Botanical Studies

An International Journal

Impact Factor 1.452

Botanical Studies Cover Image
Open Access

Tobacco plants expressing the maize nitrate transporter ZmNrt2.1 exhibit altered responses of growth and gene expression to nitrate and calcium

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201758:51

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-017-0203-9

Received: 11 August 2017

Accepted: 9 November 2017

Published: 15 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Nitrate uptake is a highly regulated process. Understanding the intricate interactions between nitrate availability and genetically-controlled nitrate acquisition and metabolism is essential for improving nitrogen use efficiency and increasing nitrate uptake capacity for plants grown in both nitrate-poor and nitrate-enriched environments. In this report, we introduced into tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) the constitutively expressed maize high-affinity transporter ZmNrt2.1 gene that would bypass the tight control for the endogenous nitrate-responsive genes. By using calcium inhibitors and varying levels of NO3 , Ca2+ and K+, we probed how the host plants were affected in their nitrate response.

Results

We found that the ZmNrt2.1-expressing plants had better root growth than the wild type plants when Ca2+ was deficient regardless of the nitrate levels. The growth restriction associated with Ca2+-deficiency can be alleviated with a high level of K+. Furthermore, the transgenic plants exhibited altered expression patterns of several endogenous, nitrate-responsive genes, including the high- and low-affinity nitrate transporters, the Bric-a-Brac/Tramtrack/Broad protein BT2 and the transcription factor TGA-binding protein TGA1, in responding to treatments of NO3 , K+ or inhibitors for the calcium channel and the cytosolic Ca2+-regulating phospholipase C, as compared to the wild type plants under the same treatments. Their expression was not only responsive to nitrate, but also affected by Ca2+. There were also different patterns of gene expression between roots and shoots.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate the ectopic effect of the maize nitrate transporter on the host plant’s overall gene expression of nitrate sensing system, and further highlight the involvement of calcium in nitrate sensing in tobacco plants.

Keywords

Calcium signalingMaize high-affinity nitrate transporter ZmNrt2.1Nitrate sensingNitrate responsive genesPotassiumTobacco

Background

Nitrogen is an essential element for all forms of life. Nitrate (NO3 ) is a major form of nitrogen in the environment taken up by plants (Guerrero et al. 1981). Because of high demand for nitrate by crop plants to achieve high yield, over 100 million tons of nitrogen-fertilizers are being applied annually to farm land worldwide in recent years (FAO 2015). Yet due to low affinity between nitrate and most types of soils, as much as 50–70% of the applied nitrogen may be leached from the soil (Peoples et al. 1995), causing pollution and eutrophication of natural water systems, especially near agricultural and urban areas (Unkles et al. 2004; Howarth and Marino 2006). Better understanding of how plants respond to nitrate availability in soil and regulate nitrate uptake is important in finding suitable solutions to over-fertilization as well as remedy for nitrogen deficiency.

Plants take up NO3 from soil by transporting it across the plasma membrane of the root epidermal and cortical cells. This process is carried out by various nitrate transporters through a proton-coupled gradient 2H+/1NO3 symport mechanism (Meharg and Blatt 1995; Crawford and Glass 1998). Once inside the cell, most nitrate is first reduced to nitrite by nitrate reductases, and then to ammonium by nitrite reductases. Ammonium is metabolized into glutamine, a universal precursor for many metabolic processes (Guerrero et al. 1981; Good et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2012). Plants have developed multiple and independently operating systems to adjust for changing nitrate availability in the environment. There are at least three known nitrate uptake systems: a constitutive high-affinity transport system (cHATS), a NO3 inducible high-affinity transport system (iHATS), and a low-affinity constitutively expressed transport system (LATS) (Crawford and Glass 1998; Forde 2000). Previous studies have shown that the LATS operates when NO3 levels are high (> 1 mM), whereas the cHATS and iHATS operate at lower NO3 levels (< 1 mM) (Crawford and Glass 1998; Quaggiotti et al. 2003; Katayama et al. 2009). Although the cHATS has a higher affinity for NO3 , the iHATS is more active with a Vmax 30 times that of cHATS and is responsible for a greater NO3 uptake (Kronzucker et al. 1996; Crawford and Glass 1998). Upon exposed to nitrate, nitrogen starved plants increase nitrate uptake several folds largely due to the iHATS (Tsay et al. 2007).

In Arabidopsis, at least four families of nitrate-transporting proteins have been studied: low-affinity nitrate transporter 1/peptide transporter (NRT1 or NPF), high-affinity nitrate transporter 2 (NRT2), chloride channel and slow anion channel associated homologues (Forde 2000; Quaggiotti et al. 2003; Krapp et al. 2014). Members of NRT1 family have been shown to play a variety of important physiological roles such as sustaining NO3 nitrate uptake and influx, transporting plant hormones, regulating NRT2 gene expression and HATS activity, and nitrate and calcium sensing (Muños et al. 2004; Remans et al. 2006; Chiba et al. 2015; Undurraga et al. 2017). Interestingly, unlike NRT2, NRT1.1 gene is not induced by nitrate deficiency nor suppressed by reduced nitrogen metabolism (Lejay et al. 1999). But Loqué et al. (2003) reported repression of NTR1.1 gene expression by the reduced NO3 product NO2 in Arabidopsis roots.

The NRT2 family is a part of the iHATS responsible for the influx of nitrate into the plant cell when nitrate becomes available in the environment. For example, the Arabidopsis NRT2.1 is crucial for NO3 influx especially when nitrate is deficient (Wirth et al. 2007). Structurally, NRT2 nitrate transporters belong to the nitrate-nitrite transporter family, a part of the Major Facilitator Superfamily of membrane transporters (Pao et al. 1998). Thus, the NRT2 membrane topology is made of two sets of six transmembrane domains connected by a cytosolic loop (Pao et al. 1998; Forde 2000). For several plants investigated, the transport activity of NRT2 protein is shown to require the direct interaction with another protein, NAR2 (Quesada et al. 1994; Zhou et al. 2000; Orsel et al. 2006). For example, in Arabidopsis both the NRT2.1 and NAR2.1 proteins were shown to localize and interact at the plasma membrane in the roots, where the active nitrate transporter is presumably formed as a NRT2.1/NAR2.1 heterooligomer (Wirth et al. 2007; Yong et al. 2010). In a study carried out in barley, nitrate and nitrite transport activity was only observed when HvNRT2.1 and HvNAR2.3 genes were both injected into the Xenopus oocytes expression system, and no transport activity was detected when HvNRT2.1 gene was injected alone or coupled with HvNAR2.1 or HvNAR2.2 genes (Tong et al. 2005). In maize roots, the accessory protein ZmNAR2.1 (ZmNRT3.1A) was important for iHATS activity and appeared to form an oligomer with ZmNRT2.1 (Pii et al. 2016). Although the two-component system in several species tested seems to be specific for NRT and NAR proteins, the rice OsNAR2.1 had a broader range of interactions with OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2 and OsNRT2.3a (Yan et al. 2011). Furthermore, the NRT2 genes in grass species are distinct from the Arabidopsis NRT2 by the absence of gene family clusters in the genomes and the lack of an intron, suggesting that the divergence of the NRT2 family occurred after the evolutionary split between dicots and monocots (Plett et al. 2010).

The iHATS including NRT2 is part of nitrate sensing system tightly controlled to maintain nitrogen homeostasis, where its activity dramatically increases upon first provision of NO3 and is quickly repressed after NO3 exposure (Crawford and Glass 1998; Quaggiotti et al. 2003; Medici and Krouk 2014). Down-regulation occurs through mRNA stability and with influx of other nitrogen metabolites such as ammonium, glutamate, glutamine, asparagine, and arginine (Imsande and Touraine 1994; Forde and Clarkson 1999). Growth and development is another signal for NRT2 regulation. For example, in Arabidopsis NRT2.1 protein levels remain stable in older plants and are not affected by environmental cues such as nutrient availability or darkness, while in younger (8-day old) seedlings the amount of NRT2.1 protein is decreased after 24 h of darkness (Laugier et al. 2012). Another study showed that light, sucrose or nitrogen treatments strongly affect both NRT2.1 transcription and HATS activity in Arabidopsis, but NRT2.1 protein level remains largely steady in response to these treatments (Wirth et al. 2007). Yet a different study reported that cellular glucose elevates NRT2.1 protein levels and transport activity in Arabidopsis, independent of NRT2.1 transcription (de Jong et al. 2014). Furthermore, posttranscriptional control was reported to be important for NRT2.1/NAR2.1 transport system in Arabidopsis roots (Laugier et al. 2012) and NRT2.1-nitrate influx in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia (Fraisier et al. 2000). Regardless of the various points of view and some seemingly discrepancies in literature, it is clear that NRT2.1 is actively regulated at various levels of transcription and translation, and there is an intricate crosstalk between plant metabolism and nitrate gene expression throughout growth and development.

In plants, hundreds of genes, including the aforementioned NO3 uptake systems and nitrate transporters (NRT), respond to nitrate as a regulatory signal (Wang et al. 2004; Krapp et al. 2014; Medici and Krouk 2014). However, increasing evidence has shown that calcium is another essential player in the nitrate signaling network. For example, Ca2+ and calcium-binding proteins such as CIPKs are important in modulating NRT gene expression in response to cellular and environmental nitrate levels (Albrecht et al. 2001; Hu et al. 2009). The universal calcium-mobilizing second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, is produced by phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes from hydrolyzing the highly phosphorylated lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (Streb et al. 1983; Hunt et al. 2004). Changes in cellular Ca2+ levels through the actions of PLC and membrane-bound calcium-permeable channels can significantly affect the expression of nitrate-responding genes (Sakakibara et al. 1997; Riveras et al. 2015). Thus, inhibitors such as U73122 for PLC (Franklin-Tong et al. 1996) and La3+ for several calcium channels (White 2000) have become a useful tool for analyzing Ca2+- or nitrate-responsive genes.

It is obvious that nitrate uptake and metabolism in plants is tightly regulated by various signals at different levels (Wang et al. 2012; Krapp et al. 2014; Medici and Krouk 2014). Studies of the high-affinity nitrate transporter NRT2, a major nitrate uptake avenue for plants, and other nitrate responsive and regulatory genes will help better understand the intricate interactions between nitrate availability in the environment and genetically-controlled nitrate acquisition and metabolism. This knowledge is needed for achieving high nitrogen use efficiency and high capacity of nitrate uptake for plants in both nitrate-poor and anthropologically nitrate-enriched environments, in order to aim for an optimal balance between fertilizer usage, plant productivity and environmental protection (Good et al. 2004). As part of the effort to investigate plant nitrate response and regulation, we introduced in tobacco plants a maize high-affinity transporter ZmNrt2.1 gene driven by the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter. Therefore, this ZmNrt2.1 transgene would bypass the tight transcriptional regulation exerted on host plant’s endogenous nitrate-responsive genes. Thus, we hoped to use ZmNrt2.1, along with calcium inhibitors and varying availability of NO3 , Ca2+ and K+, to probe changes of nitrate responses in the host plant. Our studies reveal the ectopic effect of ZmNrt2.1 on growth and nitrate sensing system involving several endogenous nitrate-responsive genes.

Materials and methods

Plant material

As described previously (Hill et al. 2016), plants of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L., cv. Havana petit) were grown in MS medium solidified with 2.7 g/L phytagel in a growth chamber at 24°C under 8 h of darkness and 16 h of cool white light of 150 μmol photons m−2 s−1. The seedlings were used for various treatments as described below.

Construction of transformation vector expressing maize nitrate transporter

The coding sequence of the high-affinity nitrate transporter gene ZmNrt2.1 from maize (Zea mays, Genbank accession: NM_001111725; Quaggiotti et al. 2003), fused with the FLAG tag (DYKDDDDK) coding sequence, was synthesized by GenScript (USA). The 1.6-kb SmaI/SacI-cut fragment was ligated into the SmaI/SacI digested binary plasmid E1492 (Zhang et al. 2004) that is derived from pBI101 (Clontech, USA). The resultant plasmid p35S-ZmNrt (Additional file 1: Figure S1) was introduced to Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105.

Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation

Plant transformation was carried out as previously described (Zhang et al. 2004; Tsai et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2016) using kanamycin (100 mg/L) as selection reagent. Eight independent, homozygous lines of transgenic plants were identified by screening T1 and T2 seeds germinated on kanamycin-containing medium. Based on the segregation ratios, plants with a single copy ZmNrt2.1 transgene were identified. Three independent lines of these plants were used for this study.

DNA, RNA and protein analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of the wild type and transgenic plants using Plant DNeasy kit (Qiagen, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out to confirm the presence of ZmNrt2.1 in the transgenic plants.

Total RNA was extracted from shoots or roots of the wild type and transgenic plants in similar physiological conditions or under different treatments using Qiagen Plant RNeasy kit, including a DNase treatment to remove residual DNA. The first-strand cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase RNase H kit (Solis BioDyne, Estonia) with random primers and oligo dT18. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using SYBR Green (Life Technologies, USA) was carried out to examine the transcription of the transgene ZmNrt2.1 and several endogenous genes with gene-specific primers. Tobacco elongation factor 1α and ribosomal large subunit protein L25 (rpL25) cDNAs were used as reference for qPCR, according to Schmidt and Delaney (2010). The information for all the primers used in this study is listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

To detect the presence of the ZmNrt protein, proteins were extracted from same leaf area of the wild type and transgenic plants according to Zhang et al. (2011) and Hill et al. (2016). Western blot analysis was done as described previously (Zhang et al. 2011, 2014), using monoclonal FLAG tag antibody (Cell Signaling, USA).

qPCR analysis of tobacco endogenous nitrate-responsive genes

To examine changes in expression of the endogenous nitrate-responsive genes in the wild type and transgenic tobacco plants, the homologous genes in tobacco were identified by analyzing the Arabidopsis and Nicotiana sequence databases. Gene specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S1) were designed for qPCR analysis of tobacco Bric-a-Brac/Tramtrack/Broad gene family member BT2 (GenBank Accessions: XM_016603770 and XM_016606879), leucine-zipper transcription factor TGA-binding protein TGA1 (KJ808740 and M62855), NAR2.1 (XM_009799779 and XM_009612602), NRT1.1 (AB102805 to AB102808) and NRT2.1 (AJ557583 and AJ557584).

Nitrate and protein determination

NO3 concentrations were determined from an aqueous extraction of 0.2 g frozen leaves and roots using the method described in Liu et al. (2014), spectrophotometrically measured at 410 nm using NaNO3 as standard. Protein extraction and measurement was done according to Hill et al. (2016).

Nutrient treatments

Seven-day-old seedlings grown on MS medium were transferred to the medium with various NO3 , Ca2+ and K+ concentrations, and grown for 14 days in a growth chamber at 24 °C under 8 h of darkness and 16 h of light at 150 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Root length and biomass were measured. Samples of roots and shoots were also collected for gene expression assays.

Plant nutrient solutions were purchased from LaMotte (USA). The medium nutrient compositions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Inhibitor treatments

Twenty-one-day-old seedlings of the wild type and ZmNrt2.1-expressing plants grown on MS medium were removed from the medium, gently rinsed with water and incubated with gentle shaking for 1 h in water, 5 mM LaCl3, 10 μM U73122 or 10 μM U73343, followed by incubation for 1 h in either 5 mM KNO3 or 5 mM KCl, according to Riveras et al. (2015). Roots and shoots were collected, used immediately for RNA extraction or flash frozen in liquid N2 and stored at – 80 °C. LaCl3, U73122 and U73343 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). LaCl3 was dissolved in water. U73122 and U73343 were dissolved in a minimal amount of dimethyl sulfoxide and diluted in water to the final concentration. All the solutions were adjusted to pH 6.5.

Statistical analysis

At least three replicates for each assay were performed. The differences were detected using one way ANOVA coupled with Games-Howell (equal variance not assumed) and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) methods (equal variance assumed) with the corresponding patterns of experimental data. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (ver. 16.0). The significant level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Generation of transgenic plants expressing the maize high-affinity nitrate transporter ZmNrt2.1

The maize high-affinity nitrate transporter ZmNrt2.1 is composed of 524 amino acids, and shares 69% residue identity and 82% similarity with the tobacco 530-amino acid NtNrt2.1 (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Kanamycin-resistant transgenic plants generated via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation were initially screened by PCR, an example of which is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3. All the transgenic plants grew and reproduced normally, with no obvious phenotypic differences as compared to the untransformed wild type plants. Homozygous lines of transgenic plants were used in this study.

While RT-PCR analyses indicate an absence of ZmNrt2.1 transcription in the wild type plants, various levels of ZmNrt2.1 mRNA were detected in leaves and roots of the transgenic ZmN plants grown in the nutrient-rich MS medium (Additional file 1: Figures S4 and S5). As expected, the expression of the tobacco endogenous nitrate transporter genes NtNrt2.1 (high-affinity) and NtNrt1.1 (low-affinity) was also detected in the leaf and root of both the wild type plants and transgenic plants (Additional file 1: Figures S4 and S5). Likewise, Western blot analyses detected the presence of FLAG-fused ZmNrt2.1 protein in the transgenic plants but not in the wild type plants (Additional file 1: Figure S5). These results demonstrate that as expected, both the wild type and transgenic plants expressed the endogenous genes such as NtNrt2.1 and NtNrt1.1, and the transgenic ZmN plants also expressed the maize ZmNrt2.1. Three independent ZmN lines with a single transgene, along with the untransformed wild type plants, were studied in parallel. Similar patterns of changes and responses were observed in all these ZmNrt2.1-expressing transgenic plant lines examined. Here, we present the data on the plant line ZmN6.

Growth response to various nitrate treatments

For the growth analysis, our control (“normal”) medium contained NO3 , Ca2+ and K+ at 10, 5 and 5 mM, respectively (see medium compositions in Additional file 1: Table S2). The nitrate contents of leaves or roots were largely similar between the wild type plants and the transgenic plants (Additional file 1: Figure S6). This is consistent with previous observations of similar NO3 contents between the wild type and CaMV 35S-NpNrt2.1 transgenic Nicotiana plumbaginifolia plants regardless of NO3 levels supplied (Fraisier et al. 2000). When grown under relatively low nitrate (1 mM) but normal Ca2+ and K+ conditions, both the wild type and ZmNrt2.1-expressing plants had similar primary root growth. However, under low levels (both 1 mM) of NO3 and Ca2+, the transgenic ZmN6 plants grew longer primary roots than the wild type (Fig. 1A, B), which is consistent with previous reports that constitutively expressing the NRT2.1 gene is associated with increased growth (Fraisier et al. 2000; Laugier et al. 2012). On the other hand, both the wild type and ZmN6 plants grew longer primary roots under 10 mM NO3 with normal levels of Ca2+ (5 mM) and K+ (5 mM) than when either Ca2+ or K+ was low. However, under 10 mM nitrate, Ca2+-restricted root growth can be compensated with a high level (50 mM) of K+ for both plants, and ZmN6 plants grew significantly longer primary roots than the wild type (Fig. 1A, B and Additional file 1: Figure S7).
Fig. 1

Growth of 7 days-seedlings under 1 mM nitrate (A, C) or 10 mM nitrate (B, D) and various Ca2+ and K+ concentrations for 14 days. Primary root length (A, B) and fresh biomass (C, D) of six to ten plants were measured. Wt: wild type, ZmN6: transgenic plant expressing ZmNrt2.1. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between plants-treatments of each panel, whereas no letter or same letters indicate insignificant differences

Likewise, under 1 mM nitrate, regardless of Ca2+ or K+ levels, both the wild type and ZmN6 plants had similar biomass (Fig. 1C, D). As expected, under 10 mM nitrate both plants had higher biomass when Ca+2 and K+ were sufficient (Fig. 1D). Again, high (50 mM) K+ level was able to overcome Ca2+-deficient (but not low NO3 ) caused growth restriction for both the ZmN and the wild type plants, when compared to the growth under 5 mM K+, and the ZmN plants grew better than the wild type (Fig. 1C, D and Additional file 1: Figure S7). Overall, these observations point to a role of Ca2+ and K+ in nitrate response and also hint at altered nitrate sensing in the ZmN plants involving both Ca2+ and K+, indicating a consequence of ectopic expression of the maize nitrate transporter gene. This prompted us to further examine expression in roots and shoots of several endogenous genes in response to NO3 , Ca2+ and K+.

Altered responses in expression of the endogenous, nitrate-responsive genes in roots

Under 1-h KNO3 treatment, the calcium channel blocker LaCl3 had largely no effect on the transcription of the endogenous nitrate transporter genes NtNrt2.1 and NtNrt1.1 in the roots of the ZmN transgenic plants, but LaCl3 inhibited these genes in the wild type plants (Fig. 2A, C). By contrast, no inhibitory effect of LaCl3 was observed for both plants when nitrate was absent (Fig. 2B, D). On the other hand, the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U73122 that blocks increases in the cytosolic Ca2+ levels had no effect on NtNrt2.1 gene expression regardless of whether nitrate was present, similar as its nonfunctional analog U73343 (Fig. 2A, B). For NtNrt1.1, U73122 and U73343 treatments exhibited largely similar expression levels (Fig. 2C, D), suggesting a lack of inhibition. In stark contrast to the NtNrt2.1 gene, the transcription of NtNAR, a protein functionally associated with NtNrt2.1, was inhibited by LaCl3 in the transgenic ZmN roots, but not the wild type roots, in the presence of either KNO3 or KCl. U73122, on the other hand, variously inhibited NtNAR genes for both plants (Additional file 1: Figure S7). These results suggest that (1) calcium, nitrate and potassium all influenced the expression of these genes, and (2) the ZmNrt2.1-expressing plants showed altered responses of the native genes NtNrt2.1 and NtNAR to changes in the calcium channels and cytosolic Ca2+ levels, as compared to the wild type plants.
Fig. 2

Expression of root high-affinity (NtNrt2.1; A, B) and low-affinity (NtNrt1.1; C, D) nitrate transporter genes in response to calcium inhibitor and nitrate treatments. Three-week-old plants were incubated for 1 h in H2O, 5 mM LaCl3, 10 μM U73122 or 10 μM U73343, followed by 1 h in 5 mM KNO3 or 5 mM KCl. The significant differences (P < 0.05) for multiple comparisons are shown with different letters separately for each panel, whereas no letter or same letters indicate insignificant variation

In Arabidopsis, a member of Bric-a-Brac/Tramtrack/Broad gene family, BT2, has been shown to be regulated by multiple signals including nitrogen nutrients and to suppress nitrate uptake (Mandadi et al. 2009; Araus et al. 2016). We examined the responses of the tobacco BT2 gene to calcium and nitrate. When treated with LaCl3 or U73122 followed by KNO3, the BT2 gene expression was elevated for both the wild type and ZmN plants (Fig. 3A), implicating a down-regulatory role by Ca channels and cytosolic [Ca2+]. Under KCl without nitrate, there was also a significant increase in BT2 expression with LaCl3 and U73122 treatments as compared to H2O only treatment, but the wild type exhibited a stronger response than the ZmN plants (Fig. 3B). This indicates a potassium effect on BT2 genes when nitrate was absent and calcium signaling pathway was impaired, reflecting a complex crosstalk among NO3 , Ca2+ and K+ in regulating genes for nitrate nutrition. Again, the ZmN transgenic plants exhibited altered responses different from the wild type plants.
Fig. 3

Expression of root Bric-a-Brac/Tramtrack/Broad gene BT2 (A, B) and transcription factor TGA-binding protein gene TGA1 (C, D) genes in response to calcium inhibitor and nitrate treatments, as described in Fig. 2

Furthermore, the transcription factor TGA-binding protein, TGA1, is reported to be responsive to nitrate and may play a regulatory role in nitrate sensing (Ho and Tsay 2010; Alvarez et al. 2014). We found that the endogenous TGA1 expression in the ZmN roots was different from that in the wild type roots. Under KNO3 treatment, TGA1 transcription in the ZmN plants was increased after incubation with LaCl3 or U73122, whereas any enhancement of TGA1 expression was abolished by these inhibitors in the wild type plants (Fig. 3C). On the other hand, without NO3 , LaCl3 and U73122 did not show inhibitory effect on TGA1 transcription in both plants (Fig. 3D). This suggests that while K+ may not be directly involved in TGA1 gene expression, Ca2+ is important in mediating the nitrate-sensing TGA1 gene expression. What is revealing is that the ZmNrt2.1-expression plants under nitrate induction exhibited an altered pattern of TGA1 expression after treatment with Ca inhibitors LaCl3 and U73122 (Fig. 3C), again highlighting the effect of the heterologous ZmNrt2.1 gene on the overall nitrate-related gene expression in the host plant.

Altered responses in expression of the endogenous, nitrate-responsive genes in shoots

Similarly, the shoots of the wild type and ZmN plants also exhibited some differences in gene expression as well as from the roots. In the presence of KNO3, LaCl3 did not inhibit NtNrt2.1 for both the wild type and ZmN plants (Fig. 4A), similar as in roots (Fig. 2A). U73122, however, almost completely abolished the NtNrt2.1transcription in the ZmN plants, whereas only partial inhibition was measured for the wild type (Fig. 4A). Without NO3 , LaCl3 and U73122 almost completely inhibited NtNrt2.1 expression for both plants as compared to H2O only treatment (Fig. 4B), which is in stark contrast to the roots where no obvious inhibition was observed (Fig. 2B). Likewise, the shoot NtNrt1.1 gene in both plants was completely inhibited by LaCl3 or U73122, under either KNO3 or KCl (Fig. 4C, D), suggesting that the calcium channel and PLC-regulated Ca2+ signaling play a significant role in the expression of nitrate transporter genes in shoots. These results also highlight root/shoot differences in nitrate transporter gene expression. This organ differential expression was observed for NtNAR genes as well, which in shoots exhibited almost identical patterns as NtNrt2.1 but was quite different from the roots (Fig. 4A, B; Additional file 1: Figure S8).
Fig. 4

Expression of shoot nitrate transporter genes NtNrt2.1 (A, B) and NtNrt1.1 (C, D) in response to calcium inhibitor and nitrate treatments, as described in Fig. 2

Unlike in roots, BT2 gene expression in shoots of the wild type plants under KNO3 treatment was significantly inhibited by both LaCl3 and U73122, whereas for the ZmN plants this inhibition was either not observed (for LaCl3) or much less severe than the wild type (for U73122) (Fig. 5A). Without nitrate, on the other hand, BT2 expression was nearly completely abolished by these two inhibitors for both plants (Fig. 5B). Similarly, the TGA1 expression in shoots was significantly inhibited by both LaCl3 and U73122 regardless of whether KNO3 or KCl was present, although subtle difference can be detected between these two plants (Fig. 5C, D). All these results implicate the involvement of the Ca2+ signaling pathway in nitrate-related gene expression, thus nitrate sensing. Meanwhile, compared to the wild type plants, the ZmNrt2.1-expressing plants exhibited certain altered patterns of nitrate-related gene expression in response to nitrate availability and Ca2+ signaling inhibitors, reflecting the ectopic effect of the maize nitrate transporter on nitrate sensing in the transgenic plants.
Fig. 5

Expression of shoot BT2 (A, B) and TGA1 (C, D) genes in response to calcium inhibitor and nitrate treatments, as described in Fig. 2

Discussion

A main goal for this study was to investigate what would happen to the host plant’s nitrate signaling if a foreign nitrate transporter gene, a member of the NO3 inducible high-affinity transport system (iHATS), was introduced and expressed. Our results show that the plants expressing the maize high-affinity nitrate transporter ZmNrt2.1 had an overall better primary root growth and higher biomass than the wild type when grown under high nitrate and K+ but Ca2+ deficient conditions, whereas there was no significant difference when nitrate was deficient (Fig. 1). One explanation may be that the additional nitrate transporter could somewhat enhance plants’ capacity for nitrate uptake and assimilation, particularly under nitrogen eutrophication where plant’s endogenous iHATS tends to be suppressed by high levels of nitrate. Plant growth responds to soil environmental cues such as the availability of minerals and nutrients. For example, root growth is generally enhanced by nutrient-poor conditions and inhibited by nutrient-rich conditions (Ericsson 1995). Root architecture is affected by nitrate transporters, such as the repression of lateral root initiation by NRT2.1 in Arabidopsis (Little et al. 2005). Therefore, lateral roots and primary roots may respond differently to NO3 ion as a signaling molecule (Zhang and Forde 2000; Little et al. 2005). We observed an enhanced primary root growth, particularly in our ZmN plants, when Ca2+ was low but K+ was high (Fig. 1), suggesting that Ca2+ and K+ may be just as important as nitrate for root development. On the other hand, other nitrate and nitrite transporters such as Nrt1.1 are shown to be important for K+ translocation in Arabidopsis (Drechsler et al. 2015), reflecting an overlapping role for these genes and a complex network of NO3 /Ca2+/K+ interactions. Any phenotypic changes observed under different nitrate nutrient conditions must be the results of interactions among these nitrogen-responsive genes, including ZmNrt2.1 in the ZmN plants.

It is somewhat puzzling that overexpression of Nrt2.1 does not seem to significantly change NO3 contents in plants regardless of nitrate provision, as reported by Fraisier et al. (2000) and observed by us (Additional file 1: Figure S6). It is possible that in our study expression of ZmNrt2.1 may not be functionally compatible with the native NtNAR2, therefore limiting its nitrate transportation activity. However, Fraisier et al. (2000) overexpressed a copy of native NpNrt2.1 gene in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia plants, therefore Nrt2.1-NAR2 compatibility is not an issue. Lack of clear cause-effect association between Nrt2.1 expression and cellular NO3 contents under various NO3 availabilities reflects the complex regulation of nitrate homeostasis and nitrogen metabolism during plant growth and development.

It should be pointed out that our study only examined the young plants (up to 3 weeks old) grown in the nutrient-defined medium. It remains to assess how our transgenic plants would compare to the wild type plants when grown under nitrate-challenging (too much or too little) conditions in soil throughout a life cycle. Nonetheless, our study demonstrates a feasibility that elevated high-affinity nitrate transporter transcription that does not respond to the typical suppression by high nitrate levels could be used as a strategy for enhanced nitrate sequestration by plants from the nitrate-polluting environment.

It is also worth noting that in our study, and in literature (e.g. Fraisier et al. 2000; Quaggiotti et al. 2003; Okamoto et al. 2003; Wirth et al. 2007), 1 mM was used as “low” nitrate treatment, which appears to exceed the NRT2’s operation limit of < 1 mM (Crawford and Glass 1998). In fact, due to plant growth, the nitrate content in the medium decreases rapidly. For example, in our experiments, the nitrate level on the 1 mM medium dropped below 0.5 mM after 1 week and was near 0.1–0.2 mM after 3 weeks (data not shown), with relatively healthy and reasonable-sized plants. Therefore, 1 mM nitrate should be an acceptable treatment for moderately low nitrate in nitrate transporter studies.

Calcium is a well-known important signal for a wide variety of physiological and biochemical processes in the cell (Dodd et al. 2010; Carafoli and Krebs 2016), as is an essential element for plant growth. However, its importance for nitrate signaling and nitrate-responsive gene regulation has not been fully understood or appreciated. Our results demonstrated a Ca2+ requirement for several nitrate-responsive genes, so that their transcription in shoots could be severely inhibited by inhibitors for calcium channel or Ca2+ level-regulating PLC, particularly when nitrate was limiting (Figs. 4 and 5). Thus, it is likely that Ca2+ and NO3 , perhaps K+ as well, are all important part of the transcriptional regulation network for many nitrate-responsive genes. Overall, our studies are consistent with the notion that Ca2+ acts as a second messenger, beside NO3 , in the nitrate signaling pathway (Riveras et al. 2015; Undurraga et al. 2017). Regardless of the role of Ca2+ or K+, nitrate availability seems to be a primary and essential signal for the cascade of gene expression for nitrogen nutrition in plants.

Using a combination of transgenic plants, inhibitors and nutrient variation, we were able to begin to dissecting, to a certain extent, the effect of a maize nitrate transporter gene on the expression of several native nitrate-responsive genes. The ZmNrt2.1 is moderately similar to the tobacco NtNrt2.1 with a similar codon usage (Additional file 1: Figure S2 and Table S3). It is not known how post-transcriptional and/or post-translational processing occurs on NRT2.1 protein in either maize or tobacco plants, as reported to take place for the Arabidopsis NRT2.1 (Wirth et al. 2007; Laugier et al. 2012). It is not clear how much, if any, ZmNrt2.1 could oligomerize with NtNAR2 to form an active nitrate transporter complex, as suggested for other plants (Tong et al. 2005; Yong et al. 2010; Pii et al. 2016). It will be important to investigate the genetic or biochemical mechanisms of how the ZmNrt2.1 interacts (or interferes) with the tobacco nitrate transporters and other native nitrate-involving genes/proteins in the host plant grown under various NO3 or K+ conditions. However, regardless of whether ZmNrt2.1 was present as a monomer or functionally complexed with an accessory partner, this study clearly showed that compared to the untransformed plants, the ZmNrt2.1-expressing plants exhibited a different response in gene transcription when nitrate was limited or the Ca2+ signal system was impaired. For example, the fact that ZmN plants were less sensitive to LaCl3 inhibition for BT2 and TGA1 transcription than the wild type (Figs. 3 and 5) suggests that being part of the host’s genetic system, the maize ZmNrt2.1 somehow altered or interfered with the endogenous gene regulatory network for nitrogen nutrition in the host plant. Further exploration of this type of ectopic effects imposed by a foreign gene may be worthwhile not only for better understanding plants’ nitrogen homeostasis, but also for creating desirable plants suitable for various nitrate environments.

In summary, the transgenic tobacco plants expressing the maize nitrate transporter gene ZmNrt2.1 exhibited altered expression patterns of a set of genes that are modulated not only by nitrate, but also by calcium. Introduction of selective foreign nitrate transporter genes into crop plants, along with managing Ca2+ or K+ availability in soil, may prove to be a feasible approach to improving nitrogen use efficiency and nitrate uptake capacity, and dealing with environmental eutrophication caused by fertilizer overuse.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

XHZ, AI and NE conceived and designed the experiments. AI, XLJ, JC, PV and XHZ performed the experiments. XLJ, YBZ and XHZ analyzed the data. XHZ wrote the manuscript. All commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a fund from Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Nigeria, and Florida Atlantic University, USA.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

The authors have generated all the contents contained in this paper. No other individual participants were involved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study did not involve human subjects, human material, human data or animals. The experimental research on cultivated plants reported in this paper has complied with institutional, national, or international guidelines.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University
(2)
Department of Soil Sciences, Modibbo Adama University of Technology
(3)
Monitoring Center for Marine Resources and Environments, Guangdong Ocean University

References

  1. Albrecht V, Ritz O, Linder S, Harter K, Kudla J (2001) The NAF domain defines a novel protein-protein interaction module conserved in Ca2+-regulated kinases. EMBO J 20:1051–1063View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez JM, Riveras E, Vidal EA, Gras DE, Contreras-López O, Tamayo KP, Aceituno F, Gómez I, Ruffel S, Lejay L, Jordana X, Gutiérrez RA (2014) Systems approach identifies TGA1 and TGA4 transcription factors as important regulatory components of the nitrate response of Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Plant J 80:1–13View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Araus V, Vidal EA, Puelma T, Alamos S, Mieulet D, Guiderdoni E, Gutiérrez RA (2016) Members of BTB gene family of scaffold proteins suppress nitrate uptake and nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Physiol 171:1523–1532PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Carafoli E, Krebs J (2016) Why calcium? How calcium became the best communicator. J Biol Chem 291:20849–20857View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiba Y, Shimizu Y, Miyakawa S, Kanno Y, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Seo M (2015) Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana NRT1/PTR FAMILY (NPF) proteins capable of transporting plant hormones. J Plant Res 128:679–686View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford NM, Glass AD (1998) Molecular and physiological aspects of nitrate uptake in plants. Trends Plant Sci 3:389–395View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. de Jong F, Thodey K, Lejay LV, Bevan MW (2014) Glucose elevates NITRATE TRANSPORTER2.1 protein levels and nitrate transport activity independently of its hexokinase1-mediated stimulation of NITRATE TRANSPORTER2.1 expression. Plant Physiol 164:308–320View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodd AN, Kudla J, Sanders D (2010) The language of calcium signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:593–620View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Drechsler N, Zheng Y, Bohner A, Nobmann B, von Wirén N, Kunze R, Rausch C (2015) Nitrate-dependent control of shoot K homeostasis by the nitrate transporter1/peptide transporter family member NPF7.3/NRT1.5 and the Stelar K+ Outward Rectifier SKOR in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 169:2832–2847PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Ericsson T (1995) Growth and shoot:root ration of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant Soil 168–169:205–214View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2018. Rome. ISBN 978-92-5-108692-6Google Scholar
  12. Forde BG (2000) Nitrate transporters in plants: structure, function and regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1465:219–235View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Forde BG, Clarkson DT (1999) Nitrate and ammonium nutrition of plants: physiological and molecular perspectives. Adv Bot Res 30:1–90View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraisier V, Gojon A, Tillard P, Daniel-Vedele F (2000) Constitutive expression of a putative high-affinity nitrate transporter in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia: evidence for post-transcriptional regulation by a reduced nitrogen source. Plant J 23:489–496View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin-Tong VE, Drobak BK, Allan AC, Watkins P, Trewavas AJ (1996) Growth of pollen tubes of Papaver rhoeas is regulated by a slow-moving calcium wave propagated by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Plant Cell 8:1305–1321View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Good AG, Shrawart AK, Muench DG (2004) Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends Plant Sci 9:597–605View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guerrero MG, Vega JM, Losada M (1981) The assimilatory nitrate-reducing system and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 32:169–204View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill W, Jin X-L, Zhang X-H (2016) Expression of an arctic chickweed dehydrin, CarDHN, enhances tolerance to abiotic stress in tobacco plants. Plant Growth Regul 80:323–334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho CH, Tsay YF (2010) Nitrate, ammonium, and potassium sensing and signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:604–610View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Howarth RW, Marino R (2006) Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: evolving views over three decades. Limnol Oceanography 51:364–376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu HC, Wang YY, Tsay YF (2009) AtCIPK8, a CBL-interacting protein kinase, regulates the low-affinity phase of the primary nitrate response. Plant J 57:264–278View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt L, Otterhag L, Lee JC, Lasheen T, Hunt J, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Sommarin MD, Gilmour DJ, Pical C, Gray JE (2004) Gene-specific expression and calcium activation of Arabidopsis thaliana phospholipase C isoforms. New Phytol 162:643–654View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Imsande J, Touraine B (1994) N demand and the regulation of nitrate uptake. Plant Physiol 105:3–7View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Katayama H, Mori M, Kawamura Y, Tanaka T, Mori M, Hasegawa H (2009) Production and characterization of transgenic rice plants carrying a high-affinity nitrate transporter gene (OsNRT2. 1). Breed Sci 59:237–243View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Krapp A, David LC, Chardin C, Girin T, Marmagne A, Leprince A-S, Chaillou S, Ferrario-Méry S, Meyer C, Daniel-Vedele F (2014) Nitrate transport and signalling in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 65:789–798View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass A (1996) Kinetics of NH4 + influx in spruce. Plant Physiol 110:773–779View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Laugier E, Bouguyon E, Mauries A, Tillard P, Gojon A, Lejay L (2012) Regulation of high-affinity nitrate uptake in roots of Arabidopsis depends predominantly on posttranscriptional control of the NRT2.1/NAR2.1 transport system. Plant Physiol 158:1067–1078View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lejay L, Tillard P, Lepetit M, Olive F, Filleur S, Daniel-Vedele F, Gojon A (1999) Molecular and functional regulation of two NO3 uptake systems by N- and C-status of Arabidopsis plants. Plant J 18:509–519View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Little D, Rao H, Oliva S, Daniel-Vedele F, Krapp A, Malamy JE (2005) The putative high-affinity nitrate transporter NRT2.1 represses lateral root initiation in response to nutritional cues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13693–13698View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu C, Wang Y, Pan K, Zhu T, Li W, Zhang L (2014) Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in leaves and roots of dwarf bamboo (Fargesia denudata Yi) subjected to drought for two consecutive years during sprouting period. J Plant Growth Regul 33:243–255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Loqué D, Tillard P, Gojon A, Lepetit M (2003) Gene expression of the NO3 transporter NRT1.1 and the nitrate reductase NIA1 is repressed in Arabidopsis roots by NO2 , the product of NO3 reduction. Plant Physiol 132:958–967View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandadi KK, Misra A, Ren S, McKnight TD (2009) BT2, a BTB protein, mediates multiple responses to nutrients, stresses, and hormones in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 150:1930–1939View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Medici A, Krouk G (2014) The primary nitrate response: a multifaceted signalling pathway. J Exp Bot 65:5567–5576View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meharg AA, Blatt MR (1995) NO3 transport across the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis thaliana root hairs: kinetic control by pH and membrane voltage. J Membrane Biol 145:49–66View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Muños S, Cazettes C, Fizames C, Gaymard F, Tillard P, Lepetit M, Lejay L, Gojon A (2004) Transcript profiling in the chl1-5 mutant of Arabidopsis reveals a role of the nitrate transporter NRT1.1 in the regulation of another nitrate transporter, NRT2.1. Plant Cell 16:2433–2447View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Okamoto M, Vidmar JJ, Glass ADM (2003) Regulation of NRT1 and NRT2 gene families of Arabidopsis thaliana: responses to nitrate provision. Plant Cell Physiol 44:304–317View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Orsel M, Chopin F, Leleu O, Smith SJ, Krapp A, Daniel-Vedele F, Miller AJ (2006) Characterization of a two-component high-affinity nitrate uptake system in Arabidopsis. Physiology and protein-protein interaction. Plant Physiol 142:1304–1317View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Pao SS, Paulsen IT, Saier MH (1998) Major facilitator superfamily. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1–34PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Peoples MB, Freney JR, Mosier AR, Bacon PE (1995) Minimizing gaseous losses of nitrogen. In: Bacon PE (ed) Nitrogen Fertilization in the Environment. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, pp 565–602Google Scholar
  40. Pii Y, Alessandrini M, Dall’Osto L, Guardini K, Prinsi B, Espen L, Zamboni A, Varanini Z (2016) Time-resolved investigation of molecular components involved in the induction of NO3 high affinity transport system in maize roots. Front Plant Sci 7:1657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01657 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Plett D, Toubia J, Garnett T, Tester M, Kaiser BN, Baumann U (2010) Dichotomy in the NRT gene families of dicots and grass species. PLoS ONE 5:e15289View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Quaggiotti S, Ruperti B, Borsa P, Destro T, Malagoli M (2003) Expression of a putative high-affinity NO3 transporter and of an H+-ATPase in relation to whole plant nitrate transport physiology in two maize genotypes differently responsive to low nitrogen availability. J Exp Bot 54:1023–1031View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Quesada A, Galvan A, Fernandez E (1994) Identification of nitrate transporter genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J 5:407–419View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Remans T, Nacry P, Pervent M, Filleur S, Diatloff E, Mounier E, Tillard P, Forde BG, Gojon A (2006) The Arabidopsis NRT1.1 transporter participates in the signaling pathway triggering root colonization of nitrate-rich patches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19206–19211View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Riveras E, Alvarez JM, Vidal EA, Oses C, Vega A, Gutiérrez RA (2015) The calcium ion is a second messenger in the nitrate signaling pathway of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 169:1397–1404View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Sakakibara H, Kobayashi K, Deji A, Sugiyama T (1997) Partial characterization of the signaling pathway for the nitrate-dependent expression of genes for nitrogen-assimilatory enzymes using detached maize leaves. Plant Cell Physiol 38:837–843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt GW, Delaney SK (2010) Stable internal reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) during development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics 283:233–241View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Streb H, Irvine RF, Berridge MJ, Schulz I (1983) Release of Ca2+ from a nonmitochondrial intracellular store in pancreatic acinar cells by inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate. Nature 306:67–69View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tong Y, Zhou JJ, Li Z, Miller AJ (2005) A two-component high-affinity nitrate uptake system in barley. Plant J 41:442–450View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tsai F-Y, Zhang X-H, Ulanov A, Widholm JM (2010) The application of the yeast N-acetyltransferase MPR1 gene and the proline analogue l-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid as a selectable marker system for plant transformation. J Exp Bot 61:2561–2573View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Tsay YF, Chiu CC, Tsai CB, Ho CH, Hsu PK (2007) Nitrate transporters and peptide transporters. FEBS Lett 581:2290–2300View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Undurraga SF, Ibarra-Henríquez C, Fredes I, Miguel Álvarez JM, Gutiérrez RA (2017) Nitrate signaling and early responses in Arabidopsis roots. J Exp Bot 68:2541–2551View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Unkles SE, Rouch D, Wang Y, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Kinghorn JR (2004) Two perfectly conserved arginine residues are required for substrate binding in a high-affinity nitrate transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17549–17554View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang R, Tischner R, Gutiérrez RA, Hoffman M, Xing X, Chen M, Coruzzi G, Crawford NM (2004) Genomic analysis of the nitrate response using a nitrate reductase-null mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 136:2512–2522View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang YY, Hsu PK, Tsay YF (2012) Uptake, allocation and signaling of nitrate. Trends Plant Sci 17:458–467View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. White PJ (2000) Calcium channels in higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 1465:171–189View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Wirth J, Chopin F, Santoni V, Viennois G, Tillard P, Krapp A, Gojon A (2007) Regulation of root nitrate uptake at the NRT2.1 protein level in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 282:23541–23552View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Yan M, Fan X, Feng H, Miller AJ, Shen Q, Xu G (2011) Rice OsNAR2.1 interacts with OsNRT2.1, OsNRT2.2 and OsNRT2.3a nitrate transporters to provide uptake over high and low concentration ranges. Plant Cell Environ 34:1360–1372View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yong Z, Kotur Z, Glass AD (2010) Characterization of an intact two-component high-affinity nitrate transporter from Arabidopsis roots. Plant J 63:739–748View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang H, Forde BG (2000) Regulation of Arabidopsis root development by nitrate availability. J Exp Bot 51:51–59View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang X-H, Takagi H, Widholm JM (2004) Expression of a novel yeast gene that detoxifies the proline analog azetidine-2-carboxylate confers resistance during tobacco seed germination, callus and shoot formation. Plant Cell Rep 22:615–622View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang X-H, Webb J, Huang Y-H, Lin L, Tang R-S, Liu A (2011) Hybrid Rubisco of tomato large subunits and tobacco small subunits is functional in tobacco plants. Plant Sci 180:480–488View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang X-H, Keating P, Wang X-W, Huang Y-H, Martin J, Hartmann JX, Liu A (2014) Production of functional native human interleukin-2 in tobacco chloroplasts. Mol Biotechnol 56:369–379View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou JJ, Fernández E, Galván A, Miller AJ (2000) A high affinity nitrate transport system from Chlamydomonas requires two gene products. FEBS Lett 466:225–227View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017