- Open Access
Reproductive phenology and pre-dispersal fruit predation in Atriplex halimus L. (Chenopodiaceae)
- Prado Romera†1,
- Francisca Fernández-Illescas†1,
- F Javier J Nieva1Email author,
- Pilar Rodríguez-Rubio†2,
- Enrique Sánchez-Gullón†3 and
- Adolfo F Muñoz-Rodríguez†1
© Romera et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 23 March 2012
- Accepted: 16 August 2012
- Published: 12 August 2013
The flowering phenology pattern of Atriplex halimus was studied in a Mediterranean habitat in order to analyze protandry effectiveness. Fruit set evolution was recorded over two years and the impact of pre-dispersal predation by insects was also evaluated.
The flowering phenology coincided in 2006 and 2007, starting in mid-July and reaching full flowering at the end of August in both years. Inflorescences are composed of glomerules with 8.78 ± 2.79 male flowers and 4.57 ± 2.58 female flowers, with no significant differences in position on the inflorescence. The peaks of male and female flower anthesis were reached in mid-August, but the male maximum occurred one week before the female. Plants at the start of flowering only bear male flowers, but female flowers soon appear. Fruit set starts at the end of August; all the flowers were transformed into fruit by mid-September and their development continued to the beginning of October, when fruit structures had matured and began to drop. Fruit predation started at the end of September and reached maximum intensity in mid-October.
At population level, male and female flowers seemed to open in the same weeks, but at plant and glomerule level male flowers opened one week before the females. Fruit predation levels were 62.42 and 43.14% in 2006 and 2007 respectively, with no significant differences between different parts of the inflorescence. And larvae of Coleophoridae were the most abundant predators.
- Atriplex halimus
- Fruit predation
Atriplex shrub species, known as saltbushes, inhabit arid regions and are frequently found in saline soils (McArthur and Sanderson 1984; Cañadas et al. 2010). Atriplex halimus L. is a Mediterranean and Macronesian scrub that grows in dry saline soils, and is a characteristic species of halo-nitrophilous vegetation (Pegano-Salsoletea). It is planted extensively in these areas for ornamental purposes and as a fodder shrub due to its tolerance of drought and salinity; it plays an important role in the rehabilitation of degraded zones (Le Houerou 1992; Kinet et al. 1998; Le Houerou 2000; Papanastasis et al. 2008) and has improved the quality of pastures in arid zones (Osman et al. 2006).
Atriplex halimus is a monoecious scrub that produces staminate flowers, with a whorl of 5 green sepals and 5 stamens, and female flowers with a single carpel enclosed within two opposite bracts which develop into dry fruit (achenes) surrounded by 2 valves, giving rise to a fruit structure that disperses as a unit. (Talamali et al. 20012003) studied floral polymorphism in the flowers of this species, observing other types sporadically including hermaphrodite flowers. Male and female flowers are set in glomerules formed by the concrescence of several dichasial cymes deployed along the axis of the branched inflorescence. Female flowers mainly develop in the proximal part and male flowers in the distal part of each glomerule (Talamali et al. 2001), and the sex ratio is affected by day length and light intensity (Talamali et al. 2003).
As a rule, in the Chenopodiaceae family plants are predominantly wind-pollinated (Blackwell and Powell 1981) and there is no evidence of self-incompatibility (Heyligers 2001). Some studies have focused on the phenology of this species in different areas (Talamali et al. 2003), and one describes protandry (Abbad and Benchaabane 2004) which is consistent with the high levels of outcrossing found in this species (Haddioui and Baaziz 2001; Ferchichi et al. 2006).
In this study we examine the flowering phenology pattern of A. halimus in a Mediterranean habitat, determining male and female flower development on three levels (population, plant and glomerule) in order to analyze protandry effectiveness.
The rates of fruit and seed predation are important parameters of the population dynamic of plants. However, there is a lack of information on fructification and seed predation despite their importance as factors for the population dynamic of A. halimus. In this study fruit set evolution was recorded over two years and the impact of pre-dispersal predation by insects was also evaluated.
