Skip to main content

Effect of different mycobionts on symbiotic germination and seedling growth of Dendrobium officinale, an important medicinal orchid



Orchids maintain a symbiotic relationship with mycorrhizal fungi in the lifecycle. Previous reports indicated that diverse mycobionts may have different roles during orchid growth and development. Although various mycorrhizal fungi have been isolated from Dendrobium roots and protocorms, little is known about their specific effects on seed germination and seedling growth. To understand the specific role of isolated fungal strains (i.e., Tulasnella and Sebacina), we used symbiotic culture to compare the effect of 6 fungal strains on seed germination and seedling growth of Dendrobium officinale, an important Chinese medicinal orchid.


In symbiotic germination tests, 6 fungal strains (4 Tulasnella strains and 2 Sebacina strains) promoted seed germination with different efficiencies. Seeds inoculated with Tulasnella strains S6 and S7 conferred higher germination percentage and faster protocorm development than other fungal strains. In symbiotic cultures, seedlings inoculated with Sebacina strain S3 had optimal fresh and dry matter yield. Also, Tulasnella strains S6 and S7 promoted seedling growth with good fresh and dry matter yield. Sebacina strain S2 inoculation greatly enhanced root and tiller production and the content of total crude polysaccharides, although seedlings were smaller with less fresh and dry matter yield than other seedlings.


Tulasnella and Sebacina strains could promote seed germination and seedling growth of D. officinale with different efficiencies. Our results suggest a non-specific mycorrhizal association and development-dependent preference. Our data provide the basic knowledge for use of different fungal strains in conservation and/or production practices of D. officinale.


A common example of widespread mutualism is the association of mycorrhiza and land plants, whereby fungi retrieve mineral nutrition in the soil and pass it back to plants and plants contribute the products of photosynthesis to fungi (Smith and Read 2008). In orchids, a compatible mycorrhizal association is a requirement for seed germination under natural conditions (Rasmussen 1995). During seed germination and early growth of protocorms, mineral nutrients are transferred from fungi to the orchid, a phenomenon known as “mycoheterotrophy” (Leake 1994). After successful infection, fungal hyphae coil and form pelotons within the cortical cells (Smith and Read 2008). Afterward, the pelotons senesce and collapse to release nutrients in orchid cells (Kuga et al. 2014). The formation and degradation of pelotons play a key role in the exchange and absorption of nutrients between an orchid and its mycorrhizal fungus (Dearnaley and Cameron 2017; Fochi et al. 2017).

Most green orchids form mycorrhizae with polyphyletic Rhizoctonia-like fungi, including Tulasnella, Ceratobasidium, Thanatephorus and Sebacina clade B (Dearnaley et al. 2012). Orchids may have high specificity in their fungal partners; an example is mycoheterotrophic orchids (Leake 1994; Bidartondo 2005) such as Corallorhiza striata complex (Barrett et al. 2010) and Hexalectris (Kennedy et al. 2011). In contrast, other orchids may associate with diverse sets of fungal partners; for example, Cypripedium californicum associates with Tulasnellaceae, Ceratobasidiaceae, and Sebacinales (Shefferson et al. 2007). Moreover, Tulasnellaceae, Thelephoraceae, Ceratobasidiaceae, Sebacinales, Russulaceae and Clavulinaceae were detected in Cymbidium goeringii and Cymbidium lancifolium (Ogura-Tsujita et al. 2012). Also, a succession of fungal colonization over the orchid life cycle occurs; for example, Gastrodia elata, a mycoheterotrophic orchid, needs Mycena for seed germination, but subsequent colonization by Armillaria is required for the orchid’s further development (Xu and Mu 1990). Although orchids are colonized by different fungi, not all colonized fungi have the same effect on the growth and development of orchids. In Vanilla, different mycorrhizal fungal isolates from roots had dissimilar effects on growth and survival (Porras-Alfaro and Bayman, 2007). In Dendrobium, Tulasnella isolated from D. aphyllum protocorms could stimulate germination, but Trichoderma could not improve germination (Zi et al. 2014).

Dendrobium officinale, one of the most important Dendrobium species in China, has long been used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat chronic diseases (Pharmacopoeia Committee of the P. R. China 2005). Previous investigations showed various fungal mycobionts identified in and/or isolated from roots or protocorms of medicinal Dendrobium species (Chen et al. 2012; Tan et al. 2014; Zi et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017), which suggests no high specificity in the fungal association. However, the roles of various fungal strains isolated from Dendrobium species have never been tested systematically with controlled in vitro culture methods.

