Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.452

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Ecogeographic variability and genetic diversity associated with seed albumins, globulins and prolamins patterns in Vicia taxa from Algeria

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201758:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0177-7

Received: 21 February 2017

Accepted: 12 May 2017

Published: 21 June 2017

Abstract

Genetic variability was studied in 78 populations of locally collected Vicia L. taxa for seed albumins, globulins and prolamins patterns by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) along with an ecogeographic characterization of sites investigated. 131, 119 and 98 bands were respectively used for albumin, globulin and prolamin cluster analysis. Dendrograms based on the Jaccard index and the UPGMA method were generated and the degree of genetic diversity between and within taxa was evaluated. Five clusters were generated from albumins, six from globulins and four from prolamins patterns. The results reflect the great diversity of storage proteins and a high correlation was obtained between the three studied fractions. Several accessions present specific bands which could be used as a discriminatory marker both on intra and interspecific levels. No clear relationships were seen between the groups according to their geographical origin. Data obtained from ecogeographic investigation can be used for future collecting missions.

Keywords

Vicia L.EcogeographyElectrophoresisAlbuminsGlobulinsProlamins

Background

The genus Vicia belongs to the Legumes, family Leguminosae which is considered one of the largest families of flowering plants and represents tremendous morphological, ecological and genetic diversity. Vicia L. comprises about 210 species widely distributed along Europe, Asia and the American regions (Hanelt and Mettin 1989). In Algeria, there are 26 species belonging to three series (Quézel and Santa 1962). The genus Vicia has the capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen (Nemecek et al. 2008). Vetch seeds contain more than 20% crude protein and relatively high amount of lysine, leucine, arginine, phenylalanine and tyrosine (Darre et al. 1998). Maxted (1993) pointed out that there had been 20 major classifications of the group since Linnaeus. Kupicha (1976) has subdivided the genus into two subgenera (Vicilla, Vicia) which have been further subdivided into 17 and 5 sections, respectively. The subgenus Vicia sensu Maxted (1993) contains 9 sections including sections Vicia, Hypechusa and Narbonensis. Section Cracca sensu Kupicha (1976) belongs to subgenus Vicilla. Morphological approach is rather difficult to estimate the all genetic diversity in the genus (Haider and El-Shanshoury 2000). Seed proteins are physiologically stable and easy to manipulate (Ladizinsky and Hymowitz 1979). Considerable insight has been drained as to their structure and synthesis during seed development and to their role as storage proteins (Higgins 1984). Electrophoretic analysis of seed storage proteins was used in testing genetic associations in Vicia at generic, specific and intraspecific levels, along with morphological characterization (Ladizinsky and Hymowitz 1979; Mirali et al. 2007; Hameed et al. 2009; Emre et al. 2010). The use of gel electrophoresis of seed protein in phylogeny is supported by the fact that mature seeds possess the same protein components unchanged with age or environmental stress, and thus provide valid evidence for genetic relatedness (Crawford 1990). Potokina et al. (2003) and Mirali et al. (2007) suggested that comparison of electrophoregrams of seed proteins is useful to assess relationships among Vicia taxa.

The objective of the present study was to investigate intra and interspecific variations in 11 taxa belonging to sections Vicia, Hypechusa, Narbonensis and Cracca by SDS-PAGE of seed albumins, globulins and prolamins to test the technique for vetches identification and to clarify the genetic diversity among Vicia taxa collected from different regions of the country along with an ecogeographic characterization of sites investigated as no studies have previously been reported on electrophoretic separation of the storage proteins of the given 11 Vicia taxa from Algeria.

Methods

Plant material and taxa identification

Object of the study were 78 accessions representing 4 taxa of Sect. Vicia, 2 taxa of Sect. Hypechusa, 1 taxon of Sect. Narbonensis and 4 taxa of Sect. Cracca. Pods were randomly collected from various bioclimatic conditions of Algeria (Fig. 1). The dry seeds were stored into separate sealed paper bags at room temperature until their utilization. Informations of the investigated accessions are given in Table 1. Taxonomic identification of accessions was verified by the morphology of plants grown from seeds in a greenhouse of the laboratory of genetics, biochemistry and plants biotechnologies of Faculty of Biology in Constantine University (eastern Algeria). Taxa identification was undertaken using the key of Quézel and Santa (1962).
Fig. 1

Geographical origin of the 78 Algerian populations studied

Table 1

Location and taxonomic identification of accessions investigated

Species/subspecies

Code

Date of collection

Province/locality/origin

Latitude

Longitude

Altitude (m)

