Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Original Article
  • Open Access

Tuber elevatireticulatum sp. nov., a new species of whitish truffle from Taiwan

Botanical StudiesAn International Journal201859:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-018-0241-y

  • Received: 20 March 2018
  • Accepted: 22 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

There are estimated 180–220 species of Tuber described in the world, but the diversity of the genus in Taiwan is poorly known, with only two species recorded, i.e., Tuber formosanum and T. furfuraceum. During our survey of hypogenous fungi in Taiwan, a whitish truffle belongs to Puberulum clade was collected from roots of Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis in central Taiwan and appeared to differ from the two recorded species.

Results

The whitish truffle is herein described as a new species Tuber elevatireticulatum, which is distinguished from closely resembled Asian whitish truffles species like Tuber thailandicum, T. panzhihuanense, T. latisporum and T. sinopuberulum by the association with Keteleeria host, small light brown ascocarps with a dark brown gleba, dark brownish and elliptical ascospores ornamented with a prominently raised alveolate reticulum. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of both ITS and LSU loci clearly supports T. elevatireticulatum as a new species without any significant incongruence.

Conclusions

The whitish truffle is herein described as a new species T. elevatireticulatum based on the evidence from morphology and DNA sequences. T. elevatireticulatum is the first scientific record of whitish truffle in Taiwan.

Keywords

  • Keteleeria
  • Morphology
  • Phylogeny
  • Taxonomy
  • Taiwan
  • Truffle
  • Tuber

Background

True truffles, belonging to the genus Tuber (Tuberaceae, Pezizales, Pezizomycetes), produce hypogeous ascocarps, which are formed in soil or sometimes within layers of leaf litter. They have lost the ability to actively discharge ascospores (Bonito and Smith 2016). They are symbiotic fungi that develop association with fine roots of specific host trees (T. oregonense Trappe, Bonito and P. Rawl. with Douglas fir) or broad host ranges (T. aestivum (Wulfen:Fr.) Spreng. with some plant species in Betulaceae, Corylaceae, Fagaceae, Tiliaceae, Pinaceae and Cistaceae) (Hall et al. 2007). The unique aroma makes some species greatly sought after as high-end culinary ingredients throughout the world, especially in Europe (Hall et al. 2007). The scarcity and irreplaceably scent of French Périgord black truffle (T. melanosporum Vittad.) and Italian Alba white truffle (T. magnatum Pico.) render them among the most famous and demanding truffles in the world (Hall et al. 2007; Bonito et al. 2010a).

Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/Names.asp) lists out three hundred and five Tuber names, however, many of them required clarification (Suwannarach et al. 2015; Kinoshita et al. 2016). Bonito et al. (2013) reassessed the published names and estimated 180–220 accepted species in the genus, was subdivided into 11 major clades according to their phylogenetic relationships. Puberulum clade, Maculatum clade and closely related lineage Gibbosum clade were phylogenetically grouped with as Puberulum Group and members of this group commonly called “whitish truffle” in order to distinguish them from Italian white truffle (T. magnatum in Aestivum clade) (Bonito et al. 2010a; Lancellotti et al. 2016). Researches in Tuber have a long history and are well-documented in Europe and North America. However, research in Asia are still scarce despite the estimated high diversity (Bonito et al. 2010a; Kinoshita et al. 2011). Hypogeous fungi in Taiwan are poorly documented, with only T. formosanum Hu (invalidly described in 1992 due to the lack of designated holotype and later re-typification in 2013) and T. furfuraceum Hu and Wang reported previously. Both species form symbiotic association with roots of Quercus glauca (Thunb. ex Murray) Oerst. in the family of Fagaceae (Hu 1992; Hu and Wang 2005; Qiao et al. 2013). A whitish truffle was mentioned in Hu (1987) but lacks a formal description.

During our survey of hypogenous fungi in Taiwan, a whitish truffle was found under Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis (Flous) Silba, in Sitou Tract, Nantou County of central Taiwan. It resembles several known Asian whitish truffles in the Puberulum Clade, such as T. thailandicum Suwannarach et al. (2015), T. panzhihuanense Deng et al. (2013), T. latisporum Chen and Liu (2007), T. pseudosphaerosporum Fan and Yue (2013), and T. alboumbilicum Wang and Li (Li et al. 2014), but differs from species in the Puberulum clade by the only species associated with Keteleeria host, small light brown ascocarps with hyphae-like hairs arised, dark brownish and elliptical ascospores ornamented with a prominently raised alveolate reticulum.