To understand the effects of various fungal strains on ontogenetic stages in orchid, we compared the effect of 6 fungal strains of Tulasnella and Sebacina on symbiotic germination and tested their ability to promote seedling growth by examining the growth rate and crude polysaccharides content. Knowledge of mycorrhizal association in medicinal Dendrobium species would be helpful for propagation, commercial cultivation and conservation.


Plant materials

Plants of D. officinale were maintained in a plantation in Jinhua, Zhejiang, China. At the time of anthesis, in March, flowers were hand-pollinated, and mature capsules were collected just before dehiscence, in November, for the following experiments. In total, 10 capsules were collected for experiments.

Fungal strains for symbiotic cultures

In our laboratory, we have developed efficient methods for fungal isolation from D. officinale protocorms and roots (Li et al. 2018a). In this study, Sebacina strains S2 and S3 were isolated from mycorrhizal protocorms by the technique of in situ seed baiting in the natural habitat in Yunnan Province of Southwestern China, and Tulasnella strains S4, S5, S6 and S7 were isolated from roots of mature plants in the same area. These fungal strains were maintained in our laboratory and deposited at the microbiological center of the Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (see Additional file 1: Table S1). Before symbiotic culture, fungal strains were inoculated on potato dextrose agar medium (potato 200 g L−1, glucose 20 g L−1, agar 12 g L−1, pH 5.2 before autoclaving) according to the procedure by Li et al. (2018b) in darkness at 25 ± 1 °C for 7 days. The actively growing mycelia from the colony margin were used as the fungal inoculum in subsequent symbiotic cultures.

Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis

DNA was extracted from pure mycelium cultures of fungi by using the Rapid Plant Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the fungal nuclear rRNA gene was amplified with the primer pairs ITS1F/ITS4R (ITS1F: 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′; ITS1R: 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) (White et al. 1990; Gardes and Bruns 1993). The PCR amplification was initial denaturing at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 1 min each, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and final extension for 5 min at 72 °C. Sequences were identified by a BLAST search against the NCBI sequence database (GenBank). For phylogenetic analysis, other ITS sequences of Tulasnella and Sebacina from various orchids were obtained from GenBank. The sequence of Armillaria sinapina was used as the outgroup. DNA sequences were aligned by using the ClustalW algorithm in MEGA 7.01, followed by manual adjustment. Distance trees were obtained by using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (Saitou and Nei 1987) with a Tajima-Nei method. For assessing relative robustness for branches, the bootstrap method was used with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein 1985).

Symbiotic germination

Before sowing seeds, oat meal agar medium (OMA: oat 4 g L−1, agar 8 g L−1, pH 5.2 before autoclaving) placed in a 9-cm diameter Petri dish was inoculated with 4 pieces of fungal inoculum for each fungal strain, then Petri dishes were placed in darkness at 25 ± 1 °C for 7 days as described by Li et al. (2018a, b). Capsules were rinsed under tap water for 10 min and surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 60 s, followed by immersion in 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 15 min. After rinsing 3 times with sterile water, capsules were cut and opened to remove seeds. About 200 seeds were sown onto the surface of OMA medium in each Petri dish. 12 replicates (Petri dishes) were used for each fungal treatment. Petri dishes without fungal inoculum were the control. After inoculation, the exact number of seeds of each dish was counted under a stereomicroscope. The cultures were placed in a growth room under a 12/12-h light/dark photoperiod at 30 μmol m−2 s−1 (daylight fluorescent tubes FL-20D/18, 20W) at 25 ± 1 °C.

Symbiotic culture of seedlings

To compare the effect of different fungal strains on seedling growth in symbiotic culture, young seedlings were obtained from asymbiotic culture before inoculation. Mature seeds were removed from capsules and placed onto modified Murashige and Skoog medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962), containing half-strength macroelements with full-strength microelements, vitamins, and amino acids and supplemented with 20 g L−1 potato homogenate, and 20 g L−1 sucrose, and solidified with 7 g L−1 agar. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.7 with 1 N NaOH solution before autoclaving at 101.33 kPa and 121 °C for 20 min. The cultures were placed in the growth room under a 12/12-h photoperiod at 25 ± 1 °C as described previously. After 6 months of sowing, seedlings about 3 cm tall were selected for symbiotic culture.