V. sativa subsp. consobrina (Pomel) Maire

5

28.5.14

Guelma

N36°26.187′

E007°17.772′

339

14

1.6.14

Annaba El bouni

N36°49.777′

E007°38.290′

28

36

23.5.14

Béjaia Affalou

N36°40.381′

E005°08.903′

1

59

30.5.14

Jijel

N36°35.082′

E006°16.728′

141

64

1.6.14

Skikda Azzaba

N36°43.532′

E007°04.706′

111

86

13.6.14

Constantine Djbel El Ouehch

N36°23.690′

E006°39.011′

880

65a

9.6.14

Tipaza El Beldj Chenoua mountain

N36°37.667′

E002°21.150′

345

52

4.6.14

Blida National parc of Chréa

N36°24.538′

E002°45.519′

249

53

30.5.14

Jijel

85

1.6.14

Skikda Ain Charchar

N36°44.366′

E007°14.176′

52

93

30.5.14

Jijel

N36°48.699′

E005°41.679′

25

V. sativa subsp. obovata Gaudin

6

22.5.14

Constantine Chaab ersas

N36°20.628′

E006°37.485′

563

7

30.5.14

Mila Messaoud Boudjriou

N36°29.743′

E006°25.527′

325

10

27.5.14

Constantine Didouche Mourad

N36°28.409′

E006°38.239′

468

17

22.5.14

Constantine Chaab ersas

N36°20.628′

E006°37.485′

563

20

3.6.14

Sétif Ain arnat

N36°07.394′

E005°12.172′

866

22

2.6.14

Oum El Bouaghi Sigus

N36°04.485′

E006°48.867′

822

28

30.5.14

Jijel

N36°35.094′

E006°16.732′

168

51

6.6.14

Sidi Bel Abbes

N35°10.824′

W000°36.026′

490

32

22.5.14

Constantine Chaab Ersas

N36°20.634′

E006°37.486′

562

57

6.6.14

Tlemcen Ain fezza

N34°52.732′

W001°13.726′

867

61

1.6.14

Annaba Berrahal

N36°49.826′

E007°29.000′

38

68

6.6.14

Ain Temouchent

N35°16.464′

W001°13.836′

281

72

28.5.14

Constantine Ain abid

N36°13.543′

E006°55.782′

847

80

28.5.14

Constantine Ain abid

N36°13.543′

E006°55.782′

847

70

28.5.15

Guelma

N36°14.816′

E007°03.045′

757

83

26.5.14

Batna Ain Touta

N35°17.632′

E005°49.035′

683

V. sativa subsp. angustifolia (L.) Gaudin

19

18.5.14

Constantine Chaab Ersas

N36°20.634′

E006°37.486′

562

V. sativa subsp. cordata (Will) Batt.

8

26.5.14

Biskra El Kantra

N35°11.517′

E005°40.673′

467

11

6.6.14

Tlemcen

N35°05.699′

W001°26.612′

90

13

26.5.14

Biskra El Kantra Ain Skhoun

N35°16.087′

E005°44.174′

584

15

1.6.14

Annaba

N36°49.980′

E007°34.092′

24

33

29.5.14

Skikda El hadaik

N36°49.894′

E006°53.079′

26

35

1.6.14

Annaba El bouni

N36°49.777′

E007°38.290′

28

37

28.5.14

Guelma

N36°28.361′

E007°21.280′

223

38

10.5.14

Jijel

N36°49.348′

E005°56.706′

14

42

28.5.14

Constantine Ain Abid

N36°13.543′

E006°55.782′

847

47

22.5.14

Constantine University

N36°20.387′

E006°37.177′

604

71

30.5.14

Jijel

N36°47.625′

E005°39.746′

17

V. lutea L.

 V. lutea subsp. vestita (Boiss.) Rouy.

1

28.5.14

Skikda Ramdane Djamel

N36°45.977′

E006°53.432′

42

4

22.5.14

Constantine University

N36°20.387′

E006°37.177′

604

58

27.5.14

Constantine Didouche Mourad

N36°30.025′

E006°40.058′

448

 V. lutea subsp. eu-lutea Maire

62

1.6.14

Skikda Azzaba

N36°43.531′

E007°04.708′

110

63

1.6.14

Skikda Ain Cherchar

N36°44.366′

E007°14.176′

52

79

1.6.14

El Tarf Ben M’hidi

N36°46.402′

E007°53.600′

11

87

30.5.14

Jijel El Milia

N36°46.668′

E006°13.551′

28

90

1st.6.14

Annaba

N36°49.980′

E007°34.092′

24

88

30.5.14

Jijel El Ansar

N36°48.661′

E006°08.016′

30

  

3

2.6.14

Oum El Bouaghi Sigus

N36°04.485′

E006°48.867′

822

  

12

5.6.14

Relizane

N35°43.689′

E000°24.265′

105

  

26

28.5.15

Guelma

N36°14.816′

E007°03.045′

757

  

27

2.6.14

Oum El Bouaghi

N35°51.459′

E007°06.377′

887

  

40

28.5.14

Guelma

N36°16.276′

E007°05.751′

711

  

44

6.6.14

Tlemcen

N34°52.088′

W001°11.698′

843

V. monantha Retz

 V. monantha subsp. calcarata (Desf.) Maire

45

3.6.14

Bordj Bou Areridj

N36°04.070′

E004°41.899′

923

49

28.5.14

Constantine Ain Abid

N36°13.543′

E006°55.782′

847

60

2.6.14

Khenchla

N35°33.685′

E007°02.177′

860

74

14.6.14

Tébessa

N35°15.936′

E007°30.306′

1078

77

26.5.14

Batna Ain Touta

N35°17.632′

E005°49.035′

683

78

20.5.14

Constantine Coudiat

N36°21.787′

E006°36.418′

633

84

10.6.14

Constantine INATAA

N36°19.002′

E006°34.626′

586

29

2.6.14

Oum El Bouaghi Sigus

N36°04.485′

E006°48.867′

822

18

3.6.14

Bordj Bou Areridj Ain taghrout

N36°07.741′

E005°03.364′

934

98

14.6.14

Tébessa Chria

N35°16.328′

E007°44.359′

1087

102

 

Constantine University

N36°20.387′

E006°37.177′

604

43

4.6.14

Médéa Oued Harbil

N36°13.633′

E002°37.643′

464

 V. monantha ssp. cinerea (M.B.) Maire

46

3.6.14

Bordj Bou Areridj El Achir

N36°04.017′

E004°40.525′

944

91

14.6.14

Khenchla

N35°15.704′

E007°20.957′

1222

V. narbonensis L.

 –

23

30.5.14

Constantine Hamma Bouziane (Chaabet El Medhbouh)

N36°26.391′

E006°33.282′

425

30

30.5.14

Mila Messaoud Boudjriou

N36°29.748′

E006°25.530′

325

34

27.4.14

Constantine Didouche Mourad

N36°29.216′

E006°38.731′

434

41

28.5.14

Guelma

N36°16.276′

E007°05.751′

711

55

27.5.14

Constantine Didouche Mourad

N36°30.023′

E006°40.051′

443

66

28.5.14

Guelma

N36°19.930

E007°12.447′

698

81

22.5.14

Constantine University

N36°20.387′

E006°37.177′

604

V. tenuifolia Roth.

 –

56

6.6.14

Ain Temouchent

N35°16.476′

W001°13.800′

276

89

6.6.14

Sidi Bel Abbes Sidi Khaled

N35°06.59′

W000°44.238′

543

V. leucantha Biv.

100

10.6.14

Constantine INATAA

N36°19.002′

E006°34.626′

586

Protein sequential extraction based on solubility

The sequential extraction was undertaken according to Freitas et al. (2000) and Riberio et al. (2004) modified. Seeds were grinded to fine powder after seed coats were removed. 10 mg of the resulting flour was defatted with n-hexane (340 µl/10 mg) for 1/4 h with agitation, decanted and dried in stove (37 °C). Albumins were extracted with water (adjusted to pH 8.0) containing 10 mM CaCl2 and 10 mM MgCl2 (340 µl/10 mg) for ½ h. One mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF) was added to the extraction buffer. The content was centrifuged for 20 min. at 14,000 rpm (4 °C). The supernatant was recovered and the albumins were precipitated by acetone (561 g/l). Globulins were extracted by 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.5–8, containing 10% (w/v) NaCl, 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 10 mM ethyleneglycol bis (b-aminoethyl ether)-N, N, N0, N0-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) (340 µl/10 mg of flour) for ½ h. 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF) was used to extraction buffer. The solution was centrifuged for 20 min. at 14,000 rpm (4 °C). Globulins were precipitated by acetone (561 g/l). Prolamins were extracted by 75% ethanol (50 µl/10 mg) for 20 min. with agitation at 4 °C. The prolamin-containing solution was centrifuged for 15 min. at 14,000 rpm (4 °C) and the prolamin were precipitated by acetone (500 µl).

Electrophoresis

Non-reducing SDS-PAGE was undertaken according to Laemmli (1970). Bromophenol blue was added to the extraction buffer to follow proteins movement in the gel. 15, 8 and 70 μl of respectively albumins, globulins and prolamins supernatants were placed on biphasic polyacrylamide gels (12%). 10 μl of a protein molecular weight marker (BIO-RAD Precision Plus Protein Standards) containing ten proteins (10, 15, 20, 25, 37, 50, 75, 100, 150 and 250 kDa) was used as standard. Tris–glycine (pH 8.3) was used as electrode buffer. Runs were carried out at a voltage of 60 V and 500 mA overnight. Gels were stained by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R, then images were scanned using ImageScannerIII.

