- Open Access
Influence of α-terpineol on the growth and morphogenesis of Penicillium digitatum
© Jing et al. 2015
- Received: 25 May 2015
- Accepted: 30 November 2015
- Published: 13 December 2015
Plant essential oils could act effectively against postharvest diseases, α-terpineol, a typical terpenoid of plant essential oils, exhibited strong antifungal activity in against Penicillium italicum, but the possible action mechanism remains undetermined. In present study, α-terpineol was evaluated for antibacterial activity against Penicillium digitatum along with the mode of their antibacterial action.
The results showed that mycelial growth of P. digitatum was strongly inhibited by α-terpineol, with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of 2.00 and 8.00 µl/ml, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy observation revealed that α-terpineol obviously altered the morphology of P. digitatum hyphae by causing the loss of cytoplasm and distortion of mycelia. A rapid increase in the membrane permeability of P. digitatum was observed after treated with MIC or MFC of α-terpineol, evidenced by the release of cell constituents, the extracellular conductivity, and the extracellular pH. In addition, α-terpineol apparently induced a decrease in total lipid contents of P. digitatum cells, indicating the destruction of cell membrane structures after treatment.
Based on our study, α-terpineol might affect the cell wall synthesis and lead to the disruption of cell wall. The cell wall disruption affected fungal morphogenesis, the integrity of membrane and leakage of intracellular components, these results suggested that α-terpineol treatment inhibited the growth of P. digitatum.
- Antifungal activity
- Cell membrane integrity
- P. digitatum
Citrus fruit can be infected by many fungal pathogens in the postharvest storage. Among them, Penicillium digitatum is the most devastating pathogen and causing about 90 % of production losses during postharvest handling of the fruit (Droby et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2010). Currently, this disease is primarily controlled by applying synthetic fungicides (Cañamás et al. 2008). However, considerable scientific interest has been directed toward alternative substances, which were capable of controlling this disease by decreasing the resistance of postharvest fungal pathogens, and the fungicides were primary concerned for human safety and environmental protection in recent reports (Sharma and Tripathi 2008; Viuda-Martos et al. 2008).
The use of plant essential oils as an alternative to synthetic fungicides has attracted keen interest in the past decades (du Plooy et al. 2009; Askarne et al. 2012). α-terpineol, a type of terpenoids constituting in many plant essential oils, reportedly exhibits strong antifungal activity (Park et al. 2009). Scora and Scora (1998) found that the inhibition zones of P. digitatum, P. italicum and P. ulaiense upon the addition of α-terpineol at a concentration of 5 μl per plate were 87, 71, and 106 mm2, respectively. In another report, α-terpineol at a concentration of 400 μg/ml reduced by 46 % the radial growth of P. digitatum (Daferera et al. 2000). However, the mechanism which α-terpineol inhibited the growth of P. digitatum remains undetermined. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the antifungal activity of α-terpineol against the mycelial growth of P. digitatum, and to elucidate its possible mode of action.
The fungal pathogen P. digitatum was isolated from infected citrus fruit and maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25 ± 2 °C. The spores’ concentration was adjusted to 5 × 105 cfu/ml using a hamacytometer.
α-Terpineol (90 %) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cholesterol (95 %) and phosphovanillin (98 %) were purchased from TCI Shanghai (Shanghai, China).
Measurement of mycelial growth
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation
The 4-day-old fungal cultures on PDA treated with α-terpineol at various concentrations (0, MIC and MFC) were used for all SEM observations (Helal et al. 2007; Yahyazadeh et al. 2008). About 5 × 10 mm segments were cut from cultures growing on PDA plates and promptly placed in vials containing 3 % (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at 4 °C. Samples were kept in this solution for 48 h for fixation and then washed with distilled water three times for 20 min each. Following which they were dehydrated in an ethanol series (30, 50, 70, and 95 %, v/v), for 20 min in each alcohol dilution and finally with absolute ethanol for 45 min. Samples were then critical point dried in liquid carbon dioxide. Fungal segments were placed in desiccators until further use. Following drying, samples prepared were mounted on standard 1/2 in SEM stubs using double-stick adhesive tabs and coated with gold–palladium electroplating (60 s, 1.8 mA, 2.4 kV) in a Polaron SEM Coating System sputter coater. All samples were viewed in a JEOL JSM-6360LV SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 25 kV at 5000× level of magnification.