For symbiotic culture of seedlings, OMA medium combined with H1 basal salts (200 mg L−1 Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 100 mg L−1 KCl, 200 mg L−1 KH2PO4, 100 mg L−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 100 mg L−1 yeast extract, 2 g L−1 sucrose) described by Rasmussen (1995) was used. Each glass bottle (9 cm diameter, 12.5 cm tall) contained 125 mL culture medium, and pH was adjusted to 5.7 before autoclaving. Before symbiotic cultures of seedlings, each glass bottle was inoculated with 4 pieces (0.5 cm3) of fungal inoculum. As the hyphae had spread over the surface of culture medium, uniform seedlings (450 mg fresh weight, single shoot of 3 cm tall with 5 roots) from asymbiotic cultures were selected and transferred to glass bottles; 12 replicates (glass bottles) were used, and each glass bottle contained 6 seedlings for each fungal treatment. After 3 months of symbiotic culture, the fresh weight, dry weight, shoot number and root number of each seedling were recorded. Glass bottles without fungal inoculum were the control. Symbiotic cultures were placed in the growth room under a 12/12-h photoperiod at 25 ± 1 °C as described previously.

Histological and histochemical observations

Developing mycorrhizal protocorms were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) for 4 h at room temperature and dehydrated with an ethanol series, then embedded in Technovit 7100 resin (Kulzer and Co., Wertheim, Germany) according to Yeung and Chan (2015). Serial, 3-μm-thick sections were cut and stained with Periodic acid–Schiff reaction for total insoluble carbohydrates, then counterstained with 0.05% (w/v) toluidine blue O (TBO) for general histology. Sections were observed under a light microscope (Axio ImagerA1, Carl Zeiss AG) and the images were captured digitally by using a CCD camera. For fungal hyphae staining, mycorrhizal protocorms were fixed as described above. Subsequently, samples were washed with 1× PBS (pH 7.4) for 3 times for 10 min, then incubated at room temperature for 90 min in 1× PBS containing the chitin-specific dye WGA-FITC at 10 μg L−1 (Molecular Probes, Karlsruhe, Germany). After a washing with 1x PBS for 3 times for 10 min, samples were mounted on glass slides and observed under a confocal microscope (LSM510, Carl Zeiss, Germany) with a 488-nm laser line and detected at 505–540 nm.

Measurement of polysaccharides content

Polysaccharides were extracted as described (Wang et al. 2018) with minor modification. Seedling stems were dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. Dried stems were ground into a fine powder and sieved through a 40-mesh sieve. Each ground sample of 20 mg was placed into a 2-mL centrifuge tube with 440 μL distilled water for about 2 h, then extraction was performed at 63 °C for 18 min in a KH5200DE ultrasonic instrument (Kunshan Hechuang Ultrasonic Machinery Co., Jiangsu, China). The extraction process was repeated 3 times, and supernatants were combined. The water extract was precipitated with 4volumes of absolute ethanol, kept at 4 °C for 24 h, then centrifuged at 5180×g at 4 °C for 20 min. The precipitate was precipitated in 80% ethanol, then dissolved in 1 mL water. After mixing, 100 μL polysaccharide aqueous solution and 1.9 mL water were added into a plugged test tube, then 1 mL of 5% phenol solution and 5 mL concentrated sulfuric acid were successively added to the same test tube. The test tube was placed into a boiling water bath for 20 min. After cooling, colorimetric determination was measured at 490 nm by using the EnSpire® Multimode Plate Reader (PerkinElmer, USA). Standard glucose at 99.9% (CAS: 50-99-7) was purchased from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (Beijing), with glucose solutions (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 and 150 μg mL−1) as standards. The linear regression equation was y = 6.9023x + 0.0824 (R2 = 0.9993). The content of polysaccharides in each sample (Y) was calculated as follows:

$$ {\text{Y}} = \frac{{{\text{Cs }} \times {\text{V }} \times {\text{D}}}}{\text{M}} \times 100 $$

where Y is the content of crude polysaccharides (mg/100 mg), Cs is the concentration of glucose in the tested sample solution (μg mL−1), V is volume of the tested sample solution (mL), D is the dilution multiple of sample solution, and M is the sample weight (mg).

Experimental design and data analysis

In symbiotic germination experiments, each Petri dish was observed and recorded under a stereomicroscope every 2 weeks after sowing. Germination and developmental stages of protocorms were defined and scored according to Stewart et al. (2003). Germination was defined as emergence of the embryo from the seed coat. All experiments (i.e., symbiotic cultures of seed germination and seedlings) were arranged in a completely randomized design. The data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mean separation was performed by Fisher’s protected least significant difference test (P < 0.05) using SPSS 22.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).


