL/L) or Nonanal (≥0.35 mL/L) completely inhibited the mycelial growth. The antifungal activity of Nonanal against P. cyclopium was more efficient than α-Phellandrene (P < 0.05). Low concentrations of α-Phellandrene (0.45 mL/L) or Nonanal (0.10 mL/L) only showed half of the antifungal activity against P. cyclopium, with PGI values of 56.90 and 57.50%, respectively. The MIC and MFC values of α-Phellandrene for P. cyclopium were 1.7 and 1.8 mL/L, respectively. The MIC and MFC values of Nonanal for P. cyclopium were 0.3 and 0.4 mL/L, respectively.
Table 1

Effect of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal on the mycelial growth of Penicillium cyclopium

α-Phellandrene concentration (μL/L)

Growth inhibition (%)f

Nonanal concentration (μL/L)

Growth inhibition (%)f

00

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.00

0.00 ± 0.00a

225.00

45.88 ± 0.56b

50.00

15.47 ± 0.49b

450.00

56.90 ± 0.64c

100.00

57.50 ± 1.10c

900.00

99.37 ± 0.01d

200.00

65.59 ± 0.16d

1350.00

100.00 ± 0.00e

300.00

99.61 ± 0.04e

1575.00

100.00 ± 0.00e

350.00

100.00 ± 0.00e

1800.00

100.00 ± 0.00e

400.00

100.00 ± 0.00e

a–eSignificant differences at P < 0.05 level

fValues arepresented as mean ± SD

Release of cell constituents

The release of cell constituents when P. cyclopium was treated with MIC and MFC of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal for 0, 30, 60 and 120 min are shown in Fig. 1. The optical density values (OD260) produced by α-Phellandrene were higher than those by Nonanal at the same treatment condition. When the P. cyclopium cells were treated with MIC or MFC of α-Phellandrene or Nonanal, the release of cell constituents increased. Suspensions of P. cyclopium with α-Phellandrene at MIC (1.7 mL/L, v/v) at 120 min reached an optical density value of 0.554, which is higher (P < 0.05) than that of the control (0.249), but lower than that of 0.668 at MFC (1.8 mL/L, v/v). Nevertheless, the OD260 values of P. cyclopium suspensions with α-Phellandrene treatment were almost identical before 60 min of exposure, and then increased after 60 min incubation. On the other hand, the OD260 values of P. cyclopium suspensions with Nonanal at MIC (0.3 mL/L, v/v) and MFC (0.4 mL/L, v/v) were higher than those of the control at the same exposure time. After 30 min of exposure, the OD260 values at MIC or MFC were almost the same.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Leakage of cytoplasmic material (OD at 260 nm) from Penicillium cyclopium with α-Phellandrene and Nonanal treatment. (Closed square) control; (closed circle) at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); (closed triangle) at minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). Data presented are the means of pooled data. Error bars indicate the SDs of the means (n = 3)

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The effect of Nonanal and α-Phellandrene on the morphology of P. cyclopium was examined using SEM (Fig. 2). The conidia of P. cyclopium grown on PDA plates for 4 days had normal, plump and homogenous morphology (Fig. 2b, d, f, h, j), and the hyphae of control fungus growing on PDA were normal, linearly tubular, regular, and homogeneous (Fig. 2a, c, e, g, i). The growth of P. cyclopium on PDA with α-Phellandrene or Nonanal at MIC or MFC treatment for 2 days demonstrated that all fungal mycelia and conidia showed considerable changes in morphology. P. cyclopium with Nonanal or α-Phellandrene at MIC concentrations showed slightly depressed conidia, partly distorted and shrunken mycelia (Fig. 2c, d, g, h). In contrast, the conidia of P. cyclopium treated with Nonanal and α-Phellandrene at MFC concentrations appeared severely collapsed and depressed possibly because of the lack of cytoplasm (Fig. 2f, j). Moreover, severely shrunken and distorted hyphae were also observed with Nonanal and α-Phellandrene at MFC concentrations (Fig. 2e, i).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Effect of Nonanal and α-Phellandrene on mycelium and conidiophore morphological changes of Penicillium cyclopium. a, b P. cyclopium without volatile substances (control); c, d P. cyclopium with Nonanal at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); e, f P. cyclopium with Nonanal at minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC); g, h P. cyclopium with α-Phellandrene at MIC; i, j P. cyclopium with α-Phellandrene at MFC