Ecogeographic parameters of investigated sites

The five ecological factors of Mediterranean climate (annual rainfall, average of the maximum temperature of the hottest month, average of a minimum temperature of the coldest month, Emberger coefficient and altitude) were used to characterize sampling stations. A global positioning systems (GPS GARMIN eTrex® model 30) was used to collect coordinates of sites investigated. Data recorded to ONM (National Office of Meteorology, Algeria) were used to characterize the climate of sites investigated (Table 2). Data recorded to CLIMATE-DATA.ORG (http://fr.climate-data.org/) were used for five stations (Mila, Ain Temouchent, Tipaza, El Tarf and Blida).
Table 2

Climatic characteristics of reference stations (2004–2014)

Reference station

Latitude

Longitude

Alt. (m)

P (mm)

m (°C)

M (°C)

Jijel (airport)

36°48N

05°53E

8

1066.1

6.8

31.5

Skikda

36°53N

06°54E

2

829

8.8

29

Annaba

36°50N

07°48E

3

684.4

6.7

31.5

Béjaia

36°43N

05°04E

2

833

7.4

30.7

Constantine

36°17N

06°37E

693

486.6

2.2

35.2

Milaa

36°27N

06°16E

437

742

4.4

31.5

Sétif (Ain Arnat)

36°10N

05°19E

1007

401.8

−2

34.8

Oum El Bouaghi

35°52N

07°07E

889

410.4

1.1

35

Tlemcen (zenata)

35°01N

01°28W

246

359.8

6.2

33.9

Ain Temouchenta

35°17N

01°08W

235

485

6.8

30.2

Biskra

34°48N

05°44E

82

143

6.9

41.3

Guelma

36°28N

07°28E

227

622.3

4.5

36.4

Sidi Bel Abbes

35°12N

00°37W

475

375.1

2.8

36

Tipaza El Beldja

36°38N

02°21E

22

631

8.4

30.8

Blidaa

36°27N

02°.44

1458

916

−0.9

28.5

Relizane

35°44N

00°32E

95

352.5

5.3

38.6

Bordj Bou Arerridj

36°04N

04°46E

928

392.9

1.7

36.4

Khenchla

35°28N

07°05E

983

520.8

1.8

34.9

Tébessa

35°25N

08°07E

821

382.6

1.7

35.6

Batna

35°45N

06°19E

822

346.8

0.1

36.4

Milaa

36°27N

06°16E

437

742

4.4

31.5

Ain Temouchenta

35°17N

01°08W

235

485

6.8

30.2

El Tarf Ben M’hidia

36°46N

07°54E

6

707

7.1

31.2

Médéa

36°17N

02°44E

1030

780

3.5

32.5

Alt altitude, P annual rainfall, M and m are the average maximum temperature of the hottest month and the average of the minimum of the coldest month, respectively

aData from “http://climate-data.org

Climatic data correction

Correction of precipitations and temperatures data based on extrapolations for different altitudinal points were undertaken (Table 3), according to the works of Seltzer (1946) as explained by Bechkri and Khelifi (2016).
Table 3

Corrected climatic data and Emberger quotient calculation of sampling sites of accessions studied

Station code

Alt. (m)

K

P (mm)

m (°C)

M (°C)