The effect of fungal strains on symbiotic germination

The results of phylogenetic analysis indicated that 6 isolated Rhizoctonia-like fungal strains were clustered with Tulasnellaceae and Sebacinales (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Table S1). According to molecular and morphological data, 4 Tulasnella and 2 Sebacina strains were identified. The cultures of Tulasnella strains S4, S5, S6 and S7 showed creamy white colonies, whereas those of Sebacina strains S2 and S3 exhibited yellowish white colonies. With the fungal strains S3, S6 and S7, growth was rapid on potato dextrose agar medium at 25 ± 1 °C, but with strains S2, S4 and S5, growth was slower (Additional file 2: Figure S1).

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic relationships of the fungal strains used in this study based on neighbor-joining analysis of internal transcribed spacer rDNA sequences of Tulasnellaceae and Sebacinales available in GenBank. Bootstrap values (calculated from 1000 re-samplings) > 70% are shown at branches. Armillaria sinapina was the outgroup

In the symbiotic germination experiments, the 4 Tulasnella and 2 Sebacina strains could induce seed germination (Fig. 2a). After 1 week of inoculation, embryos had become swollen, and fungal hyphae congregated at the suspensor end of embryos (Fig. 2b). At this stage, minor seed coat rupture was observed. After 2 weeks of inoculation, embryos continued to enlarge, which resulted in a major rupture of the seed coat (Fig. 2c). Fungal hyphae had colonized primarily in the outer and inner cells at the basal part (the suspensor end) of protocorms and formed the intracellular pelotons (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2

Symbiotic cultures of D. officinale seeds and seedlings. a Symbiotic seed germination of D. officinale seeds. Protocorms ruptured the seed coats and turned green. Scale bar = 10 mm. b Fungal staining using WGA-FITC (green) showing fungal hyphae (arrowhead) aggregated and penetrating the suspensor end of embryo. Bar = 40 µm. c Longitudinal section of a developing protocorm showing fungal hyphae (arrowhead) colonizing the basal cortical cells of an enlarged embryo. Scale bar = 50 µm. d Longitudinal section of a seedling root showing fungal hyphae (arrowheads) colonizing the epidermis (e) and cortical cells (c). Scale bar = 15 µm

The 6 fungal strains had the potential to promote seed germination at different efficiencies (Fig. 3) and to different developing protocorm stages (Table 1, Additional file 3: Figure S2). In the control (asymbiotic OMA), seeds became swollen, with rupture of the seed coat (stage 2), but no further embryo development occurred. After 5 weeks of inoculation, seeds inoculated with Tulasnella strains S6 and S7 showed higher germination rate than the other fungal strains (Table 1). However, by 9 weeks of inoculation, seeds inoculated with S7 had more protocorms reach stage 5 than those inoculated with S6 (Table 1). Seeds inoculated with Sebacina strains S2 and S3 and Tulasnella strain S4 showed a similar germination rate. In contrast, seeds inoculated with Tulasnella strain S5 had a slower germination rate than the other fungal strains, and the development of protocorms reached only stage 3 by 15 weeks of inoculation.

Fig. 3

Germination rate of D. officinale seeds inoculated with different fungal strains. After 1 week of inoculation, germination was recorded for each treatment every 2 weeks. Data are mean ± SE (n = 3)

Table 1 Effect of fungal strains on seed germination and protocorm development of D. officinale at 15 weeks of inoculation

The effect of fungal strains on seedling growth in symbiotic cultures

Light microscopy revealed that all fungal strains formed a symbiotic association with D. officinale seedlings, as evidenced by the presence of pelotons in the cortical region of roots (Fig. 2d). Growth of D. officinale seedlings differed greatly with the fungal inoculations (Fig. 4). Seedlings inoculated with Sebacina strain S3 showed optimal fresh and dry matter yield. Also, seedlings inoculated with Tulasnella strains S6 or S7 showed good fresh and dry matter yield (Fig. 4). Number of roots and tillers produced was significantly greater with Sebacina strain S2 inoculation, although the seedlings were smaller and accumulated relatively little fresh and dry matter (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4

Effect of fungal strains on seedling growth of D. officinale at 15 weeks after inoculation. Change in a fresh weight, b dry weight, c root number, and d tiller number. Data are mean ± SE. Different letters above bars are significantly different at P < 0.05 (Fisher’s protected least significant difference test)

The content of crude polysaccharides in stems

Polysaccharides accumulation in stems was higher in all mycorrhizal seedlings than in the control without fungal inoculation (Fig. 5). Among the fungal strains tested, inoculation with the Sebacina strain S2 conferred the highest polysaccharides content.

