Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Potential of algal-based products for the management of potato brown rot disease

Abstract

Background

Ralstonia solanacearum causes potato brown rot disease, resulting in lower crop’s production and quality. A sustainable and eco-friendly method for controlling the disease is required. Algae’s bioactive chemicals have shown the potential to enhance plant defenses. For the first time, the efficacy of foliar application of Acanthophora spicifera and Spirulina platensis seaweed extracts, along with the utilization of dried algal biomasses (DABs) of Turbinaria ornata and a mixture of Caulerpa racemosa and Cystoseira myrica (1:1)on potato yield and brown rot suppression were investigated under field conditions. Field experiments were conducted in three locations: Location 1 (Kafr Shukr district, Kaliobeya governorate), Location 2 (Moneira district, Kaliobeya governorate), and Location 3 (Talia district, Minufyia governorate). Locations 1 and 2 were naturally infested with the pathogen, while location 3 was not. The study evaluated potato yield, plant nutritive status and antioxidants, soil available nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium (N-P-K), and organic matter percentage. Additionally, the shift in soil microbial diversity related to R. solanacearum suppression was examined for the most effective treatment.

Results

The results revealed that seaweed extracts significantly increased potato yield at all locations, which correlated with higher phosphorus absorption, while T. ornate DAB increased potato yield only at location 2, accompanied by noticeable increases in soil nitrogen and plant phosphorus. The mixed DABs of C. racemosa and C. myrica demonstrated greater disease suppression than foliar applications. The disease-suppressive effect of the mixed DABs was accompanied by significant increases in flavonoids and total antioxidant capacity (TAC). Moreover, the application of mixed DABs increased soil bacterial biodiversity, with a higher abundance of oligotrophic marine bacterial species such as Sphingopyxis alaskensis and growth-promoting species like Glutamicibacter arilaitensis, Promicromonospora sp., and Paenarthrobacter nitroguajacolicus in all three locations compared to the untreated control. Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas putida, and P. brassicacearum abundances were increased by the mixed DABs in Location 1. These species were less abundant in locations 2 and 3, where Streptomyces sp., Bacillus sp., and Sphingobium vermicomposti were prevalent.

Conclusions

The results demonstrated that the used seaweed extracts improved potato yield and phosphorous absorption, while the mixed DABs potentially contributed in disease suppression and improved soil microbial diversity.

Background

The potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) holds a paramount position as a vegetable crop in human diets. Its introduction to Egypt in the early 19th century, lead to its widespread cultivation throughout the country. Owing to its high nutritional value, the potato quickly became a staple dish, commonly served in cooked, crispy, or chip form. Egypt is a significant potato exporter in Africa and among the top 20 potato growers in the world (Rabia et al. 2021). The average potato yield in Egypt has reached approximately 5.2 million tons, cultivated across approximately171 thousand hectares (FAO 2015). The primary potato production area in Egypt, constituting 65% of the total, is located in the Nile Delta and the Valley governorates (old districts) due to the suitable climate and soil fertility (FAOSTAT 2018; AbdEl-Hady and Abdelaty, 2019).

In fact, the potato crop in old districts in Egypt is frequently prone to brown rot disease (bacterial wilt) caused by Ralstonia solanacearum race 3, biovar 2, Phylotype II, sequevar 1 (Prior and Fegan 2005; Messiha 2006; Messiha et al. 2021). Nonetheless, the European Union (EU) has imposed strict importation restrictions on Egypt (European Communities, 2005). These restrictions require the growing of potatoes designated for the EU inside approved Pest-Free Areas (PFAs), which are predominantly located in desert regions, and exclude the Nile Delta and Valley region from export activities. This devastating soil-borne pathogen is reported in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions of the world, causing pronounced losses in different crop hosts (Farag et al. 2017; Messiha et al. 2019). Previous reports indicated that the chemical control methods such as soil fumigants, copper-containing pesticides, and antibiotics had doubtful effects (Farag et al. 1986), besides their hazardous negative ecological impacts (Hartman and Elphinstone 1994).

Numerous attempts have been undertaken to directly control R. solanacearum by utilizing antagonistic microbes or their extracts (Elhalag et al. 2016; Hamed and Messiha 2018). Indirect approaches involve the application of mineral and organic fertilisers (Messiha et al. 2021) or the adoption of biological soil disinfestation (BSD) which creates anaerobic soil conditions to impede phytopathogen proliferation (Blok et al. 2000; Messiha et al. 2007). Furthermore, previous research has explored the use of natural antioxidant producers to manage brown rot disease by inducing plant systemic resistance and enhancing soil health indices (Seadh and El-Metwally 2015; Farag et al. 2017; Messiha and Elhalag 2019; Messiha et al. 2021). The implementation of good agricultural practises is critical in the context of sustainable management. These practises have been shown to be beneficial in terms of soil health, crop yield and disease control (Kharel et al. 2022, Chen et al. 2023).

In this context, DABs and extracts are rich in phycoelicitor compounds and are recognized as plant-defensive bio-stimulants (Shukla et al. 2021). Furthermore, algal-derived bioactives, including those from cyanobacterial species such as Spirulina platensis and seaweeds (marine macroalgae), have shown the potential to trigger plant antioxidant defence responses (Saber et al. 2018; Vasantharaja et al. 2019; Benítez García et al. 2020; El-Anany et al. 2020). Seaweeds are established as valuable source of extracts that act as biostimulant and protective agent (Ramkissoon et al. 2017; Hamed and Messiha 2018; Ali et al. 2019; Kergosien et al. 2023). They are being considered as a viable alternative to chemical fertilisers within the organic farming system.

Seaweeds typically contain a diverse array of inorganic and organic bioactive compounds, including, polyphenols, polysaccharides, laminarin, carrageenan, fucoidan, as well as phytohormones such as gibberellins, cytokinins, betaine, and auxins (Hassan et al. 2021; Shukla et al. 2021). Additionally, they exhibit variable contents of proteins, glycoproteins, lipids, and essential minerals like potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca),, and various trace elements (Van Oosten et al. 2017; Yakhin et al. 2017).

The use of seaweed extracts, whether applied as foliar sprays or incorporated into the soil, has been extensively studied and demonstrated to enhance plant growth, increase crop yields, and enhance plant resistance against a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. For instance, studies on tomatoes have illustrated these effects (Khan et al. 2009; Shukla et al., 2021).

Foliar application of A. spicifera extract at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL has been shown to enhance plant resistance against Phytophthora palmivora infection in rubber trees (Pettongkhao et al. 2019). Additionally, it has demonstrated significant inhibitory effects on the growth of Xanthomonas campestris and Alternaria solani in tomatoes and sweet peppers (Ali et al. 2021). Turbinaria sp. and Cystoseira sp. have also exhibited antimicrobial properties against root rot disease, in tomato plants as reported in studies (Selvaraju & Vijayakumar 2016; Esserti et al. 2017).

Enhancing the soil suppressiveness by improving soil fertility indicators, such as available soil macronutrients (NPK), organic matter (OM%), and organic nitrogen (ON%)has been proven to be an effective and sustainable strategy for controlling disease in potatoes (Messiha 2006; Messiha and Elhalag 2019). Furthermore, promoting soil microbial biodiversity and increasing the ratio of antagonistic bacteria, such as fluorescent Pseudomonads, have been shown to significantly suppress R. solanacearum infecting potatoes (Messiha et al. 2019). The application of composted organic compounds, including plant compost, chicken manure, and animal manure, has also led to the suppression of R. solanacearum population and the stimulation of soil microbial biodiversity (Messiha et al. 2021). However, there is limited information available regarding soil biodiversity, soil fertility, and antagonist ratio influenced by algal application, whether to plants or soil.