For population phenology, ten plants randomly distributed among the Atriplex population were marked at the beginning of 2006 and evaluated weekly to determine flowering stage on a scale of zero to ten that measured the proportion of inflorescences with open flowers. Ten inflorescences from different plants were picked randomly each week for laboratory analysis with loupe or microscope magnification. Three glomerules were randomly selected from each inflorescence, one from the upper, middle and lower parts, and analyzed independently to estimate the number of male and female flowers, and the evolution of fructification and predation.
Male flower phenology was studied in 2007 by counting the number of male flowers in each glomerule which marked three different developmental stages of the flower: B) male flower bud differentiated, A) male flower at anthesis liberating pollen, and S) senescent male flowers. As male flower bud differentiation occurs sequentially, and the male flowers fall from the glomerule and disappear after flower senescence, we estimated the average number of male flowers per glomerule by calculating the arithmetic mean for the two weeks when male flowering peaked (7 and 14 August 2007). The average values for different levels of inflorescence were also calculated.
Female flower phenology and fruit evolution were studied in 2006 and 2007 by counting the number of female flowers in each glomerule, which yielded three different developmental stages of the flower: B) female flower bud differentiated, A) female flower at anthesis protruding stigmas from the flower bracts, and F) fruiting female flower, showing prominent bract development. No senescent female flower was recorded as all the flowers observed had initiated fruit development. Once all female flowers are differentiated, and there is no flower drop, we assume that their numbers will remain stable until the onset of flower drop, with possible record variations due to sampling. In order to establish an approximate level of female flowers per glomerule, we considered the week in both years when flowering peaked (28 August 2006 and 18 September 2007) together with the week before and after. The global mean values for different levels of the inflorescence were calculated.
Each week the number of male flower per glomerule at each stage was calculated with the percentage of plants and glomerules with only male flowers opened, with only female flowers opened, with both types opened, and with no flower opened.
From 7 August (when the first female bloom peak occurs in both years) to 9 October (when the size of bracts and achenes was stable), 20 female flowers were randomly selected, two from each inflorescence, and bract length and width and ovule or achene length were measured. Their stigmas were removed and mounted on cotton blue lactophenol for microscopic examination, based on the observation of pollen tubes growing on each.
Predated fruits were also counted and the predators found on inflorescences were fixed for taxonomic identification by D. M. Huertas Dionisio, an insect specialist in the field (Huertas Dionisio 2007). The percentage of fruit predation was calculated weekly. To compare the figures obtained in both years, and on different parts of the inflorescence, only values above 0% were used in analysis.
Data normality was checked by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Statistical analysis was done via the ANOVA one-way analysis of variance (when data were normally distributed) or by a non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis) if not.
During anthesis the bract size was 0.91 ± 0.17 mm long by 0.95 ± 0.26 mm wide in 2006, and 0.75 ± 0.33 mm by 0.67 ± 0.19 mm in 2007, showing no significant differences in length (one-way ANOVA: F = 3.41, p = 0.73). Bracts in 2006 were significantly broader than in 2007 (one-way ANOVA: F = 14.66, p < 0.001). In this period, the size of the ovary was 0.27 ± 0.06 mm (2006) and 0.25 ± 0.07 mm (2007), with no significant difference between years (one-way ANOVA: F = 2.33, p = 0.13). In 2006, bracts began to grow on 21 August and reached maximum size on 25 September. Final bract size on 9 October was 2.70 ± 0.37 mm by 3.86 ± 0.65 mm, and 3.22 ± 0.58 mm by 4.57 ± 0.79 mm in 2007, significantly longer (one-way ANOVA: F = 11.16, p = 0.002) and broader (one-way ANOVA: F = 9.24, p = 0.004) than the previous year. On this date, achene size was 1.47 ± 0.25 mm in 2006 and 1.80 ± 0.28 mm in 2007, a significant difference between both years (one-way ANOVA: F = 15.40, p < 0.001).