Determination of the release of cell constituents
The release of cell constituents was measured according to the method described previously (Paul et al. 2011) with minor modifications. Briefly, P. digitatum cells from 100 ml potato dextrose broth (PDB) were initially collected by centrifugation at 4000g for 20 min, washed three times with sterilized double distilled water, and resuspended in 100 ml phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.0). After that, the suspensions were treated with α-terpineol at various concentrations (0, MIC and MFC) for 0, 30, 60 and 120 min. Then, 1 ml of supernatant was used to measure the absorbance at 260 nm with a UV-2450 UV/Vis spectrophotometer [SHIMADZU international trade (Shanghai) Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China].
Measurement of extracellular conductivity and extracellular pH
The measurement of extracellular conductivity and extracellular pH of P. digitatum cells was carried out using a DDS-12DW conductivity meter (Bante Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and a Delta-320 pH-meter (Mettler-Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) following the instructions, respectively. The P. digitatum cells treated by MIC or MFC of α-terpineol were selected at 0, 30, 60 and 120 min of treatment. Control flasks without α-terpineol were also tested.
Determination of total lipid content
Total lipid content of P. digitatum cells with α-terpineol at various concentrations (0, MIC and MFC) was determined using phosphovanillin method (Helal et al. 2007). The 2-day-old mycelia from 50 ml PDB was collected and centrifuged at 4000g for 10 min. Then the samples were dried with a vacuum freeze drier for 4 h. About 0.1 g of dry mycelia were homogenized with liquid nitrogen and extracted with 4.0 ml of methanol–chloroform–water mixture (2:1:0.8, v/v/v) in a clean dry test tube with vigorous shaking for 30 min. The tubes were centrifuged at 4000g for 10 min. The lower phase containing lipids was thoroughly mixed with 0.2 ml saline solution and centrifuged at 4000g for 10 min. Then, an aliquot of 0.2 ml chloroform and lipid mixture was transferred to a novel tube and 0.5 ml H2SO4 was added, heated for 10 min in a boiling water bath. After that, 3 ml phosphovanillin was added and shake vigorously, and then incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance at 520 nm was utilized to calculate total lipid content from the standard calibration curve using cholesterol as a standard.
All experiments were performed as three biological replicates and statistical analysis (ANOVA) was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) statistical software package release 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Inhibition of mycelial growth
Effect of α-terpineol on the mycelial growth of P. digitatum
Percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth (%)
0.00 ± 0.00a,A
8.33 ± 0.00b,B
11.11 ± 4.81c,B,C
22.22 ± 9.62c,C
100.00 ± 0.00d,D
100.00 ± 0.00d,D
100.00 ± 0.00d,D
This study proved the effectiveness of α-terpineol on inhibiting the mycelial growth of P. digitatum, and the inhibitory effect was positively correlated with the α-terpineol concentration. The MIC of only showed partially antifungal activity against P. digitatum after 4 days of incubation, but the MFC of α-terpineol totally inhibited the growth of P. digitatum (Table 1). These results were consistent with those of previous studies describing the antifungal activity of α-terpineol (Scora and Scora 1998; Daferera et al. 2000; Park et al. 2009), α-terpineol treatment could make a major contribution to limiting the spread of the pathogen by lowering the spore load, and the presence of aromatic ring with a phenolic hydroxylic group in α-terpineol were suggested to be responsible for the fungitoxicity of the essential oils (Daferera et al. 2000).
Change in mycelial morphology, cell constituents, extracellular conductivity and extracellular pH
Although α-terpineol treatment did not affected the extracellular conductivity at initial exposure time, α-terpineol caused a significant increase after 30 min incubation (Fig. 2b). Moreover, the extracellular conductivity in P. digitatum suspensions with MIC or MFC of α-terpineol remained a comparable level during the entire period. After 120 min of exposure, the extracellular conductivity in P. digitatum suspensions with MFC and MIC of α-terpineol were 187.7 and 175.5 μs/cm, respectively, which were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that in control (70.8 μs/cm).
The extracellular pH in the control maintained a stable level during the entire incubation. The extracellular pH in P. digitatum suspensions treated by α-terpineol is presented in Fig. 2c. Conversely, the extracellular pH of P. digitatum suspensions with MIC or MFC of α-terpineol rapidly increased in the first 30 min of exposure, and followed by a moderate ascending trend in the subsequent stage. The extracellular pH values in P. digitatum suspensions after incubation with MFC and MIC of α-terpineol for 120 min were 5.83 and 4.90, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of the control (4.56) (P < 0.05).
The mechanism by which α-terpineol inhibited the growth of P. digitatum was poorly understood. It is generally accepted that the lipophilicity of terpenoids enabled them to preferentially partition from an aqueous phase into membrane structures of the fungi, resulted in membrane expansion, increased membrane fluidity and permeability, and induced the leakage of ions and other cellular contents (Burt 2004; Fadli et al. 2012; Bajpai et al. 2013). In the present study, the rough surface and shrinkage of cells were observed in the hyphae treated with α-terpineol, this SEM result indicated that the mode of fungitoxicity action of α-terpineol against P. digitatum might also be through cell growth hindrance. The loss of linear shape (Fig. 1b, c) and the branching of terminal hyphae (Fig. 1d, e) were showed that α-terpineol treatment might affect the apex growth of terminal hyphae, alter the normal assembly of the wall components and lost the directionality of vesicles. The application of α-terpineol could result in releasing parietal materials at positions where exocytosis did not normally taken place, the changes in the wall surface might inhibit the enzymatic reactions of cell wall synthesis (Romagnoli et al. 2005). These observations indicated that the mode of antifungal activity of α-terpineol was a result of attack of oil on the cell wall, retraction of cytoplasm in the hyphae and ultimately death of the mycelium (Ghfir et al. 1997).
Membrane permeability parameters, including loss of 260 nm absorbing materials, change in extracellular conductivity, and extracellular pH, were used to reflect the integrity of membrane. These parameters are commonly used to indicate gross and irreversible damage to the cytoplasmic and plasma membranes (Turgis et al. 2009; Paul et al. 2011; Shao et al. 2013). The addition of α-terpineol caused the rapid loss of the absorbing material at 260 nm in the tested fungal suspensions (Fig. 2a). The maximum release of cell constituents was observed in the P. digitatum cell suspensions treated with MFC of α-terpineol, showing an absorbance of 0.70 after 120 min of exposure. The extracellular conductivity in the P. digitatum suspensions with α-terpineol was higher than that of the control at all times, the values increased significantly after 30 min of exposure and positively correlated with the α-terpineol concentration (Fig. 2b), indicating rapid leakage of metal ions tested after the membrane disruption. In addition, remarkable increase of extracellular pH in P. digitatum suspensions indicating the occurrences of an irreversible impairment of pH homeostasis after α-terpineol treatment (Fig. 2c).
These findings might be attributed to the essential oil’s lipophilic properties, the oil treatment made α-terpineol permeable to the cell wall and assisted in the accumulation of polysaccharides under water stress conditions (Sharma and Tripathi 2008). The cytoplasmic contents of phospholipids, fatty acids, proteins, and polysaccharides might be leaked out after the disruption of membrane fluidity and integrity, this result might be responsible for the establishment of antifungal activity (Marquis et al. 2003; Oonmetta-aree et al. 2006). Such modifications induced by α-terpineol might be related to the interference of α-terpineol with enzymatic reactions of wall synthesis, which affected fungal morphogenesis and growth.
Total lipid content
Lipids were the main components of biological membranes (Watkins et al. 2011). The decrease in lipid content suggested that the membrane stability was reduced and the permeability to water-soluble materials was increased (Helal et al. 2007). In our study, the application of α-terpineol significantly decreased the lipid contents of P. digitatum (Fig. 3), and we hypothesized that α-terpineol could interfere with the phospholipid bilayers of membranes (Xing et al. 2014) and decrease the lipids content of P. digitatum. Thus, this result confirmed that α-terpineol could damage the cell membrane integrity of P. digitatum, affected the cell membrane structure after the disruption of cell wall and inhibited the growth of P. digitatum.
Based on the present study, it could be concluded that α-terpineol possess fungitoxic activities inhibiting the growth of P. digitatum, leading to the disruption of cell wall, and subsequently resulting in irreversible deleterious morphological alterations, disturbance of membrane structure, increase in membrane fluidity, leakage of ions and other cell contents. The present data indicated that α-terpineol could become a possible alternative to synthetic fungicides in the fight against P. digitatum.