Q2

Bioclimate

5

339

1.0719

667.04

4.05

35.71

72.25

SH-temperate winter

14

28

1.0292

704.38

6.6

31.32

97.71

SH-mild winter

36

1

0.9990

832.16

7.40

30.70

122.48

SH-warm winter

59

141

1.0998

1172.49

6.26

30.56

165.49

LH-mild winter

64

111

1.1051

916.12

8.36

28.93

152.73

LH-warm winter

86

880

1.1537

561.39

1.45

33.89

59.35

HSA-cool winter

65a

345

1.4095

889.39

7.10

28.53

142.34

LH-warm winter

52

249

0.4720

432.35

3.93

36.96

44.90

MSA-temperate winter

93

25

1.0127

1079.63

6.73

31.38

150.23

LH-mild winter

6

563

1.1068

538.56

2.72

36.11

55.32

HSA-ool winter

7

325

0.9396

697.18

4.84

32.28

87.16

SH-mild winter

10

468

0.8150

396.57

3.1

36.77

40.39

MSA-temperate winter

17

563

1.1068

538.56

2.72

36.11

55.32

HSA-cool winter

20

866

0.8596

345.38

1.43

35.78

34.48

LSA-cool winter

22

822

0.9346

383.55

1.36

33.40

39.38

MSA-cool winter

28

168

1.1200

1194.03

6.16

30.38

169.09

LH-mild winter

32

562

1.1076

538.95

2.72

36.11

55.35

HSA-cool winter

51

490

1.0159

381.06

2.74

35.89

39.42

MSA-cool winter

57

867

1.6903

608.16

3.71

29.55

80.73

SH-temperate winter

61

38

1.0409

712.39

6.56

31.25

98.94

SH-cool winter

68

281

1.0379

503.38

6.61

29.87

74.22

SH-mild winter

72

782

1.0731

522.17

1.84

34.57

54.71

HSA-cool winter

80

782

1.0731

522.17

1.84

34.57

54.71

HSA-cool winter

70

757

1.3406

834.25

0.79

32.79

89.42

SH cold winter

83

683

0.8396

291.17

0.65

37.37

27.20

HA-cold winter

19

562

1.1076

538.95

2.72

36.11

55.35

HSA-cool winter

8

467

2.0769

296.99

5.36

38.60

30.64

HA-mild winter

11

90

0.8265

297.37

6.82

34.99

36.21

HA-mild winter

13

584

2.4041

343.78

4.89

37.78

35.84

HA-mild winter

15

24

1.0245

701.16

6.61

31.35

97.22

SH-mild winter

33

26

1.0231

848.14

8.70

29.53

139.67

SH-warm winter

35

28

1.0292

704.38

6.6

31.32

97.71

SH-mild winter

37

223

1.0025

611.62

4.51

36.52

65.53

SA-mild winter

38

14

1.0045

1070.9

6.77

31.45

148.82

LH-mild winter

42

847

1.1265

548.15

1.58

34.12

57.78

HSA-cool winter

47

604

0.9268

450.98

2.55

35.82

46.49

HSA-cool winter

71

17

1.0067

1108.4

6.76

31.43

154.13

LH-mild winter

85

52

1.0482

868.95

8.6

28.65

148.65

LH-warm winter

1

42

1.0386

860.99

8.64

28.72

147.07

LH-warm winter

4

604

0.9268

450.98

2.55

35.82

46.49

HSA-cool winter

58

448

0.7986

388.59

3.18

36.91

39.52

MSA-temperate winter

62

110

1.1042

701.16

8.36

28.24

120.97

SH-warm winter

63

52

1.0482

868.95

8.6

28.65

148.65

LH-warm winter

79

11

1.0056

710.93

7.08

31.16

101.27

SH-warm winter

87

28

1.0150

1082.09

6.72

31.36

150.63

LH-mild winter

90

24

1.0245

701.16

6.61

31.35

97.21

SH-mild winter

88

30

1.0165

1083.69

6.71

31.34

150.91

LH-mild winter

3

822

0.9346

383.56

1.36

35.46

38.58

MSA-cool winter

12

105

1.0113

356.48

5.26

38.53

36.75

LSA-mild winter

26

755

1.3393

833.44

2.38

32.80

93.97

SH-cool winter

27

887

0.9980

409.57

1.108

35.014

41.43

MSA-cool winter

40

711

1.3111

815.89

2.56

32.80

92.54

SH-cool winter

44

843

2.3274

837.39

3.81

29.72

110.85

LH-temperate winter

45

923

0.9949

390.89

1.72

36.43

38.63

MSA-cool winter

49

847

1.1265

548.15

1.58

34.12

57.78

HSA-cool winter

60

860

0.9055

471.58

2.29

35.76

48.33

HSA-cool winter

74

1078

1.2686

485.36

0.67

33.80

50.25

HSA-cold winter

77

683

0.8396

291.17

0.65

37.37

27.20

HA-cold winter

78

633

0.9506

462.56

2.44

35.62

47.82

HSA-cool winter

84

586

0.9120

466.85

2.62

35.94

48.06

HSA-cool winter

98

1087

1.2780

488.96

0.63

33.73

50.67

HSA-cold winter

102

604

0.9268

450.98

2.55

35.82

46.49

HSA-cool winter

43

464

0.7097

553.56

5.76

36.46

77.08

SH-mild winter

29

822

0.9346

383.56

1.36

35.46

38.58

MSA-cool winter

18

934

1.0061

395.29

1.67

36.35

39.10

MSA-cool winter

46

944

1.0162

399.26

1.63

36.28

39.52

MSA-cool winter

91

1222

1.1835

616.36

0.84

33.22

65.29

SH-cold winter

23

425

0.7796

379.35

2.62

35.94

39.05

MSA-cool winter

30

325

0.9396

697.18

4.84

32.28

87.15

SH-mild winter

34

434

0.7870

382.95

3.23

37.01

38.88

MSA-temperate winter

41

711

1.3111

815.89

2.56

33.12

91.58

SH-cool winter

55

443

0.7944

386.55

3.2

36.95

39.28

MSA-temperate winter

66

698

1.4

871.22

2.61

33.20

97.68

SH-cool winter

81

604

0.9268

450.98

2.55

35.82

46.49

HSA-cool winter

56

276

1.0338

501.38

6.63

29.91

73.87

SH-mild winter

89

543

1.0725

402.29

2.52

35.52

41.81

MSA-cool winter

100

586

0.912

466.85

2.62

35.94

48.06

HSA-cool winter

K correction factor, Alt altitude, P annual rainfall, M and m the average maximum temperature of the hottest month and the average of the minimum of the coldest month, respectively, Q2 Emberger coefficient, SH subhumid, LH less humid, HSA higher semiarid, HA higher arid, MSA means semiarid, LSA less semiarid, SA semiarid

Calculation of the bioclimatic coefficient of Emberger (1955) and definition of the bioclimate

The pluviothermic Emberger quotient (Q2) is determined by three major climate factors. Stewart’s formula (1969) was used in the present study. Details of calculations were reported by Bechkri and Khelifi (2016).

Data analysis

The mobility and the frontal report of each band were calculated. The size marker standard curve was traced. The graphical equation and the coefficient of determination allowed the calculation of the molecular weight of each band. In this method, “absence” contributed equally to “presence” in the calculation of dissimilarity. Present bands were scored 1 and absent bands were scored 0. For each fraction, a binary matrix was constructed. A dendrogram was produced by the UPGMA based on Jaccard index (J) between protein patterns. Analyses were carried out using XLSTAT (Pearson edition, version 2014.5.03). For ecogeographic parameters, Euclidean distances (Romesburg 1990) were used in the estimation of the genetic resemblance. Matrix including the five ecological parameters of each accession was used to elaborate a dendrogram using UPGMA. Analyses were carried out with STATISTICA (version 6.1 program). The possible correlation between albumins, globulins and prolamins patterns, was evaluated by a Mantel test (Mantel 1967) based on Pearson’s correlation (XLSTAT Pearson edition, version 2014.5.03). The same test was used to test geographical matrix with seed albumins, globulins and prolamins matrices.

Results

Seed proteins variability

The three fractions electrophoregrams are represented by some accessions illustrated in Fig. 2. Figure 3 presents dendrograms generated using UPGMA and Jaccard’s index.
Fig. 2

Electrophoretic banding pattern generated by SDS-PAGE of seed storage proteins of some Vicia accessions studied. M marker, a globulins, b prolamins, c albumins

Fig. 3

Dendrograms generated using UPGMA cluster analysis and Jaccard’s index based on seed proteins diversity of 78 Vicia accessions. a Albumins, b globulins, c prolamins

Albumins patterns

A total of 131 bands were detected with molecular weights ranged from 3.23 to 148.17 kDa. Each profile presents between 11 and 26 bands. All samples had more than one seed protein pattern. Intra-accessional diversity was also investigated by examining populations of the same taxa. The largest number of bands (25) is obtained in V. monantha subsp. calcarata, V. tenuifolia and V. sativa subsp. obovata. The lowest number (11) is obtained in V. lutea subsp. vestita. The band 37.73 kDa is the most common as it appears in 48 profiles followed by the band 9.19 kDa appeared in 43 profiles and the band 24.22 kDa observed in 40 profiles. In parallel, bands 3.23, 9.46, 15.81, 19.80, 24.87, 25.97, 46.86, 63.69, 66.34, 76.29, 99.86, 113.50 and 125.98 kDa are the least common as they are specific for one accession and appear each in 1 profile, followed by bands 8.85, 14.93, 16.72, 42.84, 75.43, 77.31, 82.63 and 88.47 kDa appeared each in two profiles. The cluster analysis indicated the discrimination into five groups at 0.86 Jaccard distance (Fig. 3). The first cluster can be divided into two groups, the first one includes accessions 12, 3, 27, 18, 26. The second one regroups samples 1, 58, 63, 87, 4, 90, 62 and 79. The cluster II is divided into 2 sub-clusters. The first one contains samples 5, 6, 59, 14, 52, 65, 36, 93, 7, 10, 64 and 86. The second one can further be divided into two groups: II2a contains accessions 34, 41, 55, 30 and 81. II2b is composed of samples 32, 66, 68, 57, 61. The cluster III regroups two sub-clusters. The first one contains accessions 33, 35, 11, 37, 83, 42, 38. The second one is further divided into two groups: III2a comprises sample 88 linked to 40, 29, 102, 49, 77, 45, 60, 74, 78, 44 and 91. III2b contains accessions 17, 28, 51, 20, 22, 23 and 84. The cluster IV comprises the sample 100 one side and accessions 72, 56, 70, 46, 43, 53, 71, 89, 19 and 80 another side. Finally, the cluster V contains the sample 98 (J = 0.88). The proximity matrix using Jaccard index shows that the higher distance (J = 1) is observed between the following couples: 17-4, 1-30, 1-32, 1-37, 1-41, 1-81, 4-28, 4-32, 4-84, 6-63, 6-87, 7-87, 63-10, 87-10, 14-63, 14-87, 17-63, 28-63, 30-58, 32-58, 62-32, 79-32, 32-90, 37-90, 58-37, 37-62, 41-58, 41-1, 52-87, 55-1, 55-58, 58-81, 66-58, 58-41, 58-30, 58-32, 59-63, 87-59, 63-93, 63-84, 63-7, 63-23, 63-52, 63-64, 63-65, 64-87, 65-87, 1-66, 79-32, 87-93, 87-65. The lower distance (J = 0.10) is obtained between 18 and 26. A distance of 0.16 is observed between 43 and 19. Between 89 and 19, a distance of J = 0.15 is observed. A distance of 0.17 is obtained between 90 and 62.