Fruit predation was first observed on 25 September 2006 and on 18 September 2007 (Figure 7), reaching a maximum on 16 October in both years, with 78% (2006) and 66% (2007) of achenes predated. After this date, the level of predation varied weekly, making interpretation difficult. The probable cause was the process of fruit liberation and the intense bird predation observed in the field. The average of predated fruit by insects was 62.42% (2006) and 43.14% (2007), a significant difference (one-way ANOVA: F = 8.1, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in predation levels between upper, middle and lower parts either in 2006 (one-way ANOVA: F = 0.54, p = 0.58) or in 2007 (one-way ANOVA: F = 1.46, p = 0.25). Fruiting and predation showed no significant correlation between them.
During the study (in September) some insect eggs were found near the ovaries of female flowers in A. halimus. Many Coleophoridae (Lepidoptera) larvae were located in the inflorescences in the last week of September and first days of October in both years. Some Gelechiidae (Lepidoptera) larvae were also found in September.
A. halimus is mainly considered a monoecious species which is occasionally dioecious. However, some authors have found individuals that present unisexual and hermaphrodite flowers so this species could be polygamous or, more precisely, trimonoecious (Talamali et al. 20012003). Our study observed no other flower type than the typical male and female flowers, although one female flower was found to contain abortive stamen primordia. The male-to-female flower ratio was 2.75/1, consistent with results obtained by other authors for this species (Freeman et al. 2007).
Flowering started in July in both years of our study. However, on Porquerolles Island close to Toulon (S France), plants originating from Algeria and Tunisia started flowering in September (Talamali et al. 2003), and in Morocco, Abbad and Benchaabane (2004) found that flowering commenced in mid-August in the Safi and Marrakech regions, and around the beginning of September in Ouarzazate. These two authors justified differences in flowering phenology by the variety of climatic conditions; high temperature, low humidity and periods without rainfall accelerate the formation of flower buds. Climate data show that the station in France is colder and rainier than the location we studied, with an annual mean temperature of 14.6°C with rainfall of 925.4 mm (Cuers Station: Rivas-Martínez and Rivas-Sáenz 1996–2009), but the locations under study in Morocco are hotter and drier, with an annual mean of 18.5°C and 317.0 mm in Safi, 19.9°C and 241.0 mm in Marrakech and 19.4°C and 101.4 mm in the Ouarzazate region (Rivas-Martínez and Rivas-Sáenz 1996–2009), so the climatic conditions cited do not explain the phenological delay observed in Morocco. This difference could be due to yearly variations in meteorological or microclimatic conditions.
The Atriplex species seems to be self-compatible (Heyligers 2001), and A. halimus is considered to be highly outbreeding (Haddioui and Baaziz 2001; Ferchichi et al. 2006), indicating that this species has effective mechanisms to prevent self-crossing. Protandry had been observed in this species by Abbad and Benchaabane (2004), who established a delay of nearly a month between the appearance of male and female flowers. In our study, we observed that male and female flowers seemed to open in the same weeks at population level (Figure 3), but the highest number of male flowers opened is reached one week before that of the female flowers, and that the upper, middle and lower parts of the inflorescence showed a similar pattern of behaviour (Figure 4). At plant and glomerule level (Figure 5), we see that male flowers opened one week before the females. This is in line with observations by Talamali et al. (2001), because female flowers are distributed along the distal parts of the dichasium and so open later than the males, which are mainly found on the proximal parts.
The start of fruit set and ovule development began when the stigmas were totally receptive. In 2006 the number of fruits per glomerule was significantly higher than in 2007, but seeds and bracts were much smaller in the first year. Abbad and Benchaabane (2004) observed that drought could cause a reduction in the number of female flowers in this species, so yearly variations in the number of fruits per glomerule could be explained by differences in rainfall between these years (Figure 1); the average accumulated rainfall from January to July in the location studied is 255.1 mm, while in 2006 and 2007 this value reached 327.0 and 175.6 mm respectively. This environmental effect has been observed in other species of Atriplex (McArthur 1977; McArthur and Freeman 1982).
The yearly variation in fruit size might be the result of physiological constraints including positional, temporal and environmental effects during offspring development; but most often offspring size is determined by an equal distribution of resources among the offspring (McGinley et al. 1987), so seed number could determine its weight (Smith and Fretwell 1974; Vaughton and Ramsey 1998; Sakai and Sakai 2005; Sadras 2007; Gambín and Borrás 2009; Kosiński 2010).