GJ and NT participated the discussion and concepts of experimental designs, GJ and LJ participated writing and revision of the manuscript; LJ and HZ performed experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31271964 and 31572172), Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province (Nos. 12B126 and 15C1319) and PhD Research Fund of Xiangtan University (No. 14QDZ40).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Askarne L, Talibi I, Boubaker H, Boudyach EH, Msanda F, Saadi B, Ait Ben Aoumar A (2012) Use of Moroccan medicinal plant extracts as botanical fungicide against citrus blue mould. Lett Appl Microbiol 56:37–43View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bajpai VK, Sharma A, Baek KH (2013) Antibacterial mode of action of Cudrania tricuspidata fruit essential oil, affecting membrane permeability and surface characteristics of food-borne pathogens. Food Control 32:582–590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burt S (2004) Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—a review. Int J Food Microbiol 94:223–253View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cañamás TP, Viñas I, Usall J, Torres R, Anguera M, Teixidó N (2008) Control of postharvest diseases on citrus fruit by preharvest applications of biocontrol agent Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2: part II. Effectiveness of different cell formulations. Postharvest Biol Tec 49:96–106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Daferera DJ, Ziogas BN, Polissiou MG (2000) GC-MS analysis of essential oils from some Greek aromatic plants and their fungitoxicity on Penicillium digitatum. J Agric Food Chem 48:2576–2581View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Droby S, Eick A, Macarisin D, Cohen L, Rafael G, Stange R, McColum G, Dudau N, Nasser A, Wisniewski M, Shapira R (2008) Role of citrus volatiles in host recognition, germination and growth of Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum. Postharvest Biol Tec 49:386–396View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- du Plooy W, Regnier T, Combrinck S (2009) Essential oil amended coatings as alternatives to synthetic fungicides in citrus postharvest management. Postharvest Biol Tec 53:117–122View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fadli M, Saad A, Sayadi S, Chevalier J, Mezriouia NE, Pagèsc JM, Hassania L (2012) Antibacterial activity of Thymus maroccanus and Thymus broussonetii essential oils against nosocomial infection-bacteria and their synergistic potential with antibiotics. Phytomedicine 19:464–471View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghfir B, Fonvieille JL, Dargent R (1997) Influence of essential oil of Hyssopus officinalis on the chemical composition of the walls of Aspergillus fumigatus (Fresenius). Mycopathologia 138:7–12View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helal GA, Sarhan MM, Abu Shahla ANK, Abou El-Khair EK (2007) Effects of Cymbopogon citratus L. essential oil on the growth, morphogenesis and aflatoxin production of Aspergillus flavus ML2-strain. J Basic Microbiol 47:5–15View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Zong YY, Qin GZ, Li BQ, Tian SP (2010) Plasma membrane damage contributes to antifungal activity of silicon against Penicillium digitatum. Curr Microbiol 61:274–279View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marquis RE, Clock SA, Mota-Meira M (2003) Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:493–510View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oonmetta-aree J, Suzuki T, Gasaluck P, Eumkeb G (2006) Antimicrobial properties and action of galangal (Alpinia galanga Linn.) on Staphylococcus aureus. LWT Food Sci Technol 39:1214–1220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park MJ, Gwak KS, Yang I, Kim KW, Jeung EB, Chang JW, Choi IG (2009) Effect of citral, eugenol, nerolidol and α-terpineol on the ultrastructural changes of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Fitoterapia 80:290–296View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul S, Dubey RC, Maheswari DK, Kang SC (2011) Trachyspermum ammi (L.) fruit essential oil influencing on membrane permeability and surface characteristics in inhibiting food-borne pathogens. Food Control 22:725–731View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Romagnoli C, Bruni R, Andreotti E, Rai MK, Vicentini CB, Mares D (2005) Chemical characterization and antifungal activity of essential oil of capitula from wild Indian Tagetes patula L. Protoplasma 225:57–65View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scora KM, Scora RW (1998) Effect of volatiles on mycelium growth of Penicillium digitatum, P. italicum, and P. ulaiense. J Basic Microbiol 38:405–413View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shao X, Cheng S, Wang H, Yu D, Mungai C (2013) The possible mechanism of antifungal action of tea tree oil on Botrytis cinerea. J Appl Microbiol 114:1642–1649View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma N, Tripathi A (2008) Effects of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck epicarp essential oil on growth and morphogenesis of Aspergillus niger (L.) Van Tieghem. Microbiol Res 163:337–344View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turgis M, Han J, Caillet S, Lacroix M (2009) Antimicrobial activity of mustard essential oil against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhi. Food Control 20:1073–1079View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernández-López J, Pérez-Álvarez J (2008) Antifungal activity of lemon (Citrus lemon L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) and orange (Citrus sinensis L.) essential oils. Food Control 19:1130–1138View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watkins EB, Miller CE, Majewski J, Kuhla TL (2011) Membrane texture induced by specific protein binding and receptor clustering: active roles for lipids in cellular function. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 108:6975–6980PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xing F, Hua H, Selvaraj JN, Zhao Y, Zhou L, Liu X, Liu Y (2014) Growth inhibition and morphological alterations of Fusarium verticillioides by cinnamon oil and cinnamaldehyde. Food Control 46:343–350View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yahyazadeh M, Omidbaigi R, Zare R, Taheri H (2008) Effect of some essential oils on mycelial growth of Penicillium digitatum Sacc. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1445–1450View ArticleGoogle Scholar