Globulin patterns

A total of 119 bands were obtained with molecular weights ranged from 2.77 to 131.88 kDa. Each profile presents between 6 and 27 bands. Two accessions (41 and 55) showed a unique protein pattern; the remaining accessions had more than one protein pattern. The largest number of bands (27) is observed for accessions 43 (V. monantha subsp. calcarta) and 87 (V. lutea subsp. eu-lutea). The lowest number (6) is obtained for samples 17 and 32 belonging to V. sativa subsp. obovata. The band 35.53 kDa is the most common as it appears in 52 profiles, followed by the band 49.45 kDa observed in 45 profiles and the band 33.44 kDa found in 37 profiles. In another side, bands 5.10, 5.46, 51.74, 67.97, 78.27, 85.47, 95.33, 100.77, 103.66, 104.69, 115.04, 119.96, 130.35 kDa are the less common as they appear each in one profile, followed by bands 16.86, 18.39, 19.11, 28.98, 37.69, 47, 38.87, 68.53, 86.70 and 131.88 kDa found in two profiles. Six major clusters were obtained at the distance of 0.87 (Fig. 3b). The cluster I is further divided into two sub-clusters (I1, I2). I1 includes the accession 46 linked to 62, 63, 90, 79, 88, 4, 87, 1 and 58. I2 can be divided into two groups. The first one (I2a) includes 59, 52, 65, 86, 64, 36, 14 and 93. The second one (I2b) contains samples 6, 7 and 10. The cluster II is divided into two subclusters (II1, II2). II1 comprises two groups. II1a contains accessions 55, 41, 30, 81, 34, 23. II1b is composed of 35, 15, 13, 8, 33, 85, 83, 42, 11, 37, 47, 38. II2 comprises sample 12 linked to 49, 60, 45, 74, 18, 29, 26, 40, 44, 3 and 27. Cluster III contains sample 43 linked to accessions 68, 80, 5, 72, 19 and 61. The cluster IV (J = 0.92) comprises samples 32, 17, 28, 22, 20, 51 and 57. The cluster V (J = 0.87) is divided into two sub-clusters. V1 includes 70, 56, 100, 71, 53 and 89. V2 contains samples 102, 78, 77, 84 and 91. The accession 98, being itself the cluster VI at J = 1. The dissimilarity matrix shows that a distance of 0.00 is observed between couples: 62-63, 55-41. A low distance of 0.11 is observed between samples 1 and 58. Between accessions 1 and 4, a distance of 0.14 is observed. Samples 58 and 4 are distant by J = 0.18. A distance of 0.14 is obtained between 1 and 87. Samples 4 and 88 have a distance of 0.15. The higher distance (J = 1) is observed between 98 and all other accessions. The same distance is observed for the following couples: 5-66, 5-34, 5-22, 5-23, 10-20, 10-22, 72-17, 68-17, 46-17, 43-17, 19-17, 81-19, 84-19, 66-19, 65-19, 55-19, 57-19, 51-19, 41-19, 32-19, 34-19, 23-19, 20-52, 22-80, 22-72, 22-68, 22-62, 22-63, 22-52, 22-46, 22-28, 22-19, 19-30, 32-43, 32-46, 32-68, 32-71, 46-51, 46-57, 51-68, 51-72, 57-72, 93-61, 100-65, 93-80, 98-100 and 98-102.

Prolamin patterns

A total of 98 bands were obtained with molecular weights ranged from 11.36 to 137.638 kDa. Each profile presents between 6 and 24 bands. Two accessions (1 and 4) showed a single protein pattern; the remaining accessions had more than one seed protein pattern. The largest number of bands (24) is observed in patterns 58 (V. lutea subsp. vestita) and 62 (V. lutea subsp. eu-lutea). The lowest number (6) is obtained for samples 19 (V. sativa subsp. angustifolia), 7 and 51 both belonging to V. sativa subsp. obovata. The band 17.65 kDa is the most common as it appears in 46 profiles followed by the band 41.49 kDa appeared in 39 profiles and the band 35.53 kDa observed in 29 profiles. Bands 12.44, 51.51, 53, 56.62, 78.57, 83.92, 89.03, 94.53, 104.51, 105.45, 115.08, 118.17 and 137.63 kDa are the less common as they appear in one profile each, followed by bands 29.49, 66.63, 68.33, 81.77, 85.10, 106.71, 109.03 and 127.97 kDa obtained each in two profiles. The UPGMA generated four major clusters at the distance of J = 0.89. The first cluster (I) is divided into two sub-clusters (I1, I2). I1 includes samples 81, 41, 55, 30, 34, 23 and 66. I2 can further be divided into two groups (I2a, I2b). I2a contains accessions 88, 62, 4, 1, 63, 87, 79, 90 and 58. I2b is composed of 74, 49, 27, 44, 60, 40, 45, 18, 29, 26, 3 and 12. The cluster II comprises two sub-clusters (II1, II2). II1 contains accessions 59, 7, 86, 65. II2 includes 36, 14, 93, 64, 52, 5 and 6. The cluster III (J = 0.92) comprises two sub-clusters (III1, III2). III1 is composed of accessions 71, 53 and 70 in the group III1a and accessions 85, 11, 38, 37, 83, 15, 35, 13, 33, 8, 47 and 42 in the group III1b. The sub-cluster III2 includes two groups. III2a contains accessions 80, 72, 68 and 19. III2b is composed of 22, 17, 61, 32, 57, 28, 20 and 51. The cluster IV includes samples 89, 56, 91, 77, 102, 78, 84, 43, 98, 46, 100 and 10. The proximity matrix using Jaccard’s index shows that a distance of J = 0 is observed between samples 1 and 4. The same distance is obtained between accessions 11 and 85. Between accessions 40 and 60, a distance of 0.05 can be observed. A distance of 0.08 is obtained between samples 26 and 29. A low distance of 0.10 can be observed for the couples: 1-63, 4-63, 23-34, 55-81, 60-74. Between samples 3 and 29, 63 and 87, a distance of J = 0.16 is observed. Samples 41 and 81, 63 and 79 are distant by 0.11. A distance of 0.17 is obtained for: 3-26, 26-18, 49-29. Samples 49 and 12 are distant by J = 0.19. A distance of 0.18 is observed between accessions 12 and 26 and accessions 26 and 49. Accessions 26-27, 26-74 and 45-49 are distant by J = 0.14. A distance of 0.15 is observed for accessions 27-49 and 30-81. Couples 29-60 and 29-45 have a distance of 0.13. The higher distance (J = 1) is obtained for a large number of couples as for: 1-84, 1-100, 3-65, 3-59, 3-32, 3-28, 3-20, 4-84, 4-100, 5-100, 5-80, 5-72, 5-68, 5-61, 5-57, 5-51, 5-43, 5-34, 5-32, 5-28, 5-23, 5-19, 5-20, 5-22, 5-17, 6-43, 6-102, 7-102, 7-100, 7-91, 7-84, 7-77, 7-78, 7-66, 7-61, 7-46, 7-51, 7-43, 7-32, 7-33, 7-28, 7-20, 7-22, 7-17, 7-13, 7-8, 8-19, 8-43, 8-46, 8-56, 8-59, 8-65, 8-77, 8-78, 8-84, 8-86, 8-91, 8-98, 8-100, 8-102, 10-61, 10-57, 10-32, 10-28, 10-20, 11-19, 11-43, 11-46, 11-56, 11-59, 11-65, 11-77, 11-78, 11-84, 11-86, 11-91, 11-98, 11-100, 11-102, 12-65, 12-61, 12-59, 12-51, 12-32, 12-28, 12-19, 12-20, 13-19, 13-46, 13-56, 13-59, 13-65, 13-77, 13-98, 13-100, 13-72, 13-68, 13-61, 13-46, 13-51, 13-43, 13-32, 13-28, 13-20, 13-22, 13-17, 15-59, 15-65, 15-86, 17-86, 17-64, 17-65, 17-59, 17-52, 17-36, 18-20, 18-28, 18-32, 18-51, 18-59, 18-61.

Mantel test

A Mantel test based on Pearson’s correlation was used to highlight correlations between the matrices of albumins (matrix A), globulins (matrix B) and prolamins (matrix C). The p value was calculated from the distribution of r(AB) using 10,000 permutations with the value of r(AB.C) = 0.3099. This test showed significant correlation between the three fractions studied since the calculated p-value (<0.0001) is below the significance level of alpha (0.05 = 5%). Concerning the correlation between ecogeography and seed proteins, r values were −0.0012, −0.0039 and 0.0166 respectively for albumins, globulins and prolamins. p-values are 0.8233, 0.9319 and 0.3689 respectively for the three fractions. Thus, Mantel test showed no significant correlation between ecogeography and protein patterns since the calculated p-values are below the significance level of alpha.