These size differences cannot be considered a case of seed heteromorphism, which occurs frequently in Chenopodiaceae (Imbert 2002), but it would be interesting to determine if these differences affect seed germination requirements, as occurs in species of Atriplex that show seed heteromorphism (Khan and Ungar 1984;1986), or if they influence individual plant performance, as in Atriplex triangularis Willd. (Ellison 1987. Kheiria et al. (2007) showed the existence of fruit polymorphism in Tunisian populations, the fruits from southern Tunisia being smaller than those collected from the central and northern areas. Fruit size recorded in our study for 2006 was similar to data collated by these authors in populations from central and northern Tunisia, but the size recorded in 2007 was bigger.
A. halimus fruits suffer high levels of pre-dispersal predation by insects. Larvae of Coleophoridae (Lepidoptera) were the most abundant predators of fruits and seeds in both years of the study. Huertas Dionisio (2007) found eight species of Lepidoptera on A. halimus plants, four of which are common in inflorescences: Coleophora gaviaepennella Toll, C. granulatella Zeller, Goniodoma auroguttella Zeller (fam. Coleophoridae) and Gymnancyla sfakesella Chrétien (fam. Pyralidae). This author also found pupals of the first and second species in the inflorescences in November, and Gymnancyla sfakesella larvae in September and October.
Huertas Dionisio (2005) describes the biological cycle of Goniodoma auroguttella in A. halimus plants in Huelva (SW Spain), including locations in the “Marismas del Odiel” Natural Park. Adults emerge in June, July and August and larvae feed on Atriplex fruits until October, gaining access to the ovary/achene by a hole made in the side of the valves, and moving along the inflorescence camouflaged by fruit valves. In October, the larvae go down the stem and bore a tunnel to the pith, where they transform into chrysalides. This cycle synchronizes with the previously described phenological phases (female flowering, fruit development and predation) observed in the present study. The anthesis of pistilate flowers occurs mainly in July and August, when adult insects are in flight; the first fruit predation event in both years was observed as the fruiting bracts reached maximum size, in the second half of September; peak predation is in October when larvae stop eating and the fruits begin to drop, which points to behavioural adaptation by the predator to exploit seed resources.
The yearly differences in levels of fruit predation could be explained by factors such as population size of the predators or variations in fruit and seed size. In 2006, seeds were smaller and the predation level was 62%, while in 2007 seeds were approximately 20% bigger and the predation level was 43% which suggests that when seeds are smaller, predators compensate by attacking more fruits. This is in line with the satiation mechanism proposed by Bonal et al. (2007), in which the satiation of small predators at seed level ensures that a proportion of the seeds survive predation.
In plants with sequential flowering, seed predation may be affected by the position of the fruit within the plant (Ehrlén 1996; Kudo et al. 2001; Sánchez et al. 2008). In A. halimus there were no significant differences in predation levels between different parts of the inflorescence. Mass fruiting appears to favour seed predators and allows them to attack the fruit on different parts of the inflorescence with the same frequency, but this strategy reduces fruiting time and ensures that some fruits avoid total seed destruction (Augspurger 1981; Pías and Guitián 2007; Gomes da Silva and Bezerra Pinheiro 2009). This strategy seems most appropriate when greater seed loss is caused by a specialist predator (Ims 1990), as is the case of the Atriplex population we have studied.
At glomerule level, male flowers open earlier but protandry is incomplete because when the female flowers begin to be receptive, male flowers are still opening in the glomerule.
Fruit predation levels were 62.42 and 43.14% in 2006 and 2007 respectively. And larvae of Coleophoridae were the most abundant predators.
Different parts of the inflorescence showed a similar pattern of anthesis, and did not showed significant differences in predation levels.
The authors are grateful to the staff and institution of the Marismas del Odiel Natural Park. Special thanks to Manuel Huertas for the identification of predators.