Fig. 5

Effect of fungal strains on total crude polysaccharides content in stems of D. officinale at 15 weeks after inoculation. Data are mean ± SE. Different letters above bars are significantly different at P < 0.05 (Fisher’s protected least significant difference test)


Most green orchids are known to associate with fungi from the polyphyletic rhizoctonia group, with its different clades such as Serendipitaceae (Sebacinales), Tulasnellaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae (Batty et al. 2006; Valadares et al. 2011). The mycorrhizal association of orchids could be compatible with several fungal groups or be highly specific for a narrow group of fungi (Otero et al. 2002; Ma et al. 2003; McCormick et al. 2004; Shefferson et al. 2005; Suárez et al. 2006). Fungus isolated from a peloton in adult orchid roots and its role as a seed germination symbiont cannot been ascertained until the results of symbiotic germination are known (Hoang et al. 2017). Furthermore, the non-compatible fungi may stimulate orchid seed germination, but they could not support subsequent seedling development (Rasmussen et al. 2015). In Dendrobium species, various fungal symbionts such as Cantharellaceae, Sebacinales and Tulasnellaceae are present in the protocorm and roots of adult plants (Chen et al. 2012). In the report by Tan et al. (2014), the ITS sequence of an efficient Tulasnella strain JC-02 in promoting seed germination of D. officinale is identical to Tulasnella strains S6 in this study, suggesting this efficient fungal strain may be dominant in wild Dendrobium populations. In previous reports, Sebacina strains could stimulate seed germination and further protocorm development of D. nobile and D. officinale (Wang et al. 2011; Zhao et al. 2013). In this study, the results of symbiotic germination revealed that D. officinale is compatible with different Tulasnella and Sebacina fungal strains for seed germination (Table 1; Fig. 3), although the efficiency of the strains differs. While Tulasnella strains S4 and S5 are not close related to Tulasnella strains S6 and S7 (Fig. 1), they could stimulate seed germination and protocorm formation to stage 2 or 3 after 15 weeks of inoculation. Although they are not as effective as Tulasnella strains S6 and S7, a few seedlings were observed by 30 weeks of inoculation (data not shown). Our data suggest a non-specific fungal association (at least two different fungal clades, i.e. Sebacinales and Tulasnellaceae, Fig. 1) during germination in D. officinale.

In the present study, the mycobionts strains tested had different effects on growth and development of seedlings (Fig. 4). Although Sebacina strain S3 had little effect on seed germination, it significantly improved the growth of seedlings (i.e., optimal fresh and dry matter yield) (Figs. 4a, b). In orchids, mycorrhizal symbionts may switch in different developmental stages (McCormick et al. 2004; Rafter et al. 2016). Previous studies have demonstrated that compatible fungi for promoting seed germination may not be able to support subsequent seedling development (Bidartondo and Read 2008; Huynh et al. 2009; Rasmussen et al. 2015). Inoculation with Sebacina strain S2 greatly improved the number of roots and tillers of seedlings (Fig. 4c, d) but had little effect on yield of fresh and dry matter (Fig. 4a, b). The changes in plant growth pattern (i.e., dwarfism, multiple shoots and roots) after inoculation with Sebacina strain S2 may be attributed to hormonal compounds derived from mycorrhizal fungus. The production of plant hormones by symbiotic fungi can affect the growth and development of host plants (Hirsch et al. 1997). Further research into plant hormones produced by mycorrhizal fungi would provide insights into the growth and development of Dendrobium seedlings in symbiotic cultures.

Both Sebacina strains S2 and S3 were unable to support post-germination development beyond stage 3 by 15 weeks of inoculation (Table 1). In adult orchids, different fungal strains could be isolated from the same single peloton or from the same single root (Kristiansen et al. 2001; Raleigh et al. 2001; McKendrick et al. 2002; Taylor et al. 2003; Bougoure et al. 2005). Under natural conditions, the broadening and/or switch of a mycorrhizal association may enable orchids to adapt to the varied physiological changes during seedling development, including the switch to partial or full autotrophy, an increase in transpiration, or environmental fluctuations (Těšitelová et al. 2012).

The crude polysaccharides, the non-starch, hetero-polysaccharides, have been considered the main indicative ingredients in medicinal Dendrobium species (Meng et al. 2013; Dave and Shah 2015). Our data show a significant effect on the accumulation of crude polysaccharides in mycorrhizal seedlings of D. officinale as compared with the control (Fig. 5). Increased crude polysaccharides content has been reported in seedlings of D. nobile after fungal inoculation (Li et al. 2017). Moreover, we found a diverse effect on the growth and crude polysaccharides content of seedlings with different fungal treatments. Although conferring less fresh and dry matter yield, inoculation with Sebacina strain S2 resulted in the highest crude polysaccharides content as compared with other Sebacina and Tulasnella strains. Seedlings inoculated with Sebacina strain S3 had optimal fresh and dry matter yield and also relatively high crude polysaccharides content (about 21.6% less than S2). Fungal elicitors were found to affect the accumulation of active ingredients in medical plants by changing the expression of specific genes involved in secondary metabolite biosynthesis (Zhai et al. 2017).

Tulasnella strains S6 or S7 could stimulate seed germination and also support the growth of seedlings (Fig. 4a, b). For Drakaea, a single mycorrhizal symbiont could support growth from the protocorm to seedling and adult stages (Phillips et al. 2011). In the conservation or production practices of D. officinale, inoculation with Tulasnella strains S6 or S7 for all developing stages may simplify the operation. In terms of medicinal plant production, the addition of Sebacina strains S2 or S3 to young seedlings may increase crude polysaccharides content or fresh and dry matter yield.


The present study demonstrates that for symbiotic germination, D. officinale is compatible with Tulasnella and Sebacina strains, thereby suggesting a non-specific mycorrhizal association. Seedlings inoculated with Sebacina strains S2 and S3 showed optimal crude polysaccharides content and fresh and dry matter yield, respectively, although with little effect on seed germination. These fungal strains tested in symbiotic cultures have different effects on growth and development of seedlings, which suggests development-dependent specificity. Our data provide basic knowledge of use of different fungal strains in conservation and/or production practices.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. Barrett CF, Freudenstein JV, Taylor DL, Kõljalg U (2010) Range wide analysis of fungal associations in the fully mycoheterotrophic Corallorhiza striata complex (Orchidaceae) reveals extreme specificity on ectomycorrhizal Tomentella (Thelephoraceae) across North America. Am J Bot 97:628–643

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Batty AL, Brundrett MC, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2006) New methods to improve symbiotic propagation of temperate terrestrial orchid seedlings from axenic culture to soil. Aust J Bot 54:367–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bidartondo MI (2005) The evolutionary ecology of mycoheterotrophy. New Phytol 167:335–352

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bidartondo MI, Read DJ (2008) Fungal specificity bottlenecks during orchid germination and development. Mol Ecol 17:3707–3716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bougoure JJ, Bougoure DS, Cairney JW, Dearnaley JD (2005) ITS-RFLP and sequence analysis of endophytes from Acianthus, Caladenia and Pterostylis (Orchidaceae) in southeastern Queensland. Mycol Res 109:452–460

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J, Wang H, Guo SX (2012) Isolation and identification of endophytic and mycorrhizal fungi from seeds and roots of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). Mycorrhiza 22:297–307

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dave DT, Shah GB (2015) Pharmacological potential of naturally occurring non-starch polysaccharides (NSP). J Phytopharmacol 4:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dearnaley JD, Cameron DD (2017) Nitrogen transport in the orchid mycorrhizal symbiosis-further evidence for a mutualistic association. New Phytol 213:10–12

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dearnaley JDW, Martos F, Selosse MA (2012) Orchid mycorrhizas: molecular ecology, physiology, evolution and conservation aspects. In: Hock B (ed) Fungal association. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fochi V, Chitarra W, Kohler A, Voyron S, Singan VR, Lindquist EA, Barry KW, Girlanda M, Grigoriev IV, Martin F, Balestrini R, Perotto S (2017) Fungal and plant gene expression in the Tulasnella calospora-Serapias vomeracea symbiosis provides clues about nitrogen pathways in orchid mycorrhizas. New Phytol 213:365–379

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsch AM, Fang Y, Asad S, Kapulnik Y (1997) The role of phytohormones in plant-microbe symbioses. Plant Soil 194:171–184

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoang NH, Kane ME, Radcliffe EN, Zettler LW, Richardson LW (2017) Comparative seed germination and seedling development of the ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae), and molecular identification of its mycorrhizal fungus from South Florida. Ann Bot 119:379–393

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huynh TT, Thomson R, Mclean CB, Lawrie AC (2009) Functional and genetic diversity of mycorrhizal fungi from single plants of Caladenia formosa (Orchidaceae). Ann Bot 104:757–765

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy AH, Tatlor DL, Watson LE (2011) Mycorrhizal specificity in the fully mycoheterotrophic Hexalectris Raf. (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae). Mol Ecol 20:1303–1316

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kristiansen KA, Rasmussen FN, Rasmussen HN (2001) Seedlings of Neuwiedia (Orchidaceae subfamily Apostasioideae) have typical orchidaceous mycotrophic protocorms. Am J Bot 88:956–959

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuga U, Sakamoto N, Yurimoto H (2014) Stable isotope imaging reveals that both live and degenerating fungal pelotons transfer carbon and nitrogen to orchid protocorms. New Phytol 202:594–605

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leake JR (1994) The biology of myco-heterotrophic (‘saprophytic’) plants. New Phytol 127:171–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Q, Li B, Zhou LS, Ding G, Li B, Guo SX (2017) Molecular analysis of polysaccharide accumulation in Dendrobium nobile infected with the mycorrhizal fungus Mycena sp. RSC Advances 7:25872–25884

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li YY, Chen XM, Zhang Y, Cho YH, Wang AR, Yeung EC, Zeng X, Guo SX, Lee YI (2018a) Immunolocalization and changes of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins during symbiotic germination of Dendrobium officinale. Front Plant Sci 9:552

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li YY, Wang H, Guo SX (2018b) Protocols for establishing fungi-protocorm culture. In: Lee YI, Yeung ECT (eds) Orchid propagation: from laboratories to greenhouses—methods and protocols. Springer protocols handbooks. Humana Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma M, Tan TK, Wong SM (2003) Identification and molecular phylogeny of Epulorhiza isolates from tropical orchids. Mycol Res 107:1041–1049

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. McCormick MK, Whigham DF, O’Neill J (2004) Mycorrhizal diversity in photosynthetic terrestrial orchids. New Phytol 163:425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McKendrick SL, Leake JR, Taylor DL, Read DJ (2002) Symbiotic germination and development of the myco-heterotrophic orchid Neottia nidus-avis in nature and its requirement for locally distributed Sebacina spp. New Phytol 154:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meng LZ, Lv GP, Hu DJ, Cheong KL, Xie J, Zhao J, Li SP (2013) Effects of polysaccharides from different species of Dendrobium (Shihu) on macrophage function. Molecules 18:5779–5791

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ogura-Tsujita Y, Yokoyama J, Miyoshi K, Yukawa T (2012) Shifts in mycorrhizal fungi during the evolution of autotrophy to mycoheterotrophy in Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 99:1158–1176

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Otero JT, Ackerman JD, Bayman P (2002) Diversity and host specificity of endophytic Rhizoctonia-like fungi from tropical orchids. Am J Bot 89:1852–1858

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pharmacopoeia Committee of the P. R. China (2005) Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, vol 1. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  31. Phillips RD, Brown AP, Dixon KW, Hopper SD (2011) Orchid biogeography and factors associated with rarity in a biodiversity hotspot, the Southwest Australian floristic region. J Biogeogr 38:487–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Porras-Alfaro A, Bayman P (2007) Mycorrhizal fungal of Vanilla: diversity, specificity and effects on seed germination and plant growth. Mycologla 99:510–525

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rafter M, Yokoya K, Schofield EJ, Zettler LW, Sarasan V (2016) Non-specific symbiotic germination of Cynorkis purpurea (Thouars) Kraezl., a habitat-specific terrestrial orchid from the Central Highlands of Madagascar. Mycorrhiza 26:541–552

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Raleigh RE, Cross RG, Lawrie AC, Coates F, Moorrees ACA (2001) Research into the propagation of eastern Australian Caladenia. In: Barrett RL, Dixon KW (eds) Book of extended abstracts: proceedings from the first international Orchid conservation congress. Plant Conservation Association Inc., London, p 115

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rasmussen HN (1995) Terrestrial orchids-from seed to mycotrophic plant. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rasmussen HN, Dixon KW, Jersáková J, Těšitelová T (2015) Germination and seedling establishment in orchids: a complex of requirements. Ann Bot 116:391–402

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shefferson RP, Weiß M, Kull T, Taylor DL (2005) High specificity generally characterizes mycorrhizal association in rare lady’s slipper orchids, genus Cypripedium. Mol Ecol 14:613–626

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shefferson RP, Taylor DL, Weiss M, Garnica S, McCormick MK, Adams S, Gray HM, McFarland JW, Kull T, Tali K, Yukawa T, Kawahara T, Miyoshi K, Lee YI (2007) The evolutionary history of mycorrhizal specificity among lady’s slipper orchids. Evolution 61:1380–1390

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stewart SL, Zettler LW, Minso J, Brown PW (2003) Symbiotic germination and reintroduction of Spiranthes brevilabris Lindley, an endangered orchid native to Florida. Selbyana 24:64–70

    Google Scholar 

  42. Suárez JP, Weiß M, Abele A, Garnica S, Oberwinkler F, Kottke I (2006) Diverse tulasnelloid fungi form mycorrhizas with epiphytic orchids in an Andean cloud forest. Mycol Res 110:1257–1270

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Tan XM, Wang CL, Chen XM, Zhou YQ, Wang YQ, Luo AX, Liu ZH, Guo SX (2014) In vitro seed germination and seedling growth of an endangered epiphytic orchid, Dendrobium officinale, endemic to China using mycorrhizal fungi (Tulasnella sp.). Sci Hortic 165:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Taylor DL, Bruns TD, Szaro TM, Hodges SA (2003) Divergence in mycorrhizal specialization within Hexalectris spicata (Orchidaceae), a nonphotosynthetic desert orchid. Am J Bot 90:1168–1179

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Těšitelová T, Těšitel J, Jersáková J, Říhová G, Selosse MA (2012) Symbiotic germination capability of four Epipactis species (Orchidaceae) is broader than expected from adult ecology. Am J Bot 99:1020–1032

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Valadares R, Pereira M, Otero J, Cardoso E (2011) Narrow fungal mycorrhizal diversity in a population of the orchid Coppensia doniana. Biotropica 44:114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang H, Fang HY, Wang YQ, Duan LS, Guo SX (2011) In situ seed baiting techniques in Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo and Dendrobium nobile Lindl.: the endangered Chinese endemic Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:2051–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang X, Li Y, Song X, Meng Q, Zhu J, Zhao Y, Yu W (2017) Influence of host tree species on isolation and communities of mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi from roots of a tropical epiphytic orchid, Dendrobium sinense (Orchidaceae). Mycorrhiza 27:709–718

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang DH, Fan B, Wang Y, Zhang LJ, Wang FZ (2018) Optimum extraction, characterization, and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from flowers of Dendrobium devonianum. Int J Anal Chem 2018:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  50. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White T (eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xu JT, Mu C (1990) The relation between growth of Gastrodia elata protocorms and fungi. Acta Bot Sinica 32:26–31 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yeung EC, Chan CKW (2015) The glycol methacrylate embedding resins–Technovit 7100 and 8100. Plant microtechniques and protocols. Springer, Berlin, pp 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhai X, Jia M, Chen L, Zheng CJ, Rahman K, Han T, Qin LP (2017) The regulatory mechanism of fungal elicitor-induced secondary metabolite biosynthesis in medical plants. Crit Rev Microbiol 43:238–261

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao MM, Zhang G, Zhang DW, Hsiao YY, Guo SX (2013) ESTs analysis reveals putative genes involved in symbiotic seed germination in Dendrobium officinale. PLoS ONE 8:e72705

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zi MX, Sheng CL, Goodale UM, Shao SC, Ga JY (2014) In situ seed baiting to isolate germination-enhancing fungi for an epiphytic orchid, Dendrobium aphyllum (Orchidaceae). Mycorrhiza 24:487–499

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (81573526) to GSX.


This work was supported by Grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (81573526) to GSX. The funder had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to publish. Funding was funded by the Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences Grant (2017-I2M-3-013).

Author information




LYI and GSX conceived the study. LYI, GSX, LYY and ZY designed the study. GSX and LYI provided funding. ZY and LYY performed experiments. LYI, GSX and ZY wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shun-Xing Guo or Yung-I Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Fungal strains used in this study.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Characteristics of mycobionts at 7 days with culture on potato dextrose agar medium. (A) fungal strain S2; (B) fungal strain S3; (C) fungal strain S4; (D) fungal strain S5; (E) fungal strain S6; (F) fungal strain S7. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Developing stages of D. officinale from seed germination to protocorm formation. (A) Stage 0, embryos enclosed by intact seed coats. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (B) Stage 1, swollen seeds after 1 week of inoculation. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (C) Stage 2, swollen embryo rupturing the seed coat. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (D) Stage3, green protocorm with shoot tip and rhizoids. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (E) Stage 4, emergence of first leaf. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. (F) Stage 5, emergence of second leaf. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, X. et al. Effect of different mycobionts on symbiotic germination and seedling growth of Dendrobium officinale, an important medicinal orchid. Bot Stud 61, 2 (2020).

Download citation


  • Dendrobium
  • Mycorrhiza
  • Seed germination
  • Seedling growth
  • Crude polysaccharides