Extracellular conductivity

Exposure of P. cyclopium cells to different concentrations of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal for 0–120 min caused varying levels of extracellular conductivity (Fig. 3). In general, conductivity increased with exposure time and concentrations of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal. The concentrations for α-Phellandrene at their MIC (1.7 mL/L) and their MFC (1.8 mL/L) significantly affected the extracellular conductivity of P. cyclopium cells. Nevertheless, the concentrations for Nonanal at MIC (0.3 mL/L) and at MFC (0.4 mL/L) were only slightly affected with the extension of processing time. At 30 min of exposure, the extracellular conductivity of P. cyclopium suspensions with α-Phellandrene at MIC or MFC remained at almost the same levels, but the values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the control. By contrast, the conductivity of P. cyclopium suspensions with Nonanal at MFC at 30 min of exposure was 150.3 μs/cm, which was significantly higher than that at MIC (135.8 μs/cm) and that in the control (120.5 μs/cm). After 60 min of exposure, the conductivity of P. cyclopium suspensions treated with Nonanal remained at a stable increase. On the contrary, the conductivity of P. cyclopium suspensions in the presence of α-Phellandrene was markedly increased after 60 min of exposure at MFC. At 120 min, the conductivity of P. cyclopium suspensions at MIC reached 179.6 and 193.7 μs/cm for MFC, respectively, which were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those treated with Nonanal for MIC and MFC (145.3 and 178.2 μs/cm, respectively).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Effects of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal on the extracellular conductivity of P. cyclopium suspensions. (closed square) control; (closed circle) at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); (closed triangle) at minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). Data presented are the means of pooled data. Error bars indicate the SDs of the means (n = 3). Different letters of a–c are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05

Extracellular pH

The extracellular pH of P. cyclopium cells exposed to α-Phellandrene and Nonanal is decreased in comparison to the controls (Fig. 4). A gradual decrease in extracellular pH was observed in the control. After 30 min of exposure to α-Phellandrene at MIC and MFC, a sharp reduction in the extracellular pH of the P. cyclopium suspensions occurred, whereas the extracellular pH values in the P. cyclopium suspensions after incubation with Nonanal gradually decreased. The extracellular pH values in the P. cyclopium suspensions after incubation for 120 min with α-Phellandrene at MIC and MFC were 4.72 and 4.33, respectively, which were significantly lower than that of the control (5.3). No significant difference (P < 0.05) was found between MIC and MFC after 30 min of exposure, the extracellular pH values in P. cyclopium suspensions after incubation with Nonanal at MIC and MFC were 5.06 and 4.81, respectively, and the latter was significantly lower than that of the control (5.25) (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Effects of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal on the extracellular pH of P. cyclopium (closed square): control; (closed circle): minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); (closed triangle) minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). Data presented are the means of pooled data. Error bars indicate the SDs of the means (n = 3). Different letters of a–c are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05

Potassium ion efflux

Potassium ions (K+) leaked from P. cyclopium cells incubated with α-Phellandrene and Nonanal (Fig. 5). MFC and MIC of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal significantly induced the release of K+, and the K+ concentration after 30 min was 1.520 and 1.330 μg/mL, respectively. When the incubation time increased to 120 min, the release of K+ concentration continuously increased. By contrast, incubation with MFC of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal resulted in more K+ release than from the P. cyclopium cells with MIC of those. After 120 min of incubation, K+ released by MFC of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal reached 2.910 and 2.235 μg/mL, respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Effect of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal on the leakage of potassium ions from P. cyclopium. (closed square) control, (closed circle) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), (closed triangle) minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). Data presented are the means of pooled data. Error bars indicate the SDs of the means (n = 3). Different letters of a–c are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05

Total lipid content

α-Phellandrene and Nonanal affected the total lipid contents of P. cyclopium cells (Fig. 6). Briefly, α-Phellandrene and Nonanal significantly decreased the total lipid content, especially for α-Phellandrene (P < 0.05). The total lipid contents of the P. cyclopium cells were 100.3 ± 2.4 and 117.4 ± 2.1 mg/g dry weight for 120 min after incubation with α-Phellandrene at MFC and MIC, respectively. These values are significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those of the control (158.1 ± 2.3 mg/g dry weight). By contrast, Nonanal at MFC and MIC remarkably reduced the total lipid content of P. cyclopium cells. Moreover, the effect of Nonanal at MFC and MIC was lower than that of α-Phellandrene in P. cyclopium cells. The total lipid contents of the P. cyclopium cells were 130.5 ± 2.4 and 136.2 ± 3.2 mg/g dry weight, respectively, after incubation with Nonanal at MFC and MIC for 120 min.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Total lipid content of P. cyclopium cells in the presence of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal. (closed square) control, (closed circle) at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), (closed triangle) at minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). Data presented are the means of pooled data. Error bars indicate the SDs of the means (n = 3)