The coastal areas host diverse array of seaweed species (Hamed and Messiha 2018; Hassan et al. 2021)and research has demonstrated their potential as effective alternatives for managing plant diseases. Seaweed-derived chemical compounds can activate plants’ defense mechanisms, thereby enhancing their resistance to pathogens. Investigations have revealed that seaweeds and their extracts influence various plant defense pathways, including hormonal signalling, antioxidant enzymes, oxidative burst, and stress-responsive genes (Bahmani et al. 2023). Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of studies focusing on the use of local marine macroalgae species as a natural resource for crop disease management, enhancing soil microbial diversity, and improving crop yield (Stiger-Pouvreau and Zubia 2020; Duarte et al. 2018). This research aims to explore the utilization of seaweed extracts from locally available seaweed-originated resources as organic inputs for integrated crop production. The study also investigates the mechanisms of action involved in the proposed phytoelicitor and biostimulatory activities of these seaweed extracts.

This research is part of an integrated program aimed at the 'Rehabilitation of the Nile Valley and Delta to produce brown rot-free potatoes qualified for exportation. The current study investigates the influences of different algal components, either as foliar spray or soil DABs amendments, on the seaweed species A. spicifera, T. ornata, C. racemosa, C. myrica, and the cyanobacterium S. platenorsis at two naturally infested locations with R. solanacearum and one non-infested location.

The objectives of this study are:

To examine the effects of algae-derived phytostimulatory activities on potato growth, yield, and quality.

To achieve sustainable disease suppression by improving soil fertility indices.

To enhance soil microbial biodiversity as an indicator of soil health across different locations.

Materials and methods

Algal species tested and biomass collected

Spirulina platensis cyanobacterium extract was obtained from the Algal Biotechnology Unit, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Egypt. The marine macroalgal species of Rhodophyta, (Acanthophora spicifera (Vahl) Borgesen), Phaeophyta (Turbinaria ornata (Turn.) J. Agardh and Cystoseira myrica (Gmelin), C. Agardh. and Chlorophyta (Caulerpa racemosa (Forssk.) J. Agardh) were manually collected during low tides of the summer season 2021 at Marsa Allam (25° 4'11.41"N, 34°53’56.22") and Al-Quseir (26° 2'34.02"N, 34°18’51.51"E) seashore of the Red Sea, Egypt. To eliminate adherent pollutants and impurities, the algal specimens were washed with tap water and distilled water.

Preparation of algal extract

The macroalgal specimens were air-dried in the shade for 72 hours. The algal biomass was ground and sieved using an electric mixer to produce a fine-grained powder texture. To make algal extract, biomass powder was periodically injected into a Soxhlet extractor equipped with a 500-ml capacity flask and a condenser. The extraction was carried out in a water bath for 12 hours using 300 ml of 95% methanol and 30 g of each powdered sample individually. The crude extracts were filtered through Whatman filter paper No. 1 and concentrated under reduced pressure in the rotatory evaporator (GG SENCO) until completely dry (Leelavathi and Prasad 2015). The dried crude extracts were kept at 4°C to investigate their antibacterial and phytochemical properties.

Field experiments

The experiments were conducted at three different locations, two of which were naturally infested with R. solanacearum, location 1 at Kafr-Shukr village (30°34’02.0"N 31°1451.9E), location 2 at El-Mounira village (30°14’08.0"N 31°0736.7E), both on Kaliobeya governorate, and location 3 at Talia village, Minofyia governorate (30°1629.0N). These three locations are in the Nile Delta’s old districts, and the soil type is loamy clay. The effect of various algal applications, either as foliar spray or soil amendment by DABs, on brown rot disease control in susceptible potato Spunta cultivar, was examined. The soil was prepared by ploughing at each location and then split into 15 lines (10 m in length, 30 cm between plants, and 90 cm between lines) to represent five treatments in three repetitions. A completely randomized block design was used. Around 30 tubers (local seed potatoes) were planted per line and dispersed equally throughout the three designated locations. As a nitrogen supply, urea (46.5% N) was utilized, corresponding to 90 kg N/acre (200 kg urea). The nitrogen dosage was split into three equal parts based on the phases of vegetative development, tuberization, and tuber bulking. Superphosphate (37% P2O5) was also supplied in three equal doses at a rate of 28 kg P/acre (80 kg P2O5). Potassium fertilizer (50% K2O) was applied in two equal doses of 100 kg K/acre (200 kg K2O) during the second and third potato development periods exclusively (to avoid tuberization delay).

The proposed treatments consisted of a control with no algal application and two foliar spray treatments with Acanthophora spicifera or Spirulina platensis at a concentration of 1 mg/L. Prior to planting, the tubers were soaked for 30 minutes and allowed to dry. The leaf foliar spray was applied twice at 30 and 45 days after planting.

Two DABs supplements were used: Turbinaria ornata and a combination of Caulerpa racemosa and Cystoseira myrica (in a 1:1). Each treatment involved applying 5 grams of the respective DAB at a depth of 10–15 cm along with seed tubers before irrigation. During the potato harvest stage, 5 fresh leaves were randomly selected from at least 5 plants in each treatment for plant analyses. For soil analysis, at least four separate soil samples, each weighing 0.5 kg, to represent distinct treatments. These soil samples were obtained using an auger at a depth of 15–25 cm below the soil surface. After collection, the samples were thoroughly mixed to ensure homogeneity. Soil analyses including measurements oforganic matter (OM%) and available NPK were conducted on samples from each treatment.

Potential of algal treatments on disease suppression

In the study, three soil samples, each weighing 10 grams, from the samples intended for chemical analysis. These samples were extracted using 0.05 M phosphate buffer (PB) solution. Subsequently, the plating was performed using two sets of plates with SMSA medium. The aim of this plating was to determine the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of soil and tissues. To confirm the identity of the colonies, we conducted conventional PCR using specific primers RS-1-F and RS-1-R, which amplified a fragment of 718 base pairs (bp) (PM 7/21 (3) (2022)). Additionally, serological testing was performed using the Immunofluorescent Antibody Staining (IFAS) method as described by Janse in 1988. For the serological testing, a polyclonal antiserum for R. solanacearum (obtained from goat) was used. The antiserum was obtained from Loewe Biochemica GmbH (cat. No. 07356/01). Furthermore, Rabbit anti-Goat antibody conjugated with FITC (ab6737) from Abcam was employed as the secondary antibody for visualization.

For potato tuber analysis, we sampled all tubers from the treatment plots. Vascular tissue pieces were suspended in 40 ml of 0.05 M phosphate buffer (PB) and shaken for one hour. Afterward, the suspension was centrifuged at 4°C, and the resulting pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of 0.01 M PB. Aliquots of 100 µl were plated onto SMSA medium (Janse in 1988).

DNA extraction from the same potato extracts was performed using the Gene JET plant genomics kit, and DNA purification was carried out using the Thermo Scientific K0791 kit. To detect specific DNA sequences, we conducted a real-time fluorogenic PCR assay, specifically the TaqMan assay, following the protocol (Weller et al. 2000). Real-time PCR was conducted at the Central Laboratories, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, using the Biorad cfx96 machine with RS-I-F, RS-II-R, and RS-P (FAM) primers (Weller et al., 2000).

Effect of algae application on soil nutrients and organic matters

For soil analysis, available nitrogen (mineral N) was extracted using KCl and determined using the Technical Auto Analyzer II following Markus et al. (1982). Available phosphorus (P) was extracted using 0.5 N NaHCO3 as per Olsen et al. (1954) and measured calorimetrically according to Jackson (1962), with a KH2PO4 standard calibration curve. Available potassium (K) was extracted using ammonium acetate solutions per Jackson (1962) and measured using a Jenway flame photometer (PfP7, UK) with a KCl standard curve.

Organic matter (OM) content was determined using the Walkely and Black (1934) method. In this method, potassium dichromate was reduced by organic carbon (OC) compounds in soil samples, and unreduced dichromate was used to determine OC content through oxidation-reduction titration with ferrous ammonium sulfate

. The analysis was carried out at the Soil, Water, and Environmental Research Institute (SWERI) of the Agricultural Research Centre in Giza, Egypt.

Assessment of macronutrient uptake (NPK) and potato yield

The dried leaves (0.5 gm) were digested in 10 mL concentrated H2SO4 at 400 o C in Kjeldahl flasks. Then 1 ml of mixture H2SO4: HClO4 (2:1) was added to plant digestate for bleaching. Total nitrogen (N) was determined using Kjeldahl method. Whereas, phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) contents were determined by spectrophotometer and flame photometer methods as described by Jackson (1973). The analysis was carried out at the Soil, Water, and Environmental Research Institute (SWERI) of the Agricultural Research Centre in Giza, Egypt.

The average of tuber weight per plant (average of three plants per line) along with the total weight of each line was determined (three lines per treatment)

Determination of antioxidants

Total flavonoids (querectin equivalent) were estimated using Dowd’s method as modified by Arvouet-Grand et al. (1994). One ml of Aluminium chloride (2%) in methanol was mixed with an equal volume of the plant extract (2 mg). The absorbance reading was adjusted at 415 nm, after 10 min against a blank sample containing one ml of plant extract with one ml of methanol without Aluminium chloride. The flavonoids concentration was calculated using the following equation deduced from the standard quercetin curve:

Absorbance = 0.0258 quercetin (µg) – 0.0060 (R2: 0:9987).

The phenolic compounds (gallic acid equivalent) were determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) spectroscopic method as described by Singleton et al. (1999). One hundred microliters of leaf extract samples were reacted with 750 µl diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (1:10) for 5 min. The solution was mixed with 750 µL NaHCO3 for another 90 min at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance of the developed bright blue color of phosphomolybdenum and phosphotungsten complexes, which resulted from the reaction of phenolic compounds with FC oxidants, was determined photometrically at 725 nm (Uv/ Vis Analytikjena spectro D250 Germany). Readings were generated using the standard curve of gallic acid equivalents, GAE/g (dry weight).

The total antioxidant capacity (ascorbic acid equivalent) was determined by phosphomolybdenum spectroscopic method as described by Prieto et al. (1999). One ml of each extract (0.5 mg/ ml) was mixed with 3 ml reagent solution (4 mM ammonium molybdate, 28 mM sodium phosphate and 0.6 M H2SO4). The mixture was heated up to 95°C for 2.5 hours, and then cooled down to room temperature. The absorbance degree of green colour, due to phosphomolybdenum complex formation, was determined at 695 nm. Total antioxidant capacity was expressed as ascorbic acid equivalent. The analysis was carried out at the Regional Centre for Food & Feed (RCFF) of the Agricultural Research Centre in Giza, Egypt.

Correlation analysis between different parameters

Heat map and hierarchical clustering analysis of the different soil and plant characteristics were achieved by Pearson distance metric of the Multi Experiment Viewer (MeV)™ 4 software package (version 4.5, Boston, MA, USA)

Correlation analyses were performed on the combined data derived from the three different locations to study the relations between different tested parameters. Additionally, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out to assess the distribution of parameters across different locations and treatments.

Bacterial community analyses in the rhizosphere

Additional analysis was conducted on the treatment involving the mixed DABs due to their superior suppressive effect. For soil DNA extraction, the DNeasy® PowerSoil® Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Germany, Cat. No. 12888-100) was used. DNA yield and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop (ND-1000 spectrophotometer), and only DNA samples with a purity ratio between 1.8 and 2 (measured at A260/A280 nm) were selected for metagenome analysis. Bacterial 16S amplicon sequencing was performed by Macrogen in South Korea using Illumina technology, following the procedure outlined in Messiha (2023).

Statistical analysis and bioinformatics

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v. 23. Tukey multiple comparisons with Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at a 95% confidence level and Dunnett’s t-test (two-sided) were conducted to compare multiple groups against the control group. Multivariate tests, specifically Wilks’ Lambda, were utilized to assess the effects of different treatments on the tested parameters. The data from multiple locations were pooled, and separate analyses were performed for each location using SPSS v. 23.

Heat map and hierarchical clustering analysis for different soil characteristics and bacterial species were achieved by Pearson distance metric of the Multi Experiment Viewer (MeV)™ 4 software package (version 4.5, Boston, MA, USA)

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and data visualization were performed using R software, version 4.3.0., with the assistance of the following packages: "vegan," "permute," "lattice," "ggplot2," "tidyverse," "factoextra," and "ggrepel."

For testing the bacterial soil biodiversity, the raw reads were processed using QIIME2, version 1.9.1, to generate a table of operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Statistical analysis and visualization were conducted on a locally installed SHAMAN server. Bar plots for each diversity index were created in R v. 4.3.0 using the “ggplot2” and “patchwork” packages.

Results

Effect of algae application on potato brown rot suppression

Disease incidence for potato soil and tubers treated with different algal extracts, or DABs, compared to their untreated controls is reported as follows:

Location 1: The population of the pathogen in the soil was determined to be 1.82 ± 1.22 (log10 CFU + 1)/g (mean ± standard error). The pathogen was also detected in potato extracts from tubers grown in the untreated plots, with a population of 2.22 ± 1.52 CFU/ml and a cycle threshold (CT) value of 23.4. For tubers treated with A. spicifera, the pathogen population in the soil was 2.00 ± 1.46 CFU/g, and 2.00 ± 1.76 CFU/ml (CT = 26.72) were recovered from the potato tubers. Tubers treated with S. platensis had a pathogen population in the soil of 1.92 ± 1.64 CFU/g, and the pathogen was below the detection level in the potato tubers. The pathogen was undetectable in both soil and tubers treated with DABs (Table 1, Fig. 1A, and Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The effect of the different algal treatments on (A) disease incidence, (B) phenols, (C) flavonoids and (D) antioxidants of potato Spunta, at the harvest stage, cultivat in different locations naturally infested with Ralstonia solanacearum. Data are expressed as the mean of 3 independent replicates at the 3 different locations

Fig. 2
figure 2

(A) Heat map and hierarchical clustering based on the soil, plant analysis, yield and disease incidence of three independent locations (1, 2 and 3) treated with different algal amendments (Untreated control, algal extracts (Acanthophora spicifera, Spirulina platensis), dried algal biomasses (DABs) of Turbinaria ornate and a mixture of Caulerpa racemosa and Cystoseira myrica (1:1)) at the harvest stage (120 days). The patterns shown in the heat map indicate the average of three replicates for each parameter. Lower and higher concentrations were denoted by red colors and green respectively. The analyses were achieved by Pearson distance metric of the Multi Experiment Viewer (MeV)? 4 software package (version 4.5, Boston, MA, USA). (B) Correlation analysis of multiple factors for pooled data from the three different locations. SoilN, SoilP and SoilK = Nitrogen (ppm), Phosphorous (ppm) and Potassium (ppm) respectively. PlantN, PlantP and PlantK = N%, P% and K% respectively Phenols, Flavenoids and Antioxidants (ppm) Antioxidants = Total Antioxidant Capacity The analysis was carried out in R (4.3.0) with the “ggplot2” and “reshape2” packages

Table 1 Potato brown rot incidence under different algal treatments conditions

Location 2: The population of the pathogen in the soil was determined to be 3.07 ± 2.83 CFU/g. The pathogen was also detected in potato extracts from tubers grown in the untreated plots, with a population of 2.07 ± 1.82 CFU/ml (CT = 34.4). For tubers treated with A. spicifera, the pathogen population in the soil was 2.12 ± 1.95 CFU/g, and it was below the detection level in the potato tubers. Tubers treated with S. platensis had a pathogen population in the soil of 2.37 ± 2.12 CFU/g and 2.48 ± 1.76 CFU/ml (CT = 22.03) in potato tubers. The pathogen was undetectable in both soil and tubers treated with DABs. The IFAS test was used to confirm typical colonies recovered on SMSA (Table 1).

Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in the population of the pathogen in soil between different treatments (F = 4.9, Wilks’ Lambda P < 0.001). Dunnett t (2-sided) analysis revealed a significant difference between the untreated control and the two DABs treatments P = 0.005).

Effect of algae application on soil properties

The soil fertility index, represented by macronutrient elements (available NPK) content, and organic matter (OM%) were studied for different amendments as compared to the untreated control (Fig. 3). Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in soil N between different treatments (F = 6.6, Wilks’ Lambda P < 0.001). The foliar application of A. spicifera (1.0 mg/L) showed the highest increases in soil N content in general (P = 0.006) (Figs. 2A and 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of the different algal treatments on soil chemical properties; (A) available nitrogen (N ppm), (B) available phosphorus (P ppm), (C) available potassium (K ppm), (D) organic matter (OM%) at the harvest stage (120 days). Data are expressed as the mean of 3 independent replicates at the 3 different locations

On the contrary, different treatments didn’t affect soil P. Exceptionally, C. racemosa & C. myrica mixture (DABs mix) significantly decreased soil P (P = 0.004) at location 2. Meanwhile, S. platensis and T. ornate induced soil P at location 3 (P = 0.015 and P = 0.004 respectively) (Figs. 2A and 3B).

C. racemosa & C. myrica mixture (DABs mix) caused a significant decrease in soil K (P = 0.047) in all locations (P = 0.065, P = 0.033, and P = 0.062) for Locations 1,2, and 3, respectively. A. spicifera and T. ornate caused a similar decrease in Location 2 (P = 0.03 and P = 0.002) (Figs. 2A and 3C).

C. racemosa & C. myrica DAB mixture caused a decrease in OM being significant at location 2 (P = 0.022) (Figs. 2A and 3D).

Effect of algal application on macronutrient uptake and potato yield

As essential elements for plant growth and biomarkers of plant health, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) uptake were determined in leaves after 75 days of planting. Results in Figs. 2A and 4 revealed that algal treatment had a promotive effect on N and P uptake, particularly at location 3. For instance, A. spicifera increased N and P uptake (34%, P = 0.003 and 65%, P = 0.007) respectively as compared to the untreated control. The foliar spray of S. platensis upgraded P uptake at location 1 by 61%, P = 0.003 and by 50%, P = 0.035 at location 3. A similar finding was observed for T. ornata which caused a similar increase (32%, P = 0.006 and 60%, P = 0.011) for N and P respectively, at Location 3. Meanwhile, the DAB remarkably increased N-uptake by 32%, P = 0.006 at the same location.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The effect of the different treatments on the nutritive status of the potato Spunta; leaves (A) N-uptake (N %), (B) P-uptake (P %), and (C) potato yield at the harvest stage (120 days). The potato plant was cultivated in the three different locations naturally infested with Ralstonia solanacearum. Data are expressed as the mean of 3 independent replicates at the 3 different locations

In general, a foliar spray of A. spicifera and the cyanobacterium extract of S. platensis showed a significant increase in tuber yield (P = 0.015 and P = 0.027). In particular, A. spicifera caused a significant increase in tuber production (26% (P = 0.004), 33% (P = 0.006) and 57% (P < 0.001) for locations 1, 2, and 3 respectively. S. platensis caused a significant increase in tuber production (51% and 52%, P < 0.001) for locations 1 and 3, respectively. T. ornate caused a significant increase in tuber production (61% (P < 0.001)), for location 2 only.

Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in plant P between different treatments (F = 5.9, Wilks’ Lambda P = 0.001). Dunnett t (2-sided) analysis revealed a significant increase in S. platensis treatments as compared to the untreated control P = 0.053. Meanwhile, only a trend of significant decrease was recorded for plant K (F = 2.4, Wilks’ Lambda P = 0.06) with a significant decrease for A. spicifera treatment as compared to the untreated control P = 0.015 (Supp. Figure 1).

A significant differences in potato yield between different treatments (F = 3.4, Wilks’ Lambda P = 0.017). Dunnett t (2-sided) analysis revealed a significant increase in A. spicifera and S. platensis treatments as compared to the untreated control P = 0.015 and P = 0.027 respectively.

Effect of algal treatments on plant antioxidants

Field studies and multivariate analysis revealed a significant increase in flavonoid contents and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) among different treatments (F = 4.3 and 7.6 Wilks’ lambda P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively). Dunnett t (2-sided) analysis revealed a significant increase in flavonoids for the mixed DABs treatments as compared to the untreated control P = 0.004. Also, a significant increase in TAC for the A. spicifera and the mixed DABs treatments as compared to the untreated ontrol (P = 0.025, and P < 0.001), respectively.

The foliar spray with A. spicifera also increased phenolic compounds and flavonoid contents at location 2 as compared to the untreated control (56%, P = 0.005 and 35%, P = 0.029, respectively), and only the phenolic compounds at location 3 (26%, P = 0.031). That may respectively lead to an upgrad in total antioxidant capacity by 106%, P = 0.003 at locations 3 (Figs. 1 and 2A).

S. platensis foliar application showed also a similar stimulating effect on phenols, flavonoids and total antioxidant potential at location 2 by 80%, P < 0.001; 96%, P < 0.001; and 103%, P < 0.001, respectively.

The plant antioxidants of T. ornata were differentially induced. TAC was increased by 87% (P = 0.019) only at location 3.

In conclusion, field studies revealed that mixed DABs markedly increased flavenoids and TAC in potato leaves, which was typically higher at locations 1 and 3 (three times as compared to the untreated control, P < 0.001) and 38%, P = 0.001 higher for location 2. This effect was in accordance with the evidenced accumulation of phenolic compounds and flavonoid contents at location 1 with 37%, P = 0.009 and 66%, P = 0.002, respectively as compared to the untreated control. Similar results were recorded for location 2, with 57%, P = 0.004 and 61%, P = 0.001 increases for phenolic compounds and flavonoid contents, respectively. No significant difference was recorded for location 3 (non-infested soil).

Correlation analysis between different parameters

Figure 2B illustrates the correlation analysis between the various tested parameters in relation to different locations and algal treatments.

The results of the analysis demonstrated a negative relationship between disease incidence and potato yield (correlation coefficient: -0.44, P = 0.002). In contrast, there were positive relationships between disease incidence, soil K (+ 0.65, P < 0.001), plant K (+ 0.346, P = 0.02), and soil P (+ 0.29, P = 0.002).

Potato production from one side had a significant positive correlation with soil N (+ 0.26, P = 0.008), plant N (+ 0.47, P = 0.001), and OM (+ 0.51, P < 0.001) from the other side (Fig. 2B).

It is important to highlight that there was a significant negative correlation between OM on one side and soil P (-0.38, P = 0.01) and soil K (-0.33, P = 0.03) on the other.

It was interesting to notice that phenolic compounds were correlated positively with plant N (+ 0.67, P < 0.001) and negatively with plant P (-0.59, P < 0.001) and soil K (-0.35, P = 0.018). Flavonoids, on the other hand, were negatively correlated with OM (-0.56, P < 0.001) and potato yield (-0.32, P = 0.03). TAC was also shown to be negatively correlated with plant P (-0.36, P = 0.014).

A significant positive correlation was recorded between phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and TAC.

In Supp. Figure 2, the results of the PCA analysis are presented. The plot illustrates a clear distinction between location 3 (non-infested) and the other two locations (infested), indicating distinct patterns. The untreated controls for the infested locations exhibited proximity to each other but were distinct from the un-infested location. Furthermore, the PCA plot revealed that the mixed DABs (Caulerpa racemose: Cystoseira myrica) treatment for different locations clustered together, indicating similar response patterns.

Microbial community in the soil rhizosphere following algal application

The mixed DABs treatment exhibited the highest suppressive effect compared to other applications, and it was distinctly separated from all other treatments. This distinct separation and superior performance led to the selection of the mixed DABs treatment for further microbial community analysis. Furthermore, the mixed DABs treatment significantly enhanced soil microbial biodiversity, as evidenced by an increase in alpha diversity measures, including the Inverse Simpson index, Shannon diversity index, and Simpson diversity index, when compared to untreated soil in all three locations (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of dried algal biomass amendment using Caulerpa racemose: Cystoseira myrica, mixture 1:1 on rhizosphere bacterial biodiversity at the harvest stage of potato plant cultivated in three independent locations naturally infested with Ralstonia solanacearum. DAB: mixed dried algal biomass (Caulerpa racemose: Cystoseira myrica). Five grams of each DAB was applied at 10–15 cm deep with seed tubers. The bacterial 16S amplicons were sequenced using Illumina technology. The sequencing platforms employed were MiSeq

Figures 6 and 7 provide a summary of the most abundant bacterial species in soils from the three locations, both untreated and treated with mixed DABs. The mixed DABs treatment led to increased abundances of Glutamicibacter arilaitensis and Sphingopyxis alaskensis in all locations. Location 1 showed the highest abundance of Flavobacterium sp., which was further enhanced by the mixed DABs treatment. Additionally, the treatment resulted in increased abundances of Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas putida, and P. brassicacearum, primarily in location 1, with a lesser effect in the other two locations. Notably, these four species exhibited correlations with each other (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The most abundant bacterial species in potato soil rhizosphere, at the harvest stage, of potato plant treated with dried algal biomass of C. racemosa and C. myrica (1:1) compared to untreated control conditions. The potato plant was grown in three independent locations naturally infested with Ralstonia solanacearum. Based on ILLUMINA Miseq data

Fig. 7
figure 7

(A) Heat map and hierarchical clustering based on the most abundant bacterial species in different potato rhizosphere (untreated control and treated with the mix dried algal biomasses (DABs) of Caulerpa racemosa and Cystoseira myrica (1:1) at locations 1, 2 and 3 based on ILLUMINA Miseq data. (B) Heat map depicting the distribution of the most abundant bacterial species in different potato rhizosphere treated with the mix dried algal biomasses (DABs) of Caulerpa racemosa and Cystoseira myrica (1:1) at locations 1, 2 and 3 based on ILLUMINA Miseq data. Bacterial species: Klebsiella sp. M5al, Flavobacterium sp. OR201, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas brassicacearum, Promicromonospora sp., Bacillus spp., Paenarthrobacter nitroguajacolicus, Lentzea aerocolonigenes, Glutamicibacter arilaitensis, Sphingopyxis alaskensis, Streptomyces sp. NTGn4 and Sphingobium vermicomposti

In locations 2 and 3, the mixed DABs treatment resulted in increased abundances of Lentzea aerocolonigenes, Paenarthrobacter nitroguajacolicus, Bacillus sp., Streptomyces sp., and Promicromonospora sp. In Location 1, the mixed DABs treatment resulted in a significant decrease in the abundance of Sphingobium vermicomposti. Conversely, the abundance of S. vermicomposti noticeably increased when the mixed DABs were applied in the other two locations. Figure 6 clearly demonstrates a correlation between S. vermicomposti and Streptomyces sp. This correlation suggests a relationship or association between the abundance of these two bacterial species in the soil.

Moreover, a significant decrease in the abundances of Variovorax spp., Lysobacter spp., Massilia namucuonensis, Nocardioides mesophilus, and Povalibacter uvarum was observed in all locations.

Discussion

The effect of different seaweed extracts and dried algal biomasses (DABs) on disease suppressiveness and potato production

The commercialization of seaweed biomass and its derivatives in crop management systems has gained attention in recent years (Hamed et al. 2018; Shukla et al. 2021). In our study, A. spicifera demonstrated the most significant enhancement in potato crop production, both in naturally-infested and non-infested locations. The foliar application of A. spicifera extract positively influenced NPuptake, particularly in location 3 (non-infested area), which correlated with increased potato output (see Fig. 4). These findings align with the results reported by Garai et al. (2021) and Wadas & Dziugieł (2019). Previous research has also indicated that A. spicifera exhibits a phytostimulatory effect on tomato and sweet pepper development and yield components (Ali et al. 2021). Additionally, the application of S. vulgare and A. spicifera has been shown to significantly activate the biosynthesis of auxin (IAA), gibberellin (Ga2Ox), and cytokinin (IPT) genes (Ali et al. 2022).

Furthermore, our current research revealed that A. spicifera significantly increased the nitrogen (N) content in the soil, which may explain its conducive effect on bacterial wilt. The positive correlation between soil N and the survival of R. solanacearum has been previously addressed by Messiha et al. (2009).

This research demonstrates that the foliar application of S. platensis (1 mg/L) resulted in enhanced growth and yield of bio-fortified potatoes, particularly in locations 1 and 3. This improvement in potato growth and yield was associated with improved phosphorus (P) absorption at these specific locations. Similar positive effects have been observed in previous studies on potatoes and radishes, where the foliar application of S. platensis has led to positive outcomes in terms of crop growth and yield (El-Anany et al. 2020 and Godlewska et al. 2019). S. platensis is a cyanobacterial strain that is rich in micro and macroelements, as well as bioactive substances such as amino acids, carbohydrates, peptides, and phytohormones like gibberellins, auxins, and cytokinins (Godlewska et al. 2019). Spirulina filtrate/homogenate has been shown to enhance mineral content in plants by increasing sink strength, thereby impacting substrate flow, including minerals, within the plant promoting plant development (Khan et al. 2009 and Calvo et al. 2014). The biostimulant effect of seaweeds can be attributed to their bioactive contents, including the presence of phytoelicitors like salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene which stimulate growth and productivity (Jayaraj et al. 2008; Khan et al. 2009; Ramkissoon et al. 2017; Ali et al. 2019).

In previous studies, the disease-suppressive effect of S. vulgare and A. spicifera was attributed to the sustainable induction of antioxidant defense enzymes activities, up-regulation of phenolic compounds, and biosynthesis of phytohormone (Ali et al. 2021). λ-carrageenan extract (0.5 mg/mL) of A. spicifera upgraded the expression of salicylic acid-dependent defense genes in rubber tree leaves against Phytophthora palmivora (Pettongkhao et al. 2019). A study by Ali et al. (2021) indicated that the application of S. vulgare and A. spicifera as foliar sprays induced transcript levels of the marker genes (PR-1a, PinII, and ETR-1) that contribute to defense signalling pathways. Nevertheless, in our study, these two algal extracts were ineffective in suppressing bacterial wilt. PR-1a is an acidic PR gene (Addy et al. 2012), which might explain why it is ineffective under the alkaline conditions of the Egyptian soils.

Our findings also revealed that using T. ornate as a DAB resulted in a significant increase in potato yield only at location 2, which was accompanied by a noticeable increase in soil P and plant N. This observation is consistent with the findings of Uthirapandi et al. (2018) and Karthik et al. (2020). Although T. ornate liquid extract had a distinct hormonal composition with a higher amount of phytohormones (e.g., auxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin). The use of liquid fertilizer derived from T. ornate increased plant growth and improved the biochemical composition of starch, glucose, protein, and chlorophyll a and b contents in Ocimum sanctum (Uthirapandi et al. 2018), as well as significantly improving the growth performance of Raphanus sativus, Phaseolus vulgaris, and Vigna radiata (Karthik et al. 2020).

In the present study, we observed that DABs of T. ornate, and a mixed dry mass of C. racemosa with C. myrica showed greater disease suppression when compared to foliar application. This mightbe due to the cumulative and synergistic effects of the qualitative and quantitative active ingredients of antibiotics, lytic enzymes, fatty acids, polyphenols and bioactive compounds that are naturally found in the DABs when compared to their individual liquid extracts. Also, the disease-suppressiveness associated with the mix of DABs was accompanied by a significant increase in flavonoids and total antioxidants (TAC). This finding aligns with observations in several plant species where, the aqueous and alcoholic extract of Turbinaria conoides, Ulva reticulata and Cystoseira myriophylloides have demonstrated effective antifungal effect against various plant phytopathogens, including F. oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, Macrophomina phaseolina, Sclerotium rolfsii and Alternaria solani (Selvaraju & Vijayakumar 2016; Karthik et al. 2020). Additionally, these seaweeds-derived extracts have inhibited the growth of V. dahliae and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in tomato plants (Esserti et al. 2017).

In general, there is a noticeable decrease in available potassium (K) in both soil and plant tissues after the application of algal extracts or dried algal biomasses (DABs). This phenomenon can be attributed to various factors, including elevated levels of soil calcium (Ca), salinity, and the presence of clay minerals. This proposition is in accordance with the postulation made by Castro and Gómez (2013). Furthermore, marine seaweed is well-known for its content of chelating agents, particularly alginate-metal ion combinations, which contribute to its capacity to chelate and bind metal ions in the soil. The formationof alginate-metal ion complexes by seaweed further reinforces its role as a chelating agent in agricultural systems (Battacharyya et al. 2015).

Effect of algal amendments on soil bacterial diversity

Our results indicated that C. racemosa and C. myrica DABs enhanced soil health by upgrading the soil microbial community (Fig. 5) and induced pathogen suppression in two infested locations (Fig. 1). In fact, pathogen survival in soil is positively associated with total soluble organic matter and negatively influenced by bacterial diversity, as estimated from the results of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of eubacterial 16S rDNA directly extracted from soil (Messiha, 2006). Organic management and NPK fertilization were demonstrated to restore soil organic matter, improve soil quality, increase soil microbial biodiversity, and hence suppress the disease (Messiha et al. 2007; Luo et al. 2015). In our study, the application of mixed DABs increased the soil bacterial biodiversity. Previous reports indicated that seaweed alginates induce complex formations that absorb soil moisture and swell in size, which subsequently increases the soil water-holding capacity and aeration. This in turn encourages soil microbial growth and significantly contributes in enhancement of rhizosphere microbiome (Spinelli et al. 2010). For instance, soil application of A. nodosum extracts increased the rhizosphere bacterial biodiversity of pepper plants (Renaut et al. 2019) and altered the diversity of the soil fungal community (Wang et al. 2017).

The mixture of the two DABs, C. racemosa and C. myrica improved soil microbial communities shifting the soil bacterial biodiversity in the suppressive direction as follows:

The suppressiveness effect of the combination of C. racemosa and C. myrica DABs may be attributed to the increased abundance of S. alaskensis at the three locations. S. alaskensis is an oligotrophic marine bacteria that is considered a competitive species as addressed by Cavicchioli et al. (2003). Also, the mixture increased the abundance of G. arilaitensis at the three locations. G. arilaitensis is considered a plant growth-promoting agent under cooling conditions (Borker et al. 2021).

Location 1 exhibited the highest abundance of Flavobacterium sp., which was further increased by the mixed DABs treatment. This increase was accompanied by an increase in the abundances of Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas putida, and P. brassicacearum (Fig. 6). These species are known biocontrol agents against bacterial wilt and other plant pathogens (Bahmani et al. 2021 and Kim et al. 2022). These species were less abundant in locations 2 and 3, where Streptomyces sp., Bacillus sp., and Sphingobium vermicomposti were prevalent, perhaps inhibiting them. Both Streptomyces sp. and Bacillus sp. are soil health indicators, as both of them are known biocontrol agents and drought-resistant (Köberl et al. 2013).

This algal dried mixture increased the abundances of Lentzea spp. and Promicromonospora sp. at locations 2 and 3 only, but not at location 1, where Klebsiella sp., Flavobacterium sp., P. putida and P. brassicacearum abundances were higher, which may inhibit Lentzea spp. and Promicromonospora sp. at this location. Both Lentzea spp. and Streptomyces spp. were more abundant in the mixed DABs-treated soil compared to the untreated control. Boron tolerance is shared by both bacterial taxa (Moraga et al. 2014), which may imply an increase in soil boron concentration as a result of DABs amendment (Miller et al. 2016). Moreover, Promicromonospora sp. genera are known for improving plant growth through Gibberellin production (Kang et al. 2012). P. nitroguajacolicus abundance was increased in the mixed DABs treated soil compared to the untreated control, which can be considered a soil health indicator. P. nitroguajacolicus increased the number of productive tomato plants, as addressed by Riva et al. (2021).

On the other hand, a significant decrease in some beneficial bacteria such as Variovorax paradoxus, Lysobacter spp., Massilia namucuonensis, Nocardioides mesophilus, and Povalibacter uvarum rhizosphaere was recorded in DABs-treated soil compared to the untreated in all locations.

V. paradoxus is known as a plant growth promoter (Han et al. 2011). Lysobacter spp are known as a potential source of novel antibiotics (Panthee et al. 2016). Massilia is known to produce violacein which has antibacterial, antiparasitic, and antiviral activities (Agematu et al. 2011)

Conclusion

The foliar application of A. spicifera and S. platensis shows significant promise as a long-term potato-phycoelicitor for enhancing potato crop production. This enhancement was positively correlated with increased NP-uptake.

In contrast,, DABs demonstrate superior disease control capabilities, accompanied by substantial increases in flavonoids and total antioxidant capacity (TAC). Since the pathogen is soil-borne and DABs were incorporated into the soil, this may explain the disease suppressiveness in the soil. Furthermore, this suppressiveness is linked to increased soil bacterial biodiversity, notably an increased abundance of oligotrophic beneficial marine bacterial species.. Further research is needed to explore the synergistic effects of combining algal extracts with different types of dried algal biomass to maximize productivity while effectively suppressing diseases.

Data Availability

The data and material used during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DAB:

Dried algal biomass

TAC:

Total antioxidant capacity

OM:

Organic nitrogen

IFAS:

Immunofluorescent Antibody Staining

SMSA:

Selective Media South Africa

CCA:

Canonical-correlation analysis analyses

PCA:

Principal Component Analysis

References

  • AbdEl-Hady AM, Abdelaty EF (2019) GIS - Comprehensive Analytical Approach for Soil Use by Linking Crop Soil Suitability to Soil Management and Reclamation. Alex Sci Exch J 40:60–82. https://doi.org/10.21608/ASEJAIQJSAE.2019.27532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Addy HS, Askora A, Kawasaki T, Fujie M, Yamada T (2012) Utilization of filamentous phage φRSM3 to control bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant Dis 96:1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1023-RE

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agematu H, Suzuki K, Tsuya H (2011) Massilia sp. BS-1, a Novel Violacein-Producing Bacterium Isolated from Soil. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 75(10):2008–2010. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.100729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J (2022) Transcriptome-wide modulation by Sargassum vulgare and Acanthophora spicifera extracts results in a prime-triggered plant signalling cascade in tomato and sweet pepper. AoB PLANTS 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac046

  • Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J (2019) Biostimulatory activities of Ascophyllum nodosum extract in tomato and sweet pepper crops in a tropical environment. PLoS ONE 14:e0216710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ali O, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraman J (2021) Phytoelicitor activity of Sargassum vulgare and Acanthophora spicifera extracts and their prospects for use in vegetable crops for sustainable crop production. J Appl Phycol 33:639–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-020-02309-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arvouet-Grand A, Vennat B, Pourrat A, Legret P (1994) Standardisation d’un extrait de propolis et identification des principaux constituants. J Pharm Belg 49(6):462–468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani K, Hasanzadeh N, Harighi B, Marefat A (2021) Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from potato tissues and their effects as biological control agents against bacterial wilt. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 116:101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2021.101692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani R, More P, Babarinde S et al (2023) Seaweeds for plant disease management: current research advances and future perspectives. Phytoparasitica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-023-01074-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battacharyya D, Babgohari MZ, Rathor P, Prithiviraj B (2015) Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 196:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez García I, Dueñas Ledezma AK, Martínez Montaño E, Salazar Leyva JA, Carrera E, Osuna Ruiz I (2020) Identification and quantification of plant growth regulators and antioxidant compounds in aqueous extracts of Padina durvillaei and Ulva lactuca. Agronomy 10(6):866. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blok WJ, Lamers JG, Termorshuizen AJ, Bollen GJ (2000) Control of soilborne plant pathogens by incorporating fresh organic amendments followed by tarping. Phytopathol 90:253–259. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.3.253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borker SS, Thakur A, Kumar S, Kumari S, Kumar R, Kumar S (2021) Comparative genomics and physiological investigation supported safety, cold adaptation, efficient hydrolytic and plant growth promoting potential of psychrotrophic Glutamicibacter arilaitensis LJH19, isolated from night-soil compost. BMC Genomics 22:307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07632-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil 383:3–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castro H, Gómez MI (2013) Fertilidad y fertilizantes. pp. 231–304. En: Ciencia del suelo - principios básicos. Sociedad Colombiana de la Ciencia del Suelo. 2ª ed. Bogota, Colombia

  • Cavicchioli R, Ostrowski M, Fegatella F, Goodchild A, Guixa-Boixereu N (2003) Life under Nutrient Limitation in Oligotrophic Marine Environments: An Eco/Physiological Perspective of Sphingopyxis alaskensis (Formerly Sphingomonas alaskensis). Microb Ecol 45:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-3008-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Modi D, Picot A (2023) Soil and Phytomicrobiome for Plant Disease Suppression and Management under Climate Change: A Review. Plants 12(14):2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte I, Hernández S, Ibañez A, Canto A (2018) Macroalgae as Soil Conditioners or Growth Promoters of Pisum sativum (L). Annu Res Rev Biol 27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2018/43272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhalag KM, Messiha NAS, Emara HM, Abdallah SA (2016) Evaluation of antibacterial activity of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia against Ralstonia solanacearum under different application conditions. J Appl Microbiol 120:1629–1645. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Anany AMA, Osman YMM, Abd El-Aal MMM (2020) Studies on improving potato growth, yield and quality. Ann Agric Sci Moshtohor 58(4):963–976. https://doi.org/10.21608/assjm.2020.147937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esserti S, Smaili A, Rifai LA, Koussa T, Makroum K, Belfaiza M, Kabil EM, Faize L, Burgos L, Alburquerque N, Faize M (2017) Protective effect of three brown seaweed extracts against fungal and bacterial diseases of tomato. J Appl Phycol 29:1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0996-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Communities (2005) Commission staff working paper as an annex to: "European

  • Neighbourhood Policy" Country Report, Egypt 2-3-2005, SEC (2005) 287/3 (also see

  • http://europa-eu-un.org/articles/nl/article_4414_nl.htm)

  • FAO (2015) FAO Statistical Pocketbook (http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4691e.pdf)

  • FAO (2018) The database of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization statistical database. Retrieved from http://www.fapstat.org

  • Farag SMA, Elhalag KMA, Hagag MH, Khairy AM, Ibrahim HM, Saker MT, Messiha NAS (2017) Potato bacterial wilt suppression and plant health improvement after the application of different antioxidants. J Phytopathol 165(7–8):522–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farag NS, Fawzi FG, El-Said SIA, Mikhail MS (1986) Streptomycin in relation to potato brown rot control. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 21:115–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han J-I, Choi H-K, Lee S-W, Orwin PM, Kim J et al (2011) Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile plant growth-promoting endophyte Variovorax paradoxus S110. J Bacteriol 193:1183–1190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garai S, Brahmachari K, Sarkar S, Mondal M, Banerjee H, Nanda MK, Chakravarty K (2021) Impact of seaweed sap `foliar application on growth, yield, and tuber quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L). J Appl Phycol 33:1893–1904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godlewska K, Michalak I, Pacyga P, Baśladyńska S, Chojnacka K (2019) Potential applications of cyanobacteria: Spirulina platensis filtrates and homogenates in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35(6):1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed SM, Messiha NAS (2018) Suppression of bacterial wilt disease by some marine macroalgal extracts isolated from Safaga coast of Red Sea, Egypt. Egypt J Agric Res 96(4):1275–1288. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJAR.2018.141434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed SM, Abd El-Rhman AA, Abdel-Raouf N, Ibraheem IB (2018) Role of marine macroalgae in plant protection & improvement for sustainable agriculture technology. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 7(1):104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan S, Hamed S, Almuhayawi M, Hozzin W, Selim S, AbdElgawad H (2021) Bioactivity of ellagic acid and velutin: two phenolic compounds isolated from marine algae. Egypt J Bot 61:219–231. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejbo.2020.23778.1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman GL, Elphinstone JG (1994) Advances in the control of Pseudomonas solanacearum race 1 in major food crops. In: Hayward AC, Hartman GL (eds) Bacterial Wilt: The disease and its causative agent, Pseudomonas solanacearum. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 157–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1962) Soil Chemical Analysis. Constable. Co. Lt., London, p 497

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, p 498

    Google Scholar 

  • Janse JD (1988) A detection method for Pseudomonas solanacearum in symptomless potato tubers and some data on its sensitivity and specificity. Bull OEPP/EPPO Bull 18(3):343–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.1988.tb00385.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraj J, Wan A, Rahman M, Punja ZK (2008) Seaweed extract reduces foliar fungal diseases on carrot. Crop Protect 27(10):1360–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2008.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S-M, Khan AL, Hamayun M, Hussain J, Joo G-J, You Y-H et al (2012) Gibberellin-producing Promicromonospora sp. SE188 improves Solanum lycopersicum plant growth and influences endogenous plant hormones. J Microbiol 50:902–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-012-2273-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karthik T, Sarkar G, Babu S, Amalraj LD, Jayasri MA (2020) Preparation and evaluation of liquid fertilizer from Turbinaria ornata and Ulva reticulate. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 28:101712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kergosien N, Stiger-Pouvreau V, Connan S, Hennequart F, Bre´ bion J (2023) MiniReview: brown macroalgae as a promising raw material to produce biostimulants for the agriculture sector. Front Agron 5:1109989. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1109989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, Jithesh MN, Rayorath P, Hodges DM, Critchley AT, Craigie JS, Norrie J, Prithiviraj B (2009) Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul 28:386–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kharel M, Dahal BM, Raut N (2022) Good agriculture practices for safe food and sustainable agriculture in Nepal: A review. J Agric Food Res 10:100447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Park AR, Song CW, Song H, Kim JC (2022) Biological Control Efficacy and Action Mechanism of Klebsiella pneumoniae JCK-2201 Producing Meso-2,3-Butanediol Against Tomato Bacterial Wilt. Front Microbiol 14:13:914589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.914589PMID: 35910601; PMCID: PMC9333516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köberl M, Ramadan EM, Adam M, Cardinale M, Hallmann J, Heuer H, Smalla K, Berg G (2013) Bacillus and Streptomyces were selected as broad-spectrum antagonists against soilborne pathogens from arid areas in Egypt. FEMS Microbiol Lett 342(2):168–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leelavathi MS, Prasad MP (2015) Comparative analysis of phytochemical compounds of marine algae isolated from Gulf of Mannar. World J Pharm Pharm Sci (WJPPS) 4(5):640–654

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo P, Han X, Wang Y, Han M, Shi H, Liu N, Bai H (2015) Influence of long-term fertilization on soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, and bacterial and fungal community structure in a brown soil of northeast China. Ann Microbiol 65(1):533–542.

  • Markus DK, Mchkinnon JP, Buccafuri AF (1982) Automated analysis of nitrite, nitrate and ammonium nitrogen in soil. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station. publication No. D15117-48. Supported by state funds. Presented in part before Div.S-4. Soil Sci. Soci. Of Am. Anaheim

  • Messiha NAS (2006) Bacterial wilt of potato (Ralstonia solanacearum race 3, biovar 2): Disease management, pathogen survival and possible eradication. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands, 151 pp. ISBN 90-8504-561-4

  • Messiha NAS (2023) The impact of biological soil disinfestation in conjunction with antagonists and organic materials on potato brown rot control. Indian Phytopathols. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42360-023-00668-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messiha NAS, Elhalag KMA (2019) Organic versus mineral fertilization regimes in relation to potato brown rot suppression and crop production. Egypt J Phytopathol 47(1):237–256. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJP.2019.120386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messiha NAS, Elhalag KMA, Balabel NM, Farag SMA, Matar HA, Hagag MH, Khairy AM, Abd El-Aliem MM, Eleiwa E, Saleh O, Farag NS (2019) Microbial biodiversity as related to crop succession and potato intercropping for management of brown rot disease. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 29:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0185-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messiha NAS, Elhalag KMA, Balabel NM, Matar HA, Farag SMA, Hagag MH, Khairy AM, Abd El-Aliem MM, Hanafy MS, Farag NS (2021) Efficiency of organic manuring and mineral fertilization regimes in potato brown rot suppression and soil microbial biodiversity under field conditions. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 54(9–10):534–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2020.1844523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messiha NAS, van Diepeningen AD, Janse JD, Termorshuizen AJ, Schoeman-Weerdesteijn ME, Franz E, van Bruggen AHC (2009) Survival of Ralstonia solanacearum is affected more by soil type than by management. Appl Soil Ecol 43:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messiha NAS, van Diepeningen AD, Wenneker M, van Beuningen AAR, Janse JD, Coenen TGC, Termorshuizen AJ, van Bruggen AHC, Blok WJ (2007) Biological Soil Disinfestation (BSD), a new control method for potato brown rot, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2. Eur J Plant Pathol 117:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9109-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EP, Wu Y, Carrano CJ (2016) Boron uptake, localization, and speciation in marine brown algae. Metallomics 8(2):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mt00238a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moraga NB, Poma HR, Amoroso MJ, Rajal VB (2014) Isolation and characterization of indigenous Streptomyces and Lentzea strains from soils containing boron compounds in Argentina. J Basic Microbiol 54:568–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201200714

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Colc CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by sodium bicarbonate. U. S. Department of Agricultural Circular, p 939

  • Panthee S, Hamamoto H, Paudel A et al (2016) Lysobacter species: a potential source of novel antibiotics. Arch Microbiol 198:839–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1278-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettongkhao S, Bilanglod A, Khompatara K, Churngchow N (2019) Sulphated polysaccharide from Acanthophora spicifera induced Hevea brasiliensis defense responses against Phytophthora palmivora infection. Plants 8(3):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8030073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PM 7/21 (2022) Ralstonia solanacearum, R. pseudosolanacearum and R. syzygii (Ralstonia solanacearum species complex). EPPO Bull 52(3):225–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto P, Pineda M, Aguilar M (1999) Spectrophotometric Quantitation of Antioxidant Capacity through the Formation of a Phosphomolybdenum Complex: Specific Application to the Determination of Vitamin E1. Anal Biochem 269(2):337–341. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1999.4019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prior P, Fegan M (2005) Recent developments in the phylogeny and classification of Ralstonia solanacearum. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 695:127–136. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.695.14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabia AH, Mohamed AAA, Abdelaty EF, Shahin SF, Yacout DMM (2021) Investigating adaptation strategies developed by potato farmers to cope with climate change impacts in Egypt. Alex Sci Exch J 42(4):871–881. https://doi.org/10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.205325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramkissoon A, Ramsubhag A, Jayaraj J (2017) Phytoelicitor activity of three Caribbean seaweed species on suppression of pathogenic infections in tomato plants. J Appl Phycol 34:123–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1160-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renaut S, Masse J, Norrie JP et al (2019) A commercial seaweed extract structured microbial communities associated with tomato and pepper roots and significantly increased crop yield. Microb Biotech 12:1346–1358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riva V, Mapelli F, Dragonetti G, Elfahl M, Vergani L, Crepaldi P, La Maddalena N, Borin S (2021) Bacterial Inoculants Mitigating Water Scarcity in Tomato: The Importance of Long-Term in vivo Experiments. Front Microbiol 12:675552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.675552PMID: 34211447; PMCID: PMC8239394

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saber AA, Hamed SM, Abdel-Rahim EFM, Cantonati M (2018) Insecticidal prospects of algal and cyanobacterial extracts against the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Vie et milieu - Life and environment 68(4):199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Seadh SE, El-Metwally MA (2015) Influence of antioxidants on wheat productivity, quality and seed-borne fungi management under NPK fertilization levels. Asian J Crop Sci 7(2):87–112. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2015.87.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvaraju P, Vijayakumar A (2016) Evaluation of antifungal activity of seaweed extract (Turbinaria conoides) against Fusarium oxysporum. J Appl Nat Sci 8:60–62. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v8i1.747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla PS, Borza T, Critchley AT, Prithiviraj B (2021) Seaweed-Based Compounds and Products for Sustainable Protection against Plant Pathogens. Mar Drugs 19(2):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM (1999) Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent, Meth Enzymol. 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1

  • Spinelli F, Fiori G, Noferini M et al (2010) A novel type of seaweed extract as a natural alternative to the use of iron chelates in strawberry production. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 125:263–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stiger-Pouvreau V, Zubia M (2020) Macroalgal diversity for sustainable biotechnological development in French tropical overseas territories. Bot Mar 63(1):17–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2019-0032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uthirapandi V, Suriya S, Boomibalagan P, Eswaran S, Ramya SS, Vijayanand N, Kathiresan D (2018) Bio-fertilizer potential of seaweed liquid extracts of marine macro algae on growth and biochemical parameters of Ocimum sanctum. J Pharmacogn and Phytochem 7(3):3528–3532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosten MJ, Pepe O, De Pascale S, Silletti S, Maggio A (2017) The role of biostimulants and bioeffectors as alleviators of abiotic stress in crop plants. Chem Biol Technol Agric 4:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasantharaja R, Abraham LS, Inbakandan D, Thirugnanasambandam R, Senthilvelan T, Jabeen SA, Prakash P (2019) Influence of seaweed extracts on growth, phytochemical contents and antioxidant capacity of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Biocat Agric Biotech 17:589–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadas W, Dziugieł T (2019) Growth and marketable potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber yield in response to foliar application of seaweed extract and humic acids. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(6):13219–13230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkely A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtrarff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xiang L, Wang S et al (2017) Effects of seaweed fertilizer on the Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings growth and soil microbial numbers under continue cropping. Acta Ecol Sin 37:180–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller SA, Elphinstone JG, Smith NC, Boonham N, Stead DE (2000) Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiplex, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(7):2853–2858. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.7.2853-2858.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH (2017) Biostimulants in plant science: A global perspective. Front Plant Sci 7: 2049

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out as part of the "Rehabilitation of Nile Valley and Delta to produce brown rot-free potato suitable for exportation" project, which was funded by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STIFA27859) of the Egyptian Ministry of Scientific Research. The author is extremely grateful for the financial support and kind collaboration.

Prof. Nabil S Farag, emeritus professor at Plant Pathology Research Institute (PPATHRI), ARC, Egypt, is grateful for reviewing the work and providing insightful feedback. Many thanks also to Prof. Ahmed A Gomah emeritus professor at PPATHRI, ARC, for his valuable assistance in field trials and valuable experiments field advice.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). The study was carried out as part of the "Rehabilitation of Nile Valley and Delta to produce brown rot-free potato suitable for exportation" project, which was funded by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STIFA27859) of the Egyptian Ministry of Scientific Research.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have accepted the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nevein A. S. Messiha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they don’t have any potentials conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval and consent to participate are not required for this manuscript

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamed, S.M., Kamal, M. & Messiha, N.A.S. Potential of algal-based products for the management of potato brown rot disease. Bot Stud 64, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-023-00402-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-023-00402-y

Keywords