Cluster analysis based on ecogeographic data

The dendrogram illustrated in Fig. 4 shows the relationships between these taxa, based on the variation in the five ecogeographic parameters studied. At the Euclidean distance of 716.43, the dendrogram can be divided into two major clusters (I and II). The first one is further divided into two sub-clusters (Ia and Ib). Ia (d = 119.65) comprises samples 44, 66, 41, 40, 26 and 70 belonging to 2 bioclimates (LH–SH). Ib can be divided into Ib1 (d = 226.96) and Ib2 (295.93). Ib1 contains the sample 77 (HA) linked to accessions 83, 89, 13, 8, 34, 23, 55, 58, 51, 10, 43, 78, 100, 84, 81, 102, 4, 47, 19, 32, 17 and 6 from 4 bioclimates (HA–MSA–SH–HSA). Ib2 (d = 295.93) is composed of samples 91, 98, 74 belonging to 2 bioclimates (SH–HSA) linked to 46, 18, 45, 27, 29, 3 (MSA) then 22, 20, 60, 80, 72, 57, 49, 42 and 86. (MSA–LSA–HSA–SH). The second cluster comprises subclusters IIa which contains samples 12 (LSA) and 11 (HA) and IIb. The latter comprises groups IIb1 (d = 165.56) composed of accessions 71, 38, 88, 87, 93, 28 and 59 belonging to 1 bioclimate (LH) and IIb2 which can further be divided into two groups: At a distance of d = 172.22, the first group contains accessions 64, 1, 63, 85, 33, 36, 62, 79, 61, 90, 15, 35 and 14 collected from two bioclimates (LH–SH). The second group (d = 317.53) comprises sample 65 (LH) linked to accessions 56, 68, 52, 37, 30, 7 and 5 (SH–MSA–SA). The higher distance (d = 1286) is observed between 91 (V. monantha subsp. cinerea, SH) and 93 (V. sativa subsp. consobrina, LH). A distance of d = 1284 is obtained between 87 (V. lutea subsp. eu-lutea, LH) and 91. The distance of d = 0 is obtained between the following couples: 35-14, 6-17, 32-19, 80-72, 15-90, 42-49, 47-4, 47-102, 47-81, 85-63, 4-102, 77-83, 102-81, 3-29, 30-7, 100-84 and 4-81. Low distances of d = 1 are observed between 6 and 19, 17 and 19, 41 and 40.
Fig. 4

Dendrogram generated using UPGMA cluster analysis and Euclidean distances based on ecogeographic characterization of sites investigated

Discussion

The discrimination in the genus Vicia into subgenera, sections and subsections was undertaken by several studies, based on morphological and cytological analyses (Hanelt and Mettin 1989; Kupicha 1976; Leht 2009). In the present work, seed storage proteins and ecogeographic parameters were used.

Seed proteins variability

The differences among accessions were observed and all eleven taxa can be recognized by their protein profiles. Samples within each taxon showed a different number of bands with different molecular weights. Thus, intraspecific heterogeneity is obtained. A positive correlation was exhibited between seed globulin, seed albumin and seed prolamin contents (highly significant). Our results partially confirmed classification of Vicia by Kupicha (1976), Hanelt and Mettin (1989) and Leht (2009) at subgeneric and sectional levels. According to Osborne (1924), proteins are classified into albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins based on their solubility which is a convenient method to initiate the discrimination of the seed storage proteins from a species that has not been studied in detail (Ribeiro et al. 2004). The differences in the three fractions profiles of individual seeds was expected since Mudzana et al. (1995) and Goodrich et al. (1985) found that there was variability in the total seed storage protein profiles of individual seeds within a subspecies. This was probably due the cross fertilization nature of the genus.

Albumins patterns

Albumins cluster analysis revealed five major clusters, differing only in the relative position of some accessions in subgroups. Populations of V. monantha subsp. calcarata belonging to section Cracca of the subgenus Vicilla (sensu Kupicha) are linked to samples of V. lutea (Sect. Hypechusa) which indicates a close relationship between the two subspecies of V. lutea when it is difficult to determine distinct groups which could be individually identified as eu-lutea or as vestita. There are bands which are specific of some accessions and can be used as markers to discriminate samples at interspecific level. Discrimination at intraspecific level is also obtained by albumins patterns. The use of albumins proved to be helpful in revealing interspecific variability and intraspecific diversity in the studied taxa. Some bands are specific constant markers for each taxon and can be discriminated bay their electrophoregrams. Other bands are common of several taxa. Albumins present the highest bands number which indicates major role of albumin heterogeneity in discriminating the Vicia samples (Mustafa 2007).

Globulins patterns

Cluster analysis of globulins patterns revealed six basic groups. A low distance can be observed between samples of V. lutea subsp. vestita or by samples of V. lutea subsp. eu-utea and V. lutea subsp. vestita. V. narbonensis (sect. Narbonensis) and V. lutea subsp. vestita (sect. Hypechusa) present close globulin profiles. These results concord with those of Jaaska (1997), Jaaska and Leht (2007) and Shiran and Raina (2014), which showed the species of sections Hypechusa as sister to the clade of section Narbonensis. High distances are observed between V. narbonensis (sect. Narbonensis) and V. sativa (sect. Vicia) and between species of V. sativa or between V. lutea subsp. eu-lutea (sect. Hypechusa) and V. sativa. Globulins are the major storage proteins present in seeds of legumes (Freitas et al. 2000) and differences both at intraspecific and interspecific levels can be obtained by globulins patterns. A good example in this case is the one of sample 43 (V. monantha subsp. calcarata) characterized by 3 specific bands (51.74, 78.27 and 115.04 kDa). The unique population of V. leucantha also has a specific band (119.96 kDa). Samples of V. monantha subsp. calcarata are a good example for intraspecific heterogeneity as shown by accessions 102 and 43, characterized by one specific band each.

Prolamins patterns

Cluster analysis of prolamins patterns revealed four basic groups. Few studies have been reported concerning the utilization of prolamins patterns to discriminate Vicia taxa in comparison with albumins and globulins. The classification obtained using the UPGMA showed that samples belonging to the same taxon close together in the clusters. A common profile was observed for samples 1 and 4 belonging to V. lutea subsp. vestita, but this taxon also showed other patterns. It is may be due to the fact that native wild populations are composed of a mixture of genotypes which provide survival advantages in varied environmental conditions. Outcrossing could also be an explanation of diversity in the accessions studied, as indicated for several types of vetch (Hanelt and Mettin 1989; Mirali et al. 2007). The sample 10 (V. sativa subsp. obovata) showed differences in its electrophoregram compared to the other taxon members, and might be considered an ‘‘off type’’ as proposed by De la Rosa and Gonzalez (2010). Prolamins patterns are a good discriminatory marker in Vicia taxa at both intraspecific and interspecific levels especially for V. sativa samples as the subspecies belonging to this species can be characterized by specific bands as in the case of samples 6, 10, 57, 82 and 95 of V. sativa subsp. obovata or samples 48, 77 and 42 belonging to V. sativa subsp. cordata. V. leucantha, V. tenuifolia and V. narbonensis are also characterized by specific bands which could be considered as markers at interspecific level.

Interspecific and intraspecific variation

V. sativa s.l. (Sect. Vicia)

Vicia sativa is the most polymorphic species of the genus Vicia and the debate about its taxonomic classification is extensive. In the present work, the all studied taxa of V. sativa s.l (section Vicia) are found in the same group on the basis of albumins homology and can be found in three clusters which indicates a close relationship between subspecies of V. sativa when it is difficult to observe separate groups which could be identified as obovata, consobrina, cordata or angustifolia. In our previous paper using plant morphology (Bechkri and Khelifi 2016), our results have demonstrated that in the V. sativa using morphological traits alone do not provide a stable grouping. A close relationship between samples can be seen. The picture generated between the phylogenetic trees may be due to the possible phylogenetic instability of these taxa as indicated by Leht (2009).

V. narbonensis (Sect. Narbonensis) and V. lutea (Sect. Hypechusa)

On the basis of albumins patterns, all populations of V. narbonensis belong to the same subcluster except for the accession 23 which is linked to accessions of V. sativa. Globulins patterns linked all accessions of V. narbonensis together. Accessions of V. narbonensis clustered together using prolamins profiles. Albumins, globulins and prolamins patterns joined all samples of V. lutea in the same subcluster with no discrimination between subsp. eu-lutea and subsp. vetsita. These observations show that there is an overlap between accessions of these two subspecies. The utilization of seed storage proteins shows a close relationship between the taxa when it is difficult to distinguish groups which could be identified as eu-lutea or as vestita. Albumins and globulins profiles not link accessions of V. lutea and V. narbonensis. Prolamins patterns of the present study concord with those of Jaaska (1997) and Jaaska and Leht (2007) and Shiran and Raina (2014) which showed the species of sections Hypechusa as sister to the clade of section Narbonensis. Our data revealed that subgenus Vicia is a well-separated subgenus and agreed with the results based on morphology reported by Diklic (1972) and with results on phylogenetic relationships (Potokina et al. 1999; Leht 2009). Seed albumins, globulins and prolamins patterns showed V. lutea samples to form an homogenous group. The same findings were reported by Przybylska and Zimniak-Przybylska (1997).

V. monantha, V. tenuifolia and V. leucantha (Section Cracca)

Samples of V. monantha clustered together in two different groups on the basis of albumins patterns with no distinction between the two subspecies calcarata and cinerea. An exception is observed for two samples (43 and 46) which clustered with accessions of V. sativa, V. tenuifolia and V. leucantha. Globulins patterns joined the majority of samples of V. monantha subsp. calcarata all together with an exception for the sample 98 which forms a separate cluster. Profiles of V. monantha subsp. cinerea do not have provided clear groupings. Prolamins patterns gave stable groups where samples of subsp. monantha are linked together. Six samples clustered together in another subcluster which contains samples of subsp. cinerea. Samples of these species clustered together on the basis of albumins, globulins and prolamins patterns. They are also linked to samples of V. monantha. Thus, species of section Cracca sensu Kupicha belong to one group. Populations of V. tenuifolia, V. leucantha and V. monantha clustered together showing also an overlap between these taxa. These species are classified by Kupicha (1976) in the sub-genus Vicilla, section Cracca. Thus, the three species attributed to the section Cracca are joined in a separate group in the present work. V. tenuifolia and V. leucantha, are grouped in one subcluster of closely related taxa that provided strong homologous variation with shared characters. As a consequence, the treatment of V. tenuifolia, V. monantha and V. leucantha in the section Cracca is supported. In the present analysis, V. leucantha, the species transferred by Ball (1968) to his section Ervum, is in the same clade with the remaining Cracca species. In spite of this, our analysis of seed proteins supports Kupicha’s placement of V. leucantha in section Cracca as was also done by Davis and Plitmann (1970).

Ecogeographic characterization

As the first step towards more efficient conservation is to undertake an ecogeographic study (Maxted et al. 1996), the aim of the present work was to collect ecogeographic informations from investigated stations of Vicia L. Analysis of the passport data will elucidate each taxon’s geographic and ecological location. The distribution maps will be used in the planning of future collecting missions. The wide geographic ranges may explain the high degree of protein seed storage variation among accessions and should be considered in conservation programs of this Vicia taxa (El Bakatoushi and Ashour 2009). The obtained intraspecific diversity within the taxa reflects a wide geographical and ecological distribution of this species as reported by Ehrman and Maxted (1990) and Maxted (1995). Studying the species from different geographic regions and altitudes, indicates that the species may be still evolving in different pathways as reported by Ashour et al. (2005). According to Hannelt and Mettin (1989), Vicia taxa do not tolerate extreme environmental conditions. Whereas, Francis et al. (2000) report that V. sativa has good adaption to adverse environmental conditions. Cluster analysis shows that samples having differences in electropherograms and belonging to different taxa can belong to an identical bioclimate and altitudes as in the case of accessions 19 and 32 which were collected from the same locality. In parallel, there are samples with high protein homology level which are collected from stations belonging to the same bioclimate. Accessions 72 and 80 are a good example in this case. The dendrogram obtained with ecogeographic parameters did not indicate clear discrimination among accessions based on their geographical locations. The Mantel test between proteins patterns and ecogeography indicated that the correlation between proteins profiles resemblance and geographical origin is less significant. The same findings were reported by Chung et al. (2013), Potokina et al. (2003), Mirali et al. (2007) and De la Rosa and Gonzalez (2010). Considering all stations of the current paper, the studied samples of Vicia L. occur from 1 to 1222 m. Stations belong to seven different bioclimates (SH, LH, HSA, MSA, LSA, HA) and are characterized by cool, wild, warm or temperate winters. Considering all stations of the current work, V. sativa L. occurs from sea level to 880 m which is consistent with the findings of Maxted (1995). Samples of V. narbonensis were collected from sites receiving between 382.95 and 697.18 mm of precipitations and belonging to bioclimates characterized by cool or mild winter. Bennett and Maxted (1997) reported that the V. narbonensis occur over a wide range of altitudes, from sea level to 3200 m when Abd El Moneim (1992) reported that V. narbonensis adapts in areas receiving 250–300 mm annual precipitations and are characterized by low winter temperatures. Accessions of V. lutea were collected from sites belonging to four bioclimates (LH, HSA, MSA, SH) and altitudes ranged between 11 and 604 m with a minimum temperatures ranged from 2.55 to 8.64 °C. Accessions 74, 77, 91 and 98 belonging to V. monanatha occur until 1222 m and at these altitudes, they require some frost tolerance as the temperatures can drop to 0.63 °C as in the case of the accession 98. V. leucantha was collected from a site characterized by HSA bioclimate with a minimum temperature of 2.62 °C (cool winter) and an altitude of 586 m. The two samples of V. tenuifolia occurred in SH and MSA bioclimates with mild or cool winters and at altitudes of 276 and 543 m. These patterns are not necessarily a real picture of the preferred altitude of these two taxa. A larger number of accessions from each geographical location should be tested to confirm patterns.

Conclusion

The electrophoregrams obtained can be exploited as passport data for the genetic diversity of the studied taxa. Seed protein electrophoresis is a valid tool for taxa discrimination. The variability observed indicates that improvement by simple selection for these traits is possible. No significant correlation is obtained between seed proteins and ecogeography. The use of more samples from different origins is necessary to include most of the genetic determinants of these traits.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content and are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript in accordance with ICMJE criteria. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Plant material is available in “laboratoire de génétique biochimie et biotechnologies végétales”. Université Frères MENTOURI Constantine Algeria.

Consent for publication

Authors agree to the terms of the Springer Open Copyright and License Agreement.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Authors agree to the terms of ethics approval and consent to participate.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Génétique Biochimie et Biotechnologies Végétales, Faculté des sciences de la nature et de la vie, Université Frères MENTOURI

References

  1. Abd El Moneim AM (1992) Narbon Vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.): a potential feed legume crop for dry areas in West Asia. J Agron Crop Sci 169(5):347–353View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashour FM, El-Sadek LM, El-Badan GE (2005) Karyotypic relatedness among Vicia species. Egypt J Genet Cytol 34:345–353Google Scholar
  3. Ball PW (1968) Vicia L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (eds) Flora Europaea, vol 2. Rosaceae to Umbelliferae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–136Google Scholar
  4. Bechkri S, Khelifi D (2016) Variation in Vicia sativa s.l. from Algeria based on morphological characters and ecogeographic parameters. Genet Resour Crop Evol. doi:10.1007/s10722-016-0404-1 Google Scholar
  5. Bennett SJ, Maxted N (1997) An ecogeographic analysis of the Vicia narbonensis complex. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:411–428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung JW, Kim TS, Suresh S, Lee SY, Cho GT (2013) Development of 65 novel polymorphic cDNA-SSR markers in common vetch (Vicia sativa subsp sativa). Molecules 18(7):8376–8392View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford DJ (1990) Plant molecular systematics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Darre MJ, Minior DN, Tatake JG, Ressler C (1998) Nutritional evaluation of detoxified and raw common vetch seed using diets of broilers. J Agric Food Chem 46:4675–4679View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis PH, Plitmann U (1970) Vicia L. In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. University Press, Edinburgh, pp 274–321Google Scholar
  10. De la Rosa L, Gonzalez JM (2010) The genetic diversity associated with seed proteins in a collection of Spanish underground vetches (Vicia sativa L. subsp. amphicarpa (Dorthes) Asch. et Graebn.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:565–573View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Diklic N (1972) Vicia L. In: Josifovic M (ed) Flora SR Srbije. Beograd, Sanu, pp 315–355Google Scholar
  12. Ehrman TA, Maxted N (1990) Ecogeographic survey and collection of Syrian Vicieae and Cicereae (Leguminosae). Plant Genet Res Newsl 77:1–8Google Scholar
  13. El Bakatoushi R, Ashour FM (2009) Genetic diversity among some Vicia narbonensis L. varieties as revealed by karyotype and protein analysis. Egypt J Genet Cytol 38:85–97Google Scholar
  14. Emberger L (1955) Une classification biogéographique des climats. Rec Trav Lab Bot Géol Fac Sci 7:1–43Google Scholar
  15. Emre I, Turgut-Balik D, Genç H, Sahin A (2010) Total seed storage protein patterns of some Lathyrus species growing in Turkey using SDS-PAGE. Pak J Bot 42(5):3157–3163Google Scholar
  16. Francis GM, Enneking D, Abd El Moneim AM (2000) When and where will vetches have an impact as grain legumes? In: Knight R (ed) Linih’ng research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st century. Proceedings of the Third International Food Legume Research Conference, Adelaide 1997. Current plant science and biotechnology in agriculture. Kluwer, London, p 375–384Google Scholar
  17. Freitas RL, Ferreira RB, Teixeira AR (2000) Use of a single method in the extraction of the seed storage globulins from several legume species. Application to analyse structural comparisons within the major classes of globulins. Int J Food Sci Nutr 51:341–352View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodrich W, Cooke J, Morgan AG (1985) The application of electrophoresis to the characterization of cultivars of Vicia faba L. FABIS Newsl 13:8–11Google Scholar
  19. Haider AS, El-Shanshoury AR (2000) Variability of storage proteins and esterase isozymes in Vicia sativa subsp. Biol Plant 43:205–209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hameed A, Shah TM, Atta BM, Iqbal N, Haq MA, Ali H (2009) Comparative seed storage protein profiling of Kabuli chickpea genotypes. Pak J Bot 41(2):703–710Google Scholar
  21. Hanelt P, Mettin D (1989) Biosystematics of the genus Vicia L. (Leguminosae). Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:199–223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins TJV (1984) Synthesis and regulation of major proteins in seeds. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 35:191–221View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaaska V (1997) Isoenzyme diversity and phylogenetic affinities in Vicia subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae). Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:557–574View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaaska V, Leht M (2007) Phylogenetic relationships between and within sections Hypechusa, Narbonensis and Peregrinae of genus Vicia (Fabaceae) based on evidence from isozymes and morphology. CEJB 2(1):137–155Google Scholar
  25. Kupicha FK (1976) The infrageneric structure of Vicia. Notes R Bot Gard Edinb 34:287–326Google Scholar
  26. Ladizinsky G, Hymowitz T (1979) Seed protein electrophoresis in taxonomic and evolutionary studies: review. Theor Appl Genet 54:145–151View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Leht M (2009) Phylogenetics of Vicia (Fabaceae) based on morphological data. Feddes Repert 120(7–8):379–393View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mantel N (1967) Adaptation of Karber’s method for estimating the exponential parameter from quantal data, and its relationship to birth, death, and branching processes. Biometrics 23:739–746View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxted N (1993) A phenetic investigation of Vicia L. subgenus Vicia (Leguminosae, Vicieae). Bot J Linn Soc 111:155–182View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Maxted N (1995) An ecogeographical study of Vicia subgenus Vicia. Systematic and ecogeographic studies on crop genepools 8. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (1996) Complementary conservation strategies. In: Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Hawkes JG (eds) Plant genetic conservation: the in situ approach. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 20–57Google Scholar
  33. Mirali N, El-Khouri S, Rizq F (2007) Genetic diversity and relationships in some Vicia species as determined by SDS–PAGE of seed proteins. Biol Plant 51(4):660–666View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Mudzana G, Pickett AA, Jarman RJ, Cooke RT, Keefe PD (1995) Variety discrimination in faba beans (Vicia faba L.) an integrated approach. Plant Var Seeds 8:135–145Google Scholar
  35. Mustafa AEZ (2007) Genetic variation among Egyptian cultivars of Vicia faba L. Pak J Biol Sci 10(23):4204–4210View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Nemecek T, Von Richthofen JS, Dubois G, Casta P, Charles R, Pahl H (2008) Environmental impacts of introducing grain legumes into European crop rotations. Eur J Agron 28:380–393Google Scholar
  37. Osborne TB (1924) The vegetable proteins. London, Longmans-GreenGoogle Scholar
  38. Potokina E, Tomooka N, Vaughan DA, Alexandrova T, Xu RQ (1999) Phylogeny of Vicia subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae) based on analysis of RAPDs and RFLP of PCR-amplified chloroplast genes. Genet Res Crop Evol 46:149–161View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Potokina E, Endo Y, Eggi E, Ohashi H (2003) Electrophoretic patterns of seed proteins in the East Asian Vicia species (Leguminosae) and their systematic utility. J Japanese Bot 78(1):29–37Google Scholar
  40. Przybylska J, Zimniak-Przybylska Z (1997) Electrophoretic seed albumin patterns in Vicia species of sectt. Hypechusa and Peregrinae (Fabaceae). Plant Syst Evol 208:239–248View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Quézel P, Santa S (1962) Nouvelle flore de l’Algérie et des régions méridionales. Tome 1. Editions du centre national de la recherche scientifique, Paris, pp 524–531Google Scholar
  42. Ribeiro AC, Teixeira AR, Ferreira RB (2004) Characterization of globulins from common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). J Agric Food Chem 52:4913–4920View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Romesburg HC (1990) Cluster analysis for researchers. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, MalabarGoogle Scholar
  44. Seltzer P (1946) Le climat de l’Algérie. Alger, Carbonel, p 219Google Scholar
  45. Shiran B, Raina SN (2014) Evidence of rapid evolution and incipient speciation in Vicia sativa species complex based on nuclear and organellar RFLPs and PCR analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:519–532View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Stewart P (1969) Un nouveau climagramme pour l’Algérie et son application au barrage vert. Bull Soc Hist Nat Afr Nord 65:1–2Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017