Discussion

α-Phellandrene and Nonanal exhibited strong antifungal activity against P. cyclopium. The inhibitory effect was positively correlated with the concentration of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal. These results were consistent with those of previous studies describing the antifungal activity of these volatile compounds (Fernando et al. 2005; Rodriguez-Burbano et al. 2010; Pandey et al. 2014; Sharma et al. 2014). At a relatively low concentration (0.1 mL/L), Nonanal reduced the mycelial growth of P. cyclopium by half, making it a promising antifungal substance. In addition, the inhibitory effect of Nonanal on P. cyclopium was more efficient than that of α-Phellandrene on P. cyclopium. The phenomenons were not observed in α-Phellandrene and Nonanal, indicating that the aldehyde compounds are more effective than alcohols and olefine in controlling postharvest pathogens (Droby et al. 2008). Among aldehyde constituents, cinnamaldehyde showed the highest activity, followed by citral, and then perillaldehyde, octanal and Nonanal (Inouye et al. 2001).

The potential mechanisms underlying the anti-microbial activity of aldehydes and terpenes are not fully understood, but a number of possible mechanisms have been proposed. Gram-positive bacteria are known to be more susceptible to essential oils than Gram-negative bacteria (Farag et al. 1989; Smith-Palmer et al. 1998). The weak antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria was ascribed to the presence of an outer membrane (Tassou and Nychas 1995; Mann et al. 2000), which possessed hydrophilic polysaccharide chains as a barrier to hydrophobic essential oils. In the current experiment, in vitro antifungal activity enabled us to hypothesize that the potential antifungal activity of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal against P. cyclopium could be closely correlated with the physiology of the hyphae. SEM analysis showed that the volatile compounds could alter the morphology of P. cyclopium hyphae, disrupting the membrane integrity (Yahyazadeh et al. 2008; Tyagi and Malik, 2011).

These changes generally occur because of an increase in the permeability of cells, and such changes commonly result in the leakage of small molecular substances, ions, and formation of lesions (Bajpai et al. 2013). The leakage of cytoplasmic membrane was analyzed by determining the release of cell materials including nucleic acid, metabolites and ions which was absorbed at 260 nm in the suspensions (Oonmetta-aree et al. 2006). After the addition of the α-Phellandrene and Nonanal visibly increased with increasing volatile compound concentration. The maximum release of cell constituents was observed in P. cyclopium treated with α-Phellandrene at MFC. The methyl ester is able to penetrate to the hydrophobic regions of the membranes and the carboxyl groups pass through the cell membrane, perturbing in the lowering of internal pH and denaturing of proteins inside the cell (Marquis et al. 2003). From the results of the present study combined with the previous studies, we can conclude that the two volatile compounds apparently induced the leakage of intracellular protons. These findings suggest that irreversible damage to the cytoplasmic membranes of P. cyclopium occurred, and the ions inside the cells leaked, ultimately leading to apoptosis of the fungus in the presence of volatile compounds.

In addition to cell wall and plasma membrane alteration and disruption, exposure of the hyphae of P. cyclopium to α-Phellandrene or Nonanal resulted in K+ leakage. Our results are in agreement with the reported by Helal et al. (2006). The phenomenon could be explained that the release of ions was only based on their size and/or due to formation of holes or lesions of lipid bilayer of the plasma membrane (Prashar et al. 2003). The fatty acid composition of microbial cell membranes affects their ability to survive in various environments (Ghfir et al. 1994). The decrease in lipid content suggested that membrane stability decreased while the permeability of water-soluble materials increased (Helal et al. 2007). Fumigation of P. cyclopium with C. citratus essential oil, induced alterations in both the lipid content and the fatty acids methyl esters composition of the cells (Helal et al. 2006). In the present study, the addition of α-Phellandrene and Nonanal significantly decreased the lipid content of P. cyclopium. The results have shown that the two volatile compounds had the ability to penetrate lipid structures of the cells and disrupt the cell membrane integrity.

In conclusion, this study showed that α-Phellandrene and Nonanal could significantly inhibit the mycelial growth of P. cyclopium cells, disrupt their cell membrane integrity and result in the leakage of cell components. Our present study suggested that α-Phellandrene and Nonanal might be used as fungicides to fight against postharvest fungal diseases.

Conclusions

α-Phellandrene and Nonanal significantly inhibit the mycelia growth of P. cyclopium. These changes disrupt the integrity of the fungal cell membrane, leading to the leakage of cell constituent and potassium ions, and triggering an increase of the total lipid content, extracellular pH and membrane permeability. α-Phellandrene and Nonanal might be used as biological fungicides for the control of P. cyclopium in postharvest tomato fruits in the future.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JZ, HS and TW participated in the discussion and concepts of experimental designs, JZ and HS participated to data analysis and drafted the manuscript; HS, SC and ZL performed experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31272181 and 31471887), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2015JJ6108) and Ph.D. Research Fund of Xiangtan University (No. KZ08033). We thank Hu Tian for assistance with technical assistance and providing the bacterial strain.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Chemical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, 411105, People’s Republic of China
(2)
College of Horticulture Forestry&Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Al-Burtamani SKS, Fatope MO, Marwah RG, Onifade AK, Al-Saidi SH (2005) Chemical composition, antibacterial and antifungal activities of the essential oil of Haplophyllum tuberculatum from Oman. J Ethnopharmacol 96:107–112View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajpai VK, Sharma A, Baek KH (2013) Antibacterial mode of action of Cudrania tricuspidata fruit essential oil, affecting membrane permeability and surface characteristics of food-borne pathogens. Food Control 32(2):582–590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Burt S (2004) Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods-A review. Int J Food Microbiol 94:223–253View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buttery RG, Ling LC, Douglas ML (1988) Tomato leaf volatile aroma components. J Agric Food Chem 35(6):1039–1042View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Costa TR, Fernandes OFL, Santos SC, Oliveira CMA, Liao LM, Ferri PH, Paula JR, Ferreira HD, Sales BHN, Silva MRR (2000) Antifungal activity of volatile constituents of Eugenia dysenterica leaf oil. J Ethnopharmacol 72:111–117View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Demirci F, Kırımer N, Demirci B, Noma Y, Başer KHC (2001) Screening of biotransformation products of carvone enantiomers by headspace-SPME/GC-MS. Z Naturforsch C 56(2):58–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorman HJD, Deans SG (2000) Antibacterial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J Appl Microbiol 88(2):308–316View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Droby S, Eick A, Macarisin D, Cohen L, Rafaela G, Stange R, McColum G, Dudai N, Nasser A, Wisniewski M, Shapira R (2008) Role of citrus volatiles in host recognition, germination and growth of Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum. Postharvest Biol Tech 49(3):386–396View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fadli M, Saad A, Sayadi S, Chevalier J, Mezriouia NE, Pagèsc JM et al (2012) Antibacterial activity of Thymus maroccanus and Thymus broussonetii essential oils against nosocomial infection-bacteria and their synergistic potential with antibiotics. Phytomedicine 19:464–471View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Farag RS, Daw ZY, Hewedi FM, EI-Baroty GSA (1989) Antimicrobial activity of some Egyptian spice essential oils. J Food Protect 52(9):665–667View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernando WGD, Ramarathnam R, Krishnamoorthy AS, Savchuk SC (2005) Identification and use of potential bacterial organic antifungal volatiles in biocontrol. Soil Biol Biochem 37(5):955–964View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher K, Phillips C (2008) Potential antimicrobial uses of essential oils in food: is citrus the answer? Trends Food Sci Technol 19(3):156–164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghfir B, Fonvieille JL, Koulali Y, Ecalle R, Oargent R (1994) Effect of essential oil of Hyssopus officinalis on the lipid composition of Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycopathologia 126(3):163–167View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Helal GA, Sarhan MM, Abu Shahla ANK, Abou El-Khair EK (2006) Effects of Cymbopogon citratus L. essential oil on the growth, lipid content and morphogenesis of Aspergillus niger ML2-strain. J Basic Microbiol 46(6):456–469View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Helal GA, Sarhan MM, Abu SANK, Abou EEK (2007) Effects of Cymbopogon citratus L. essential oil on the growth, morphogenesis and aflatoxin production of Aspergillus flavus ML2-strain. J Basic Microb 47(1):5–15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hernández V, Mora F, Araque M, Montijo SD, Rojas L, Meléndez P, Tommasi ND (2013) Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Astronium graveolens JACQ essential oil. Rev Latinoamer Quím 41(2):89–94Google Scholar
  17. Inouye S, Takizawa T, Yamaguchi H (2001) Antibacterial activity of essential oils and their major constituents against respiratory tract pathogens by gaseous contact. J Antimicrob Chemother 47(5):565–573View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Iscan G, Kirimer N, Demirci F, Demirci B, Noma Y, Can Baser KH (2012) Biotransformation of (-)-(R)-α -phellandrene: antimicrobial activity of its major metabolite. Chem Biodivers 9(8):1525–1532View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jansen RMC, Miebach M, Kleist E, van Henten EJ, Wildt J (2009) Release of lipoxygenase products and monoterpenes by tomato plants as an indicator of Botrytis cinerea induced stress. Plant Biol 11(6):859–868View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan A, Ahmad A, Akhtar F, Yousuf S, Xess I, Khan LA et al (2010) Ocimum sanctum essential oil and its active principles exert their antifungal activity by disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane integrity. Res Microbiol 161:816–823View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kubo A, Lunde CS, Kubo I (1995) Antimicrobial activity of the olive oil flavor compounds. J Agric Food Chem 43(6):1629–1633View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Maes K, Debergh PC (2003) Volatiles emitted from in vitro grown tomato shoots during abiotic and biotic stress. Plant Cell Tissue Org 75(75):73–78View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann CM, Cox SD, Markham JL (2000) The outer membrane of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC6749 contributes to its tolerance to the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). Lett Appl Microbiol 30(4):294–297View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Marquis RE, Clock SA, Mota-Meira M (2003) Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26(5):493–510View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Muroi H, Kubo A, Kubo I (1993) Antimicrobial activity of cashew apple flavor compounds. J Agric Food Chem 41(7):1106–1109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Nurettin Y, Canan G, Osman Ü, Ahmet Y, Serdar Ü, Kamil C, Salih T (2006) Composition and antimicrobial activities of volatile components of Minuartia meyeri. Turk J Chem 30:71–76Google Scholar
  27. Oonmetta-aree J, Suzuki T, Gasaluck P, Eumkeb G (2006) Antimicrobial properties and action of galangal (Alpinia galangal Linn.) on Staphylococcus aureus. LWT-Food. Sci Technol 39(10):1214–1220Google Scholar
  28. Pandey AK, Mohan M, Singh P, Palni UT, Tripathi NN (2014) Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of essential oil of Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng. from Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Food. Bioscience 7(9):80–87Google Scholar
  29. Paré PW, Tumlinson JH (1999) Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiol 121(2):325–331View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Paul S, Dubey RC, Maheswari DK, Kang SC (2011) Trachyspermum ammi (L.) fruit essential oil influencing on membrane permeability and surface characteristics in inhibiting food-borne pathogens. Food Control 22(5):725–731View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Perez C, Agnese AM, Cabrera JL (1999) The essential oil of Scenecio graveolans (compositae)-chemical composition and antimicrobial activity tests. J Ethnopharmacol 66:91–96View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Prashar A, Hili P, Veness RG, Evans CS (2003) Antimicrobial action of palmarosa oil (Cymbopogon martini) on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Phytochem 63(5):569–575View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodriguez-Burbano D, Quijano-Celis C, Pino J (2010) Composition of the essential oil from leaves of Astronium graveolens Jacq grown in Colombia. J Essent Oil Res 22(6):488–489View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shao X, Cheng S, Wang H, Yu D, Mungai C (2013) The possible mechanism of antifungal action of tea tree oil on Botrytis cinerea. J Appl Microbiol 114(6):1642–1649View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharma P, Shah GC, Dhami DS, Chauhan PK, Singh V (2014) Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activities of senecio laetus edgew. From cold desert of western Himalaya. Int J Pharm Res Bio-sci 3(1):188–199Google Scholar
  36. Smith-Palmer A, Stewart J, Fyfe L (1998) Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils and essences against five important food-borne pathogens. Lett Appl Microbiol 26(2):118–122View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Talibi I, Askarne L, Boubaker H, Boudyach EH, Msanda F, Saadi B, Ait Ben Aoumar A (2012) Antifungal activity of Moroccan medicinal plants against citrus sour rot agent Geotrichum candidum. Lett Appl Microbiol 55(2):155–161View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tassou CC, Nychas GJE (1995) Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Mastic gum (Pistacia lentiscus var chia) on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in broth and model food systems. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 36(3–4):411–420View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Tyagi AK, Malik A (2011) Antimicrobial potential and chemical composition of Mentha piperita oil in liquid and vapour phase against food spoiling microorganisms. Food Control 22(11):1707–1714View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Yahyazadeh M, Omidbaigi R, Zare R, Taheri H (2008) Effect of some essential oils on mycelial growth of Penicillium digitatum Sacc. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24(8):1445–1450View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang PY, Chen KS, He PQ, Liu SH, Jiang WF (2008) Effects of crop development on the emission of volatiles in leaves of Lycopersicon esculentum and its inhibitory activity to Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum. J Integr Plant Biol 50(1):84–91View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement