Skip to main content

Advertisement

Botanical Studies
Botanical Studies Cover Image
We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Phalaenopsis orchid miniaturization by overexpression of OsGA2ox6, a rice GA2-oxidase gene

Botanical Studies volume 61, Article number: 10 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phalaenopsis orchids are one of the most common potted orchids sold worldwide. Most Phalaenopsis cultivars have long inflorescences that cause shipping problems and increase handling costs. Miniaturization of Phalaenopsis orchids not only reduces overall production costs but also can expand the appeal of the orchids to a different group of consumers who prefer to keep flowers on desks or tabletops. Although some miniature Phalaenopsis plants can be obtained via hybridization or mutation, they are unpredictable and limited in variety. We therefore used the transgenic approach of overexpressing gibberellin 2-oxidase 6 (OsGA2ox6), a rice GA deactivation gene, to investigate its functional effect in miniaturizing Phalaenopsis and to create a stable miniaturization platform to facilitate a supply for the potential demands of the miniature flower market.

Results

A commercial moth orchid, Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’, was transformed with the plasmid vector Ubi:OsGA2ox6 and successfully overexpressed the OsGA2ox6 gene in planta. The transgenic lines displayed darker-green, shorter, and wider leaves, thicker roots and much shorter flower spikes (10 cm vs 33 cm) than the nontransgenic line with a normal flower size and blooming ability and are therefore an ideal miniaturized form of Phalaenopsis orchids.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the ectopic expression of OsGA2ox6 can miniaturize Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’ while preserving its blooming ability, providing an alternative, useful method for miniaturizing Phalaenopsis species. This miniaturization by a transgenic approach can be further expanded by using GA2ox genes from different plant species or different gene variants, thereby expanding the technical platform for miniaturizing Phalaenopsis species to meet the potential demands of the miniature Phalaenopsis flower market.

Background

Orchidaceae is one of the largest families of flowering plants and contains some of the most important ornamental plants sold on the market. From a floriculture standpoint, orchids have great economic value; the total number of commercially traded live orchid plants in the global market increased from 460 million in 1996–2005 to 660 million in 2006–2015, an increase of approximately 200 million plants (44%) (Hinsley et al. 2017). The orchid family comprises 763 genera and more than 28 thousand species (Christenhusz and Byng 2016; Govaerts et al. 2015). Among them, species of the genus Phalaenopsis, also known as moth orchids, are some of the most commonly sold potted orchids worldwide (Hinsley et al. 2017). Although the Phalaenopsis genus has great commercial value, most Phalaenopsis cultivars have large flowers and long inflorescences/flower spikes; these bulky and cumbersome features cause shipping problems and increase handling costs.

For commercial production in floriculture markets, plant growth retardants (PGRs), a group of synthetic bioregulators, have been widely used to shape plant morphology, e.g., to create miniature Phalaenopsis orchids (Lopez et al. 2007). For instance, the PGRs paclobutrazol (PAC) and uniconazole (UNI) are frequently used to suppress internode elongation in floriculture crops by inhibiting gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis at the enzyme ent-kaurene oxidase (KO) (Additional file 1: Fig S1) (Rademacher 2000). The suppression of inflorescence elongation by PAC has also been demonstrated in Phalaenopsis cultivars (Newton and Runkle 2010; Wang and Hsu 1994). However, repetitive PAC treatment is needed for long-term inhibition of inflorescence growth, and several factors, such as PAC concentration, treatment temperature, timing and application method, all influence the effectiveness of PAC treatment (Barrett and Bartuska 1982; Gilbertz 1992; Latimer and Whipker 2013), which increases the complexity of PGR application in the floriculture industry.

Miniature Phalaenopsis orchids not only benefit commercial producers by reducing handling costs but also may be desired by a different group of consumers. Miniature orchids are easier to keep in small pots and are much more convenient to display indoors or on a tabletop if large floor spaces are not available. Even though miniature orchids such as Phalaenopsis equestris have been used as breeding parents to reduce plant stature (Frowine 2007; Hus and Chen 2015), introducing miniature orchids into a breeding program often produces progeny with small flowers that are not desirable in the market.

In addition to PGR treatments and selection via hybridization or mutation, genetic engineering is an alternative approach for shaping plant morphology. Many miniaturized transgenic plants have been produced by manipulating GA biosynthesis through the ectopic expression of GA deactivation genes (Lo et al. 2017; Nir et al. 2014; Wuddineh et al. 2015). GA deactivation enzymes such as GA methyltransferase, elongated uppermost internode (EUI) and GA2-oxidase (GA2ox) have been identified, and plant height reduction by the overexpression of these genes has been demonstrated (Lo et al. 2008; Sakamoto et al. 2001; Varbanova et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2006). Therefore, overexpressing these GA deactivation genes ectopically in Phalaenopsis orchids through a transgenic approach that can miniaturize the orchids is logically feasible. However, appropriate miniaturized transgenic plants with normal flowers are rare, as many aspects of floral development are impaired by severe dwarfism (Hedden, 2003; Lee et al. 2014; Lo et al. 2008; Sakamoto et al. 2001, 2003; Singh et al. 2002); this complication has hindered the use of these GA deactivation genes in the flower industry.

Although GA deactivation can be achieved through various modifications (Yamaguchi 2008), 2-beta hydroxylation by GA2oxs seems to be the most conserved GA deactivation process among plant species (Gou et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2015; Kim et al. 2019; Lo et al. 2008; Schomburg et al. 2003; Schrager-Lavelle et al. 2019; Wuddineh et al. 2015). GA2oxs can be further classified into the C19 and C20 types, which are responsible for catalyzing C19-GAs and C20-GAs, respectively. Although ectopic expression of both types of GA2oxs can miniaturize plants, in comparison to the expression of C19-type GA2ox, that of C20-type GA2oxs has little effect on flower and seed development (Lo et al. 2008; Sakamoto et al. 2001; Schomburg et al. 2003). Our previous study showed that the expression of the C20-type GA2ox OsGA2ox6 had no effect on the reproductive organs of rice and tobacco (Lo et al. 2008). This characteristic makes OsGA2ox6 a suitable gene for miniaturizing Phalaenopsis orchids.

In this study, transgenic Phalaenopsis orchids overexpressing OsGA2ox6 were generated. We examined the effects of ectopic OsGA2ox6 on development and discussed the potential application of these transgenic plants.

Materials and methods

Plant materials, propagation of PLBs and growth conditions

Protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) of the commercialized Phalaenopsis variety Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’ were purchased from Sunhope Biotech (Chiayi, Taiwan). When the PLBs grew to approximately 2–4 mm, their tip portions were cut horizontally (Additional file 1: Fig S2) to generate additional PLBs. The cut PLBs were cultured in T2 medium containing 2% (w/v) sweet potato homogenate, 2.5% (w/v) banana pulp, 0.35% (w/v) Hyponex No. 1 (Hyponex Co. Ltd., Japan), 0.1% (w/v) tryptone, 0.01% (w/v) citric acid, 2% (w/v) sucrose, 0.1% (w/v) charcoal, and 0.3% (w/v) phytagel at pH 5.5 (Chan et al. 2005) for propagation, and the newly propagated PLBs were used for transformation. Petri dishes (90 × 15 mm) and glass vases (80 × 120 mm) were used for PLB propagation and plantlet regeneration after agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Individual 2.5- or 3-inch pots filled with Chilean sphagnum moss (Chile) were used to grow the regenerated plantlets, which were first grown in a growth chamber at 28/23 °C under a 16 h/8 h light–dark cycle for approximately 2 months and then moved into a greenhouse under natural environmental conditions until blooming.

Construction of the Ubi:OsGA2ox6 transformation vector

The full-length cDNA of OsGA2ox6 (1077 bp) was amplified with an OsGA2ox6-BamHI-F & R primer set (Additional file 2: Table S1) by Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cloned (by BamHI digestion) into pAHC18 plasmid, which is a modified version of pUC18 that contains the maize Ubiquitin (Ubi) promoter and Nopaline Synthase (Nos) terminator (Bruce et al. 1989). The OsGA2ox6-containing pAHC18 was further inserted into the binary vector pCAM1301 (Hajdukiewicz et al. 1994) to obtain the transformation vector Ubi:OsGA2ox6. The resulting plasmid vector in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA-105 was used for Phalaenopsis transformation.

Phalaenopsis transformation and plantlet regeneration

When the new PLBs grew to approximately 2–4 mm, their tip portions were cut horizontally (Additional file 1: Fig S2) and cultured in T2 medium 7 days before transformation. The transformation vector Ubi:OsGA2ox6 in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA-105 was cultured in AB medium (bioWORLD, Ohio) at 28 °C 2 days before transformation. The Phalaenopsis transformation was based on methods reported previously (Chan et al. 2005). On the day of transformation, the cut PLBs were incubated with acetosyringone (AS)-induced Ubi:OsGA2ox6-containing Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA-105 for 30 min, and then the infected PLBs were moved to Petri dishes containing T2 medium plus AS (200 μM) and incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 3 days before selection. During selection, the PLBs were washed several times with MS medium containing 500 μg/mL cefotaxime (Cyrusbioscience, Seattle) to cleanse the Agrobacterium and then placed in T2 medium containing 500 μg/mL cefotaxime plus 5 μg/mL hygromycin at 25 °C under a 16 h/8 h light–dark cycle for 30 days as the first round of selection. The PLBs surviving after selection were further dissected and subcultured monthly on T2 medium plus 25 μg/mL hygromycin for transgenic plantlet regeneration. Transgenic plantlets were maintained by either dissecting the regenerated plantlets or mass propagation through horizontally cut transgenic PLBs.

PCR, RT-PCR and southern blot analyses

Using CTAB buffer extraction protocols (Doyle and Doyle 1987), the genomic DNA (~ 0.1 µg) extracted from the leaf tissue of Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’, the nontransgenic (NT) line and the OsGA2ox6-overexpression (GA2ox6-OX) transgenic lines were subjected to PCR analysis with gene-specific primer sets (Additional file 2: Table S1) and DreamTaq DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for transgene identification.

For RT-PCR analysis, total RNA was extracted from the leaf tissue using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and then treated with RNase-free DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to remove any possible DNA contaminants. Three micrograms of the DNA-free RNA sample was used as a template for cDNA synthesis (reverse transcription) with a RevertAid first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the protocols recommended by the manufacturer in a 20 µl total reaction volume. Then, 1 µl of the synthesized cDNA was subjected to PCR analysis in a 15 μl total reaction volume using a gene-specific primer set (Additional file 2: Table S1) and GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega) for transgene expression analysis.

For Southern blot analysis, 30 µg of each DNA sample was digested by HindIII, subjected to 1% (w/v) agarose gel analysis and then transferred to Amersham Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The P32-labeled GUS DNA probe was used for hybridization according to the instructions for the Amersham Rediprime II DNA labeling system (GE Healthcare).

GUS activity assay

A GUS activity assay was performed as described previously (Hsing et al. 2007), with minor modifications. Approximately 5 mm of leaf or root tissue was excised from the plantlet and placed in GUS staining solution, and vacuum aspiration was applied for 30 min. Then, the samples were incubated overnight at 37 °C. The staining solution and chlorophyll were removed by incubation with 70% ethanol at 65 °C for 1 h. The GUS staining solution contained 80 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.4 mM potassium ferricyanide (pH 7.0), 8 mM EDTA, 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-100, and 2 mM X-glucuronide.

Results

Generation of OsGA2ox6-overexpressing (GA2ox6-OX) transgenic Phalaenopsis orchids

To investigate how a rice C20-type GA2oxs can affect the growth of Phalaenopsis orchid plants and be used as a method to miniaturize Phalaenopsis species for the floriculture market, a plasmid (Ubi:OsGA2ox6) (Fig. 1a) with the OsGA2ox6 gene driven by a maize ubiquitin promoter was introduced into PLBs of Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’ (Fig. 1b) by agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Six months after transformation, three surviving PLB groups that survived out of approximately four hundred PLBs on the selection medium (medium containing 25 μg/mL hygromycin) started to grow new PLBs, and the leaf-like organs regenerated (Fig. 1c). The surviving PLBs were dissected and subcultured in a selection medium on a monthly basis, and two types of propagation patterns were observed (Fig. 1d, e) in all GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. Type A grew roots and leaves normally (Fig. 1d). Type B grew more PLBs mostly from dissected/wounded regions (Fig. 1e). Three months after subculturing, type A grew more roots and leaflets (Fig. 1f), while type B grew large numbers of PLBs with fewer differentiated roots and leaflets (Fig. 1g). Close-up views of the NT line showed longer leaves (left side in Fig. 1h), and the GA2ox6-OX transgenic line showed shorter and wider leaves and thicker roots (right side in Fig. 1h). Approximately 12 months after transformation, a GA2ox6-OX transgenic line through type A propagation pattern grew multiple leaves and roots (Fig. 1i).

Fig. 1
figure1

Ubi:OsGA2ox6 transformation vector and comparisons of different propagation types of GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines at various growth stages. a Schematic diagram of the Ubi:OsGA2ox6 transformation vector. The target gene OsGA2ox6 (yellow box) driven by the ZmUbi promoter (blue arrow), hygromycin phosphotransferase (Hpt) and GUS genes driven by the 35S promoter (green arrows) in their relative scale within the left border (LB) and right border (RB) of T-DNA are shown. The primers (Hpt-F & -R and ZmUbi-F & OsGA2ox6-R) used for confirming vector integration (genomic DNA PCR) and the primers (OsGA2ox6-F & -R) used for gene expression analysis (RT-PCR) as well as the sizes in bp of their PCR products are indicated. b Protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) of Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’ used for transformation. c Three surviving transgenic PLBs 6 months after transformation and selection. d–g Growth of propagation type A (d, f) and type B (e, g) from the GA2ox6-OX transgenic line 1 month (d, e) and 3 months (F, G) after subculture. A group of three PLBs is shown. h Examples of an NT (left) and a GA2ox6-OX transgenic (right) plantlet growing multiple leaves and roots approximately 10 months after transformation. i Close-up view of a transgenic plantlet growing approximately 12 months after transformation. j–k Example of the mother PLBs from NT (j) and GA2ox6-OX transgenic (k) lines used for propagation. l–m Clonal propagation of NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic PLBs compared in parallel. The PLBs from NT (l) and GA2ox6-OX (m) lines were dissected horizontally to expose their surrounding epidermal cells in order to generate and propagate new PLBs. n–o Growth of many PLBs three months after subculture for NT (n) and GA2ox6-OX (o) lines

Full size image

PLBs of the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines propagate much more quickly than those of the NT line and generate more PLBs from wounded regions

In the regeneration and propagation process, all the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines revealed different proliferation and differentiation patterns (Fig. 1d, e) from those of NT plants. During the subculturing process, we observed that all the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines generated PLBs efficiently from the dissection/wound sites, so their PLBs propagated much faster than those of the NT line. To explore whether this phenomenon can be maintained in subsequent subculture processes, the PLBs from the NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (Fig. 1j, k) were cut horizontally (Additional file 1: Fig S2) to expose their surrounding epidermal cells to generate new PLBs (Fig. 1l, m). Three months after subculture, the PLBs of the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines propagated much faster and produced many more PLBs than the NT plants (Fig. 1n, o), with fewer differentiated plantlets.

Molecular characterization of GA2ox6-OX transgenic plants

During the study period, three surviving PLB groups were originally obtained: PLB group #1 had only one PLB that survived and regenerated and was named #1-1; PLB group #2 had no survival; and PLB group #3 had 3 separate PLBs that survived and regenerated (as shown in Fig. 1c) and were named lines #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4. The regenerated plantlets (T0 plants) from these four putative GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines were analyzed by PCR using a primer set specific to a hygromycin B phosphotransferase (Hpt) gene (Fig. 1a, with 542 bp expected) and another primer set targeting the maize ubiquitin promoter and the 3’ end of OsGA2ox6 (Fig. 1a, with 1064 bp expected) in the T-DNA construct to verify transgene integration. The results showed positive and correct PCR products for all four tested lines (Fig. 2a), confirming that they were GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. In addition, both the leaf and root samples from these lines displayed a deep-blue color with X-Gluc substrate in the GUS activity assay (Fig. 2b), indicating that the GUS gene in the pCAMBIA1301 vector was also successfully integrated into the rice genome and expressed. Representative GUS staining results for PLBs and root tips of NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines are provided as supplementary data in Additional file 1: Fig S3. The expression of the OsGA2ox6 transgene measured by RT-PCR analyses showed a high level in all four transgenic lines but not in the NT line (Fig. 2c), indicating that the OsGA2ox6 transgene was strongly expressed in the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. Furthermore, the leaf DNA samples from three (lines #1-1, #3-2, and #3-3) of the four GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines were analyzed by Southern blotting to verify their T-DNA insertion events (Additional file 1:Fig S4). The results of the different hybridization patterns suggested that each line was independently transformed and regenerated.

Fig. 2
figure2

Molecular characterization of GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. a Genomic DNA PCR. Primers specific to the T-DNA vector construct (Ubi-F/GA-R) and the Hpt gene (Hpt-F/Hpt-R) were used to verify the integration of the transgene. Four GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines, (#1-1, #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4), were analyzed. NT: nontransgenic line. b GUS activity assay. Leaf and root samples from the NT line and four GA2ox6-OX lines were analyzed. c RT-PCR. The OsGA2ox6 transgene expression in the NT line and four GA2ox6-OX lines was analyzed by RT-PCR, and the expression of the actin gene (from Phalaenopsis) was used as an internal control

Full size image

Effects of ectopic OsGA2ox6 on vegetative development

The regenerated transgenic plantlets were continuously subcultured and propagated to produce more orchid plants. After approximately 2 years of growing in a greenhouse under natural environmental conditions (with an average summer temperature of ~ 32/26 °C and average winter temperature of ~ 24/16 °C), the transgenic orchid plants became mature and started to grow flower spikes (Fig. 3). The side view (Fig. 3a), top view (Fig. 3b) and leaf lengths, widths and numbers (Fig. 3c) for each representative plant of the four GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines and their NT host plants are shown for comparison and characterization (Fig. 3). All leaves, except the youngest one in line #1-1, were measured at the growth stage shown in Fig. 3a, b. The leaf shape and root sizes of GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines were very different from those of their NT host plants (Figs. 3, 4). The GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines displayed darker-green leaves with shorter lengths (5.6 to 6.8 cm in Fig. 3c), approximately half those in the NT line (12.0 cm in Fig. 3c), and greater widths (3.8–4.3 cm) than the average width in the NT line (3.4 cm), making the L/W ratio ~ 1.5 for the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines and 3.5 for the NT line (Fig. 3c). In addition, three plants each from the NT line and four GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (the growth stage of plants from line #1-1 was earlier than that of plants from lines #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4) were compared, and all GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines revealed similar phenotypes but showed different phenotypes compared with those of the NT line (Additional file 1: Fig S5). The length and width of the longest leaf were measured for three plants each of the NT line and transgenic lines #1-1, #3-2, #3-3, and #3-4 and showed the same tendency as those in Fig. 3c, although some variations were observed (Table 1). For example, GA2ox6-OX lines #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4 showed similar L/W ratios, while line #1-1 (at an earlier stage) had a lower L/W ratio (0.9) compared to those shown in Fig. 3c (1.6). The GA2ox6-OX lines produced 7-9 leaves, while only 3 leaves were produced in the NT line under the same growth conditions (Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure3

Phenotypic comparisons of the NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines at the vegetative stage. Comparison of representative mature NT plants and four different GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (#1-1, #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4) in side view (a) and top view (b). The numbers of leaves and the average leaf length, width and length/width ratio of each representative plant were measured for the NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (c), and the resulting data are shown below the pictures. The flower spikes are indicated by yellow arrows in the photos

Full size image
Table 1 Morphological comparison of leaves and roots in nontransgenic (NT) and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines
Full size table

Compared to those of the NT line (Fig. 4a), the roots of the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (Fig. 4b, lines #1-1, #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4) were much shorter and thicker. The measurements from a representative plant line #3-3 showed that the root length ranged from 4 to 20 cm and was much smaller than the 16 to 43 cm root length of the NT line (Fig. 4c); the average root width (1.6 cm) in the GA2ox6-OX transgenic line was much greater than that (0.9 cm) in the NT line (Fig. 4c). Moreover, the greatest root length and root width values collected from three plants each of the NT line and four transgenic lines (#1-1, #3-2, #3-3 and #3-4) revealed the same pattern, with a much shorter root length and thicker root width compared to those of the NT line (Table 1).

Fig. 4
figure4

Phenotypic comparisons of roots of the NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. a Three plantlets of NT control plants showing longer roots. b Three plantlets from each of the four GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (#1-1, #3-2, #3-3, and #3-4) showing shorter roots. Bar = 12 cm. c Comparison of the lengths and widths of roots dissected from the NT line and representative GA2ox6-OX transgenic line #3-3 are shown. The ranges of root length and average root width measured for the dissected roots are provided below the pictures

Full size image

Effects of ectopic OsGA2ox6 on reproductive development

The flower spikes of one GA2ox6-OX transgenic line took approximately two to three months to completely elongate, and then the first flower bud began to swell and bloom (Fig. 5a, b). A series of photographs shows the flowering process of one flower spike with 3 flower buds, from the blooming of the first flower to the end of the blooming of the third flower (Fig. 5b–e). In this case, each flower bud took approximately 10 days to complete blooming, and each flower lasted approximately 1 to 2 months for a total two- to three-month flowering period, similar to that of NT control plants.

Fig. 5
figure5

Phenotypic comparisons of NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic plants at the blooming stage. a The GA2ox6-OX transgenic plants bear a flower spike (inflorescence) indicated by a yellow arrow. b Blooming of the first flower bud. Bar = 10 cm. c Blooming of the first two flower buds. Bar = 10 cm. d Blooming of all three flower buds. Bar = 10 cm. e Top view of completely blooming GA2ox6-OX transgenic plants. f Comparison of NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic plants at the blooming stage. The 33 cm flower spike length of the NT line and 10 cm spike length of GA2ox6-OX plants are indicated by yellow lines. g An example of a GA2ox6-OX transgenic line with two flower spikes

Full size image

Interestingly, the flower spike length (10 cm) of the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines was much shorter than that (33 cm) of the NT line (Fig. 5f). Although the flower spike of the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines was short, it still bore three flower buds with similar sizes and shapes and only one fewer bud than observed in the NT line (Fig. 5f). In addition, two GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines from more than 20 mature transgenic plants grew two flower spikes, while none were observed in NT control plants during the study period; whether these two flower spikes are related to the expression of OsGA2ox6 requires further investigation. An example of the two flower spikes is shown in Fig. 5g.

Discussion

The C20-type OsGA2ox6 does not affect the size of flower buds and is useful in miniaturizing Phalaenopsis orchids

There are two types of GA2oxs, distinguished by either the C20 or C19 type of GA substrate catalysis (Lo et al. 2008; Schomburg et al. 2003). The weaker reduction in plant size by C20-GA2ox than by C19-GA2ox might be attributed to substrate catalysis not being the limiting step in the GA biosynthesis pathway (Lo et al. 2008; Rieu et al. 2008) (Additional file 1: Fig S1). In addition, our previous studies demonstrated that overexpression of OsGA2ox6 in rice and tobacco reduced plant size but had no significant effects on the reproductive organs (Lo et al. 2008). The present study showed that the expression of OsGA2ox6 in GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines significantly reduced flower spike and leaf size but did not affect the size of flower buds (Figs. 3 and 5), thus making OsGA2ox6 a useful gene for miniaturizing Phalaenopsis orchids.

Miniaturization of Phalaenopsis orchids can be achieved by overexpressing the rice OsGA2ox6 gene

Inhibitors of GA biosynthesis have been used as PGRs to reduce longitudinal shoot growth and for many other applications, such as miniaturizing plants or improving seedling acclimatization in ornamental horticulture (Latimer and Whipker 2013; Rademacher 1991). Among PGRs, PAC and UNI, two triazole-type compounds that retard plant growth by inhibiting GA synthesis, are frequently used in the miniaturization of Phalaenopsis orchids to reduce shipping costs and produce an aesthetically pleasing shape (Latimer and Whipker 2013; Newton and Runkle 2010; Rademacher 2000; Wang and Hsu 1994). However, repeated applications of PAC and UNI are needed to maintain the miniaturization of Phalaenopsis orchids, which raises the cost, and the effectiveness of this treatment can vary among plants in ways that significantly affect their market value.

To overcome these drawbacks, a transgenic approach involving the introduction of a gene involved in GA biosynthesis can be utilized. Many transformation methods that provide a feasible approach for the introgression of foreign genes to alter Phalaenopsis orchid phenotypes have been established (Anzai et al. 1996; Chai et al. 2002; Hsieh and Huang 1995; Hsing et al. 2016). In the present study, a rice C20-type GA2ox gene, OsGA2ox6, which affects active GA synthesis (Lo et al. 2008), was introduced and ectopically overexpressed in Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’ in order to miniaturize regenerated plantlets. Despite various transgenic events with different T-DNA copy insertions (Additional file 1: Fig S4), all the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines showed the same phenotype (Fig. 3), and each individual line could be vegetatively propagated to maintain the same miniaturized phenotype observed in the maternal transgenic lines (data not shown). These observations suggest that Phalaenopsis orchids can be miniaturized by overexpressing the rice OsGA2ox6 gene and that the miniaturized phenotype of these ectopically expressed transgenic lines can be uniformly propagated to ensure their market value. In addition, this transgenic approach using OsGA2ox6 can be further expanded to different orchids or other flower species, which is more advantageous than using hybridization or mutation with Phalaenopsis equestris, as these methods are limited in Phalaenopsis genus.

The low leaf L/W ratio and much shorter flower spike of GA2ox6-OX lines reduce the space needed for growth and handling

The GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines displayed darker-green, shorter and wider leaves (Fig. 3) than the NT lines, reflecting typical GA-deficiency phenotypes (Nir et al. 2014; Sakamoto et al. 2004; Varbanova et al. 2007). In addition to confirming this phenotype, the present study successfully demonstrated the recognition and expression of OsGA2ox6 driven by the ZmUbi promoter and the functional effects of OsGA2ox6 in these Phalaenopsis orchids (Figs. 2, 3, 4).

The leaf shape, characterized by a low leaf L/W ratio, and the much shorter flower spike of these GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (Figs. 3, 5) could reduce the space required for plantlets to grow in greenhouses and for packing boxes, which would improve the handling and transportation requirements of these orchids. In addition, the much shorter flower spike provides a novel flower pattern and does not require a plastic support stick (Fig. 5f); thus, these miniaturized Phalaenopsis orchids could provide a new style of orchid for tabletop decorations, attracting more consumers to orchids and expanding the market. In brief, these features that save costs would in many ways make these miniaturized Phalaenopsis orchids very competitive in the floral industry.

The faster formation of PLBs in the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines may be correlated with STM regulation and is beneficial for mass propagation

The in vitro clonal propagation of PLBs is a routine practice for mass production in the orchid floriculture industry (Yam and Arditti 2009). These PLBs (often described as somatic embryos) undergo a process of cell differentiation to form plantlets. During the regeneration and propagation process of the GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines, the PLBs of transgenic lines (Fig. 1m–o) propagated much faster and produced more PLBs, when wounded regions were more significant, than the NT line (Fig. 1l–n), resulting in less leaflet differentiation from PLBs. This phenomenon might be similar to the promotion of rice tillers under GA deficiency caused by the overexpression of OsGA2ox genes (Lo et al. 2008).

In Arabidopsis, the activity of shoot apical meristems was reported to be regulated by a class-I KNOTTED-like homeobox gene called SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM), which activated cytokinins and repressed GA biosynthesis (Jasinski et al. 2005). In addition, the process of cell differentiation in orchid tissue culture can be promoted by adding banana pulp since the banana pulp contains abundant natural cytokinins (Arditti and Ernst 1993; Withner 1974). Both cytokinins and GA are likely to be involved in the regulation of somatic embryogenesis (PLB formation) during orchid tissue culture. A recent study suggested that STM and GA2ox might also be involved in the regulation of PLB formation in Phalaenopsis aphrodite, as the expression pattern of PaSTM during PLB formation was positively correlated with that of PaGA2ox1 and the overexpression of PaSTM in Arabidopsis accompanies the upregulation of AtGA2ox2 (Fang et al. 2016). Our results showed that the overexpression of OsGA2ox6 promoted the formation of large amounts of PLBs in the transgenic lines, reinforcing the potential for the expression of GA2ox genes to promote PLB formation via PaSTM. However, the mechanism underlying the promotion of PLB formation by GA2ox requires further investigation.

Conclusion and future perspectives

In the present study, we demonstrated that the ectopic expression of OsGA2ox6 can miniaturize Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘SPM313’ without compromising its blooming ability, providing an alternative, useful method for miniaturizing Phalaenopsis species to produce a supply for the potential demands of the miniature Phalaenopsis orchid market.

GA2ox genes have been identified and characterized in many plant species (Lo et al. 2008; Schomburg et al. 2003; Schrager-Lavelle et al. 2019; Wuddineh et al. 2015), and various activities of individual OsGA2ox gene families (Hsieh et al. not yet published, in review) and different mutation variants of OsGA2ox6 (Lo et al. 2017) have also been demonstrated. Therefore, the GA2ox genes from various plant species and variants of OsGA2ox6 can be used to expand the toolbox for miniaturizing Phalaenopsis orchids. Although many GA2ox genes from different plant species have been studied, the GA2ox genes in Phalaenopsis have not yet been identified or functionally characterized. Research on orchids is now in the postgenomic era (Tsai et al. 2017), with transcriptomic databases such as OrchidBase (Tsai et al. 2013) and Orchidstra (Chao et al. 2017) that contain numerous gene-expressed sequences collected from Phalaenopsis species. These genes provide an excellent resource for functional studies of GA2ox genes in Phalaenopsis species, and GA2ox genes with known functions can be further applied to miniaturize Phalaenopsis orchids.

Abbreviations

AS:

Acetosyringone

GA2ox6-OX:

OsGA2ox6 overexpression

NT:

Nontransgenic

PAC:

Paclobutrazol

PGRs:

Plant growth retardants

PLBs:

Protocorm-like bodies

UNI:

Uniconazole

References

  1. Anzai H, Ishii Y, Shichinohe M, Katsumata K, Nojiri C, Morikawa H, Tanaka M (1996) Transformation of Phalaenopsis by particle bombardment. Plant Tissue Cult Lett 13:265–272

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arditti J, Ernst R (1993) Micropropagation of orchids. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett JE, Bartuska CA (1982) PP333 effects on stem elongation dependent on site of application. HortScience 17:737–738

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce WB, Christensen AH, Klein T, Fromm M, Quail PH (1989) Photoregulation of a phytochrome gene promoter from oat transferred into rice by particle bombardment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9692–9696

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chai M, Xu C, Senthil K, Kim J, Kim D (2002) Stable transformation of protocorm-like bodies in Phalaenopsis orchid mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Sci Hortic 96:213–224

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan YL, Lin KH, Sanjaya Liao LJ, Chen WH, Chan MT (2005) Gene stacking in Phalaenopsis orchid enhances dual tolerance to pathogen attack. Transgenic Res 14:279–288

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chao YT, Yen SH, Yeh JH, Chen WC, Shih MC (2017) Orchidstra 2.0—a transcriptomics resource for the orchid family. Plant Cell Physiol 58:e9

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Christenhusz MJ, Byng JW (2016) The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fang SC, Chen JC, Wei MJ (2016) Protocorms and protocorm-like bodies are molecularly distinct from zygotic embryonic tissues in Phalaenopsis aphrodite. Plant Physiol 171:2682–2700

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Frowine SA (2007) Miniature Orchids. Timber Press, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbertz DA (1992) Chrysanthemum response to timing of paclobutrazol and uniconazole sprays. HortScience 27:322–323

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gou J, Ma C, Kadmiel M, Gai Y, Strauss S, Jiang X, Busov V (2011) Tissue-specific expression of Populus C19 GA 2-oxidases differentially regulate above- and below-ground biomass growth through control of bioactive GA concentrations. New Phytol 192:626–639

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Govaerts R, Campacci M, Baptista D, Cribb P, George A, Krenuz K, Wood J, Bernet P, Kartochvil K, Gerlach G (2015) World checklist of Orchidaceae. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Garden, Kew. http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/ Accessed on May 2015

  15. Hajdukiewicz P, Svab Z, Maliga P (1994) The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 25:989–994

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hedden P (2003) Constructing dwarf rice. Nat Biotechnol 21:873–874

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hinsley A, De Boer HJ, Fay MF, Gale SW, Gardiner LM, Gunasekara RS, Kumar P, Masters S, Metusala D, Roberts DL (2017) A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation. Bot J Linn Soc 186:435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsieh R, Huang P (1995) Studies on genetic transformation of Phalaenopsis via pollen tube pathway. J Chin Soc Hort Sci 41:309–324

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hsing YI, Chern CG, Fan MJ, Lu PC, Chen KT, Lo SF, Sun PK, Ho SL, Lee KW, Wang YC, Huang WL, Ko SS, Chen S, Chen JL, Chung CI, Lin YC, Hour AL, Wang YW, Chang YC, Tsai MW, Lin YS, Chen YC, Yen HM, Li CP, Wey CK, Tseng CS, Lai MH, Huang SC, Chen LJ, Yu SM (2007) A rice gene activation/knockout mutant resource for high throughput functional genomics. Plant Mol Biol 63:351–364

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsing HX, Lin YJ, Tong CG, Li MJ, Chen YJ, Ko SS (2016) Efficient and heritable transformation of Phalaenopsis orchids. Bot Stud 57:30

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsu CC, Chen WH (2015) The breeding achievements from Phalaenopsis equestris. Malayan Orchid Rev 49:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang Y, Wang X, Ge S, Rao GY (2015) Divergence and adaptive evolution of the gibberellin oxidase genes in plants. BMC Evol Biol 15:207

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jasinski S, Piazza P, Craft J, Hay A, Woolley L, Rieu I, Phillips A, Hedden P, Tsiantis M (2005) KNOX action in Arabidopsis is mediated by coordinate regulation of cytokinin and gibberellin activities. Curr Biol 15:1560–1565

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim GB, Son SU, Yu HJ, Mun JH (2019) MtGA2ox10 encoding C20-GA2-oxidase regulates rhizobial infection and nodule development in Medicago truncatula. Sci Rep 9:5952

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Latimer JG, Whipker B (2013) Selecting and using plant growth regulators on floricultural crops. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication, Blacksburg, p 430-102

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee DH, Lee IC, Kim KJ, Kim DS, Na HJ, Lee I-J, Kang S-M, Jeon H-W, Le PY, Ko J-H (2014) Expression of gibberellin 2-oxidase 4 from Arabidopsis under the control of a senescence-associated promoter results in a dominant semi-dwarf plant with normal flowering. J Plant Biol 57:106–116

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lo SF, Yang SY, Chen KT, Hsing YI, Zeevaart JA, Chen LJ, Yu SM (2008) A novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases control semidwarfism, tillering, and root development in rice. Plant Cell 20:2603–2618

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lo SF, Ho TD, Liu YL, Jiang MJ, Hsieh KT, Chen KT, Yu LC, Lee MH, Chen CY, Huang TP, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Chen LJ, Yu SM (2017) Ectopic expression of specific GA2 oxidase mutants promotes yield and stress tolerance in rice. Plant Biotechnol J 15:850–864

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lopez R, Runkle E, Wang YT, Blanchard M, Hsu T (2007) Growing the best Phalaenopsis. Orchids 3: 182–187. The american orchid society, Florida, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  30. Newton LA, Runkle ES (2010) Effects of paclobutrazol sprays on inflorescences of three potted moth orchid clones. HortTechnology 20:892–895

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nir I, Moshelion M, Weiss D (2014) The Arabidopsis gibberellin methyl transferase 1 suppresses gibberellin activity, reduces whole-plant transpiration and promotes drought tolerance in transgenic tomato. Plant Cell Environ 37:113–123

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rademacher W (1991) Inhibitors of gibberellin biosynthesis: applications in agriculture and horticulture. In: Takahashi N, Phinney BO, MacMillan J (eds) Gibberellins. Springer, New York, pp 296–310

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rademacher W (2000) Growth retardants: Effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:501–531

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Rieu I, Eriksson S, Powers SJ, Gong F, Griffiths J, Woolley L, Benlloch R, Nilsson O, Thomas SG, Hedden P, Phillips AL (2008) Genetic analysis reveals that C19-GA 2-oxidation is a major gibberellin inactivation pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20:2420–2436

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sakamoto T, Kobayashi M, Itoh H, Tagiri A, Kayano T, Tanaka H, Iwahori S, Matsuoka M (2001) Expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene around the shoot apex is related to phase transition in rice. Plant Physiol 125:1508–1516

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakamoto T, Morinaka Y, Ishiyama K, Kobayashi M, Itoh H, Kayano T, Iwahori S, Matsuoka M, Tanaka H (2003) Genetic manipulation of gibberellin metabolism in transgenic rice. Nat Biotechnol 21:909–913

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sakamoto T, Miura K, Itoh H, Tatsumi T, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ishiyama K, Kobayashi M, Agrawal GK, Takeda S, Abe K, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kitano H, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M (2004) An overview of gibberellin metabolism enzyme genes and their related mutants in rice. Plant Physiol 134:1642–1653

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schomburg FM, Bizzell CM, Lee DJ, Zeevaart JA, Amasino RM (2003) Overexpression of a novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases decreases gibberellin levels and creates dwarf plants. Plant Cell 15:151–163

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schrager-Lavelle A, Gath NN, Devisetty UK, Carrera E, Lopez-Diaz I, Blazquez MA, Maloof JN (2019) The role of a class III gibberellin 2-oxidase in tomato internode elongation. Plant J 97:603–615

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh DP, Jermakow AM, Swain SM (2002) Gibberellins are required for seed development and pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14:3133–3147

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tsai WC, Fu CH, Hsiao YY, Huang YM, Chen LJ, Wang M, Liu ZJ, Chen HH (2013) OrchidBase 2.0: comprehensive collection of orchidaceae floral transcriptomes. Plant Cell Physiol 54:e7

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsai WC, Dievart A, Hsu CC, Hsiao YY, Chiou SY, Huang H, Chen HH (2017) Post genomics era for orchid research. Bot Stud 58:61

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Varbanova M, Yamaguchi S, Yang Y, McKelvey K, Hanada A, Borochov R, Yu F, Jikumaru Y, Ross J, Cortes D, Ma CJ, Noel JP, Mander L, Shulaev V, Kamiya Y, Rodermel S, Weiss D, Pichersky E (2007) Methylation of gibberellins by Arabidopsis GAMT1 and GAMT2. Plant Cell 19:32–45

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Y-T, Hsu T-Y (1994) Flowering and growth of Phalaenopsis orchids following growth retardant applications. HortScience 29:285–288

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Withner CL (1974) Developments in orchid physiology. In: Withner CL (ed) The orchids: scientific studies. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 129–168

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wuddineh WA, Mazarei M, Zhang J, Poovaiah CR, Mann DG, Ziebell A, Sykes RW, Davis MF, Udvardi MK, Stewart CN Jr (2015) Identification and overexpression of gibberellin 2-oxidase (GA2ox) in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for improved plant architecture and reduced biomass recalcitrance. Plant Biotechnol J 13:636–647

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yam TW, Arditti J (2009) History of orchid propagation: a mirror of the history of biotechnology. Plant Biotechnol Rep 3:1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yamaguchi S (2008) Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:225–251

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu Y, Nomura T, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Peng Y, Mao B, Hanada A, Zhou H, Wang R, Li P, Zhu X, Mander LN, Kamiya Y, Yamaguchi S, He Z (2006) Elongated Uppermost Internode encodes a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase that epoxidizes gibberellins in a novel deactivation reaction in rice. Plant Cell 18:442–456

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Division of Biotechnology, TARI, for providing the greenhouse to grow the transgenic Phalaenopsis orchids.

Funding

This work was financially supported through grants (99AS-1.1.1-FD-Z1; 100AS-1.1.1-FD-Z1; 101AS-9.1.1-FD-Z1) from the Council of Agriculture, Taiwan, to Liang-Jwu Chen and in part by the Advanced Plant Biotechnology Center via the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan
    • Kun-Ting Hsieh
    • , Su-Hui Liu
    •  & Liang-Jwu Chen
  2. Division of Biotechnology, Taiwan Agriculture Research Institute, Taichung, 41362, Taiwan
    • I-Wen Wang
  3. Agricultural Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 40227, Taiwan
    • Liang-Jwu Chen
Authors
  1. Kun-Ting Hsieh
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Su-Hui Liu
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. I-Wen Wang
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Liang-Jwu Chen
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

KTH and LJC consolidated the results, wrote the manuscript and finalized the manuscript. SHL and IWW performed transformation of Phalaenopsis orchids and grew and maintained transgenic Phalaenopsis orchids at the Taiwan Agriculture Research Institute (TARI). SHL and KTH performed molecular analysis of transgenic Phalaenopsis orchids. LJC was responsible for the experimental design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang-Jwu Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Fig S1. A simplified GA biosynthesis and metabolic pathway. The target gene (KO) inhibited by PGRs, such as PAC and UNI, is indicated. The GA2 oxidases that catalyze the C20 and C19 types of GA substrates in their relative pathways are shown. Fig S2. Propagation of PLBs and plantlet regeneration. When the PLBs grew to approximately 2-4 mm (A), their tip portions were cut horizontally (B) to expose their epidermal/surface cells (C) in order to form/propagate new PLBs and generate plantlets (D). Fig S3. GUS staining results for PLBs and root tips of NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. (A) GUS staining of tissues from NT and GA2ox6-OX lines are shown. (B) GUS staining of PLBs from NT and GA2ox6-OX lines are shown. (C) GUS staining of root tips from NT and GA2ox6-OX lines are shown. Fig S4. Southern blot analysis. Genomic DNA isolated from leaves of the NT line and three OsGA2ox6 transgenic lines (#1-1, #3-2 and #3-3) was cut with the restriction enzyme HindIII and probed with α P32-labeled GUS DNA fragment. Fig S5. Phenotypic comparisons of NT and GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines. Three plants each from the NT line and four GA2ox6-OX transgenic lines (#1-1, #3-2, #3-3, and #3-4) were compared. The growth stages of plants from line #1-1 are earlier than those of the NT line and the other 3 GA2ox6-OX lines. All GA2ox6-OX lines showed similar phenotypes, but their phenotypes differed from those of the NT line. The scale bar = 10 cm.

Additional file 2: Table S1. Primers and their sequences used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsieh, K., Liu, S., Wang, I. et al. Phalaenopsis orchid miniaturization by overexpression of OsGA2ox6, a rice GA2-oxidase gene. Bot Stud 61, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-020-00288-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Phalaenopsis orchids
  • Miniature flowers
  • Transgenic
  • GA2-oxidase
  • OsGA2ox6