- Abbad A, Benchaabane A: The phenological study of Atriplex halimus L. Afr J Ecol 2004, 42: 69–73. 10.1111/j.0141-6707.2004.00449.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Augspurger CK: Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: Experimental studies on effects of pollinator and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology 1981, 62: 775–788. 10.2307/1937745View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blackwell WH, Powell MJ: A Preliminary Note on Pollination in the Chenopodiaceae. Ann Mo Bot Gar 1981, 68: 524–526. 10.2307/2398886View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonal R, Muñoz A, Díaz M: Satiation of predispersal seed predators: the importance of considering both plant and seed levels. Evol Ecol 2007, 21: 367–380. 10.1007/s10682-006-9107-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cañadas EM, Jiménez MN, Valle F, Fernández-Ondoño E, Martín-Peinado F, Navarro FB: Soil-vegetation relationships in semi-arid Mediterranean old field (SE Spain): Implications for management. J Arid Environ 2010, 74: 1525–1533. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.06.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehrlén J: Spatiotemporal variation in predispersal seed predation intensity. Oecologia 1996, 108: 708–713. 10.1007/BF00329046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ellison AM: Effect of seed dimorphism on the density-dependent dynamics of experimental populations of Atriplex triangularis ( Chenopodiaceae ). Am J Bot 1987, 74: 1280–1288. 10.2307/2444163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferchichi H, Hcini K, Bouzid S: Chromosome numbers in Tunisian populations of Atriplex halimus L. (Chenopodiaceae). Afr J Biotechnol 2006, 5: 1190–1193.Google Scholar
- Fernández-Illescas F, Nieva FJJ, Silva I, Tormo R, Muñoz AF: Pollen production of Chenopodiaceae species at habitat and landscape scale in Mediterranean salt marshes: An ecological and phenological study. Rev Palaeobot Palyno 2010, 161: 127–136. 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.03.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Freeman DC, McArthur ED, Miglia KJ, Nilson MJ, Brown ML: Sex and the lonely Atriplex . West N Am Naturalist 2007, 67: 137–141. 10.3398/1527-0904(2007)67[137:SATLA]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gambín BL, Borrás L: Resource distribution and the trade-off between seed number and seed weight: a comparison across crop species. Ann Appl Biol 2009, 156: 91–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gomes da Silva AL, Bezerra Pinheiro MC: Reproductive success of four species of Eugenia L. (Myrtaceae). Acta Bot Bras 2009, 23: 526–534. 10.1590/S0102-33062009000200024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haddioui A, Baaziz M: Genetic diversity of natural populations of Atriplex halimus L. in Morocco: An isoenzyme-based overview. Euphytica 2001, 121: 99–106. 10.1023/A:1012051222530View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heyligers PC: Dispersal and monoecy in Atriplex cinerea (Chenopodiaceae). Aust J Bot 2001, 49: 501–508. 10.1071/BT00063View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huertas Dionisio M: Estados inmaturos de Lepidoptera (XXII). Dos especies del género Goniodoma Zeller, 1849 en Huelva, España ( Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae ). SHILAP Rev. Lepidopt 2005, 33: 5–15.Google Scholar
- Huertas Dionisio M: Lepidópteros de los Espacios Naturales Protegidos del Litoral de Huelva (Micro y Macrolepidoptera). Bol Soc Entomol 2007, 2: 1–248.Google Scholar
- Imbert E: Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspect Plant Ecol 2002, 5: 13–36. 10.1078/1433-8319-00021View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ims RA: On the adaptive value of reproductive synchrony as a predator- swamping strategy. Am Nat 1990, 136: 485–498. 10.1086/285109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan MA, Ungar IA: Seed polymorphism and germination responses to salinity stress in Atriplex triangularis Willd. Bot Gaz 1984, 45: 487–494.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khan MA, Ungar IA: Life history and population dynamics of Atriplex triangularis . Vegetatio 1986, 66: 17–25. 10.1007/BF00044079View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kheiria H, Ferchichi H, Bouzid S: Morphological variability of fruit and chromosome numbers in Tunisian populations of Atriplex halimus L. (Chenopodiaceae). Caryologia 2007, 60: 203–211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinet JM, Benrebiha F, Bouzid S, Lailhacar S, Dutuit P: Biodiversity study on Atriplex halimus for in vitro and in vivo detection of plants resistant to harsh environmental conditions and for potential micropropagation. Cah Agric 1998, 7: 505–509.Google Scholar
- Kosiński I: Long-term variation in seed mass and seed production in populations of Paris quadrifolia . Plant Biol 2010, 12: 206–214. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00199.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kudo G, Maeda T, Narita K: Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success within inflorescences of Corydalis ambigua (Fumariaceae): pollination efficiency or resource limitation? J Ecol 2001, 89: 48–56. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00512.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Houerou HN: The role of saltbushes ( Atriplex spp .) in arid land rehabilitation in the Mediterranean Basin: a review. Agroforest Syst 1992, 18: 107–148. 10.1007/BF00115408View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Houerou HN: Utilization of Fodder Trees and Shrubs in the Arid and Semiarid Zones of West Asia and North Africa. Arid Land Res Manag 2000, 14: 101–135.Google Scholar
- McArthur ED: Environmentally induced change in sex expression in Atriplex canescens . Heredity 1977, 48: 97–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McArthur ED, Freeman DC: Sex expression in Atriplex canescens : genetics and environment. Bot Gaz 1982, 143: 476–482. 10.1086/337323View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McArthur ED, Sanderson C: Distribution, systematics and evolution of Chenopodiaceae: an overview. In Proceedings of the symposium on the biology of Atriplex and related chenopods, General Technical Report INT-172. Edited by: Tiedemann AR, McArthur ED, Stutz HC, Stevens R, Johnson KL. US Department of Agriculture, Ogden, Utah; 1984:14–24.Google Scholar
- McGinley MA, Temme DH, Geber MA: Parental investment in offspring in variable environments, theoretical and empirical considerations. Am Nat 1987, 130: 370–398. 10.1086/284716View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Osman AE, Bahhady F, Hassan N, Ghassali F, Al Ibrahim T: Livestock production and economic implications from augmenting degraded rangeland with Atriplex halimus and Salsola vermiculata in northwest Syria. J Arid Environ 2006, 65: 474–490. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.07.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papanastasis VP, Yiakoulaki MD, Decandia M, Dini-Papanastasi O: Integrating woody species into livestock feeding in the Mediterranean areas of Europe. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2008, 140: 1–17. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.03.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pías B, Guitián P: Flowering phenology and female reproductive success in the mass-flowering tree Sorbus aucuparia (Rosaceae). Ecoscience 2007, 14: 205–213. 10.2980/1195-6860(2007)14[205:FPAFRS]2.0.CO;2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rivas-Martínez S, Rivas-Sáenz S: Sistema de Clasificación Bioclimática Mundial. España: Centro de Investigaciones Fitosociológicas; 1996–2009. http://www.ucm.es/info/cifGoogle Scholar
- Sadras VO: Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crop Res 2007, 100: 125–138. 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.004View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sakai SA, Sakai A: Nature of size-number trade-off: test of the terminal-stream-limitation model for seed production of Cardiocrium cordatum . Oikos 2005, 108: 105–114. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13232.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sánchez AM, Albert MJ, Escudero A: Female reproductive output in a Mediterranean shrub: effects from inflorescence to population. Plant Biol 2008, 10: 675–683. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00085.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith CC, Fretwell SD: The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 1974, 108: 499–506. 10.1086/282929View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Talamali A, Dutuit P, Le Thomas A, Gorenflot R: Polygamie chez Atriplex halimus L. ( Chenopodiaceae ). CR Acad. Sci. III-Vie 2001, 324: 107–113.Google Scholar
- Talamali A, Bajji M, Le Thomas A, Kinet JM, Dutuit P: Flower architecture and sex determination: how does Atriplex halimus play with floral morphogenesis and sex genes? New Phytol 2003, 157: 105–113. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00651.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaughton G, Ramsey M: Sources and consequences of seed mass variation in Banksia marginata (Proteaceae). J Ecol 1998, 86: 563–573. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00279.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.