Methods

Sample collection

Ascocarps were collected with three-pronged garden cultivators, wrapped with tissue paper and kept in separate plastic zipper bags until further morphological and molecular analyses in laboratory. Ascocarps were weighted freshly within 24 h, and the pH value of adjacent soil were measured by JENCO 6010M pH meter following protocol of the manufacturer.

Morphological analysis

Ascocarps were cleaned with dry toothbrush, and then cut into halves for observing gleba color or color change under air exposure. Sections of fresh tissue were made with a razor blade by hand, then mounted in 0.1% (w/v) cotton blue in lacto-phenol for describing morphological characteristics by a Leica DMLB light microscope. Ascospore dimensions, with the ornamentation excluded, were based on at least 100 randomly selected ascospores. The range of ascospore length to width ratio (Q), average Q with ± standard deviation (Q) was calculated, and number of meshes across the ascospore width was measured.

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ascospores from dried gleba were mounted onto SEM stubs with carbon double-sided tape (Nisshin EM CO., Ltd, Tokyo), coated with gold–palladium, then examined and photographed with a tabletop HITACHI TM3000 SEM. Holotype was deposited at Herbarium of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei, Taiwan (Index Herbarium: TAIF).

Molecular analysis

DNA extraction

Approximately 9–14 mg of gleba tissue of fresh ascocarps were ground by plastic pestle with 800 µl of Lysis Buffer (Taiwan Advanced Nanotech Inc.; containing Guanidine salt, Tris buffer and surfactants) in 1.5 ml centrifuge tube for DNA extraction. DNA was then extracted using the TANBead fungal Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit and TANBead Nucleic Acid Extractor (Taiwan Advanced Nanotech Inc.) following protocol of the manufacturer.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing

Two nuclear ribosomal DNA loci were used for amplifying and sequencing, including the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) with forward primer ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) was paired with reverse primer ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) (White et al. 1990); and ribosomal large subunit (LSU) with forward primer LR0R (5′-ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC-3′) (Rehner and Samuels 1994) was paired with reverse primer LR5 (5′-TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG-3′) (Vilgalys and Hester 1990). PCR was performed in 25 µl reactions containing 2.5 µl DNA template, 1 µl primer each, 8 µl ddH20 and 12.5 µl 2× Taq Master Mix (including 20 mM KCl, 4 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 40 mM Tris–HCl with pH 8.8, 0.2% Triton X-100, 20 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.2 mg/ml BSA, 0.4 mM dNTP mix, 100 U/ml Taq DNA Polymerase and stabilizers) (Genomics Bioscience and Technology CO., Ltd.). PCR for ITS/LSU were run as an initial denaturation at 94/95 °C for 3/2 min, then at 94/95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56/50 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s/1 min by 30 cycles and a final extension at 72 °C for 5/10 min on a multigene thermal cycler (Labnet International, Inc.). PCR products were checked on agarose gel containing 1.4% agarose and 0.5× Tris–acetate-EDTA (TAE) and stained with 5 µl/100 ml Healthview™ nucleic acid stain under UV light by multilmage™ light cabinet (Alphalmager 2200). The PCR products were sent to Seeing Bioscience Co., Ltd. for purification and sequencing by Sanger Sequencing Method (ABI 3730).

Phylogenetic analyses

Six ITS and eight LSU sequences were obtained from ascocarps of T. elevatireticulatum and were submitted to GenBank with Accession Numbers MF540616–MF540621 (ITS) and LSU sequences: LC425119–LC425126 (LSU). Other whitish Tuber sequences were obtained from GenBank database for phylogenetic analyses (Table 1), with Choiromyces alveolatus as the outgroup. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013) with default settings, and poorly aligned sites were identified using Gblocks 0.91b (Castresana 2000) with gaps allowed in conserved blocks and with all other parameters left as default values. Ambiguous sites were excluded from phylogenetic analyses. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted with MEGA 6.0 (Tamura et al. 2013) using K2P model. Bootstrap analyses were conducted with 1000 replications (Felsenstein 1985). Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted with MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012), for evaluating the effect of different phylogenetic approach. K2P model was used and MCMC chains were run for 1,000,000 generations, sampling every 100th tree. Among these, the first 20% trees were discarded as burn-in phase and the remaining trees were used to calculate Bayesian posterior probabilities. The consensus tree was viewed with FigTree 1.4.3 (Rambaut 2014).
Table 1

Details of the whitish Tuber ITS sequences used in phylogenetic study

Taxa

Voucher no.

Origin

GenBank Accession no.

References

ITS

LSU

Choiromyces alveolatus

MES97

USA

HM485332

 

Bonito et al. (2010a)

Choiromyces alveolatus

HS2886

USA

HM485333

 

Bonito et al. (2010a)

Choiromyces alveolatus

p688L

USA

 

EU669426

Unpublished

Choiromyces alveolatus

MES97

USA

 

JQ925660

Bonito et al. (2013)

T. alboumbilicum

YAAS L2324a

China

KJ742702

 

Li et al. (2014)

T. bellisporum

JT7270

USA

FJ809856

FJ809827

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. bellisporum

JT6060

USA

FJ809857

FJ809828

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. borchii

GB45

Italy

HM485344

 

Bonito et al. (2010a)

T. borchii

CMI-UNIBO 3405

Italy

FJ554521

 

Bonuso et al. (2010)

T. borchii

Tar042

Italy

KT165326

 

Belfiori et al. (2016)

T. borchii

AH39139

Spain

 

JN392291

Alvarado et al. (2012)

T. borchii

GB32

Italy

 

FJ809852

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. californicum

JT22590

USA

HM485351

 

Bonito et al. (2010a)

T. californicum

src880

USA

HM485350

 

Bonito et al. (2010a)

T. californicum

RPC-9

USA

 

AF156927

Taylor and Bruns (1999)

T. castellanoi

JT19924

USA

FJ809859

FJ809830

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. castellanoi

JT28069

USA

FJ809860

FJ809831

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. dryophilum

 

Italy

AF003917

 

Unpublished

T. dryophilum

GB37

Italy

HM485354

JQ925688

Bonito et al. (2013)

T. dryophilum

GB35

Italy

 

JQ925687

Bonito et al. (2013)

T. elevatireticulatum b

XTAM1

Taiwan

MF540616

LC425119

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTAM2

Taiwan

MF540617

LC425120

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTAM3 a

Taiwan

MF540618

LC425121

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTAM4

Taiwan

MF540619

LC425122

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTAM5

Taiwan

MF540620

 

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTAM7

Taiwan

MF540621

LC425123

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTBX1

Taiwan

 

LC425124

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTBX4

Taiwan

 

LC425125

This study

T. elevatireticulatum

XTBX5

Taiwan

 

LC425126

This study

T. flavidosporum

K213a

Japan

AB553446

AB553520

Kinoshita et al. (2016)

T. gibbosum

SPCP_B2a

Canada

KP972062

 

Berch and Bonito (2016)

T. gibbosum

JT6555

USA

 

FJ809833

Bonito et al. (2010a)

T. gibbosum

JT19424

USA

HM485362

FJ809834

Bonito et al. (2010a)

T. huizeanum

BJTC FAN186a

China

JQ910651

NG_059991

Fan et al. (2013a)

T. japonicum

N88a

Japan

AB553444

 

Kinoshita et al. (2016)

T. japonicum

K228

Japan

 

AB553519

Kinoshita et al. (2016)

T. latisporum

HKAS 44315a

China

DQ898183

 

Chen and Liu (2007)

T. latisporum

BJTC FAN126

China

 

KP276204

Fan et al. (2016a)

T. lijiangense

BJTC FAN307

China

KP276188

KP276203

Fan et al. (2016a)

T. liui

HKAS 48269

China

DQ898182

 

Chen and Liu (2007)

T. liyuanum

BJTC FAN162a

China

JQ771191

 

Fan and Cao (2013)

T. liyuanum

BJTC FAN162a

China

 

KT067698

Fan et al. (2016b)

T. maculatum

M4TM

Poland

KJ524530

 

Unpublished

T. maculatum

Mac1

Italy

AF106889

 

Unpublished

T. maculatum

ZB2656

Hungary

 

JF261366

Unpublished

T. microsphaerosporum

BJTCFan152a

China

KF805726

 

Fan and Yue (2013)

T. microverrucosum

BJTC FAN142a

China

JN870099

 

Fan et al. (2011)

T. microverrucosum

BJTC FAN142a

China

 

KT067696

Fan et al. (2016b)

T. oligospermum

AH39338

France

JN392266

JN392319

Alvarado et al. (2012)

T. oligospermum

AH37867

Italy

JN392259

JN392322

Alvarado et al. (2012)

T. oregonense

SPCP_B26

Canada

KP972064

 

Berch and Bonito (2016)

T. oregonense

DUKE GB284a

USA

FJ809874

 

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. oregonense

JT27945

USA

 

FJ809836

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. oregonense

JT8767

USA

 

FJ809837

Bonito et al. (2010b)

T. panzhihuanense

DXJ267a

China

JQ978648

 

Deng et al. (2013)

T. panzhihuanense

HKAS:95329

  

KY174963

Unpublished

T. panzhihuanense

HKAS:95328

  

KY174962

Unpublished

T. pseudomagnatum

BJTC FAN163a

China

JQ771192

 

Fan and Cao (2013)

T. pseudomagnatum

BJTC FAN163a

China

 

KP276192

Fan et al. (2016b)

T. pseudosphaerosporum

BJTCFan250a

China

KF744063

 

Fan and Yue (2013)

T. pseudosphaerosporum

BJTCFan250a

China

 

KP276194

Fan et al. (2016a)

T. puberulum

 

Serbia

FM205642

 

Marjanovic et al. (2010)

T. puberulum

ZB436

Hungary

 

JF261369

Unpublished

T. shearii

OSC51052

USA

HM485389

 

Bonito et al. (2010a)

T. shearii

OSC51052

USA

 

JF419280

Guevara et al. (2013)

T. shearii

JT12498

USA

GQ221450

 

Unpublished

T. sinopuberulum

BJTC FAN157a

China

JQ690073

JQ690070

Fan et al. (2013b)

T. sinosphaerosporum

BJTC FAN135a

China

JX092086

 

Fan et al. (2013c)

T. sinosphaerosporum

BJTC FAN135a

China

 

KP276195

Fan et al. (2016a)

T. sphaerospermum

AH37798

Morocco

JN392245

JN392304

Alvarado et al. (2012)

T. sphaerospermum

AH39197

Spain

JN392242

JN392307

Alvarado et al. (2012)

T. thailandicum

CMU-MTUF1a

Thailand

KP196328

KP196333

Suwannarach et al. (2015)

T. thailandicum

CMU-MTUF2

Thailand

KP196329

KP196334

Suwannarach et al. (2015)

T. turmericum

BJTC FAN473a

China

KT758837

 

Fan et al. (2015)

T. vesicoperidium

BJTC FAN155a

China

JQ690071

JQ690068

Fan et al. (2013b)

T. xanthomonosporum

YAAS L3185a

China

KJ162154

 

Qing et al. (2015)

T. zhongdianense

wang0299a

China

DQ898187

 

Chen and Liu (2007)

T. zhongdianense

BJTC FAN176

China

 

KP276201

Fan et al. (2016a)

aHolotype

bNew species described in this study are bold as indication

Results

Taxonomy

Tuber elevatireticulatum K.F. Wong and H.T. Li, sp. nov. Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Tuber elevatireticulatum. a Mature ascocarp. b, c Cross section of ascocarp showing a dark brown gleba with narrow, light brown veins. d Section of peridium and gleba. e Pseudoparenchymatous tissue of peridium. f Hyphae-like hairs arising from outermost cells. g Ascospores. h Scanning electron micrograph of an ascospore. Bars: a, b 3.5 mm; c 1.5 mm; d 500 µm; eg 50 µm; h 10 µm

MycoBank no.: MB824068.

Etymology: Referring to the prominently elevated reticulum on the ascospores.

Ascocarp hypogeous, scattered, solitary, subglobose or irregular, 12–19 mm long × 10–15 mm wide, 0.32–1.7 g in fresh weight, solid, smooth on the surface, whitish to pale yellowish when fresh, becoming light brown at maturity. Peridium two-layered; inner layer 85–425 μm thick, hyaline, composed of intricately interwoven hyphae; outer layer 75–110 μm thick, light brownish, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of globose, subglobose, rod-shaped or angular cells, 5–25 μm diam. Hyphae-like hairs arise from outermost cells, hyaline, septate, tapering towards the ends, acute or round at the apex, 50–275 × 1.25–3.75 μm. Gleba translucent or light-brown, marbled with narrow, white veins when young, becoming dark brown, marbled with narrow, light brown veins at maturity. Asci 1-3(-4)-ascospored, globose, subglobose, ovoid to ellipsoid, 47.5–88 × 37.5–75 µm, hyaline, with a wall 2.5 µm thick. Ascospores broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, rarely subglobose and globose, with mature ascospore ratio ranging 0.2–53% (n = 1000), yellowish brown to dark brown, with a wall 2.5–5 µm thick, 32.5–50 × 20–32.5 µm from 1-ascospored asci, 20–48 × 20–32.5 µm from 2-ascospored asci, 20–40 × 20–27.5 µm from 3-ascospored asci, 22.5–35 × 17.5–25 µm from 4-ascospored asci (Q = 1.0–1.75, Q = 1.30 ± 0.19), ornamented with irregular reticulations 2.5–7.5 µm high, with meshes varying in size, mostly 3-4(-5) across the ascospore width.

Specimens examined: TAIWAN, Nantou County, Sitou Tract, associated with roots of K. fortunei var. cyclolepis, 1 Jun 2017, collected by C.-L. Lin, K.-F. Wong, H.-T. Li and F.-Y. Lin, XTAM3 (holotype), ITS sequences: MF540616–MF540621; LSU sequences: LC425119–LC425126.

Notes: Tuber elevatireticulatum grows in montane area of central Taiwan with elevation of 1150 m. It is associated with a cluster of K. fortunei var. cyclolepis in a mixed coniferous plantation, at least 4 m apart from the nearest Cryptomeria japonica (L. f.) D. Don, Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum. and a few Pinus species which all have no record of association with Tuber species. Ascocarps are mostly scattered and distributed in solitary in loamy soil with pH ranging from 5 to 6. Ascocarps are usually found within 0–2 m from tree trunks, starting to develop in March and maturing in June. Odor is pleasant, mild, peculiar but superb, rarely becoming unpleasant with ageing. The temperature during the ascocarp formation is 20–25 °C.

Phylogenetic analyses

The ITS matrix consisted of 52 sequences and 1661 aligned bases, of which 1198 bp were identified as poorly aligned and were excluded by Gblocks. The resultant ITS alignment was 463 bp. The LSU matrix consisted of 47 sequences and 1519 aligned bases, of which poorly aligned and were excluded by Gblocks and the resultant LSU alignment was 580 bp. As Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded similar tree topologies of ITS region, thus the only tree generated form ML analysis is shown in Fig. 2. The ML and Bayesian analyses of LSU region is similar in general, due to the limited availability of sequences in database, the tree inferred form ML analysis is presented in Fig. 3, separate trees are presented as Additional files 1, 2.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of Tuber elevatireticulatum and related whitish truffles based on the ITS-rDNA sequences. Choiromyces alveolatus was used as the outgroup taxa. Numbers identify the bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are indicated near branches as BS/PP. Values of BS and PP below 50% are not indicated. The sequences of new species described in this study are bold as indication

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of Tuber elevatireticulatum and related whitish truffles based on the LSU-rDNA sequences. Choiromyces alveolatus was used as the outgroup taxa. Numbers identify the bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are indicated near branches as BS/PP. Values of BS and PP below 50% are not indicated. The sequences of new species described in this study are bold as indication

There has no significant incongruence among ITS and LSU region of ribosomal DNA. Tuber elevatireticulatum is clearly different from other whitish truffles and formed a monophyletic clade with strong bootstrap (BS) and posterior probability (PP) values (1.00/1.00). Based on the ITS analysis, T. elevatireticulatum was placed clearly in the Puberulum clade, within which it formed a subclade with five Asian species, including T. thailandicum, T. pseudosphaerosporum, T. alboumbilicum, T. latisporum, and T. panzhihuanense, with strong branching supports by BS (0.89) and PP (0.99) value. Also included in the Puberulum clade were T. borchii, T. dryophilum, T. oligospermum and T. sphaerospermum from Europe; T. microsphaerosporum, T. sinopuberulum, T. vesicoperidium, T. lijiangense, T. sinosphaerosporum, T. zhongdianense, T. huizeanum, T. liui and T. liyuanum from China; and T. californicum from the USA. These whitish truffle species formed a subclade within the Puberulum clade with strong PP value of 1.00 and was sister to the one where T. elevatireticulatum was placed. The groupings of whitish truffles were similar from those in Kinoshita et al. (2011), Suwannarach et al. (2015) and Bonito and Smith (2016).

Discussion

Tuber elevatireticulatum is distinguished from other whitish truffle species by the only species associated with Keteleeria host, its small light brown ascocarps with a dark brown gleba and brown, ellipsoid ascospores with a prominent raised alveolate reticulum. Phylogenetic analyses clearly placed T. elevatireticulatum among other whitish truffle species in the Puberulum clade as a distinct taxon. Morphologically, truffles belonging to the Puberulum clade tend to have small and light-colored ascocarps, globose to subglobose ascospores with an alveolate-reticulate ornamentation (Bonito and Smith 2016). However, ascospores of T. elevatireticulatum are mostly ellipsoid, resembling those of the species in the Maculatum clade.

Tuber elevatireticulatum clustered in a subclade of the Puberulum group with several Asian whitish truffle species, including T. thailandicum, T. pseudosphaerosporum, T. alboumbilicum, T. panzhihuanense, and T. latisporum (Fig. 2). Tuber elevatireticulatum is similar to T. thailandicum in having a dark brown gleba at maturity, hyphae-like hairs, and the size of alveolae of the reticulum. However, T. thailandicum differs by having a larger ascocarp size (> 2 cm in diam.), a thinner peridium (150–225 µm), shorter hyphae-like hairs (20–63.5 µm), subglobose ascospores with a smaller Q value (1.09 ± 0.08), and larger ascospores in one-ascospored asci (40–65 × 40–62 µm) (Suwannarach et al. 2015). In addition, T. thailandicum is associated with roots of Betula, whereas T. elevatireticulatum is with Keteleeria roots, a host previously unknown to Tuber species. Tuber elevatireticulatum resembles T. pseudosphaerosporum in having light-colored ascocarps with a smooth surface and the same numbers of ascospores in asci but differs from the latter by a smaller ascocarp size, well-developed hyphae-like hairs, larger ellipsoid ascospores, a lower reticulum, and occurrence in a different season (Fan and Yue 2013). Tuber alboumbilicum is different from T. elevatireticulatum by a smaller ascocarp size (< 1 cm), a thinner peridium, and globose ascospores. Tuber panzhihuanense is distinct from T. elevatireticulatum by a dark grey to blackish gleba (Deng et al. 2013). Tuber latisporum is different from T. elevatireticulatum by reddish brown ascocarps, a blackish gleba and larger ascospores (62–93 × 41–74 µm) (Chen and Liu 2007). Beyond this subclade, Tuber sinopuberulum resembles T. elevatireticulatum in having light brown ascocarps with a smooth surface but differs from it in lacking hyphae-like hairs arising from the peridium, a light brown to brown gleba color, and globose ascospores (Fan et al. 2012).

Truffles in general favor dry, alkaline and calcareous soil (Hall et al. 2007), but T. elevatireticulatum was found in an area with a subtropical humid climate, slightly acidic soil of pH 5–6, and relatively high annual rainfall. This phenomenon has also been observed in Asia like Japan (Kinoshita et al. 2011) and Thailand (Suwannarach et al. 2015).

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CLL, HTL and KFW collected, recorded and photographed the Tuber ascomatas, and all the authors prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Experimental Forest, College of Bio-resources and Agriculture, National Taiwan University for assisting specimen collecting. We appreciate Dr. Yu-Ming Ju, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, for suggesting the epithet of Tuber elevatireticulatum; and Dr. Huei-Mei Hsieh for assistance in multi-gene analyses.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. All the experiments undertaken in this study comply with the current laws of Taiwan.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This study is supported by the Council of Agriculture, Taiwan, under Grant No. 106AS-11.1.5-Fl-G2 to C-H Fu.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Watershed Management, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, COA, Taipei, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
(3)
The Experimental Forest, National Taiwan University, Nantou County, Taiwan
(4)
Division of Forest Protection, Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, COA, Taipei, Taiwan
(5)
Tianroei Limited Company, Taipei, Taiwan
(6)
Advance Plant Protection Limited Company, Hsinchu, Taiwan

References

  1. Alvarado P, Moreno G, Manjón JL (2012) Comparison between Tuber gennadii and T. oligospermum lineages reveals the existence of the new species T. cistophilum (Tuberaceae, Pezizales). Mycologia 104(4):894–910. https://doi.org/10.3852/11-254 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Belfiori B, Riccioni C, Paolocci F, Rubini A (2016) Characterization of the reproductive mode and life cycle of the whitish truffle T. borchii. Mycorrhiza 26(6):515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0689-0 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berch SM, Bonito G (2016) Truffle diversity (Tuber, Tuberaceae) in British Columbia. Mycorrhiza 26(6):587–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0695-2 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonito GM, Smith ME (2016) General systematic position of the truffles: evolutionary theories. In: Zambonelli A, Lotti M, Murat C (eds) True truffle (Tuber spp.) in the world—soil ecology, systematics and biochemistry. Springer International Publishing, Basel, pp 3–18View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonito GM, Gryganskyi AP, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R (2010a) A global meta-analysis of Tuber ITS rDNA sequences: species diversity, host associations and long-distance dispersal. Mol Ecol 19:4994–5008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04855.x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonito GM, Trappe JM, Rawlinson P, Vilgalys R (2010b) Improved resolution of major clades within Tuber and taxonomy of species within the Tuber gibbosum complex. Mycologia 102(5):1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.3852/09-213 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonito G, Smith ME, Nowak M, Healy RA, Guevara G, Cázares E, Kinoshita A, Nouhra ER, Domínguez LS, Tedersoo L, Murat C, Wang Y, Moreno BA, Pfister DH, Nara K, Zambonelli A, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R (2013) Historical biogeography and diversification of truffles in the Tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS ONE 8(1):e52765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052765 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonuso E, Zambonelli A, Bergemann SE, Iotti M, Garbelotto M (2010) Multilocus phylogenetic and coalescent analyses identify two cryptic species in the Italian bianchetto truffle, Tuber borchii Vittad. Conserv Genet 11(4):1453–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9972-3 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 71:540–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen J, Liu PG (2007) Tuber latisporum sp. nov. and related taxa, based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycologia 99:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2007.11832572 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Deng XJ, Liu PG, Liu CY, Wang Y (2013) A new white truffle species, Tuber panzhihuanense from China. Mycol Prog 12:557–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0862-6 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan L, Cao JZ (2013) Two new species of white truffle from China. Mycotaxon 121(1):297–304. https://doi.org/10.5248/121.297 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan L, Yue SF (2013) Phylogenetic divergence of three morphologically similar truffles: Tuber sphaerosporum, T. sinosphaerosporum, and T. pseudosphaerosporum sp. nov. Mycotaxon 125:283–288. https://doi.org/10.5248/125.283 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan L, Cao JZ, Liu YY, Li Y (2011) Two new species of Tuber from China. Mycotaxon 116(1):349–354. https://doi.org/10.5248/116.349 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan L, Cao JZ, Yu J (2012) Tuber in China: Tuber sinopuberulum and T. vesicoperidium spp. nov. Mycotaxon 122:255–263. https://doi.org/10.5248/121.255 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan L, Hou CL, Li Y (2013a) Tuber microverrucosum and T. huizeanum two new species from China with reticulate ascospores. Mycotaxon 122(1):161–169. https://doi.org/10.5248/122.161 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan L, Cao JZ, Yu J (2013b) Tuber in China: T. sinopuberulum and T. vesicoperidium spp. nov. Mycotaxon 121(1):255–263. https://doi.org/10.5248/121.255 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan L, Cao JZ, Li Y (2013c) Tuber sinosphaerosporum sp. nov. from China. Mycotaxon 122(1):347–353. https://doi.org/10.5248/122.347 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Fan L, Liu X, Cao J (2015) Tuber turmericum sp. nov., a Chinese truffle species based on morphological and molecular data. Mycol Prog 14(11):111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1134-z View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fan L, Han L, Zhang PR, Xiang-yuan Yan XY (2016a) Molecular analysis of Chinese truffles resembling Tuber californicum in morphology reveals a rich pattern of species diversity with emphasis on four new species. Mycologia 108(2):344–353View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan L, Zhang PR, Yan XY, Li Y (2016b) Phylogenetic analyses of Chinese Tuber species that resemble T. borchii reveal the existence of the new species T. hubeiense and T. wumengense. Mycologia 108(2):354–362View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Guevara G, Bonito J, Trappe JM, Cazares E, Williams G, Healy R, Schadt C, Vilgalys R (2013) New North American truffles (Tuber spp) and their ectomycorrhizal associations. Mycologia 105(1):194–209. https://doi.org/10.3852/12-087 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall IR, Brown GT, Zambonelli A (2007) Taming the truffle: the history, lore, and science of the ultimate mushroom. Timber Press, London, p 304pGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu HT (1987) Studies on the symbiotic relationship between truffles and trees (I) mycorrhiza-synthesized experiments. Q J Exp For 1:1–6Google Scholar
  26. Hu HT (1992) Tuber formosanum sp.nov. and its mycorrhizal associations. Q J Exp For 6:79–86Google Scholar
  27. Hu HT, Wang Y (2005) Tuber furfuraceum sp. nov. from Taiwan. Mycotaxon 93:155–157Google Scholar
  28. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kinoshita A, Sasaki H, Nara K (2011) Phylogeny and diversity of Japanese truffles (Tuber spp.) inferred from sequences of four nuclear loci. Mycologia 103:779–794. https://doi.org/10.3852/10-138 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kinoshita A, Sasaki H, Nara K (2016) Two new truffle species, Tuber japonicum and Tuber flavidosporum spp. nov. found from Japan. Mycoscience 57:366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2016.06.006 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lancellotti E, Lotti M, Zambonelli A, Franceschini A (2016) The Puberulum group sensu lato (whitish truffles). In: Zambonelli A, Lotti M, Murat C (eds) True truffle (Tuber spp.) in the world—soil ecology, systematics and biochemistry. Springer International Publishing, Basel, pp 105–124View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Li SH, Zheng LY, Liu CY, Wang Y, Li L, Zhao YC, Zhang XL, Yang M, Xiong HK, Qing Y, Wang L, Zhou DQ (2014) Two new truffles species, Tuber alboumbilicum and Tuber pseudobrumale from China. Mycol Prog 13(4):1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-014-1004-0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Marjanović Z, Grebenc T, Aleksa G, Miroslav M, Miroljub M (2010) Ecological specificities and molecular diversity of truffles (genus Tuber) originating from mid-west of the Balkan Peninsula. Sydowia 62(1):67–87Google Scholar
  34. Qiao P, Liu PG, Hu HT, Wang Y (2013) Typification of Tuber formosanum (Tuberaceae, Pezizales, Ascomycota) from Taiwan, China. Mycotaxon 123:293–299. https://doi.org/10.5248/123.293 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Qing Y, Li SH, Liu CY, Li L, Yang M, Zhang XL, Wang Y (2015) Tuber xanthomonosporum, a new Paradoxa-like species from China. Mycotaxon 130(1):61–68. https://doi.org/10.5248/130.61 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rambaut A (2014) FigTree v1.4.3 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. Accessed 4 Oct 2016
  37. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61(3):539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Rehner SA, Samuels GJ (1994) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 98(6):625–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80409-7 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Lumyong S (2015) A new whitish truffle, Tuber thailandicum from northern Thailand and its ectomycorrhizal association. Mycol Prog 14:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1107-2 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197 View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor DL, Bruns TD (1999) Community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Pinus muricata forest: minimal overlap between the mature forest and resistant propagule communities. Mol Ecol 8(11):1837–1850. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00773.x View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriology 172(8):4238–4246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement